Tag Archives: death penalty

Death Takes a Christmas Holiday – Update for December 23, 2024

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

BIDEN CLEANS OUT DEATH ROW SO TRUMP CAN’T

death170602President Biden this morning commuted the death sentences of 92.5% of those on federal death row, converting the sentences of 37 men to life without parole less than a month before Donald J. Trump will return to the Oval Office with a promise to restart legally sanctioned killing.

Only three men, each a mass killer in crimes with special circumstances, will remain on federal death row. Robert D. Bowers, 52, murdered 12 Jewish worshippers at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh. White supremacist Dylann Roof, 30, murdered nine black worshippers at a Charleston, SC, church Charleston, S.C., in 2015; and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 31, is the survivor (for now) of the two brothers behind the Boston Marathon in 2013 that killed three and injured more than a dozen others. Tsarnaev’s attack was ultimately held to be terrorism-related.

Biden said in a statement, “Today, I am commuting the sentences of 37 of the 40 individuals on federal death row to life sentences without the possibility of parole. These commutations are consistent with the moratorium my Administration has imposed on federal executions, in cases other than terrorism and hate-motivated mass murder.

Biden promised during his 2020 presidential campaign to end the federal death penalty. Although legislation he backed failed to advance in Congress during his administration, Biden directed the Dept of Justice Department to issue a moratorium on federal executions, a stark contrast to Trump’s frenzy of 13 executions in a 6-month period in 2020-2021.

death200623The Bureau of Prisons had to transfer extra personnel from around the system to USP Terre Haute for the executions, a step that became a COVID superspreader event for the federal prison system as the personnel carried the virus back to their home institutions, where it galloped through staff and inmate ranks.

Biden was a longtime advocate for the death penalty, having claimed to have personally written in death as a maximum sentence for a variety of federal crimes in the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. Even during the moratorium of his current term, DOJ has sought the death penalty in a case where a 34-year-old Uzbekistan native ran down cyclists and joggers with a truck in New York and in the 2022 Buffalo Tops Family Market mass shooting in which an 18-year-old white supremacist murdered 10 black shoppers.

death200330A broad collection of groups and people opposing the death penalty — including civil rights groups, religious organizations, current and former law enforcement officials, ex-prison workers and murder victims’ relatives — had called on Biden to commute the federal death sentences. Nevertheless, the predictable outrage against the commutation began within hours of the announcement, with the New York Post already trumpeting that “Biden commutes death sentences of child killers and mass murderers 2 days before Christmas.”

Biden continues to promise that “[i]n the coming weeks, the President will take additional steps to provide meaningful second chances and continue to review additional pardons and commutations.”

New York Times, Biden Commutes 37 Death Sentences Ahead of Trump’s Plan to Resume Federal Executions (December 23, 2024)

Washington Post, Biden commutes most federal death sentences before Trump takes office (December 23, 2024)

White House, Statement of President Joe Biden (December 23, 2024)

– Thomas L. Root

Does Backlash on CARES Act Clemency Threatens Further Action? – Update for December 16, 2024

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

IS THE BIDEN COMMUTATION WAVE BREAKING ON POLITICAL SHOALS?

As I reported last Thursday, President Biden granted clemency to nearly 1,500 Americans on CARES Act home confinement, people who the White House says “were placed on home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic and who have successfully reintegrated into their families and communities.”

Biden has promised additional clemencies, and there is no shortage of candidates. But if he anticipated the congratulations of a grateful nation, hw ia probably disappointed.

clemencypitch180716In Pennsylvania, there’s a firestorm over one of those receiving commutation. Michael Conahan was convicted of funneling juvenile defendants to two private, for-profit detention centers in exchange for $2.1 million in kickbacks, a scandal known as “Kids-for-Cash.” That is, he took bribes to send kids to for-profit juvenile prisons with sentences disproportionate to their crimes He pleaded guilty to racketeering conspiracy and was sentenced in 2011 to 17½ years in prison. He was released to home confinement in Florida under the CARES Act in June 2020.

Sandy Fonzo, a mother who blames her son’s suicide on the emotional toll that being wrongly placed in detention exacted, said, “Conahan’s actions destroyed families, including mine, and my son’s death is a tragic reminder of the consequences of his abuse of power. This pardon feels like an injustice for all of us who still suffer.”

(Conahan was not pardoned. Rather, his sentence was commuted, but his conviction remains intact).

The Pennsylvania governor, Josh Shapiro, also condemned Biden’s decision, telling reporters that his fellow Democrat “got it absolutely wrong”, the Pennsylvania Capital-Star reported.

The Washington Post said:

For Biden, this is another unforced error. More broadly, it raises fresh questions about presidential clemency going too far and whether it should exist at all. There was outrage when former president Donald Trump pardoned allies such as Stephen K. Bannon, Paul Manafort and Charles Kushner, the father of his son-in-law. And there was outrage over Biden pardoning his son Hunter. It could all get even more outrageous if Biden grants preemptive pardons or Trump pardons the January 6 rioters.

Such dubious grants of presidential mercy reinforce a belief that America has a two-tiered justice system where the wealthy and connected fare much better than everyone else — and certainly better than the young people who came before Judges Conahan and Ciavarella in Luzerne County.

takethemoney191015Meanwhile, Biden has been blasted for commuting the sentence of an Illinois CARES Act confinee. A former city official in Illinois who orchestrated the largest municipal embezzlement in state history. Rita Crundwell—with four years to go on a 235-month sentence for fraud, is among the people granted clemency. Crundwell, who was taken out of Dixon, Illinois, city hall in handcuffs back in 2012, stole something like $53 million in city funds during her tenure as city comptroller.. She used the funds to pay for a lavish lifestyle that included raising champion quarter horses and buying a $2 million tour bus, jewels, furs, multiple homes and other trappings. All the while, the City of Dixon struggled to pay for infrastructure and other projects.

Meera Sachdeva, a former Mississippi oncologist, received clemency on her 20-year sentence handed down in 2012 for defrauding Medicare by providing diluted chemotherapy drugs and using old needles at her cancer clinic. Her clinic was said to be so unsanitary that multiple patients were admitted to local hospitals with infections after being treated there. One of Sachdeva’s patients claimed to have contracted HIV because of old needles.

The Washington Free Beacon said in a review of those who received clemency that “many of the recipients were serving sentences for serious crimes.”

Advocacy groups have been calling for a broad range of additional clemency grants, including for people on federal death row and with marijuana convictions. Biden has previously issued blanket pardons for those convicted of minor marijuana-related crimes, but those didn’t make any federal inmates eligible for release, because none of the recipients was in prison.

Rachel Barkow, a New York University law professor and expert on federal clemency, said during an Ohio State clemency conference that commuting the sentences of those on CARES Act home confinement is “low-hanging fruit” because they’re already out of prison.

Barkow expressed concern last Wednesday, the day before the clemency was announced, that CARES Act commutation would be the limit of Biden’s clemency actions. “I’m a little worried that he’s only going to do that and he’s going to try to make it out like that’s some big deal when that’s not a big deal at all. That’s not even the bare minimum,” she said. The hue and cry from both sides of the aisle—focusing on individual cases rather than the common-sense commutation of the entire cohort—could make Biden shy away from anything further.

clemency170206At the same time, the CARES Act clemency was unreasonably opaque, leaving out some people with perfect home confinement records and unremarkable crimes while including people whose offenses – like the kids-for-cash judge and the horse-breeding embezzler – whose commutations sparked predictable media anger. I am aware of at least three people – including a woman who was raped at FCI Dublin but is now on CARES Act home confinement – who were omitted from the list without explanation.

Nevertheless, Biden continues to come under intense pressure from a coalition of civil rights, criminal justice, and religious groups urging him to grant relief to several classes of federal offenders, including the 40 people on federal death row and nonviolent drug offenders.

Last week, faith leaders – including black pastors, Catholics, former corrections officials, civil rights advocates, and current and former prosecutors – called on Biden to commute all federal death row sentences before Trump, who supports capital punishment, takes office.

Others are calling for commutation of sentence for women who suffered sexual abuse at FCI Dublin. “We all just feel so passionately that if Biden can pardon his son, he can definitely grant clemency to survivors of this heinous abuse by federal government employees,” former Dublin prisoner Kendra Drysdale told The Guardian.

jan6riot241216Meanwhile, President-elect Trump told Time Magazine last week that he would offer clemency to most of the rioters who stormed the Capitol. “It’s going to start in the first hour,” he said. “Maybe the first nine minutes.” However, in a filing in a DC sentencing last week, the government warned that a “pardon would not unring the bell of conviction. In fact, quite the opposite. The defendant would first have to accept then pardon, which necessitates a confession of guilt.”

Harrisburg, WBRE-TV, ‘Kids for Cash’ victim reacts after Biden commutes sentence for Pennsylvania judge (December 13, 2024)

Sauk Local News Network, Biden commutes prison sentence of Rita Crundwell, former comptroller who embezzled $53M from city of Dixon (December 12, 2024)

Washington Free Beacon, Drug Lords, Ponzi Schemers, and Corrupt Officials: Meet Joe Biden’s Clemency Recipients (December 13, 2024)

Daily Beast, Mom’s Outrage Over Biden’s Presidential Clemency for Corrupt Kids-for-Cash Judge and Cohort (December 13, 2024)

Newsweek, She Stole Millions From Taxpayers to Buy Show Horses. Biden Set Her Free (December 13, 2024)

The Hill, Who are the people convicted in Capitol Riot Trump could pardon? (December 14, 2024)

Reason, Biden Issues More Pardons and Commutations Under Pressure From Criminal Justice Groups (December 12, 2024)

Newsweek, Could Joe Biden Pardon Everyone on Death Row? (December 10, 2024)

Guardian, US shuts down prisons amid scrutiny over sexual abuse and crisis of suicides (December 5, 2024)

– Thomas L. Root

Joe Biden Does a Father’s Duty… Now Who Might Be Next? – Update for December 2, 2024

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

BIDEN PARDONS HUNTER… WHO MIGHT BE NEXT?

President Joe Biden pardoned his son, Hunter, last night, saving him prison time for gun possession offenses and tax crimes.

pardonme190123I will not listen to criticism for his action, regardless of the fact that the President recklessly claimed last summer he would never do such a thing. What father would not spare his son’s conviction and prison if it was in his power to do so? Even if Joe’s rationale – that no one is ever prosecuted for the 18 USC § 922(g)(3) and 18 USC § 922(a)(6) offenses that Hunter faced, and for his son to be indicted was raw political theater – is bullshit on stilts.

And it is. Somehow Joe omitted mention of Hunter’s tax convictions, those being of a nature and severity that are brought every day. As for the gun offenses, look at United States v. Daniels at Note 6, where a concurring judge chronicles other cases in that Circuit alone where (g)(3) offenses were brought against people who blew a little dope but were not intoxicated when they bought their guns.

Yes, Hunter’s gun offense was pretty pedestrian (but the (g)(3) conviction was probably unconstitutional, as Daniels explains). Still, if I were elected president (an event unlikely to happen), I would pardon any of my kids or siblings or parents or cousins in a heartbeat. It’s family.

In a statement released Sunday, Biden said, “I believe in the justice system, but as I have wrestled with this, I also believe raw politics has infected this process and it led to a miscarriage of justice.”

No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter’s cases can reach any other conclusion than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son,” Biden said. “I hope Americans will understand why a father and a President would come to this decision.

On Twitter (now inexplicably called “X”) last night, New York University law professor and clemency expert Rachel Barkow said, “This pardon of Hunter Biden better be the first of a huge flurry of commutations. There are so many cases even more deserving than this one that the Pardon Attorney has recommended granting, and they’re just waiting for Biden’s signature.”

pardonturkey231121There were others just earlier last week. On Monday, Peaches and Blossom became the 7th and 8th turkeys to be pardoned by Joe Biden in his presidential career. Law professor and clemency expert Mark Osler has noted that presidents could apply lessons from the annual Thanksgiving week event to their clemency practices:

First, it occurs regularly. Turkeys are pardoned every year, not just in the waning days of an administration. Second, decisions are made by objective specialists with the current chairman of the National Turkey Federation… responsible for managing a thorough selection process… Third, there are defined criteria. The finalists are selected based on their willingness to be handled, their health and their natural good looks. Fourth, attention is paid to making sure they thrive after their grant of clemency. After the ceremony, they are sent to Virginia Tech’s “Gobbler’s Rest” exhibit, where they are well cared for… This contrasts sharply with the process of giving clemency to humans… [The] procedure through which clemency is granted is irregular, run largely by biased generalists, devoid of consistent, meaningful criteria, and it does little to ensure success of individuals after their release.

That does not lessen the optimism that in the next 49 days, Biden will hit a home run, pardoning or commuting sentences for everyone from Jack Smith and Merrick Garland to people on death row, CARES Act prisoners and those left behind by the First Step Act’s nonretroactivity.

Democrats and criminal justice reform advocates continue to pressure Biden to use his presidential authority to pardon those currently in federal prison fng from drugs to tax evasion—particularly those awaiting execution for more serious charges. Last week, 54 people who received clemency over the past five presidential administrations asked Biden to be “bold and compassionate during your remaining time in office and grant clemency to the deserving applicants referred to you by the Office of the Pardon Attorney.”

The clemency recipients wrote that they each had received long, unjust sentences before they finally regained their freedom.

death200330Prior to last Monday’s turkey pardoning, the group Prison Policy Initiative blasted Biden for reneging on his campaign promise to end the federal death penalty. “More turkeys have been pardoned from dinner plates in the US than people have been granted clemency from death row,” PPI said in an Instagram post. “Biden’s days left in office are limited, but it’s not too late for him to spare everyone from federal death row (and cement his legacy for the better).”

The Quaker organization Friends Committee on National Legislation said last week that “since 1973 there have been 200 exonerations from death row and over 1,600 people killed, with 50 executions at the federal level.” The group is not asking Biden to pardon all 40 people awaiting capital punishment but instead to commute their sentences to life in prison.

Writing in The Hill last week, former Bureau of Prisons Director Hugh Hurwitz urged Biden to commute the sentences of people currently on CARES Act home confinement. “Now that President-elect Donald Trump is returning to the White House,” Hurwitz wrote, “those remaining in home confinement are again concerned that his administration will reverse course and send them back to prison. Only this time, they have been quietly living at home and working in our communities for almost five years. This uncertainty is creating a lot of anxiety among these people and their families… We do not know what a new Trump administration will do, but there is no reason for us to wait and see. Until Jan 20, Biden has the unique power to grant clemency. This group of people has proven to be trustworthy and safe in our society. If ever there was a case for clemency, this is it.”

compassion160124Whether any of these pressure tactics will be enough to motivate Biden to move on clemency is not clear. But with less than two months left in his presidency, the only real strategy clemency advocates have is to stress how history will view him if he does nothing at all. And that will be effective only to the extent that he cares at all about that.

Associated Press, Biden pardons his son Hunter despite previous pledges not to (December 1, 2024)

United States v. Daniels, 77 F.4th 337 (5th Cir. 2023)

White House, Statement from President Joe Biden (December 1, 2024)

TwitterX, @RachelBarkow (December 1, 2024)

CNN, The process to pardon turkeys is more rational than the one used for humans (November 19, 2018)

Natl Criminal Justice Assn, Hunter Biden Defense Hints That President Should Pardon Him (November 30, 2024)

Tag24, Biden Urged to Take “Last Opportunity” for Positive Legacy in Letter from Over 50 Clemency Recipients (November 26, 2024)

Politico. Biden pardoned turkeys. Will he pardon more people? (November 26, 2024)

Prison Policy Initiative, More turkeys have been pardoned from dinner plates in the US than people have been granted clemency from death row (November 26, 2024)

The Hill, Biden’s easy case for clemency: prisoners in home confinement (November 26, 2024)

NCJA.Org, Death Penalty Opponents Seeking Commutations From Biden (November 26, 2024)

Friends Committee on National Legislation, Recommendations for Executive Action for the Remainder of President Biden’s Term (November 26, 2024)

– Thomas L. Root

Risk of COVID Interrupts Death For A Bit – Update for January 14, 2021

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

HOW BAD IS COVID?

Despite the 11th-hour Supreme Court petitions, the celebrity protests, the scathing editorials, nothing has stopped the Trump Administration’s headlong rush to execute federal inmates. Thirteen have been executed this century, 10 of them in the last six months.

Then came COVID.

President-elect Joe Biden has promised to halt the lethal injections, but three more were scheduled to die this week until last Tuesday, when SD Indiana Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson ruled that the federal government’s poor management of the previous 10 executions “has created a substantial risk” that other inmates and staff may contract the virus.

The judge got promptly overruled by higher-ups, so the death march continued with killing Lisa Montgomery two days ago. The government plans on doing in two more inmates between today and next Wednesday at noon, when the new President stops it.

executionwoman21011For the BOP to be able to carry out the remaining executions, the judge ruled, it has to create a contact log that tracks staff who come into close contact with others during the execution process. For 14 days after the execution, execution staff have to take daily rapid COVID-19 tests, and anyone who produces a positive test must go through contact tracing. “The defendants have touted the availability of testing but have chosen not to utilize rapid testing of staff and visitors who enter prison grounds,” the judge wrote. “Most disconcerting, the defendants represented to the Court that contact tracing would occur after any BOP staff member involved in the executions tested positive. This has not been the case—and the Court finds the failure was not by accident but by design.”

COVID might have been stymied at stopping the intentional killing, but it remains adept at bringing death to inmates. The number of dead inmates hit 198 last Friday. Inmate COVID cases fell 25% between Dec 31 and last Wednesday, but then jumped back up to 6,227 as of Friday. They started falling again (as the BOP continues to declare anyone who tested positive 10 days ago to be cured), settling at 5,043 yesterday.

Ominously, BOP staff cases continue to climb. The number crossed  2,000 for the first time ever last week, and stood at 2,107 yesterday. If the staff keeps getting sick, more inmates invariably will contract it as well.

BOPCOVID210113

As of yesterday, FCI Ft Dix reported 461 cases, with Lexington (444 cases), Butner Medium II (208 cases) and nine other facilities with more than 100 cases each, with 19 more having 50 or more cases.

The BOP’s vaccine program is not going all that well. Government Executive reported last week that the Bureau “has received just 12,800 vaccine doses, but has already used 57% of those.” The BOP has distributed the vaccine to only 31 of its roughly 150 facilities. COs and health care workers are receiving the vaccine in the BOP’s first phase of distribution, although some inmates have gotten vaccines when stocks remained after all employees who elected to get vaccinated had been served. Only about “half of staff at each of the 31 facilities receiving vaccines have so far been vaccinated, according to Justin Long, a bureau spokesman. Inmates will begin receiving doses when more become available under a plan developed by the Trump administration’s Operation Warp Speed, Long said.”

Meanwhile, a national debate is brewing over whether inmates should be inoculated before the general population. Health officials say inoculating prison employees without giving the shot to prisoners won’t help stop the spread. “It doesn’t make sense to vaccinate workers but not vaccinate the people they are charged with protecting,” said Wanda Bertram, a spokeswoman for the Prison Policy Initiative, which is advocating that staff and inmates receive the vaccine.

nothing170125But a typical reaction came from Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, a Democrat, who said last month, “There’s no way it’s going to go to prisoners before it goes to people who haven’t committed any crime.”

Meanwhile, the Minnesota ACLU accused FCI Waseca staff of showing deliberate indifference to inmates during a massive COVID-19 outbreak in a hearing last Wednesday. The ACLU represents a plaintiff class of inmates seeking a temporary injunction to release many Waseca inmates to home confinement to curb the spread of the outbreak.

ACLU lawyer Clare Diegel called it a “drastic remedy” but necessary because of “terrifying” conditions at the prison. But Erin Secord, an AUSA representing the BOP, insisted the prison had taken numerous steps to protect inmates, the infections had been quelled and the court lacked jurisdiction to release prisoners. She said the suit should be dismissed.

control200511The president of a union representing employees at FCI Williamsburg in South Carolina last week blamed prison leadership for decisions that led to skyrocketing COVID-19 cases there. ”They made some changes on the process of what we were doing… that allowed COVID to actually walk into the institution,” American Federation of Government Employees’ Local 525 President Stephen Pinckney said. “From there, it spread like wildfire once it got in.”

Pinckney alleged that the process of screening people entering the complex to determine whether they had potential symptoms of COVID-19 symptoms was shifted from outside the facility to inside in early December. “I really would like to see our executive staff removed for one thing because they are more concerned right now on the financial side of the institution that they are about the health and wellbeing of staff there,” Pinckney said.

Indianapolis Star, Terre Haute executions paused by judge until COVID-19 measures are instituted (January 8, 2021)

Government Executive, Federal Agencies Have Distributed 200K Coronavirus Vaccine Doses So Far (January 4, 2021)

Wall Street Journal, As Covid-19 Surges in Jails, Guards Want Vaccine Early (January 4, 2021)

WCSC-TV, Charleston, South Carolina, Prison workers union calls for action on COVID-19 outbreak at FCI Williamsburg (January 8, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Turkey Gobbles Up Trump’s Last Pardon? – Update for November 25, 2020

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

TRUMP ISSUED NEW PARDON YESTERDAY… OF A TURKEY

Thanksgiving week is the traditional time for the President of the United States to “pardon” a turkey or two… and this week was no exception. Yesterday, President Trump – absent any appreciation for irony of having ordered five executions before he leaves office in two months – pardoned turkeys Corn and Cob. “We hope — and we know it’s going to happen — that Corn and Cob have a very long, happy and memorable life,” Trump said.

pardonturkey201125

Politico noted that “turkeys pardoned at the White House are bred for slaughter and are often too unhealthy to support long lifespans. Most die a few months after getting pardoned.” They will still outlive five federal inmates, including one woman, scheduled to be executed by lethal injection at the US Penitentiary in Terre Haute over the next 60 days. It is irregular for an administration to execute prisoners during its lame-duck period, rather than to let the incoming administration make its own decisions on the matter.

The Presidential pardon-fest every Thanksgiving Week has its owen rituals. “The turkeys will be given silly names (past recipients have included birds named Mac and Cheese), some children and White House staffers will look on, and there will be forced jokes and stiff laughter,” law professor and pardon expert Mark Osler complained last year.

We still get requests from people on where to find clemency applications and questions about how to write them. To be blunt, pardon and commutation petitions make sense only if an inmate has exhausted all other avenues for relief and has plenty of extra postage to waste.

That sentiment is shared by Osler and New York University law professor Rachel Barkow, a former Sentencing Commission member. Last week, they wrote about how, for all of the talk Trump’s 44 commutations issued in the past four years have caused, he “has exercised this presidential power rarely.” All but five of his grants were to people connected to him politically or championed by celebrities. Indeed, Trump’s early grant of a pardon to Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio energized Trump’s political opponents in Arizona and may have cost him enough voters to lose the state.

presidential_pardon_thanksgiving_tile_coasterTrump used a Super Bowl ad to highlight his grant of clemency to Alice Marie Johnson, whose case was pushed on him by Kim Kardashian. Earlier this year, he fully pardoned her — and she was a featured speaker at the Republican National Convention. Barkow and Osler wrote, “Treating clemency as made-for-TV fodder, and plucking out a few cases that the campaign hoped had compelling narratives, is disappointing. More than 13,000 petitions are moldering in the bureaucratic maze of the clemency process, even as covid-19 ravages U.S. prison populations.”

The authors worry that “people will focus on Trump’s inappropriate grants and conclude that the clemency power needs to be limited — instead of focusing on the many people still waiting for a decision. This raises two issues: Any legislation to limit the clemency power is likely to be found unconstitutional. This approach also gets the problem backward: Clemency must be expanded, not limited, because there are so many people serving disproportionately long federal sentences who have no hope for relief other than presidential clemency.”

clemency170206Biden’s major competitors in the primaries all endorsed the idea of taking clemency out of the hopelessly conflicted Justice Department and establishing a bipartisan board. That proposal was included in the Democratic Party platform. It must be implemented — and soon. The overstuffed clemency pipeline is about to burst.”

Last week, the Prison Policy Initiative urged President-elect Biden to “use the president’s clemency power to release people convicted of nonviolent drug crimes. A President Biden,” the Initiative wrote, “willing to use clemency in a broad, sweeping manner could significantly reduce the federal prison population — without needing to consult Congress. But if President-elect Biden spends too much time reviewing clemency applications to avoid all possible risk, it’s unlikely that he will make a big impact.”

Politico, Trump pardons Corn the turkey as a finishing White House act (November 25)

Washington Post, Trump abused the clemency power. Will Biden reform it? (November 16)

Prison Policy Initiative, The promise — and peril — of Biden’s criminal justice reform platform (November 13)

– Thomas L. Root

Death, SWAT and Smokes: A Quick Trip Around the BOP – Update for June 23, 2020

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

NEWS FROM AROUND THE BOP

Deadly Business: The Dept. of Justice last week set new dates to begin executing federal death-row inmates following a months-long legal battle over the plan to resume executions, which have been on hold since 2003 .

death200623Attorney General William Barr directed the BOP to schedule the executions, beginning in mid-July at USP Terre Haute, of four inmates convicted of killing children. Three of the men had been scheduled to die last year, when Barr ended an informal moratorium on capital punishment.

Congress Queries BOP: House of Representatives Homeland Security Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Mississippi) last week asked the BOP for details about whether agency officers who helped police the Washington, DC, protest have been quarantined or tested for COVID-19 before returning to work.

Thompson, who joined with Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Illinois), Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Maryland) and Sen. Cory Booker (D-New Jersey), noted that some BOP officials deployed to the protest — part of a display of force demanded by President Trump — came from FCI Petersburg, in Hopewell, Virginia (site of a significant coronavirus outbreak), yet were seen without wearing masks.

IG Out of SORTS with BOP: The DOJ Inspector General last week issued a report last week recommending that BOP Special Operations Response Teams (SORT) be suspended until comprehensive guidelines are developed.

cops200623BOP institutions maintain their own SORTs. A typical Special Operations and Response Teams has 15 members, including an emergency medical treatment specialist, a firearms instructor, a rappel master, a security/locking systems expert, a blueprint expert, and several firearms and tactical planning/procedures experts. As of 2013, the Bureau maintained 44 SORTs involving more than 700 BOP staff. 

The DOJ Inspector General wrote, “SORT members deployed a distraction device munition in a confined space, which was not authorized for use under BOP policy; SORT members deployed real OC spray rather than inert OC spray during a training exercise, allegedly without proper authorization; and SORT members used force, including firing a simunition round, against staff members who were allegedly yelling to the SORT that they were ‘out of role’ and physically vulnerable… BOP policies we reviewed did not clearly specify the types of weapons, less than lethal weapons, and munitions, if any, that are authorized for use during BOP training exercises; and did not provide safeguards to ensure that exercises are conducted safely.”

cigarette200623BOP CO Gets Charged: The US Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania announced on June 10 that a former correctional officer at FCI Schuylkill was charged on June 9 with bribery and corruption. The criminal information filed by the USAO alleged that between 2011 and 2016, the CO had smuggled tobacco into FCI Schuylkill in exchange for payments by prisoners.

AP, New dates set to begin federal executions (June 15, 2020)

Politico, Dems ask Bureau of Prisons for coronavirus update on staffers who manned protests (June 15, 2020)

DOJ Inspector General, Management Advisory Memorandum of Concerns Identified During Mock Exercises by Federal Bureau of Prisons Special Operation Response Teams (June 18, 2020)

Special Ops Magazine, Special Operations and Response Teams (SORT) (Jan. 2013)

DOJ, Former FCI Schuylkill Correctional Officer Charged In Bribe Scheme to Provide Tobacco to Inmates (June 10, 2020)

– Thomas L. Root

Unjust Sentence is an “Extraordinary and Compelling” Reason for Sentence Reduction, District Court Says – Update for November 18, 2019

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

DISTRICT COURT GRANTS SENTENCE REDUCTION BECAUSE OF “INJUSTICE” OF ORIGINAL SENTENCE

Since the First Step Act passed 11 months ago, a number of observers (me included) have predicted that changes in the 18 USC § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) sentence reduction procedures that let a defendant petition the district court directly if the Bureau of Prisons failed to do so could be the most consequential provision in the new law.

Sentencestack170404Last week, a district court in Nebraska granted a sentence reduction filed by a defendant whose whopping 895-month sentence for drug trafficking and three stacked 18 USC § 924(c) counts. As you recall,  § 924(c) conviction adds a consecutive sentence of at least five years for using or carrying a gun during a drug or violent crime, increasing to a minimum 25 years for a subsequent offense. Due to poor draftsmanship, the statute has been applied so that if a defendant sold pot while carrying a gun on Monday, did it again on Tuesday and again on Wednesday, and then was caught, he or she would face maybe 41 months or so for the pot sales, but a mandatory additional time of five year, 25 years and 25 years, for a whopping 58 years plus in prison. The First Step Act clarified the statute, so that the 25 year subsequent 924(c) offense had to be committed after conviction for a prior offense.

However, to appease the Sen. Tom Cottons (R-Arkansas) of the world, the First Step change was not retroactive. That left a lot of people stranded with unconscionable sentences. People like Jerry Urkevich.

The government opposed Jerry’s sentence reduction motion, arguing that just because he could not have gotten more than 368 months after First Step passed does not make his sentence reduction motion argument “extraordinary and compelling” (as required by the statute). Furthermore, the government argued, even if the defendant’s sentence were cut, he would still have about half of it to serve, making his motion “premature.”

extraordinary191118The court rejected the government’s arguments, noting that the list of “extraordinary and compelling reasons” in Guideline 1B1.13 Note 1 that justify a sentence reduction is not exclusive. Instead, there is a catch-all provision providing that there can be an “extraordinary and compelling reason” other than medical, age or family. That, the judge said, allows a court to consider § 3553(a) factors, as well as criteria in the Sentencing Commission’s policy statement.

Although the Sentencing Commission has not amended 1B1.13 since First Step passed, the court said it “infers that the Commission would apply the same criteria, including the catch-all provision… and that this Court may use Application Note 1(D) as a basis for finding extraordinary and compelling reasons to reduce a sentence.” Here, the court said, a reduction in sentence was warranted by “the injustice of facing a term of incarceration forty years longer than Congress now deems warranted for the crimes committed.”

The court also rejected the government’s strange and unsupported argument that a sentence reduction cannot be granted unless it results in immediate release. “If this Court reduces the defendant’s sentences on [two 924(c) counts] to 60 months each, consecutive,” the judge wrote, “he will not be eligible for immediate release. His sentence would total 368 months, and he would have served somewhat more than half that sentence. Nonetheless, the Court does not consider the Motion premature. A reduction in the sentence at this juncture will help the defendant and the Bureau of Prisons plan for his ultimate release from custody and may assist him in his pending efforts to seek clemency from the Executive Branch.”

In his Sentencing Law and Policy blog, Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman wrote, “I have made much of a key provision of the First Step Act which now allows federal courts to directly reduce sentences under the (so-called compassionate release) statutory provisions of 18 USC § 3582(c)(1)(A) without awaiting a motion by the Bureau of Prisons. I see this provision as such a big deal because I think, if applied appropriately and robustly, this provision could and should enable many hundreds, and perhaps many thousands, of federal prisoners to have excessive prison sentences reduced.)”

While not precisely a matter of § 3582(c) sentence reduction, the Washington Post reported last week that hundreds of relatives of murder victims, current and former law enforcement officials and former judges have signed letters urging the Trump administration to call off plans to resume federal executions next month.

death170602The letters, signed by current and former officials across the justice system as well as 175 relatives of murder victims, plead with President Trump and Attorney General William P. Barr to stop the executions, which Barr announced last summer that the Trump administration would resume on Dec. 9. The Justice Dept. said five executions were scheduled in the next two months and that more would follow.

Victims’ relatives — the largest single group to sign the letters — denounced the death penalty process as wasteful and something that only extends their grieving. “We want a justice system that holds people who commit violence accountable, reduces crime, provides healing, and is responsive to the needs of survivors,” they write. “On all these measures, the death penalty fails.”

United States v. Urkevich, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197408 (D.Neb. Nov. 14, 2019)

Sentencing Law and Policy, Another District Court finds statutory sentence reform among “extraordinary and compelling reasons” for reducing sentence by 40 years under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) (Nov. 16)

Washington Post, Hundreds of victims’ relatives, ex-officials ask Trump administration to halt federal executions (Nov. 12)

– Thomas L. Root