Tag Archives: trump

Most Recent Pardons Don’t Bode Well For Federal Clemency – Update for December 2, 2025

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

PARDONS FROM THE SUBLIME TO THE WEIRD

President Trump conducted the annual turkey pardon on the Tuesday before Thanksgiving, sparing “Waddle” and “Gobble” from the processing house.

At the same time, he extended the pardon to the Peach and Blossom, the two turkeys President Biden pardoned last year. Trump contended that Biden’s pardon of the birds was invalid because it was signed with an autopen instead of by Biden himself.

“The turkeys known as Peach and Blossom last year have been located, and they were on their way to be processed, in other words to be killed, but I stopped that journey and I am officially pardoning them,” Trump said.

Last Friday, Trump wrote on Truth Social: “Any document signed by Sleepy Joe Biden with the Autopen, which was approximately 92% of them, is hereby terminated, and of no further force or effect. The Autopen is not allowed to be used if approval is not specifically given by the President of the United States.” 

Trump also said that he has now overturned all the executive orders under the Biden administration and “anything else that was not directly signed by Crooked Joe Biden.”

Unless it’s an autopen doing the signing

It is not clear what “anything else that was not directly signed by Crooked Joe Biden” might include, such as clemencies. However, any notion that pardons might be excluded was undercut by Trump’s comments during the turkey pardon. Trump has previously suggested that Biden’s clemencies were illegal, but he has not yet tried to void any of them. His recent actions suggest that such an attempt is not out of the question.

Trump continues to issue clemencies one at a time, even where doing so contradicts his policies. In a Saturday social media post, Trump said that drug cartels present one of the most pressing dangers to the USA, saying in a social media post that airspace above and surrounding Venezuela should be considered “CLOSED IN ITS ENTIRETY.”

But this pronouncement followed Trump’s Friday social media announcement of a pardon for Juan Orlando Hernández, former president of Honduras, who was convicted of drug trafficking charges and has 35 years to go on his 45-year federal sentence.

The New York Times said, “The two posts displayed a remarkable dissonance in the president’s strategy, as he moved to escalate a military campaign against drug trafficking while ordering the release of a man prosecutors said had taken “cocaine-fueled bribes” from cartels and “protected their drugs with the full power and strength of the state — military, police and justice system.”

Trump said he had issued the pardon to Hernández because “they gave him 45 years because he was the president of the country — you could do this to any president on any country.”  Trump said that friends had alerted him to the wrongs done to Hernández: “Many people that I greatly respect” had told him Hernández had been “treated very harshly and unfairly.”

“Why would we pardon this guy and then go after Maduro for running drugs into the United States,” wrote Sen. Bill Cassidy (R., La.) on X. “Lock up every drug runner! I don’t understand why he is being pardoned.”

Meanwhile, just in case you think Trump’s pardon czar Alice Marie Johnson has gone dormant, she said in a Thanksgiving social media post that Trump had commuted the 7-year sentence of a private equity executive who had served less than two weeks for his role in what prosecutors described as a $1.6 billion scheme that defrauded thousands of victims.

David Gentile reported to prison on November 14th and suffered horribly in a minimum-security camp for nearly two weeks before being released on Thanksgiving Eve, according to the BOP. Alice Johnson said that she was “deeply grateful to see David Gentile heading home to his young children” and called it an “act of mercy.”

A White House official used the old refrain of “Biden something something,” suggesting that the Biden administration’s Ponzi scheme claim against Gentile’s company – good enough to convince a unanimous jury – was nevertheless “profoundly undercut by the fact that GPB had explicitly told investors what would happen… At trial, the government was unable to tie any supposedly fraudulent representations to Mr. Gentile.” The White House official spoke on condition of anonymity due to not being authorized to speak on the topic.

Ironically, we have always advised people seeking clemency that arguing the unjustness of their conviction was strongly disfavored.  Apparently, that’s the case no longer.

ABC News, Trump’s turkey pardoning turns political, but Waddle and Gobble are spared (November 25, 2025)

NBC, Trump ‘cancelling’ Biden executive orders signed by autopen (November 28, 2025)

New York Times, In Announcing Pardon of Drug Trafficker While Threatening Venezuela, Trump Displays Contradictions (November 29, 2025)

Wall Street Journal, He Was Convicted of Running a Narco State. Now Trump Plans to Pardon Him. (December 1, 2025)

Reuters, Trump frees former GPB Capital CEO after Biden admin’s Ponzi scheme sentence (November 30, 2025)

X.com, Alice Marie Johnson – All Grace (November 27, 2025)

~ Thomas L. Root

Bureau of Prisons Slipping on ICE – Update for November 25, 2025

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

THAT GIANT SUCKING SOUND…

Remember H. Ross Perot? During his unsuccessful third-party bid for president in 1992, he warned that the “giant sucking sound” we all heard was the sound of jobs going to Mexico.

It turns out that Bureau of Prisons director William K. Marshall III is hearing one of his own, the sound of BOP correctional officers quitting for the gold-plated working conditions of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Last week, Pro Publica reported that “ICE has been on a recruiting blitz, offering $50,000 starting bonuses and tuition reimbursement at an agency that has long offered better pay than the federal prison system. For many corrections officers, it’s been an easy sell.”

By the start of November, the BOP had lost at least 1,400 more staff this year than it had hired, according to ProPublica. “We’re broken and we’re being poached by ICE,” one union official told ProPublica. “It’s unbelievable. People are leaving in droves.”

The exodus comes amid shortages of critical supplies. Staffers told Pro Publica that some facilities had even stopped providing basic hygiene items for officers, such as paper towels, soap and toilet paper.

Fewer corrections officers result in more lockdowns, less programming, fewer health care services for inmates, greater risks to staff, and more grueling hours of mandatory overtime. Prison teachers and medical staff are being forced to step in as corrections officers on a regular basis.

In a video posted last Wednesday afternoon, Deputy Director Josh Smith said that the agency was “left in shambles by the previous administration” and would take years to repair. Staffing levels, he said, were “catastrophic,” which, along with crumbling infrastructure and corruption, had made the prisons less safe.

He also frankly appraised the agency’s approach to the First Step Act:

The First Step Act was sabotaged by the Biden DOJ and BOP.  They have mismanaged millions meant for FSA implementation – building a time credit calculator that has never worked right – and FSA programming required by the law never materialized. Instead, they hired an outside contractor that blocked every outside program submitted by some of the most impactful faith-based organizations. They only approved internal BOP classes, and, despite spending hundreds of millions of dollars, the BOP still only added 100 halfway house beds in six years… all while reentry services division lost over 90 critical positions.

They diverted hundreds of millions of First Step Act funding into non-FSA programming and unrelated projects that they just labeled ‘FSA.’ This mismanagement squandered taxpayer money and undermined public safety. Lockdowns and collective punishment have become knee-jerk reactions… BOP has been consistently voted the worst place to work in all the federal government… This is the hand that we’ve been dealt, a Bureau on the brink scarred by decades of failure…

The so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law on July 4th, could offer some financial support for the agency’s staffing woes, as it will route another $5 billion to the BOP over four years — $3 billion of which is specifically earmarked to improve retention, hiring and training. Yet exactly what the effects of that cash infusion will look like remains to be seen: Pro Publica reported that the “Bureau declined to answer questions about when it will receive the money or how it will be spent.”

Pro Publica, “We’re Broken”: As Federal Prisons Run Low on Food and Toilet Paper, Corrections Officers Are Leaving in Droves for ICE (November 20, 2025)

BOP, Video Message from the Deputy Director: A Bureau on the Brink (November 19, 2025)

~ Thomas L. Root

‘Hell’ vs. Truth on Federal Clemency – Update for November 24, 2025

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

GIVING ‘HELL’ TO THE CLEMENCY POWER

President Harry S Truman’s supporters liked to shout, “Give ‘em hell, Harry!” at his rallies. However, as Truman explained it, ‘I never did give them hell. I just told the truth, and they thought it was hell’.”

I once again heard from a reader last week that some of the guys at his facility thought I was too negative about President Trump. Seven years ago, I wrote glowingly about his support for the First Step Act, still the most consequential piece of criminal justice reform legislation in the last 30 years. But Trump has done nothing for federal criminal justice reform since then, and that’s the truth. To my critics, it just seems like ‘hell’.

‘Hell’, you ask? Minnesota constitutional lawyer Marshall Tanick last week aptly described the hellscape of Trump clemencies:

In addition to the unconditional pardons issued on the first day of his current term to all 1,500-plus January 6th rioters, as he promised during the campaign, with Floridians comprising the largest state group, and the 77 more recently to white collar election denier operatives, the president has issued more than 1,600 pardons and commutations of sentences this year. Nearly all of them, with a few exceptions like star baseball player Darryl Strawberry, have been given to political supporters and financial donors to his campaign or their relatives or those with business interests aligned with the president and his family. Most of them were charged and many convicted of massive fraudulent schemes.

A transparent theme has been political leanings, as reflected in his explanation for commuting the seven-year sentence of mendacious Republican former Congress member George Santos after serving a puny four months. The president said he released the discredited New Yorker from confinement because he did “ALWAYS VOTE REPUBLICAN,” as if that is the criterion for the exercise of presidential lenity.

Still waiting for your pardon or commutation? You probably don’t fit the criteria. Not like Dan Wilson, a man who – perhaps alone in American history – has received two presidential pardons in a single year. Wilson, a Kentucky militia member who joined the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, was indicted for that and as a felon-in-possession under 18 USC § 922(g)(1) for the guns agents found when they searched his home on a J6-based search warrant.

Trump had already erased Wilson’s felony conviction for his role in the riot when he issued his Inauguration Day pardon for all of the 1,500 participants in the attack. But Wilson remained in prison because the federal court concluded that the pardon was limited to J6 conduct and did not extend to separate crimes. Dan still had three years to serve for the 922(g)(1).

Last week, Trump quietly pardoned Wilson for the felon-in-possession count, reasoning that “because the search of Mr. Wilson’s home was due to the events of January 6, and they should have never been there in the first place…” according to a White House official.

In a separate action, Trump pardoned Suzanne Ellen Kaye for having threatened to shoot federal agents if they came to her house to question her about January 6th. The White House said her case was “clearly a case of disfavored First Amendment political speech being prosecuted and an excessive sentence.”

Meanwhile, if you were not at the January 6th riot, your clemency application will sit at the Office of Pardon Attorney. As I noted last week, only 1% of Trump’s clemencies this year went through the OPA.

‘But wait,’ you say. ‘You don’t have to be a rioter or election denier to get a pardon.’ Right you are. Just last week, Trump also pardoned Joseph Schwartz, a nursing home magnate who was sentenced last April to 36 months in prison for failing to pay $38 million in payroll taxes withheld from employees’ earnings. Schwartz hired a couple of right-wing lobbyists, paying them $960,000 to secure a pardon. Although Trump’s own interim US Attorney at the time, Alina Habba, said last April the offense deserved prison time (recommending a shocking 12 months and a day sentence), Trump signed off on the pardon. Schwartz walked out of FCI Otisville camp last week after serving three months.

A White House official, asked by the Washington Post whether Trump or others in the White House or Justice Department had met with Schwartz’s lobbyists, responded with a statement:

No one from White House Counsel nor [White House pardon czar] Alice Johnson met with the individuals named. Either way, the President is the final decision-maker on all pardons, and any one spending money to lobby for pardons is foolishly wasting funds.

Uh-huh.

I’m not alone in criticizing Trump’s gross abuse of clemency (at the expense of federal prisoners who deserve thoughtful consideration if not outright grant of commutation or pardon). Law professor Mark Osler, a national clemency expert, wrote last week on Sentencing Matters Substack:

These are hard days for people like me who believe that the pardon power is an essential part of the Constitution and a beautiful machine that embodies one of our primary national virtues: a belief in second chances. While clemency has been subjected to sharp criticism before (most recently, in the wake of Bill Clinton’s shady pardon of fugitive financier Marc Rich), the wave of criticism now — most often turning on President Trump’s grants to loyalists, celebrities, and business associates — has sometimes included outright calls to simply get rid of the federal pardon power.

Conservative writer Jonah Goldberg wrote last week that

[t]he president has some unique powers… including the sole, final authority to grant pardons. Pardons cannot be reviewed or repealed by Congress or the courts. It’s time we changed that—and the only way to do so is by amending the Constitution.

There are two reasons for getting rid of the president’s power to pardon. The first is the grotesque abuses of that power by Presidents Trump and Biden. In his first term, Trump issued a series of egregious pardons for, among others, lackeys, war criminals and political allies.

Biden then issued blanket and preemptive pardons for his family and various political allies… and a raft of other pardons and commutations that Biden allegedly just outsourced to ideologues on his staff.

Back in office in 2025, Trump has outdone Biden and himself. He launched his second term by granting mass pardons to the goons who beat police with flagpoles and stormed the Capitol on his behalf on January 6, 2021. Since then, he’s pardoned a rogues’ gallery of donors, partisan allies, and people with business ties to him or his family…

This coming week, the White House will pardon two turkeys out of the 219 million to be slaughtered in the US over the next 12 months. That puts a turkey’s odds of clemency at about 1:110 million. Sadly, for federal prisoners without money or political ties to the Trump Administration, the odds are not much better.

I’m for any president, regardless of party, who properly uses the clemency power to correct injustice. That has not been Trump in 2025. 

Just truth. Not hell.

Naples News, Presidential pardon process needs to be changed (November 20, 2025)

Washington Post, The case of a felon who paid lobbyists nearly $1 million to seek a Trump pardon (November 22, 2025)

Politico, Trump re-pardons a Jan. 6 defendant to erase unrelated gun conviction (November 15, 2025)

NPR, Trump issues two pardons related to Jan. 6 investigation (November 15, 2025)

Sentencing Matters Substack, A Terrible Use of a Beautiful Machine (November 17, 2025)

Los Angeles Times, Instead of Addressing Injustice, Pardons Only Pervert Justice (November 19, 2025)

USA Today, You can choose the names of turkeys to get a presidential pardon. Here’s how. (November 22, 2025)

~ Thomas L. Root

The Pardon Power’s a Wreck – Update for November 18, 2025

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

PARDON OUR PARDONS

Sobering news on the clemency front. To many, it seems that President Trump has exercised his pardon and commutation pen unlike any of his predecessors. Recent reports from Politico and ProPublica make it clear that the President’s beneficiaries have mostly been people with access to him or his inner circle.  Those petitioners who have followed rules set out by the Dept of Justice have been left out in the cold.

Trump has granted clemency to allies, donors and culture-war figures — as well as to people like him who were convicted of financial wrongdoing. A week ago, he granted pardons to 77 people, including Rudy Giuliani and other allies tied to Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Those clemencies came on top of the commutation awarded last month to Republican George Santos, the disgraced former New York congressman found guilty of defrauding donors and lying to Congress. Trump freed Santos after he had served fewer than 3 months of his 87-year sentence

Politico said, “The pardons are the latest attempt by Trump to rewrite the history of his bid to seize a second term he didn’t win in 2020, an effort that culminated in the violent attack on the Capitol by a mob of his supporters who attempted to halt the transfer of power. Trump pardoned more than 1,000 of those who joined the mob within hours of his inauguration in January, including hundreds who assaulted police officers protecting the Capitol.”

For those who followed DOJ protocol, ProPublica reported, “the sense is growing that the process no longer matters; they’ve watched the public database of applicants swell with thousands of pending cases, while Trump grants pardons to people who never entered the system at all.”

In the 10 months since Trump took office, about 10,000 people have filed petitions for pardon or commutation, two-thirds of the total number of clemency applications (14,867) filed during the four years of the Biden presidency.

DOJ rules require that people seeking pardons wait five years after their release before applying, show good conduct and remorse, and file petitions through the Office of the Pardon Attorney. But in his second term, Trump has largely abandoned that process.

“It’s unfair to the little guy,” said Margaret Love, who served as pardon attorney from 1990 to 1997 under Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton and now represents people in clemency cases. “I tell people, ‘Sorry, you don’t have a chance.’”

In Trump’s first term, fewer than half of his clemency recipients had applied through the Pardon Attorney. By one estimate, only 1 in 10 had been recommended by the OPA.

This term is worse. Now, only 10 of the roughly 1,600 people granted pardons (under 1%) had filed petitions with the Pardon Attorney, and even within that small group, some did not appear to meet DOJ’s standards and requirements.

St. John’s law professor Mark Osler, a national expert on federal clemency, wrote yesterday in Sentencing Matters Substack:

Imagine a classic Jaguar sedan, perhaps a 1972 XJ in British racing green — elegant, stunningly fast, unusual. It’s a joy to drive, wonderful to look at, and can come to define its owner in a way few cars can.

For those of us who care about federal clemency, watching President Donald Trump’s use of the pardon power in his second term has been like standing by as a driver uses that classic Jag to knock down an old house by slamming it into a wall again and again and again as a crowd gathers, aghast. It is a terrible use of a beautiful machine.

These are challenging times for individuals like me who believe that the pardon power is an integral part of the Constitution and a vital institution that embodies one of our primary national virtues: a belief in second chances. While clemency has been subjected to sharp criticism before (most recently, in the wake of Bill Clinton’s shady pardon of fugitive financier Marc Rich), the wave of criticism now — most often turning on President Trump’s grants to loyalists, celebrities, and business associates — has sometimes included outright calls to simply get rid of the federal pardon power.

I somehow doubt that anything is likely to improve before it worsens. For now, it is harder than ever for a federal prisoner not connected to this President by money, politics or some other transaction deemed beneficial to Trump to get noticed – let alone approved – for federal clemency.

ProPublica, How Trump Has Exploited Pardons and Clemency to Reward Allies and Supporters (November 12, 2025)

Politico, Trump pardons top allies who aided bid to subvert the 2020 election (November 10, 2025)

Sentencing Matters Substack, A Terrible Use of a Beautiful Machine (November 17, 2025)

~ Thomas L. Root

Clemency Pay-to-Play? – Update for October 30, 2025

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

TRUMP CLEMENCY CIRCUS PAUSED AMID PROFITEERING CONCERNS

NBC reported last week that the White House was tightening up on clemency, just as the White House pardoned serial liar George Santos and Binance crypto executive Changpeng Zhao.

Sources told NBC News that White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, who has played a central role in reviewing pardons, became more outspoken about abuses last August after reports emerged that lobbyists and consultants were advertising themselves as offering access to Trump pardon authority for steep prices.

Those officials said Wiles pushed back hard against these efforts and tightened the process to distance it from those attempting to broker influences. While it’s legal to engage lobbyists on these issues, Wiles made it clear to those on the outside that she would not tolerate people trying to profit from the pardon process.

Reports in August by Bloomberg that two intermediaries seeking to cash in on pardons were floating a plan to another bitcoin exec to secure a presidential pardon for him in exchange for $30 million. The report set off alarms inside the White House, the two White House officials and two others familiar with the discussions told NBC News.

Some lobbyists had received proposals as high as $5 million to put clemency cases in front of Trump. Recently, an associate of former Sen. Bob Menendez, who is accused of bribing the senator with gold bars, paid $1 million to a Washington lobbyist with ties to Trump to help secure clemency.

Not that it matters that much. Trump last week pardoned Santos as a political favor to the outspoken Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), who has recently turned critical of the President. The late-week pardon to Zhao acknowledged a man whose company, Binance, has also been a key supporter of the Trump family’s World Liberty Financial crypto venture, making billions.

The President said the pardon was because each man had been persecuted for political reasons.

What is pretty clear is that the President has no incentive or interest in granting pardons or commutations unless a financial or political gain is to be made. Today’s Wall Street Journal reports that as soon as Trump was elected a year ago, Zhao’s representatives began discussions with Trump allies, offering a deal for the Trump family in exchange for a pardon. Binance agreed with the Trumps’ start-up cryptocurrency venture, World Liberty Financial, that Binance could leverage into clemency for Zhao, the Journal reported, citing sources close to the transaction.

“This spring,” the Journal reports, “Binance took steps that catapulted the Trump family venture’s new stablecoin product, enhancing its credibility and pushing its market capitalization up from $127 million to over $2.1 billion.” Following that,

Trump granted Zhao a presidential pardon last week, “likely paving the way for the world’s largest crypto-trading platform to return to the U.S., from where it was banned after the company pleaded guilty in 2023 to violating anti-money-laundering rules.

While avoiding possibly fallacious post hoc, ergo propter hoc reasoning, the arrangement does leave garden-variety prisoners wondering what – other than some soups and honeybuns from next week’s commissary day – they might have to trade the Trumps for clemency.

NBC, White House tightens the clemency process as Trump resumes pardons (October 24, 2025)

Wall Street Journal, Trump Pardons Convicted Binance Founder (October 23, 2025)

Wall Street Journal, Binance Boosted Trump Family’s Crypto Company Ahead of Pardon for Its Billionaire Founder (October 30, 2025)

~ Thomas L. Root

Jailer Trump Sends Former Death Row Prisones to Supermax – Update for October 17, 2025

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

PRESIDENT TRUMP MAKES BOP DESIGNATION DECISIONS

Among the last clemencies made by President Biden before leaving office were his commuting the sentences of 37 BOP death row inmates to life. Hours later, newly installed President Trump ordered that the life sentences of these men be made into what the Wall Street Journal called “a living hell.”

Based on the order Trump had Attorney General Pam Bondi issue, the BOP officials canceled plans to transfer most of the inmates to mainline prisons. Instead, Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove III executed Bondi’s order, directing that all but a few prisoners requiring medical facilities be designated to ADMAX Florence, which the Wall Street Journal called “the harshest institution in the federal system.”

The Journal said that Aaron Reitz, then an assistant attorney general, led a roundtable with the families and said he was disappointed that the cells “have windows to see daylight.” He suggested that prison food was too good for these men. “I’ve got no problem with gruel.” he said. “If made right, it’s a nutritious all-in-one meal.” Later in an interview, Reitz said, “If you’re not going to be killed lawfully at the hands of the state, well, your prison sentence is going to be hard as hell.” 

The Journal reported that “while the president’s authority to grant clemency for federal crimes is virtually unfettered, the power to impose vengeance via prison assignments isn’t clear.”

Attorney General Pam Bondi said Trump wanted to “ensure that they spend the remainder of their lives in conditions consistent with the egregious crimes they committed.” David Fathi, director of the National Prison Project at the ACLU, which represents 21 of the inmates, said that none of the prisoners qualified for ADX placement under the BOP’s Program Statement 5100.08, Inmate Security Designation and Custody Classification Manual. ‘None of our plaintiffs were designated for ADX,” he said. “Under Attorney General Bondi, all of our plaintiffs have been slated for ADX, not because of a security risk but to inflict maximum suffering.”

“People should be very concerned about the president and attorney general’s disregard for the law in this case,” Fathi said. “Today, it may be people who are very unpopular. Tomorrow, it could be anybody.”

Wall Street Journal, Biden Spared 37 Killers From Execution. Trump Ordered Up a Lifetime of Torment (October 11, 2025)

Bureau of Prisons Program Statement 5100.08 CN-2, Inmate Security Designation and Custody Classification Manual (March 5, 2025)

~ Thomas L. Root

Trump Seeks Crime Reform… And It’s Not First Step Act 2.0, Either – Update for September 4, 2025

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

GOOD NEWS AND BAD NEWS
McTrump the Crime Dog

President Trump said last Wednesday that Republican leaders in Congress were working with him on a “comprehensive crime bill” in what the New York Times called “his latest effort to push the issue of crime to the foreground of American politics.”

“It’s what our Country needs, and NOW!” Trump said on his Truth Social platform. “More to follow.” He said both House and Senate Republican leadership were working on the bill, but he offered no details.

A new crime bill would normally be a welcome opportunity to amend the First Step Act, especially to address the Federal Time Credit program. However, the bad news is that Trump does not appear to have a crime bill of that kind in mind.

Targeting what he calls “out of control” crime was central to Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, although US crime is near its lowest level in decades. He has raised the issue in the last two months, with the deployment of National Guard in Washington DC to allegedly control crime there.

Politico reported last week that Trump’s latest comments have puzzled Republicans on Capitol Hill, who don’t know what “comprehensive” measure the president is talking about. Trump discussed extending his control over the DC police with House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) last Tuesday. The House Oversight Committee, which has jurisdiction over DC issues, plans to advance some bills this month to crack down on juvenile crime, reform the education system, and unwind certain policing policies. However, Politico notes, “it’s the Judiciary Committee that would have to advance any crime-related bills that are national in scope.”

Trump ramrodded First Step through Congress in 2018. But running in 2024, Trump distanced himself from his own achievement, barely mentioning FSA on the campaign trail. In 2023, Florida’s governor and a rival presidential candidate, Ron DeSantis, attacked FSA as a “jailbreak bill” and pledged to repeal it.

And while Trump did appoint Alice Marie Johnson, a woman he pardoned in 2020, as pardon czar soon after returning to the White House, “he doesn’t appear eager,” the New York Times said last week, “to remind voters of his criminal justice reform measures… Instead, Trump is pushing for tougher sentencing, including against minors.”

“They’re children, but they’re criminals,” Trump said at last Tuesday’s marathon Cabinet meeting as he turned to his attorney general, Pam Bondi. “We are getting that changed, Pam, I hope, because you have 14-year-old kids that are evil, they’re sick, and they have to be put away.”

At the same meeting, Trump said he wants to see the death penalty imposed on every person convicted of murder in DC. “If somebody kills somebody in the capital, Washington, D.C., we’re going to be seeking the death penalty,” Trump said. “And that’s a very strong preventative.”

Trump appointed Fox News commentator Jeanine Pirro as US Attorney for the District of Columbia after even Republicans refused to confirm firebrand Ed Martin for the post. Pirro has talked a tough game in support of Trump’s theme that DC crime is out of control, demanding that her prosecutors bring the harshest charges allowable, even for minor infractions. Now, Salon reported this past weekend, “her aggressive posture is colliding with real-world constraints, exposing both her limitations and the fragility of politicized law enforcement.”

Pirro recently revealed that she is getting help from military lawyers, because her office is short 90 prosecutors and 60 investigators and paralegals. DC federal courts, which normally process about six new criminal cases per week, now face six or more cases per day, many stemming from low-level offenses that would’ve been diverted or even dismissed previously.

The increase in workload may be unique to DC, but the staffing is not. According to reports I have received, seasoned AUSAs and support staff have been resigning from US Attorneys’ offices around the country. One federal defense attorney told me last week that the quality of work and responsiveness of AUSAs in his district, the Southern District of Ohio, has fallen dramatically since January. “It’s hard to get a call back,” he said.

Salon said last week, “It’s clear that Pirro’s [charging] directives are unsustainable.” With so many people around the country heading for the exits, US attorneys’ offices may be unable to execute on a harsh new crime bill, even if one passes. That does little to address the bad news that an opportunity to reduce recidivism even more by tweaking FSA – and helping prisoners in the process – may be lost in the tough-on-nonexistent–crime posturing.

Writing in Sentencing Law and Policy last week, Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman observed that “[a] decade into the Trump era, I have learned not to take too literally or too seriously what Donald Trump says on social media.  But given that Prez Trump and his GOP allies are viewing crime fighting and crime policy as a winning political issue (and also that Democrats are struggling with a response… new political talk of a new “Comprehensive Crime Bill” makes lots of sense… But, of course, the devil is in the details when it comes to enacting big new federal legislation and in navigating the modern politics and policy-making of crime and punishment.  The First Step Act was truly the culmination of decades of federal criminal justice reform debates, and it is unclear what sets of criminal justice proposals will get enough support in Congress to get to the desk of the President. (I assume a crime bill would not find a way to be immune from the Senate filibuster, so at least 60 Senate [votes] would seem to be a necessity for any bill.)”

New York Times, Trump Says Republicans Are Working on a ‘Comprehensive’ Crime Bill (August 27, 2025)

Politico, Republicans scratch their heads over Trump’s ‘comprehensive’ crime bill (August 27, 2025)

New York Times, In Trump’s 2nd Term, More Incarcerations, Less Talk of Reform (August 27, 2025)

Washington Post, Trump wants expanded death penalty, longer control over police in D.C. (August 26, 2025)

Salon, Fox News star’s jump to the Trump administration is backfiring (August 31, 2025)

Sentencing Law and Policy, Is it too early to speculate about what could be in a new “Comprehensive Crime Bill”? (August 27, 2025)

~ Thomas L. Root

Pardon Industry Grinds On Although Trump’s Not Signing – Update for August 27, 2025

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

PARDON OUR MESS

Senior Dept of Justice officials were left scrambling to interpret sweeping clemency orders that former President Joe Biden approved for thousands of federal prisoners in his final days in office, and they criticized the White House for falsely portraying the releases as limited to “nonviolent” offenders, according to internal emails revealed last week.

The records show that former Associate Deputy Attorney General Bradley Weinsheimer raised alarms immediately after Biden issued three autopen-signed warrants on Jan. 17, covering nearly 2,500 federal prisoners.

In a January 18th message to the White House and the DOJ Pardon Attorney, Weinsheimer wrote that one warrant granting clemency for “offenses described to the Dept of Justice” was so vague it could not be lawfully carried out.

Weinsheimer suggested that Biden provide “a list as to each inmate listing the offenses that are covered by the commutation.” He said Biden needed to clarify the “meaning of the warrant language” so the DOJ could implement it “in the manner intended by the President.”

Weinsheimer also pushed back against White House statements that the clemency recipients were only “non-violent drug offenders,” according to the emails. “In communication about the commutations, the White House has described those who received commutations as people convicted of non-violent drug offenses,” Weinsheimer wrote. “I think you should stop saying that because it is untrue or at least misleading.”

The clemency list included a prisoner who had killed a mother and her 2-year-old child to protect his drug business, another whose enforcer tortured an informant with a butane torch, and a Gangster Disciples member implicated in multiple murders and kidnappings.

Despite Weinsheimer’s warning, the White House promoted the mass commutations as relief for “non-violent drug offenses” and as the largest clemency action ever.

Biden later said he approved broad categories of inmates, leaving details on how to apply those standards to staff. The revelations come amid multiple probes by the Trump administration into Biden’s use of his autopen – a machine that automatically signs the President’s name to documents – for key decisions.

Meanwhile, President Trump – who at the start of his second term was as busy as Biden ever was with a clemency pen– has not granted a pardon or commutation in almost three months.

Trump granted multiple pardons every month from January through May (and, of course, did a massive clemency grant on Inauguration Day for the January 6th rioters). You may remember that at the time, Trump’s pardon of 1,500 J6ers was described in news accounts as a “last-minute, rip-the-bandage-off decision.”  In fact, one White House advisor said that as Trump’s team wrestled with the issue, “Trump just said: ‘F -k it: Release ’em all.'”

However, despite rumors to the contrary, Trump has gone “full stop” on commutations and pardons since the end of last May.

At the time, media reports said that more clemency grants were expected “in the coming days.” So what happened?

Writing in Sentencing Law and Policy last week, Ohio State law professor Doug Berman wondered whether some of the pundit criticism around the last group of grants may have had some impact on how Trump is thinking about clemency action.

No one can be sure, but the pardon industry continues apace, with reports still being published about some people spending millions to buy access to the President for clemency. Last week, I had two prisoners separately say that the rumor mill reports a big commutation/pardon push in a month. I consider that to be myth. With a major push against supposed gangs rampaging in Washington, DC, Trump is not likely to think this is a good time to let some people out of prison.

Bloomberg Law, How a $30 Million Pardon Scheme Failed Before It Got to Trump (August 18, 2025)

New York Times, Flattery, Lobbyists and a Business Deal: Crypto’s Richest Man Campaigns for a Pardon (August 9, 2025)

Washington Examiner, Biden ignored DOJ warnings over legally flawed autopen pardons (August 19, 2025)

Axios, “F–k it: Release ’em all”: Why Trump embraced broad Jan. 6 pardons (January 22, 2025)

New York Post, Biden DOJ ripped White House over clemency grant to ‘non-violent offenders’: ‘Stop saying that because it is untrue’ (August 19, 2025)

~ Thomas L. Root

The Wild, Wild West Wing – Update for June 3, 2025

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

TRUMP MANAGES TO MAKE CLEMENCY EVEN CRAZIER

wildwildwestwing250603The rolling waves of pardons and commutations emanating from the White House seem like good news to federal prisoners, who are filing clemency petitions to get in on the frenzy. Think Robinhood investors piling into a meme stock…

Over the past several weeks, President Donald Trump has issued a wave of pardons and sentence reductions to dozens of people. That’s good news. The bad news is that the recipients of Trump’s largesse are largely political allies, campaign donors, law enforcement officials, and Republican politicians.

I won’t try to recount them all, people from crooked cops to digital dope peddlers to gang bangers to celebrity fraudsters. Even George Floyd murderer Derek Chauvin and accused sex monster and rapper Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs are being talked about as candidates for Trumpian clemency largesse. Instead, I’ll look at the lessons to be derived from the freedom frenzy:

The three sure-fire ways to get clemency from this Administration are (1) to be a rabid Trump supporter, (2) to have millions to spend, or (3) to know someone who knows someone who knows someone in Trump’s inner circle.

clemencypitch180716For more than a century, career civil servants led the Dept of Justice Office of Pardon Attorney, evaluating clemency petitions based on legal and humanitarian criteria that were criticized for the glacial review pace, too much DOJ input, and opaque and sometimes inconsistent decisions. But now, newly appointed Pardon Attorney Ed Martin, a vigorous MAGA partisan, “has begun turning the office into a new pipeline for political allies to get their cases in front of Trump,” the Wall Street Journal reported last week.

Martin unabashedly described his pardon approach last week on X: “No MAGA left behind.”

Martin said he is working closely with Alice Johnson, the White House pardon czar whom Trump pardoned of drug offenses during his first term. That’s good news. The bad news is Martin’s approach: “The message should be clear that we’re sticking by people that do good things and the right things.”

MAGAhat250603Martin’s first pardon recommendation, adopted by Trump last week, was Scott Jenkins, the former sheriff of Culpeper County, Virginia. Jenkins was to report to prison last week after being convicted of selling no-show auxiliary sheriff’s deputy positions for over $75,000 in bribes. The evidence included videos of the sheriff accepting bags of cash and testimony of some of the people who bought the badges. He was sentenced to 120 months.

But as the Bulwark explained last week, “Jenkins was a rabidly anti-immigrant, pro-Trump sheriff who’d become a minor celebrity in MAGA world. Trump himself may not have known of him, but Ed Martin did… Martin celebrated his achievement just after the pardon: ‘Thank you, President Trump! I am thrilled that Sheriff Jenkins is the first pardon since I became your Pardon Attorney.’”

For those not connected to MAGA, seeking clemency “has become big business for lobbying and consulting firms close to the administration, with wealthy hopefuls willing to spend millions of dollars for help getting their case in front of the right people,” a lobbyist told NBC News. “From a lobbying perspective, pardons have gotten profitable.”

pardonsale210118Two people directly familiar with proposals to lobbying firms said they knew of a client who’d offered $5 million to help get a case to Trump. “Cozying up to a president’s allies or hiring lobbyists to gain access to clemency isn’t new,” NBC said. “But along with the price spike, what’s different now is that Trump is issuing pardons on a rolling basis — rather than most coming at the end of the administration.”

“It’s like the Wild West,” a Trump ally and lobbyist said. “You can basically charge whatever you want.”

But what about Alice Johnson, appointed as Pardon Czar to bring worthy clemency candidates to President Trump? Is that working?

Alice apparently was instrumental in bringing reality TV stars and celebrity whiners Todd and Julie Chrisley to Trump for full pardons of their bank and tax fraud convictions. Todd stayed in the headlines for the 24 months he served of his 12-year sentence by claiming, among other things, that FPC Pensacola was “literally” starving inmates to death, that the prisoners were forced to live in filth and eat contaminated food, and that he “feared for his life.”

“I know not only their stories, but I make sure that I’m selecting people who have either been rehabilitated, who pose no safety risk, and also we look at cases where there has been obvious weaponization against these individuals,” Alice Johnson told NewsNation Now. She was quoted in Eonline as saying “The celebrity part really didn’t play a role in this… These are everyday Americans who deserve a second chance,” she continued. “I’ve really been looking at those who pose no safety risk, don’t have victims of violent crimes. These people need to be returned to their families. They really get a chance to have a second shot at life.”

money170419A month ago, Trump pardoned Paul Walczak, a former nursing home executive sentenced to 18 months in prison and ordered to pay more than $4 million in restitution for tax crimes. The pardon came after Walczak’s mom, a GOP donor, Walczak’s pardon has received attended a $1-million-per-person fundraising dinner at Mar-a-Lago, the New York Times reported.

Even some of the people who are not rich or famous are lucky enough to get in on the act. An “everyday American” prisoner who was not a Chrisley but received clemency last week was serving a 50-year sentence for healthcare fraud. One of his co-defendants, however, had been Alice Johnson’s cellie at FCI Aliceville. Alice got her sprung in 2020. Five years later, the co-defendant lobbied Alice to get him out, too.

I helped him with his clemency petition a few years ago, a 100-page tome. No doubt he deserved clemency but no more or less than countless others whose conspiracies did not include someone who became Alice’s cellmate.

clemencytornado250603Ultimately, it’s depressing. Clemency has always been like a tornado tearing through a neighborhood, taking some lucky inmates seemingly at random while leaving others in their bunks to serve out their time. Now, there isn’t even a randomness factor anymore, a sense among prisoners that maybe, despite the ordinariness of their offense or their families’ quotidian circumstances, they may be the beneficiaries of a Presidential act of grace.

Now, it’s all about loyalty, wealth, connections.

We’re in a different clemency world than ever before, but the average federal inmate is further from fair consideration than ever.

CNN, ‘No MAGA left behind’: Trump’s pardons get even more political (May 28, 2025)

NBC, Trump pardons drive a big, burgeoning business for lobbyists (May 31, 2025)

Washington Post, Trump’s clemency spree extends to ex-gangster, rapper, former congressmen (May 29, 2025)

The Bulwark, Trump’s Dangerous Pardon Power (May 27, 2025)

Pensacola News Journal, Todd Chrisley served sentence at Pensacola Federal Prison Camp before pardon. What to know (May 28, 2025)

New York Times, Trump Pardoned Tax Cheat After Mother Attended $1 Million Dinner (May 27, 2025)

– Thomas L. Root

Getting Habeas Corpus ‘The Hell Out of Here’ – Update for May 13, 2025

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

HABEAS MABEAS?

The Trump Administration continues to underscore its dedication to constitutional rights.

canceldueprocess250513A week ago, President Trump was asked on NBC’s Meet the Press whether US citizens and noncitizens alike had 5th Amendment due process rights. “I don’t know,” the President replied. “I’m not, I’m not a lawyer. I don’t know.”

Trump said he has “brilliant lawyers… and they are going to obviously follow what the Supreme Court said.” He complained that he was trying to deport “some of the worst, most dangerous people on Earth… I was elected to get them the hell out of here, and the courts are holding me from doing it.”

In other words, what a President perceives to be his mandate trumps (no pun intended) constitutional protections.

Last Friday, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller said that the White House is “actively looking at” suspending habeas corpus as part of the administration’s immigration crackdown:

Well, the Constitution is clear — and that of course is the supreme law of the land — that the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus can be suspended in a time of invasion. So, it’s an option we’re actively looking at. Look, a lot of it depends on whether the courts do the right thing or not.

alicewords250513Habeas corpus dates predates medieval English common law. It requires law enforcement to justify detaining people and produce those people before a judge so their cases can be reviewed. Federally, the right is exercised through 28 USC §§ 2241 and 2255. The Constitution’s Suspension Clause allows habeas corpus to be suspended only “in cases of rebellion or invasion [when] the public Safety may require it.”

Of course, the White House is suggesting that habeas corpus would be suspended only for immigrants here illegally. The problem is this: ICE sweeps up someone it says is an illegal immigrant. That person has no right to challenge the accusation before being whisked out of the country. My barber, a guy whose family has been in this country for at least 150 years, told me the other day that he didn’t see why illegal immigrants should have any constitutional protections whatsoever. My question to him was, “So what if ICE bursts into your shop and grabs you, alleging that you’re an illegal immigrant. What do you do then, if you can’t petition the court for a hearing at which ICE has to prove you’re not dyed-in-the-wool-American born-in-the-USA Bob the Barber?”

He thought about that but concluded, “No, they’d never do that.”

Right.

A suspension of habeas corpus would mean the Trump administration could detain people believed to be noncitizens without letting them challenge that detention or to deport noncitizen prisoners without giving them access to §§ 2241 or 2255 proceedings or to immigration courts.

dueprocess250513Habeas corpus has been suspended only four times in American history, and each time Congress has authorized the suspension. (In the case of the Civil War, President Limcoln suspended habeas corpus first, but Congress caught up with the Habeas Corpus Suspension Act, 12 Stat. 755 (1863), that authorized Lincoln’s suspension after the fact).

The National Constitution Center has observed that the Constitution is vague when it comes to “who in the government can suspend the writ of habeas corpus, but it is commonly believed that only Congress can do so,” Forbes said last week. “That means it’s likely Trump would face legal challenges if he decided to suspend the writ of habeas corpus on his own without Congress… but it remains to be seen how the courts could rule.”

habeasinvasion250513New York Times writer Maggie Haberman told CNN that the habeas corpus suspension proposal is an attempt to put the federal courts on notice: “Some of this might just be fear. A, it’s a way to intimidate the courts, which we have seen Trump and Stephen Miller do, a lot of, they’ve been criticizing judges routinely and repeatedly… It also might be to scare migrants and to get migrants to leave.”

Boston Globe, Trump, in a new interview, says he doesn’t know if he backs due process rights (May 4, 2025)

The Hill, White House ‘actively looking’ at suspending habeas corpus in immigration crackdown (May 9, 2025)

National Constitution Center, The Suspension Clause (2025)

Forbes, Stephen Miller Suggests Trump Administration Could Suspend Habeas Corpus To Detain Immigrants—Here’s What That Means (May 9, 2025)

The Hill, Haberman: Threat to nix habeas corpus just a way to ‘intimidate courts,’ ‘scare migrants’ (May 10, 2025)

– Thomas L. Root