Tag Archives: cornyn

No Christmas Treats for Prisoners from Sentencing Commission – Update for December 20, 2024

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

SENTENCING COMMISSION ROLLS OUT MINIMALIST 2025 AMENDMENT PROPOSAL

The United States Sentencing Commission yesterday adopted a slate of proposed amendments to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines for the amendment cycle that will end on or before May 1, 2025, with the adoption of amendments to become effective next November.

Anyone who thought the Commission might roll out a proposal to no longer enhance methamphetamine sentences because of purity – something that US District Judge Carlton Reeves (who is currently chairman of the USSC) ruled from the bench two years ago makes no sense – was disappointed (but see below).

lumpofcoal221215Likewise, any federal prisoners hoping for a resolution to last August’s surprise decision to table retroactivity for four amendments that became effective last fall just found coal in their stockings. The Commission had proposed retroactivity for changes in Guidelines covering acquitted conduct, gun enhancements, Guidelines calculation where a defendant is convicted of an 18 USC § 922(g) felon-in-possession count, a 21 USC § 841 drug trafficking count and a separate 18 USC § 924 gun conviction; and a change in the drug Guidelines to tie mandatory and high base offense levels to statutory maximum sentences instead of more complex factors that inflate sentencing ranges.

Generally, changes in the Guidelines do not apply to people who have already been sentenced, but Guideline 1B1.10 addresses the rare occasions where a Guideline change is retroactive, providing prisoners already sentenced with a chance for a time reduction.

I wrote at the time that the Commission was perhaps responding to criticism heaped on it for adopting amended Guideline 1B1.13(b)(6), which permits judges to grant compassionate release where a prisoner’s sentence could not be imposed today because of changes in the law that occurred after the sentence was imposed. After the Commission adopted the amended 1B1.13 in April 2023, Sens John Kennedy (R-LA), Ted Cruz (R-TX), John Cornyn (R-TX), Tom Cotton (R-AR) and Marco Rubio (R-FL) introduced the Consensus in Sentencing Act (S.4135) to require the Commission to achieve “bipartisan agreement to make major policy changes” by ”requiring that amendments to the Guidelines receive five votes from the Commission’s seven voting members.”

whine160814At the time, Kennedy complained that “[i]n recent years, the Commission has lost its way and begun forcing through amendments on party-line votes.” The Commission has seven voting members. No more than four members can belong to the same political party.

S.4135 never went anywhere, and it will die with the end of the 118th Congress in 10 days or so. Nevertheless, last June, retired US District Judge John Gleeson, a member of the Commission, met with Kennedy and – according to the Senator – “acknowledged the concerns raised about the Commission’s recent practices and confirmed that the Commission will return to making changes on a bipartisan basis.”

“I look forward to seeing the fruits of this commitment,” Kennedy said at the time.

The Commission is now seeking to harvest those fruits by issuing a request that the public comment on whether “it should provide further guidance on how the existing criteria for determining whether an amendment should apply retroactively are applied” and “[i]f so, what should that guidance be? Should it revise or expand the criteria? Are there additional criteria that the Commission should consider beyond those listed in the existing Background Commentary to § 1B1.10?”

The answer to whether there should be additional criteria is self-evident, especially because the same players (except for Rubio, leaving Congress for a position in President-elect Trump’s Cabinet) will be back in the Senate.

usscretro230406What the Commission decides will only partially address the Senators’ principal beef against any USSC proposal that passes on a 4-3 vote (at least until the Republicans again hold a majority on the Commission).

Third Circuit Judge L. Felipe Restrepo’s USSC term expires next October, the earliest chance Trump will have to tip the balance of the Commission to conservative. Given that Trump’s previous nominees to the Commission (never approved by the Senate) included US District Judges Danny Reeves and Henry “Hang ‘em High” Hudson, the likelihood that 4-3 Commission decisions will start looking good to Kennedy, Cruz and the others is fairly high.

Other USSC proposals for the amendment cycle include

• creating an alternative to the “categorical approach” used in the career offender guideline to determine whether a conviction qualifies a defendant for enhanced penalties;

• addressing the guidelines’ treatment of devices designed to convert firearms into fully automatic weapons (Glock switches and drop-in auto sears);

• adding a provision to the use of a stolen gun enhancement that requires that the defendant knew the gun was stolen; and

• resolving a circuit split on whether a traffic ticket in an “intervening arrest” that can serve to bump up criminal history.

Public comments are due by February 3, 2025, with replies due by February 18, 2025.

alicecuriouser230317Curiously, Judge Reeves said, “Over the next month, the Commission will consider whether to publish additional proposals that reflect the public comment, stakeholder input, and feedback from judges that we have received over the last year – including at the roundtables we have held in recent months on drug sentencing and supervised release.”

Whether this is a teaser that changes in the Commission’s approach to meth will be on the table is unclear.

Sentencing Commission meeting video (December 19, 2024)

Sentencing Commission Public Hearing (Video) (August 8, 2024)

Sentencing Commission, Final Priorities for Amendment Cycle (August 8, 2024)

S.4135, Consensus in Sentencing Act

Sen John Kennedy, Kennedy confirms that Sentencing Commission will return to bipartisan agreement for changes to Sentencing Guidelines (June 3, 2024)

USSC, Issue For Comment: Criteria for Selecting Guideline Amendments Covered by §1B1.10 (December 19, 2024)

USSC News Release, U.S. Sentencing Commission Seeks Comment on Proposals to Promote Public Safety And Simplify Federal Sentencing (December 19, 2024)

USSC, Summary of Proposed 2025 Amendments (December 19, 2024)

– Thomas L. Root

Is Senate Fed Up With BOP? – Update for July 13, 2023

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH, SENATORS MAY BE TELLING BOP

Phineas T. Barnum reputedly said, “there’s no such thing as bad publicity.” But P.T. Barnum never served as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

badpublicity230714It’s been a rough ride. First, the Dept. of Justice Inspector General has issued a scathing report of BOP mismanagement and maladministration that led to the suicide of high-value celebrity prisoner Jeffrey Epstein and the murder of Whitey Bulger. There has been a steady stream of death-of-a-thousand-cuts reports of BOP employees being convicted of everything from inmate sexual abuse to cellphone smuggling to COVID fraud. The Washington Post fumed last week that “regardless of the offense, any unnatural death in custody is a failure of the prison system.”

This week has seen well-loathed U.S. Gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar – serving an endless string of life sentences for an endless string of revolting assaults of women gymnasts – stabbed multiple times at USP Coleman by attackers unknown. BOP employees promptly blamed the attack on a short-staffed facility.

It wasn’t long before the Associated Press reported that Nassar was attacked inside his cell, “a blind spot for prison surveillance cameras that only record common areas and corridors.” The AP said, “In federal prison parlance, because of the lack of video, it is known as an ‘unwitnessed event.’”

It isn’t clear that even full implementation of the Prison Camera Reform Act (Pub.L. 117-321), hardly prevented Capitol Hill from finally having had enough of the BOP follies.

Enough is more than enough. After several half-hearted attempts to address BOP management weaknesses, a bipartisan group of senators yesterday announced the introduction of the Federal Prison Accountability Act of 2023 (no bill number assigned yet), intended to increase oversight at federal prisons.

FPAA would require the president to seek Senate advice and consent when appointing the BOP director, who would be appointed to a single, 10-year term. Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said requiring Senate confirmation of the BOP director would “bring badly needed transparency and accountability to the federal prison system.”

“The Director of the Bureau of Prisons leads thousands of employees and expends a massive budget,” Grassley said in a press release. “It’s a big job with even bigger consequences should mismanagement or abuse weasel its way into the system.”

sexualassault211014It took awhile to get here. Following an 8-month investigation last year that revealed rampant sexual abuse of female prisoners and a failure to prevent recurring sexual abuse, Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) introduced the Federal Prison Oversight Act (S.4988) late last year. The bill – which would have required the DOJ Inspector General to conduct inspections of the BOP’s 122 correctional facilities, provide recommendations to problems and assign each facility a risk score – was window-dressing, a political statement with no chance of passage in the waning days of the 117th Congress.

Three months ago, however, Ossoff introduced a revised version of FPOA (S.1401), with Rep. Lucy McBath (D-GA) filing a companion bill in the House (H.R.3109). The new FPOA would have, among other actions, created a hotline for prisoners to report misconduct.

mismanagement210419Now, three months later, the latest effort to reform federal prisons would subject the BOP director to the same congressional scrutiny as other law enforcement agency chiefs such as the director of the FBI, which Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said is needed. “The Director of the Bureau of Prisons oversees more than 34,000 employees and a multi-billion dollar budget, and should be subject to Senate review and confirmation as well,” McConnell said.

Grassley introduced FPAA along with McConnell and Sens Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ), Rand Paul (R-KY), Mike Lee (R-UT), John Cornyn (R-TX), Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Mike Braun (R-IN) and Ossoff. With that kind of legislative horsepower behind it – not to mention black eyes like Jeffrey Epstein, Whitey Bulger and Larry Nasser – it’s safe to predict that Director Colette Peters may be the last BOP Director to not be approved by the Senate.

The Hill, Bipartisan senators introduce bill to increase federal prison oversight (July 13, 2023)

Sen. Charles Grassley, Senators Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Increase Accountability at Federal Prisons (July 13, 2023)

Associated Press, Larry Nassar was stabbed in his cell and the attack was not seen by prison cameras, AP source says (July 11, 2023)

Associated Press, Former federal prison guard sent to prison for violating civil rights of injured inmate (July 11, 2023)

Washington Post, Jeffrey Epstein’s suicide reveals grave failures of U.S. prisons (July 10, 2023)

– Thomas L. Root

Senate Judiciary Committee: A Win, A Tie and A Rain Delay – Update for May 28, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

AN ONLY PARTLY SATISFYING DAY AT THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE

The Senate Judiciary Committee considered three criminal justice reform bills yesterday, with results that were a little heartening, a little disheartening.
heartening210528The Committee approved the COVID-19 Safer Detention Act, S.312, 14-8. The bill now goes to the full Senate. The vote came despite the strenuous objections of Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas), who claimed that the bill would let dangerous criminals out on the street to violently accost fair maidens (or that’s how he sounded). Cotton didn’t cotton to approving something with “COVID-19” in the title, when BOP Director Michael Carvajal assured the Committee last month that by May 15th, every BOP inmate that wanted the vaccine would have received it.

That the BOP did not meet its deadline two weeks ago had little meaning. In fact, at 23 facilities – including some camps – fewer than 300 inmates had gotten the vaccine as of May 14. FPC Alderson, according to BOP records, had only 57 inmates vaccinated. While it’s possible that fewer than 10% of Alderson’s 622 inmates (all female) agreed to take the vaccine, but that’s pretty unlikely.

cotton171226Cotton tried to amend the bill so that it would apply only to inmates who had not been vaccinated for medical reasons approved by the BOP. That amendment failed.

An amendment that was approved, however, struck the bill’s proposed age reduction from 60 to 50. As amended, an elderly offender still must be 60, but he or she need only serve two-thirds of the statutory sentence (the total sentence minus good conduct time). It also adds judicial review for denial of elderly offender home detention, cuts the period for administrative exhaustion for compassionate release. Finally, during the pandemic, any defendant considered to be at a higher risk for severe illness from COVID–19, including because the defendant is 60 years of age or older or has an underlying medical condition, would by definition “an extraordinary and compelling reason” under 18 USC 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) for compassionate release.

Committee Chair Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., who sponsored the proposed legislation, told the committee before the bill’s passage that the pandemic has shown that the BOP can’t be trusted to identify and release prisoners who are vulnerable to the coronavirus.

fail200526“The Bureau of Prisons failed,” Durbin said, noting that nearly 31,000 inmates requested compassionate release during the pandemic and the Bureau of Prisons approved only 36, fewer requests than it approved in 2019, before the pandemic. Durbin said that 35 federal inmates died while waiting for the BOP to rule on their requests.

The Committee began debating the Prohibiting Punishment of Acquitted Conduct Act of 2021 (S. 601). That bill would prohibit judges from considering conduct underlying an acquitted count in sentencing. Predictably, Cotton opposed that as well, but concerns were also expressed by Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island).

Cornyn said that judges should be allowed to consider acquitted offenses in some cases, giving the example of a sexual offender who has repeatedly abused a victim and has some charges dropped because they are based on abuse that happened too long ago to be prosecuted. He apparently did not distinguish between dropped charges and charges a jury refused to convict on.

“There are circumstances that would endure to the benefit of a guilty criminal defendant and violate the rights of crime victims to be heard as provided by law,” Cornyn said.

Whitehouse, a former prosecutor, argued that judges should not have their hands tied at sentencing because some technical reason prevented conviction for conduct that clearly occurred. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minnesota), another former prosecutor, supported the measure.

Durbin decided to hold further consideration on S.601 to incorporate amendments.

disheartening210528The Committee adjourned for a Senate roll-call vote, and thus did not start discussing the First Step Implementation Act of 2021 (S. 1014), the star of the day’s hearing. This is the most consequential of pending bills, one which would grant judges the option to apply the 18 USC 3553(f) safety valve to a larger number of drug offenders and – most significant – make the reductions in mandatory minimums for drug and gun offenses granted in § 401 and 403 of the First Step Act retroactive.

The Committee should be taking up the First Step Implementation Act of 2021 soon. That is heartening.

Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Executive Business Meeting (May 27)

– Thomas L. Root

Good, Bad… But Not Indifferent – Update for May 27, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

EITHER GOOD OR BAD

Maybe you’ve noticed our good-and-bad theme this week. Here are some shorts:

thumbsup210526Good: The DC Circuit last week joined seven other circuits in holding that Guideline 1B1.13 does not limit compassionate release motions when those motions are brought by prisoners instead of the BOP.

The Circuit just joins seven other circuits since last September to so hold.  Only the 11th Circuit disagrees.

United States v. Long, Case No 20-3064, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 14682 (DC Cir., May 18, 2021)

thumbsdown210526Bad: The two Federal Bureau of Prisons Correctional Officerss who were supposed to be watching Jeffrey Epstein, later charged for lying to investigators and phonying up records to hide the fact they were cruising the Web instead, last week entered guilty pleas in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York under deferred prosecution deals that will cost them 100 hours of community service but no prison time.

Forbes, Federal Prison Guards Admit To Filing False Records During Jeffrey Epstein’s Suicide (May 21, 2021)

thumbsup210526Good: Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-Minnesota and John Cornyn (R-Texas), and House Reps. Karen Bass (D-California) and Guy Reschenthaler (R-Pennsylvania) introduced the One Stop Shop Community Reentry Program Act last week, a bill that would set up reentry centers to help coordinate access to job training, medical and mental health services, and financial counseling. The centers would also help individuals land jobs, gain job-skill training, obtain driver’s licenses, fill out college and student loan applications and receive financial counseling.

The bill passed the House in the last session of Congress, but never came to a vote in the Senate.

NPR, Congress Wants To Set Up One-Stop Shops To Help Ex-Inmates Stay Out Of Prison (May 20, 2021)

thumbsdown210526Bad:  Dr. Homer Venters, an epidemiologist tasked by a federal court with inspecting FCC Lompoc reported last week that the facility has “an alarmingly low vaccination acceptance rate among the inmate population,” due to prison staff neglecting to address inmates’ “very valid and predictable concerns” about the effects the vaccine might have on their underlying health conditions.

Rather than address inmate fears, Venters said, prison staff dismissively told the inmates to either “take the vaccine or sign a refusal form.” He reported to the Court that “many of the people who reported refusing the vaccine told me they were willing to take it but simply had questions about their own health status.”

“The approach of BOP Lompoc not only fails to engage with patients; it has a paradoxical effect of creating a pool of extremely high-risk unvaccinated patients,” he wrote. “In other detention settings I have worked in, a COVID-19 refusal by a high-risk patient would result in a prompt session with a physician or mid-level provider because the consequences of infection are so grave.”

Santa Barbara Independent, Doctor ‘Extremely Concerned’ About Low Vaccination Rate Among Lompoc Prisoners (May 20)

– Thomas L. Root

First Step Vote Set, But Drama Will Go To The Wire – Update for December 17, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

FIRST STEP SENATE VOTES SET FOR TODAY AND WEDNESDAY

firststep1800509Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) ended the Senate’s 4-day work last Thursday night by scheduled a procedural vote on the latest revision of the First Step Act of 2018 for 5:30 p.m. today. That vote, promised weeks ago, will be a crucial test of the bill’s backing, where supporters will need to put up 60 votes to advance the bill.

In the latest iteration of First Step, the measure has been renumbered this year for the third time this year as S.3747 and has dropped its unwieldy title of “Formerly Incarcerated Reenter Society Transformed Safely Transitioning Every Person Act” – and thus the need for all capital letters.

If the Monday vote is successful, the Senate leadership says First Step could be wrapped up Wednesday, after allowing opponents the opportunity to have yet amendments considered. “My impression is that people are not going to string this out unnecessarily for procedural reasons, as long as they get an opportunity to make their arguments and have a vote on their amendment,” said Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas), who announced his support for First Step this week.

Supporters say they have at least 70 votes for the measure, although cosponsors of the measure are officially at 35. Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Missouri), a member of Senate leadership, predicted that “slightly more than half” of the GOP conference and as many as 30 of the 51 GOP senators could back it.

As McConnell set the week’s votes last Thursday, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) sought to make last-minute changes in First Step that would reflect a compromise the bill’s supporters had reached with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas). Cruz endorsed the bill because it was supposed to bar many violent criminals from earning early release, but the version that was presented on Wednesday (which is available online) did not include all of the exclusions Cruz had been promised. Lee tried to get McConnell to change them, according to multiple people familiar with the matter, but McConnell wanted to give his divided caucus at least 24 hours to review the new just-released text. The bill‘s chief critic, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas), joined in a private meeting with McConnell, Lee and Cornyn on the Senate floor Thursday afternoon, during which Lee argued that the changes should be made to increase the bill‘s conservative support.

To get any amendments into the bill, the legislation must be amended on the Senate floor. Cruz’s endorsement was critical to moving the bill forward, and he has repeatedly touted that the legislation would no longer allow the early release of violent criminals.

senatevote181217McConnell will allow only a little time and very few amendments to First Step before the Wednesday vote. After the Senate begins debating the bill, it will ultimately take 60 votes to pass it. And an amendment, however, will require just 50 votes in the narrowly divided Senate. Cotton and Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) are expected to offer an amendment to add new exclusions to the list of inmates not allowed to get program credits. Because amendments need only a simple majority, some Republicans will have to vote against them to keep the provisions from being added to the legislation. One senator predicted that many Democrats would probably defect from the legislation if the Cotton amendment passed.

Still, First Step will pass as long as it survives an uncertain amendment process. Most Senate Democrats support it, a significant bloc of Republicans is expected to back it, and President Donald Trump is expected to sign it if it passes the Senate and House ahead of the Dec. 21 partial government shutdown deadline.

The biggest immediate impact of First Step would be felt by nearly 2,600 federal prisoners convicted of crack offenses before 2010. That’s the year the Fair Sentencing Act reduced the disparity in punishment between crack cocaine and the powdered form of the drug. First Step would make the reform retroactive.

goodconduct180509All federal inmates will benefit from an increase in good time from 47 days a year to 54 days a year, retroactive to the beginning of each inmate’s sentence. The change is estimated to result in 4,000 extra prisoners being released in the next year, some immediately.

If it passes the Senate, the House and Senate will have to reconcile their different versions of First Step and then approve the reconciled version, all before Dec. 21. Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Maryland, the House minority whip, told reporters last week, “I presume… we will be able to approve it next week. I’m hopeful that it can move that quickly.” The New York Times said House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) has pledged swift action before the House leaves town for the year-end holidays.

The Hill, McConnell sets Monday test vote on criminal justice bill (Dec. 13)

Politico, GOP infighting continues as criminal justice bill advances (Dec. 13)

The Hill, Senate heads toward floor fight on criminal justice bill (Dec. 14)

The Marshall Project, What’s Really in the First Step Act? (Nov. 16)

First Step Act of 2018, S.3747 (Dec. 12)

The New York Times, Criminal Justice Bill Will Go Up for a Vote, McConnell Says (Dec. 12)

– Thomas L. Root
LISAStatHeader2small

Senate Reconvenes with FIRST STEP Act on Its Plate – Update for November 13, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

IT’S THE WITCHING HOUR FOR FIRST STEP

The Senate reconvenes today for what promises to be a busy lame-duck session, one that may be easier for Republicans to manage because they retained control of the Senate after last week’s bruising mid-term election.

firststep180814The biggest task facing the Senate is to address the budget ahead of a December 7th deadline. But equally important to 5,000 of our readers who happen to be guests of Uncle Sam’s Bureau of Prisons, the Senate has a final chance before the end of the year to pass a bill that combines prison and sentencing reforms calculated to improve the lives of more than 180,000 federal inmates while increasing the odds that they will never be inmates again.

The FIRST STEP Act (S. 2795), a pronounceable acronym for the “Formerly Incarcerated Reenter Society Transformed Safely Transitioning Every Person Act,” offers prison programs in an attempt to reduce inmates’ likelihood to re-offend after they’ve been released. The House approved the bill in May. In August, the White House brokered a compromise among several senators, including Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Richard Durbin (D-Illinois), to include some sentence reform provisions from the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2017 (S.1917), which the Senate Judiciary Committee approved last winter. 

The amended Act will reportedly be introduced in the Senate today.


The changes that would flow from passage of FIRST STEP are incremental but significant: Increases in compassionate release of terminally ill inmates: bans on restraints for pregnant inmates during childbirth, cuts to some mandatory minimum sentences, greater leeway for judges imposing sentences, more good time, elderly inmate home confinement, and programs that let inmates earn more time in halfway house and home confinement.


But some tough decisions and hard bargaining lie ahead. The bill is hotly debated and opposed by some conservatives who worry it may release dangerous people prone to reoffend and overburden local police. There is also fear that mixing sentencing reform with prison reforms, which have generally had more support among lawmakers, will threaten chances of passing a criminal justice bill this year before having to start all over again with a new Congress.

Georgetown University law professor Shon Hopwood said he thinks legislators have found a compromise that can pass Congress and be signed into law. FIRST STEP will not bring retroactive relief to that many inmates, but Hopwood still says the reforms would bring about concrete changes in the lives of many federal inmates.


grassley180604Sen. Grassley said last month he thinks the plan to combine the FIRST STEP with his own SRCA can get through the Senate. “We’ve already worked out what I think is something that can move in the Senate if we can get it up, and it would be both sentencing reform and prison reform,” Grassley said. While he did not elaborate on the nature of the agreement, he said he’s been in talks to get the compromise legislation moving in the lame-duck session between November’s elections and the end of the current Congress in January.

A committee aide said the in-the-works deal rolls in several elements of the SRCA, including reductions in mandatory minimums, increased flexibility for judges to set lower sentences, change to how 924(c) enhancements for drug crimes are calculated and Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 retroactivity.

Conservative Republicans who oppose FIRST STEP lost traction last week with the forced resignation of Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, who had previously infuriated Grassley with his unsubtle lobbying to kill SRCA in Committee. Last week, the Fraternal Order of Police, a vigorous opponent of SRCA last March, issued a press release supporting the amended FIRST STEP.

What’s more, some influential conservative voices favor the amended FIRST STEP Act. The National Review said last Friday that “by a 360–59 vote, the House adopted prison reform via the FIRST STEP Act. The Senate should add sentencing-reform language before full adoption.”

There is a chance some controversial elements of prison reform, such as increased “good time,” could still fall by the wayside in order to mollify some conservative concerns with the existing legislation, according to Rep. Doug Collins (R-Georgia), the House FIRST STEP Act (H.R. 5682) sponsor. But not including sentencing reform in the package could alienate Democrats needed to ensure the compromise legislation passes both chambers. Longtime sentencing reform advocate Sen. Durbin and other Democrats like Sen. Cory Booker (D-New Jersey) and Sen. Kamala Harris (D-California) had previously opposed FIRST STEP because it did not include sentencing reform. The three instead pushed for the Grassley/Durbin-sponsored SRCA, although they don’t appear to have been involved in crafting the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman’s compromise legislation.


cornyn181113Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, the majority whip and main sponsor of the Senate version of FIRST STEP, said last month that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) will have a tight schedule to fill, between confirming the backlog of two dozen judges and keeping the government open ahead of a Dec. 7 funding deadline. “Certainly Sen. McConnell is going to prioritize federal judicial nominations, but if there is the will to move on legislation, that would be included,” Cornyn said. However, with Republicans not just retaining, but building on their majority in the Senate for the next Congress, the pressure may be off McConnell to push through judicial appointments before next term.

Those advocating for reform have an ally in the White House: President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner has championed passage of FIRST STEP for months, and Trump himself has continued to say he would support the Act.

A CNN report last week suggested continuing White House interest in FIRST STEP. CNN said that former New Jersey governor Chris Christie, whom CNN says is a front-runner to be President Trump’s new attorney general, attended a “law enforcement roundtable on prison reform efforts at the White House on Thursday morning.” Christie then met privately with the President’s son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner to further discuss prison reform issues. An administration official said Kushner and Christie have “a really close and good working relationship, particularly as it relates to prison reform.”


Some reform advocates worry that pushing too hard to add too much to a reform package could jeopardize the progress made by FIRST STEP. Kevin Ring, president for FAMM, said there are real people who will have their lives improved by the bill, and they could easily end up with no legislation at all. “We’d greatly prefer having the sentencing be a part of it, but we don’t want to hold out for everything and end up with nothing,” he said.


For Hopwood, the next two months presents a choice between trying to help as many people as possible now and going for the long haul. “What you’re saying when you hold out for systemic reform is, ‘We don’t want to help the lives of people who are in the system for 20 years,’ because it might be that long,” Hopwood said.

Law360, Hard Decisions Loom In Lame-Duck Push For Sentencing Reform (Nov. 4, 2018)

CNN, Trump considering Christie, Bondi, Acosta for attorney general (Nov. 8)

National Review, The Lame-Duck Session Should Sprain Trump’s Wrist (Nov. 9)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

After Wild Week, Criminal Justice Reform Postponed Until November, If Then – Update for August 27, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small

TOPSY-TURVY WEEK IN WASHINGTON FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM

Last week, the editor of this newsletter took a vacation away from the Internet and cellphone coverage for the first time in years. After all, the last weeks of August are always quiet in the courts and halls of Congress.

scotus170627
The Supreme Court may be gone for the summer, but no one else in Washington seems to be…

What a mistake leaving town turned out to be…

The week started out well. Senate Minority Whip Richard Durbin (D-Illinois), the No. 2 Senate Democrat, said he could support the compromise criminal justice reform bill that Republican colleagues presented to President Trump and senior White House officials three weeks ago. That bill, which combined four sentencing changes with FIRST STEP Act, is a compromise pushed by senior White House adviser Jared Kushner in order to win the support of Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa). Grassley, co-sponsor of the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2017 (which was approved by the Committee last February), has opposed FIRST STEP because of the absence of sentencing reform provisions that change some mandatory minimums.

oddcouple180702Durbin’s announcement made him the first Democratic senator to support the legislation, which is key to assuring Senate passage.

Two days later, the news site Axios reported that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) agreed in a meeting with Kushner, Grassley, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) to bring the compromise bill to a vote if an informal review showed that the measure had at least 60 votes in support. Axios admitted that McConnell’s spokesperson said a commitment to a vote had not been made, but asserted that another source said the Majority Leader came just shy of promising a vote.

Axios also reported President Trump had said earlier on Thursday that while he will not endorse the bill before the midterms, he was open to the compromise currently being negotiated, according to a senior administration official and Sen. Lee. The White House said in a statement “the President remains committed to meaningful prison reform and will continue working with the Senate on their proposed additions to the bill.”

While many, including Lee, wish the vote would occur today, McConnell’s willingness to bring it to a vote if the support is there (and earlier reports are that the compromise would collect 80 votes or more) is encouraging. The delay is entirely political: “I think the sentencing reforms are still controversial and divide Republicans,” Cornyn said. “I just don’t see the wisdom of dividing Republicans on a contentious matter like that before the election.

sessions180322Then, on Friday, the Washington Free Beacon reported that Trump told Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III and Kushner the day before that he was opposed the FIRST STEP compromise, in large part due to an exception he believes it carves out that may release convicted drug traffickers early. A statement released by the Dept. of Justice seemed to confirm that. DOJ said: “We’re pleased the president agreed that we shouldn’t support criminal justice reform that would reduce sentences, put drug traffickers back on our streets, and undermine our law enforcement officers who are working night and day to reduce violent crime and drug trafficking in the middle of an opioid crisis.”

The Free Beacon story, however, said that Trump had later walked back his opposition, and told Grassley and Kushner that he was “willing to take up prison/sentencing reform” after the election.

The Free Beacon said “McConnell is famously skittish about dividing his caucus, and so is still unlikely to bring a bill to the floor if it does not have Republican caucus support. Trump’s backing—once held out, and now withdrawn—would almost certainly be vital to getting more Republicans on board.”

dontknow180828So the compromise may be voted on after the mid-term elections the first week of November. Or it may not. Trump may support it. Or he may not. The Democrats may support the compromise. Or they may not.

Of course, last week also brought the conviction of Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman, on fraud charges unrelated to the Trump campaign, and the guilty plea (and probable cooperation agreement with the Feds) of Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen. That is bad news for the defendants and for Trump, but to the extent it makes Trump angrier and more fearful of the Justice Department, it probably increases the chances Trump will support criminal justice reform.

The Hill, Democratic leader gives boost to criminal justice reform compromise (Aug. 21, 2018)

Axios, McConnell commits to moving forward on criminal justice bill after midterms (Aug. 23, 2018)

Washington Free Beacon, Trump Strongly Opposed to FIRST STEP (Aug. 24, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Truth is Stranger than Fiction: Reality TV Star’s White House Visit May Jump-Start Sentence Reform – Update for June 4, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues. 

LISAStatHeader2small
WILL THE KARDASHIANS SAVE SENTENCE REFORM?

kardash180604Talk about headlines we never imagined ourselves writing… The twists and turns of federal sentence and prison reform legislation get weirder and weirder. Last week, as Senate Republicans fought one another over whether FIRST STEP Act (H.R. 5682) did enough to benefit prisoners, President Trump had a sit-down in his office with Kim Kardashian over a commutation for Alice Martin, a grandmother doing life at FCI Aliceville, and then pardoned a conservative New York filmmaker who did 8 months in a halfway house over a two-bit campaign finance crime.

So why does this matter to federal prisoners?

To start, The Hill reported last week that the Senate is “under growing pressure” to take up the FIRST STEP Act, which is a priority Trump son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner. But Senate negotiators say they are not close to a deal that would allow the bill to move quickly.

grassley180604Instead, the fight is pitting two influential senators, John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), against each other as they back competing bills. “We’ve got work to do here on building consensus… but right now we don’t have it,” Cornyn said last week. The divisions could scuttle any chance that the Trump-backed FIRST STEP becomes law this year.

Both Cornyn and Grassley are signaling they plan to press forward with trying to build support for their own separate bills once the Senate returns to Washington, D.C., this week. “We’re going to take up my bill,” Grassley said, referring to the Sentence Reform and Corrections Act (S.1917). “Or I should say, my bipartisan bill that’s got 28 co-sponsors — equal number Republicans and Democrats… What the House does through [FIRST STEP] is about the equivalent of a spit in the ocean compared to what the problem is of too much imprisonment.”

SRCA would link prison reform to reductions in mandatory minimums for certain drug offenses, correction of stacked 924(c) convictions, and retroactivity of the 2010 Fair Sentencing Act. Both Grassley and Durbin say they’ve made a deal not to separate the prison and sentencing reform components despite pressure from the White House.

sessions180215The Hill reports that SRCA is unlikely to be taken up in the Senate given opposition from Trump officials, chiefly Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III. Grassley admitted last week he has not yet convinced Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) to bring SRCA to the floor. “You’ve got to remember that McConnell doesn’t like the bill,” Grassley said, “and all I can say is that you ought to let a Republican president who needs a big, bipartisan victory have a bipartisan victory.”

Last week, McConnell told senators, “Look, guys, if you all can get your act together and come up with something that you’re comfortable with, that the president will sign, I’d be willing to take a look at it.”

Enter Kim Kardashian West, reality TV star and wife of Kanye West. Kim, who made early release for federal prisoner Alice Martin. Kardashian visited the White House on Wednesday to urge President Trump to commute the sentence of a 63-year-old grandmother serving life for a first-time drug offense. In pleading her case for a commutation for the inmate, Kardashian seized upon draconian federal sentencing practices that can put low- or midlevel nonviolent offenders away for decades, even life.

kardashian180604Interestingly, Trump – who tends to agree with the last person who spoke to him – tweeted that he and Kardashian had a good visit, and talked about “prison reform and sentencing.” This left some observers hopeful that the President was listening to people other than Sessions, and was about to signal his support for adding some sentencing reform measures to FIRST STEP. At the same time, Trump’s interest in harsh sentencing may help McConnell find some backbone to put FIRST STEP and SRCA to a vote.

Meanwhile, debate continued about the FIRST STEP Act. The liberal opponents of FIRST STEP argue that passing the bill, which lacks any reform of mandatory minimum sentence, would leave Congress and the administration believing they had solved mass incarceration, and thus not willing to address the issues at the heart of the prison problem anytime soon. But the Washington Post suggested this fear is overblown:

If Democrats take control of the House in November, they will be able to revisit the issue anytime they want — but they will have real clout to go along with their passion,” the Post said. “Nothing in the current bill precludes bolder, more comprehensive action when the votes, and the president’s pen, are lined up and ready.

The Hill, Senate grapples with prison reform bill (May 30, 2018)

Washington Post, In prison reform, a little of something is better than a lot of nothing (May 28, 2018)

The Hill, Don’t kick the can down the road on prison reform — now is the time for change (June 1, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

The Thrillah on the Hill-ah – Update for May 14, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues. 

LISAStatHeader2small
HOUSE BILL MAY FALL VICTIM TO SENATE DEMAND THAT IT DO MORE

rumble180515With the House Judiciary Committee last week rewriting the old Prison Redemption and the Reform Act into the new FIRST STEP Act (H.R. 5682), the action on criminal justice reform turns to the Senate, where FIRST STEP is already running into pushback. Let’s get ready to rumble.

The White House-backed bill picked up some mo after the House Judiciary Committee passed it onto the floor with a bipartisan 15-5 vote. But some Senate are deadlocked about how to approach the bill, threatening the chances of it getting signed into law. Ironically, the senators raising the most opposition are supporters – not opponents – of criminal justice reform. In fact, some of the traditional foes of criminal justice reform, conservative groups, sound like unabashed supporters. And those who you’d think were most likely to support reform are opposing it.

“Although today’s vote is a positive sign, we still have a long way to go. As the bill’s title suggests, this is the first step,” said conservative nonprofit FreedomWorks. “Congress must do more to ensure that those who are re-entering society and want a better life for themselves and their families have meaningful opportunities to work toward that goal. Another part of the discussion is sentencing reform. Sooner or later, Congress will have to revisit this issue to ensure that we are reforming sentences for low-level, nonviolent offenders and reserving limited prison space for violent offenders.”

vacancy180515But Kate Gotsch of the Sentencing Project complains that the bill does not account for the fact that halfway houses likely won’t have space to accommodate the inmates who accrue more earned-time credit. Progressive groups also point out that while the legislation encourages – even rewards – prisoners for participation in rehabilitative programs, the Bureau of Prisons is struggling with a horrifically-long wait list for the programs it currently offers. And many facilities don’t have the staff to run additional programs. Much of BOP Director Mark Inch’s grilling by the House Oversight Committee last month came over severe cuts in halfway house time for inmates and for the BOP’s practice of “augmentation,” where teachers, nurses and other professional staff at federal prisons are required to drop their regular duties to fill shifts for correctional officers in the housing units.

Nevertheless, FIRST STEP co-sponsor, Rep. Hakeen Jeffries (D-N.Y.) predicted last Friday the bill would come up for a House vote by the end of May.

Sens. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Richard Durbin (D-Illinois), the No. 2 Senate Democrat, both want a broader criminal justice measure including the mandatory minimum sentencing reforms they previously tucked into the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act, S.1917, which passed out of the Judiciary Committee last February. The SRCA, which picked up two more co-sponsors last week, is now sponsored by 14 Democrats and 13 Republicans. It slashes mandatory minimums for drug offenses, makes the Fair Sentencing Act retroactive for inmates with pre-2010 crack sentences, and brings relief to people with stacked 924(c) convictions.

sessions180322Despite White House opposition, spearheaded by Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, both senators say they’ve made a deal to not split prison reform from changes to sentencing guidelines. But The Hill predicted last weekend that combining sentencing reform with prison reform will “all but kill any chance of getting sentencing reform through the GOP-controlled Congress.

Grassley’s and Durbin’s approach is poison to both to Sessions and to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), who refused to bring SRCA to a vote in the last session of Congress despite sponsorship of 40” senators. And some of the bill’s most vocal opponents, Sens. Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) and David Perdue (R-Georgia), are some of Trump’s closest allies on Capitol Hill.

Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island) last week introduced a companion bill to the House’s FIRST STEP Act. S. 2795, a bill to provide for programs to help reduce the risk that prisoners will recidivate upon release from prison, represents an effort by some in the Senate to press forward with a narrower bill that would match FIRST STEP. Asked if Sens. Grassley’s and Durbin’s stance was realistic, Cornyn said, “Their opinion matters, but I wouldn’t say that’s the end of the discussion.” 

House Republicans already have made some changes to their prison reform bill in an attempt to win the support needed for it to pass that chamber, but the modifications did not placate Grassley or Durbin, whose support would likely be critical if any legislation is to reach the Senate floor.

In a show of strength, Sen. Cornyn and White House advisor and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner were to tour FCI Seagoville in suburban Dallas last Friday, to tout FIRST STEP. Sen. Cornyn made it, but Kushner skipped out.

kushner180515Sen. Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina), while saying he’s open to either path forward on the issue, is skeptical that a prison reform bill alone would be able to get the 60 votes needed to ultimately clear the Senate. “It’s how we get the votes, and I’m not sure how you do [it with just that]. The way that that evolved was by talking about pairing the two,” he said, referring to both sentence reform and prison reform.

Sen. Grassley appears to be closing the door for now on negotiating with Cornyn. He said he and Durbin are pushing forward with their bill, adding that he’s delivered that message to Kushner several times. “[We’re going] to try to convince the White House that we’re right,” he said. “This is a wonderful opportunity for the president to have a bipartisan victory and to sign it, and that’s exactly what he needs for the midterm election.”

S. 2795: A bill to provide for programs to help reduce the risk that prisoners will recidivate upon release from prison, and for other purposes, Introduced May 7, 2018, by Sens. Cornyn and Whitehouse.

FreedomWorks, FreedomWorks Applauds Important “First Step” In Criminal Justice Reform (May 9, 2018)

The Hill, Trump-backed prison reforms face major obstacles in Senate (May 13, 2018)

Roll Call, Criminal justice overhaul efforts appear stuck (May 11, 2018)

Mother Jones, Jared Kushner’s Prison reform Bill Just got Slightly Less Bad (May 7, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Sentencing Reform, We Hardly Knew Ye – Update for March 21, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small
COALITION TO PASS SENTENCING REFORM IS FALLING APART

The bipartisan sentencing reform movement is breaking apart in the face of President Trump’s prison reform proposals, which focus on prisoners re-entering society instead of reducing mandatory minimums. The division between prison reform and sentencing reform advocates, especially in the Senate, could threaten the momentum behind either proposal.

trump170515
President Trump counts the number of high officials he has fired or who have left his Administration… could the Attorney General be next?

Trump and Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III have no interest in anything more than prison reform right now. And Jared Kushner, the White House’s sentencing reform advocate, has reportedly decided prison reform is the only way forward. Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) won’t support Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) on the Sentencing Reform & Corrections Act – which Grassley’s Judiciary Committee passed last month 15-5 — despite his prior support. Cornyn is pushing instead for his bill, the CORRECTIONS Act with Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island) that calls only for prison reforms aimed at aiding re-entry and reducing recidivism. An aide to a Judiciary Committee member told Axios last week that “McConnell isn’t going to put sentencing reform on the floor, particularly now that the administration opposes it. So the options are the Whitehouse-Cornyn bill, or nothing.” 

reform160201On the House side, Rep. Doug Collins (R-Georgia), whose Redemption Act mirrors the Cornyn-Whitehouse bill and has the most momentum in the House, told Axios he supports some kind of broader, more comprehensive criminal justice reforms, but right now, “prison reform can get the votes in Congress… but sentencing reform can’t.” Reps. Bobby Scott (D-Virginia) and Jason Lewis (R-Minnesota, who are cosponsoring a bipartisan House sentencing reform bill, are still optimistic about the chances for sentencing reform. The odds of getting any bill through the House Judiciary Committee, whose chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Virginia) is so notoriously slow at moving legislation that the Committee has become known as the place bills go to die, are considered slim. “This guy just refuses to move legislation,” said a senior Republican lawmaker. “I can’t think of a single thing he’s actually accomplished,” added a top GOP Republican aide.

Progressive groups and senators like Grassley, Dick Durban (D-Illinois), Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) continue to push for sentencing reform.

sessions180322There’s some good news coming out of the Washington rumor mill. After Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was fired and Trump economic advisor Gary Cohn quit last week, several publications reported that the President had Sessions on his short list of people to be fired. Vanity Fair said that according to two Republicans in regular contact with the White House, there have been talks that Trump could replace Sessions with EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, former Oklahoma attorney general, who would not be recused from overseeing the Russia probe. Such a replacement could soften Trump Administration opposition to SRCA, inasmuch as Pruitt is not reputed to be as hidebound as Sessions.

Axios, The criminal justice reform coalition is breaking up (Mar. 15, 2018)

Politico, The Place Bills Go to Die (Mar. 15, 2018)

Just Security, How Trump Might Replace Sessions with Pruitt as Attorney General (Mar. 15, 2018)

Vanity Fair, “Trump wants them out of there”: After swinging the axe at Tillerson, Trump mulls what to do with McMaster, Sessions, Jared, and Ivanka (Mar. 14, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small