Tag Archives: clemency

Rethinking Clemency with First Step – Update for September 4, 2019

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

MORE CALLS TO USE THE FIRST STEP ACT TO END-RUN CLEMENCY

hamilton190904Over 11,400 commutation petitions languish at the Justice Dept.’s Office of the Pardon Attorney, record numbers for a clemency system that America’s founding fathers designed to be, in the words of Alexander Hamilton, “as little as possible fettered or embarrassed.”

An article published last week by Law 360 detailed the precipitous decline in use of federal clemency over the past 150 years, and suggested enhanced use of the sentence-reduction procedure changes in the First Step Act.

DOJ involvement in clemency began during the Civil War, because President Lincoln was overwhelmed by personal visits from “crying mothers and wives of disgraced soldiers” pleading for pardons. By 1898, all clemency petitions were routed through DOJ before maybe getting to the White House. Still, until about 50 years ago, presidents generally granted 13% to 40% of petitions.

Since then, the numbers have fallen to the single digits until President Obama. His 2014 clemency initiative was a public relations victory but a bureaucratic disaster, generating more commutation petitions in a year than OPA had received in the previous 24 years combined.

Despite granting over 1,700 commutations, Obama hardly made a dent in the overall prison population, “There could have easily been 20,000 commutations,” former OPA attorney Sam Morison argued. “That would have been about 10% of the prison population. That would have been historic.” But as it is, Obama left office with over 11,350 commutation petitions still pending.

kardashian190904Morison argues that the clemency power “will never function correctly until that Office of the Pardon Attorney is out of the Department of Justice.” While President Trump’s administration has been studying that idea, nothing has come of the White House roundtable group that has been meeting on the proposal for more than a year. Georgetown University law professor Shon Hopwood, noting Trump’s widely publicized pardons and commutations, said many petitioners will inevitably try “going around the system,” but “it shouldn’t require Kim Kardashian’s assistance to get clemency.”

Hopwood instead has been citing the First Step Act’s expansion of compassionate release as a more accessible option. I have been writing about this sleeper of a sentence-reduction provision for six months (see “Will First Step Let the Holloway Black Swan Swim Again?” Update for March 26, 2019). Such releases are traditionally available only to the elderly and terminally ill, but the statute – 18 USC 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) – says nothing about illness as such. Instead, it simply permits sentence reduction based on “an extraordinary and compelling reason.”

Under the First Step Act, a defendant no longer needs approval of the Bureau of Prisons to file a motion for resentencing with his or her sentencing court.

In a forthcoming law review article, Hopwood writes that judges can consider any “extraordinary” reasons for compassionate release without having to wait for BOP approval. Former US Pardon Attorney Margaret Love calls the concept a “hidden, magical trapdoor in the First Step Act that has yet to come to everyone’s attention. This has obviated the need for the clemency process to take care of the great majority of commutation cases.”

clemencybacklog190904

Hopwood acknowledges that prosecutors are likely to oppose these motions, but said they could provide a safety valve in which the judiciary simultaneously helps alleviate mass incarceration and the OPA’s commutation workload. And, unsurprisingly, DOJ has argued against Hopwood’s interpretation. In a filing last January, the government said the compassionate release statute “is simply not an avenue by which defendant can secure relief from his sentence based on his post-conviction reform… The relief defendant seeks is instead properly addressed in a petition to the executive branch for clemency.”

Lots of luck with that, the authors write. “The odds of getting presidential relief are approaching zero. The office that granted 41% of all pending and newly filed clemency petitions in 1920 is on track to grant less than 0.1% under Trump…”

Law360.com, How Courts Could Ease The White House’s Clemency Backlog (Aug. 25)

Sentencing Law and Policy, Exploring how compassionate release after FIRST STEP might indirectly help with persistent federal clemency problems (Aug. 26)
– Thomas L. Root

Petition Your Way to Clemency – Update for August 30, 2019

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

ANOTHER ROUTE TO CLEMENCY (BUT NOT AN EASY ONE)

ulbricht190830Ross Ulbricht (known as “Dread Pirate Roberts” to his friends, or sometimes just “DPR” for short) is serving a life term at the sunny U.S. Penitentiary in Tucson for having set up an Internet dark-web marketplace called “Silk Road,” where drugs, guns and criminal acts were bought and sold for bitcoins. As of this week, his change.org petition seeking support for a request for a Presidential pardon has generated an unprecedented 200,000 online signatures.

The petition, which asks President Trump to grant Ross’s application for pardon, is sponsored by the inmate’s mother and sister. His mother told Bitcoinist.com, that her son “is a good person, an idealist, and a libertarian.” She said, “I didn’t think of him as someone who was interested in technology pers se, but he was interested in Bitcoin because he was a freedom guy. He worked on the Ron Paul [Presidential] campaign. He was very interested in Bitcoin as a means to monetary freedom for people.”

Whether 201,403 signatures (the count as of 8 am EDT today), including those of some from politicians and movie celebs, is enough to motivate President Trump to release DPR, a man convicted of drug trafficking on a massive scale, is impossible to predict.

dreadedpirate190830The change.org page, written by Ross’s mother, says, “My son, Ross Ulbricht, is a first-time offender serving a double life sentence without parole, plus 40 years, for a website he made when he was 26 years old and passionate about free markets and privacy. Ross―an Eagle Scout, scientist and peaceful entrepreneur―had all non-violent charges at trial. He was never prosecuted for causing harm or bodily injury and no victim was named at trial.”

Far be it from me to interfere with a mother’s loving narrative, but the facts in the Dread Pirate’s case were a bit uglier than that. The 2nd Circuit said in its decision denying Ross’s appeal:

[T]he facts of this case involve much more than simply facilitating the sale of narcotics. The district court found by a preponderance of the evidence that Ulbricht commissioned at least five murders in the course of protecting Silk Road’s anonymity, a finding that Ulbricht does not challenge in this appeal. Ulbricht discussed those anticipated murders callously and casually in his journal and in his communications with the purported assassin Redandwhite. For example, in connection with the first hit, he wrote to Redandwhite that “FriendlyChemist is a liability and I wouldn’t mind if he was executed.” In the course of negotiating the price for the killing, DPR claimed that “[n]ot long ago, I had a clean hit done for $80k,” but that he had “only ever commissioned the one other hit, so I’m still learning this market.” He then paid $150,000 in Bitcoins for the murder, and he received what purported to be photographic documentation if its completion. Ulbricht then wrote in his journal that he “[g]ot word that the blackmailer was executed,” before returning quickly to other tasks associated with running the site.

In negotiating the other four killings, Ulbricht initially resisted multiple murders. He instructed Redandwhite to “just hit Andrew [usernames Tony76 and nipplesuckcanuck] and leave it at that.” Redandwhite said he could do it for “150 just like last time,” but that he would not be able to recover any of DPR’s money if he killed only one person because he would have to commit the murder outside of the victim’s home or office where he stored his funds. Id. If Ulbricht wanted him to recover money, the self-professed assassin claimed, he would have to kill not only Tony76, but also his three associates. DPR responded that he would “defer to [Redandwhite’s] better judgment and hope[d] [to] recover some assets” from the hit. He then sent $500,000 in Bitcoins, the agreed-upon price for four killings, to Redandwhite. As the district court stated in discussing Ulbricht’s journal entries concerning these projected murders, his words are “the words of a man who is callous as to the consequences or the harm and suffering that [his actions] may cause others.”

The record was more than sufficient to support the district court’s reliance on those attempted murders in sentencing Ulbricht to life in prison.

don190830Under current interpretation, a mere solicitation to commit murder is not a crime of violence under United States v. Davis, but we would be hard-pressed to call Ross a “peaceful entrepreneur.” Our local herbal tea lady is a peaceful entrepreneur, unless she has ordered a hit on the Starbucks across the street.

Still, we’ll see what effect 200,000 online signatures have on President Donald Trump. Unless it’s reported on “Fox and Friends,” we suspect not much.

Bitcoinist.com, Petition for Clemency for Silk Road Founder Nears 200k Signatures (Aug. 19)

change.org, Clemency for Ross Ulbricht, Serving Double Life for a Website

United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 131 (2nd Cir. 2017)

United States v. Davis, — U.S. —, 139 S. Ct. 2319, 204 L.Ed.2d 757 (June 24, 2019)

– Thomas L. Root

Clemency in Dibs and Drabs – Update for August 6, 2019

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

TRUMP GRANTS CLEMENCY TO A FEW MORE… TOO FEW MORE

President Trump last week commuted two sentences and granted pardons to five others who previously pleaded guilty to nonviolent crimes but have completed their sentences.

obtaining-clemencyTrump commuted the sentence of Ronen Nahmani, who was serving a 20-year sentence for conspiracy to distribute the synthetic drug “spice.” The White House said Ronen had no prior criminal history and has five young children at home, the oldest is 13 years old, and a wife battling terminal cancer. Trump noted his case for an early release received bipartisan support from legislators.

Trump also commuted the sentence of Ted Suhl, an Arkansas man convicted in 2016 on four counts of bribery after prosecutors said he took part in a scheme to increase Medicaid payments to his faith-based behavioral health-care center for juveniles company. Suhl lost at the 8th Circuit, and was preparing to file in the Supreme Court. The White House noted his “spotless disciplinary record” over three years in prison and highlighted support for the commutation from former Gov. Mike Huckabee and former U.S. Attorney Bud Cummins.

Trump pardoned five other people who had already served their sentences, for offenses ranging from transferred government property illegally to transporting marijuana, to running an illegal gambling parlor in 1987 and stealing guns from luggage.

With Monday’s announcements, Trump has now pardoned or reduced the sentences of 19 individuals since taking office. Ohio State University law professor Douglas Berman noted in his Sentencing Law and Policy blog last Wednesday that with over 177,000 people in federal prison, “six commutations is, by all sensible measures, a very small number. The granting of only six commutations seems especially disappointing given that last year Prez Trump was talking about considering clemency requests that including “3,000 names, many of those names have been treated unfairly, … [and] in some cases, their sentences are far too long.”

clemency170206Trump’s six clemency grants in his first term beats the first term records of every president since Reagan. The record is still held by Nixon, who granted 48 clemencies in his first term. Berman noted “that so very few federal prisoners have recently received clemency while the federal prison population has swelled makes these numbers even more depressing. The also look terrible if we look back further historically, as almost every other 20th Century US President (except for Dwight Eisenhower) granted a hundred or more commutations while in office (with Woodrow Wilson granting 341 in 1920 alone).”

The Hill, Trump announces seven pardons or commutations (July 29)

Wall Street Journal, Trump Commutes Prison Sentences in Medicaid Bribery, Drug Cases (July 29)

Sentencing Law and Policy, A (depressing) first-term scorecard for recent presidents (July 30)

– Thomas L. Root

Will President Circumvent DOJ With White House Pardon Attorney? – Update for June 13, 2019

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

RUMOR FLOATED THAT TRUMP WILL APPOINT HIS OWN NON-DOJ PARDON ATTORNEY

The Washington Examiner reported last week that “worried clemency advocates are urging President Trump to select his own pardon attorney as the Justice Department reviews a stack of resumes collected on short notice” to fill its own Pardon Attorney slot.

pardonme190123There hasn’t been a politically appointed Pardon Attorney in over 40 years, but advocates say it could enhance the position’s stature and ensuring that Trump’s interest in giving second chances extends beyond isolated cases. “I think it makes a lot of sense to have the pardon attorney job be a political one,” said Margaret Love, U.S. pardon attorney from 1990 to 1997.

The job posting was open for just a month, closing May 10, suggesting that DOJ may already have a candidate in mind, probably another career prosecutor. “I wonder if they are going to make Trump aware of [the search]. Shouldn’t the president have some say over who his pardon attorney is?” said Sam Morison, who worked for 13 years as a staff attorney in the DOJ’s Office of the Pardon Attorney. “If they are just going to the U.S. attorneys’ offices, they are going to get someone who’s a company man, and that’s the idea,” he said.

Rosalind Sargent-Burns, a long-time Office of the Pardon Attorney staffer, was named acting Pardon Attorney on May 28. She has never been a line prosecutor, to her credit, and has held various  positions in the OPA over the past decade, including Designated Agency Ethics Officer, Team Lead, Senior Attorney Advisor over the pardon portfolio, Acting Deputy Pardon Attorney, and Deputy Pardon Attorney.

yesman190613Morison wants Trump to pick his own pardon attorney and move the office into the White House, citing institutional weight against clemency in cases DOJ itself prosecuted. He is hopeful based on President Trump’s public remarks, including that there are “a lot of people” in prison for “no reason.” “Trump gets a lot of criticism, but I think it’s refreshing for him to admit something everyone knows to be truth: The Justice Department is not perfect, and prosecutions are not perfect. Most presidents aren’t actually willing to acknowledge that,” Morison said. “I think Trump does not trust DOJ, and in this particular instance he’s probably correct.”

Heritage Foundation scholar Paul Larkin, who wants Trump to create a White House Office of Executive Clemency, participated in a private group discussion on clemency reform two months ago. CAN-DO founder Amy Povah also wants the pardon attorney separated from DOJ. “We are relying on President Trump to finally be the hero we’ve been waiting for because he is an outsider who doesn’t worry about shaking up the status quo,” she said.

Trump has now fallen behind President Obama on clemency, having granted only 12 people pardons or commutations, nearly all at the urging of politicians or celebrities. At this point in his presidency, Obama had granted clemency to 17 people.

Washington Examiner, Trump urged to pick his own pardon attorney (June 6)

– Thomas L. Root

No Clemency for the Hot Polloi – Update for May 21, 2019

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

NEW TRUMP PARDONS DO LITTLE TO SPUR CLEMENCY HOPE

clemency170206President Trump last week granted a full pardon to media tycoon Conrad Moffat Black and Patrick Nolan, former Republican leader of the California State Assembly, but there is little in those acts of executive grace to cause prisoners who are not politically connected or are not BBFs with celebrities that Trump will start granting clemency to the thousands whose applications languish on file.

Black, a British citizen, had been the CEO of the publisher of Chicago Sun-Times, The Daily Telegraph and The Jerusalem Post. He was convicted in 2007 on three counts of mail fraud and one count of obstruction of justice. Two fraud counts were later thrown out by the Supreme Court. Black served 37 months in federal prison. Last year wrote a book called Donald J. Trump: A President Like No Other, which some media accounts allege was little more than a hagiography.

Nolan was a California legislative leader who spent years in prison after being convicted in the 1990s, after being secretly recorded accepting checks from an undercover FBI agent. He pled to one count of racketeering and did 25 months. Trump characterized Nolan’s decision to plead guilty as a “difficult” one, which makes him no different from all the other 94% of federal defendants who plead guilty every year.

These pardons do little to encourage federal inmates that Trump will wield his clemency power to benefit prisoners who are not connected. 

pardonme190123The President has pardoned nine people and commuted the sentences of three others since taking office, in a pattern apparently driven by politics, celebrity support and television. The only commutation of someone who was not politically connected was that of Alice Johnson, whose case had been taken to the president by Kim Kardashian West.

A few have complained that the President’s pardons are driven by politics or are “all about him.” This, of course, makes him no different from his predecessors (Obama and Manning, Clinton and Rich).

The President has been rumored to be planning pardons, timed for the Memorial Day weekend, of servicemen who have been accused or convicted of war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.  However, the opposition to such actions appears to be fierce, and some have suggested that the hue and cry may cause Trump to abandon the plan.

The Hill, Trump pardons media tycoon, former GOP leader of California State Assembly (May 15)

The New York Times, Trump May Be Preparing Pardons for Servicemen Accused of War Crimes (May 18)

The Hill, Here are the 12 pardons or reduced sentences granted by Trump (May 16)

– Thomas L. Root

Time to Restart the Clemency Machine? – Update for January 23, 2019

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

A RENEWED CRY FOR CLEMENCY

pardonme190123Focus on the First Step Act over the past six months has left President Trump’s push to reform clemency in the dark. Last week, however, The Atlantic published a proposal written by three prominent clemency advocates to revamp the process.

The two clemency processes now in use, law professors Mark Osler and Rachel Barkow, and Koch Industries general counsel Mark Holder argued, are the formal Dept. of Justice Pardon Attorney process and Trump’s much more informal celebrity-studded personal recommendation process.

Trump’s is informal: The president evaluates individual cases based on personal recommendations. The problem with the President’s system, the authors complain, is that it does not scale. Instead, it is a one-celebrated-case-at-a-time celebrity-driven approach, in which people with access to Trump lobby him in the Oval Office until he signs off.

But the DOJ process, the article contends, “isn’t any better. It courses through seven levels of review, much of it through a hostile… bureaucracy that tends to defer to local prosecutors who are, in turn, loath to undo the harsh sentences they sought in the first place. Indeed,” the authors observe, “the First Step Act passed in spite of DOJ opposition because those same prosecutors objected to lowering the mandatory minimum sentences that give them so much bargaining power.”

The articles cites some states as having better systems, including Arkansas, Connecticut, Georgia, and South Carolina. In those systems, an expert board – with people from criminal justice, social work, and psychology backgrounds, former judges, defense lawyers, prosecutors, and community activists – identify and evaluate clemency candidates.

obtaining-clemencyThe authors suggest that the President create a similar board of bipartisan clemency advisers who would work with a professional staff to identify cases for White House action. In 1975, President Gerald Ford impaneled an 18-member clemency board to help him with pardon requests from applicants charged with crimes related to avoiding the draft during the Vietnam War. That board was diverse and bipartisan, and ultimately recommended more than 13,000 pardons.

Trump convened a conference on revamp the clemency last summer, but nothing has come of it so far.

The Atlantic, The Clemency Process Is Broken. Trump Can Fix It (Jan. 15)

– Thomas L. Root

Time for the Turkey to Pardon People? – Update for November 28, 2018

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

TURKEYS PARDONED, NOW HOW ABOUT PEOPLE?

turkey181128President Trump “pardoned” two turkeys at the annual White House ceremony held last week, but told reporters afterwards that he hadn’t considered  giving any people clemency for Thanksgiving.

Speaking to reporters, Trump side-stepped a question about whether he would issue holiday pardons. “I love the pardons for the turkey,” Trump said. Asked if he would pardon any people, Trump said: “I haven’t thought of it — it’s not a bad thing.”

Behind bars, Trump has generated enormous hope for presidential clemency. Two weeks ago, he endorsed the FIRST STEP Act, after saying in October that “a lot of people” are jailed for “no reason” and that he was “actively looking” for inmates to release.

There are signs that the White House and the Dept. of Justice Office of Pardon Attorney are processing commutation requests from prisoners and pardon requests from already released inmates, making clemency advocates hopeful for near-term reprieves. Trump already has been more generous than recent predecessors early in his first term, issuing nine pardons and prison commutations. He hasn’t given any clemency grants in four months, however, in an apparent pause for the midterm elections.

Last week, New York University law professor and former federal prosecutor Mark Osler wrote that “the process used to choose which turkey might be pardoned is far more rational, efficient and effective than the one used to evaluate clemency for humans.

obtaining-clemencyFirst, he said, the pardons occur regularly, every year, not just in the last days of an administration. Second, decisions are made by objective specialists with the current chairman of the National Turkey Federation responsible for managing a thorough selection process. Third, there are defined criteria. The finalists are selected based on their willingness to be handled, their health and their natural good looks. Fourth, attention is paid to making sure they thrive after their grant of clemency. After the ceremony, they are sent to Virginia Tech’s “Gobbler’s Rest” exhibit, where they are well cared for.

By contrast, Osler said, the clemency process “is irregular, run largely by biased generalists, devoid of consistent, meaningful criteria, and it does little to ensure success of individuals after their release.”

Osler said the DOJ Pardon Attorney is part of the problem. The DOJ, “after all, is the entity that prosecutes these individuals in the first place. Within that office, staff members evaluate cases and provide a report to the pardon attorney, who decides on a recommendation after seeking out the opinion of the very US attorney’s office that prosecuted the case.

But then, instead of going to the President, the Pardon Attorney’s recommendation is routed to an aide to the deputy attorney general, who makes a recommendation to the DAG, the same DAG who is “the direct supervisor of and closely allied with the United States attorneys in the field, whose offices chose to pursue the challenged convictions and sentences in the first place.”

If the recommendation has survived this far, it goes to the White House, where some assistant to the White House counsel evaluates it and makes yet another recommendation to the boss. And, of course, that boss, who has many other duties, also has a conflict: “this time, the tendency to protect the President from risk, something that is inherent in any use of the pardon power.”

presidential_pardon_thanksgiving_tile_coasterWhat’s missing, Osler argued, is “all the things that make the turkey process work. It’s irregular, as inattention by any one of the numerous sequential evaluators stops the whole thing. And instead of objective specialists, we have decisions being made by the deputy attorney general, who is neither objective nor a specialist. The criteria are poorly articulated and currently issued by the stiflingly conflicted DOJ. And finally, there is little to no connection between the process and what comes after, as prison gives way to freedom.”

Osler suggested that the process be taken from DOJ altogether and be given to an independent clemency board, as most states do. “If we did that,” Osler claimed, “the clemency process would finally be at least as functional as the one that informs a silly holiday tradition.”

Washington Examiner, Trump pardons turkeys, says he hasn’t considered human clemency for Thanksgiving (Nov. 20, 2018)

CNN, The process to pardon turkeys is more rational than the one used for humans (Nov. 19, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

FIRST STEP First Up After Mid-Terms? – Update for November 5, 2018

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

SENATE POISED TO CONSIDER AMENDED FIRST STEP ACT

Criminal justice reform advocates confirmed to the Washington Examiner last week that sentencing reform provisions will be included in the FIRST STEP Act (S.2795), to be unveiled shortly after tomorrow’s mid-term elections, amendments which are likely to trigger an intense lame-duck struggle over attaching penalty reductions to a White House-backed prison reform bill. 

firststep180814The FIRST STEP Act passed the House in a 360-59 vote earlier this year, but without sentencing reforms. Reform advocates expect rapid legislative action after a pre-election pause, and believe there will be enough votes to pass the expanded legislative package. Two people close to the process told the Washington Examiner that a bipartisan group of senators has agreed to attach a set of sentencing reforms to the House-passed bill. 

The additions include shortening federal three-strike drug penalties from life in prison to 25 years, reducing two-strike drug penalties from 20 years to 15, unstacking 18 USC 924(c) sentencing enhancements to require a conviction on the first 924(c) charge before 25-year minimum mandatory sentences apply, making the 2010 Fair Sentencing Act (that cut crack penalties) retroactive, and expanding the 18 USC 3553(f) “safety valve.”

“We are very excited about it. We think that the four reforms that are in the bill are ones that make sense,” said Mark Holden, the general counsel of Koch Industries and an influential conservative reform advocate. “From what we understand, there are enough votes — plenty — for it to happen.”

Both Holden and another person close to the legislation drafting process, who asked not to be identified, said there is wording to reduce concern about illegal immigrants benefiting from sentencing reform. 

Sentencestack170404Many of the proposed changes to the FIRST STEP Act are included in the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act (S.1917), which passed the Senate Judiciary Committee last February but has not been brought to the floor for a vote. While the physical text of the new sentencing reforms is still being written, the SRCA provides a good example of what might be in the final bill text. “The sentencing reforms that could be included in the First Step Act… do not eliminate any mandatory minimum sentences,” wrote FreedomWorks vice president Jason Pye in The Hill last week. “But these proposed reforms would apply a measure of common sense to federal sentencing law.”

Holden said he expects the White House, particularly presidential adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner, to forcefully back the bill. Last month, President Trump said in a Fox News interview that while Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III opposed sentencing reform, Trump was in favor. “”If he doesn’t support reform, then he gets overruled by me,” the President said. “Because I make the decision, he doesn’t,” Trump said Oct. 11. 

“I think President Trump is doing a really good job on these sentencing reform measures,” Holden said. “He’s right, he’s the president, he makes the call, and we’re glad he said it.”

cotton171204It’s unclear how a group of Republican skeptics, such as Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, will react. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), will be the ultimate decision-maker in whether the bill gets a floor vote. A Louisville Courier-Journal writer said last week that with prison and sentencing reforms polling off the charts in Kentucky, and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) leading the charge, there is little doubt McConnell will find enough votes during the promised whip count (he needs 60) to send the bill to the floor.

The reform efforts have received significant White House support, and in turn, policy advocates have sought to build bridges with Trump-supporting activists. Last month, clemency advocates including Amy Povah of CAN-DO Clemency and Alveda King, the anti-abortion evangelical leader, hosted a panel at a Women for Trump event at Trump International Hotel in Washington. 

pardon171128Povah wants Trump to supplement FIRST STEP passage with generous use of his constitutional pardon powers. Last month, Trump said “a lot of people” are jailed for years for “no reason” and that he was actively looking to release some. Povah said clemency would be particularly appreciated around the holiday, including Thanksgiving, when presidents pardon turkeys, disillusioning people who are looking for one. 

“I think Trump said it best, he said that he’s going to release a lot of people and I think a lot of people in prison took that seriously and literally,” Povah said.

Povah said she’s particularly grateful for Kushner’s role in pushing both legislation and clemency cases, particularly after Sessions’ appointment as attorney general (an appointment Trump openly regrets making and who is likely to resign or be fired after tomorrow’s election). “Jared is a beacon of hope for so many prisoners. They had lost hope for any leniency or reform when Jeff Sessions was sworn in as attorney general. If felt like a nail in the coffin,” she said.

Washington Examiner, Prison reform bill to include sentencing, setting up post-election fight (Nov. 4, 2018)

Americans for Tax Relief, The US Needs Sentencing Reform and the First Step Act (Nov. 2, 2018)

Louisville Courier Journal, Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell play key roles in justice reform (Nov. 1, 2018)

The Hill, Congress must make sentencing reform priority for public safety (Nov. 2)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

After Making the Mess, Trump Tries to Clean It Up – Update for September 19, 2018

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small

WHITE HOUSE TRYING TO BRING ORDER TO CHAOTIC CLEMENCY PROCESS

Since President Trump granted executive clemency to former federal inmate Alice Johnson, thousands of federal inmates have been trying to get their clemency petitions in front of President Trump through celebrities, sports figures, elected officials and raw appeals to his better nature.

chaos180920After the Johnson pardon, Trump himself put out a sort of cattle call for clemency applications – even inviting professional football players to send him names rather than protest the criminal justice system by kneeling during the national anthem. But, with the White House meeting two weeks ago, the White House has started an attempt to instill some discipline to the process as part of what Trump reportedly hopes will become a signature piece of his efforts at criminal justice reform.

“We were very critical of the process as it stands,” said attendee Brittany Barnett, a Dallas lawyer who heads pro-clemency Buried Alive Project. “We definitely can’t keep doing these one-offs and it can’t just be celebrity endorsements.”

Law professors Rachel Barkow and Mark Osler told the meeting the president should abolish the Dept. of Justice Office of the Pardon Attorney. Obama relied on that office to process more than 20,000 applications through his clemency initiative, ultimately cutting sentences for 1,715 people but leaving town with a record 11,355 petitions pending.

Clemency experts say bureaucracy and poor planning stifled the program’s ability to free many more. Out of 13,000 people denied between 2014 and 2017, thousands appeared to be worthy candidates—at least on paper, according to a 2017 analysis by the U.S. Sentencing Commission.

The independent analysis found that more than 2,500 of the inmates who were denied appeared to meet all of the guidelines for the types of cases the DOJ claimed to prioritize. The guidelines were supposed to prioritize nonviolent, low-level offenders who served at least ten years in prison, did not have significant criminal history, demonstrated good conduct in prison, and had no history of violence.

slot161208But in fact, the Commission found, only 3% of drug offenders who appeared to meet all of the DOJ’s criteria actually received clemency. Conversely, only 5%of the people who did receive clemency appeared to meet all of the criteria. Without much transparency in the review process, several critics now compare it to a “lottery system.”

DOJ control of the clemency process comes with a built-in conflict of interest: The same officials who prosecute offenders decide whether those same people are worthy of presidential mercy. Justice “shouldn’t be the gatekeeper because that means the gate never opens for far too many deserving people,” Barkow said.

USA Today, Kardashian effect: Trump White House tries to tame a chaotic, celebrity-driven approach to pardons (Sept. 10, 2018)

Cannabis Wire, The Prisoners Left Behind (Sept. 7, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Reality TV Star Talks to Reality TV Star About Clemency – Update for September 12, 2018

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small

KIM KARDASHIAN GOES TO WASHINGTON TO TALK CLEMENCY POLICY

kardashian180604Kim Kardashian was back at the White House last Wednesday to discuss prison reform with top Trump administration officials.

The reality television star, who successfully lobbied for the commutation of Alice Johnson in June, attended a listening session on clemency with a number of officials, Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law, and Ivanka Trump.

“The discussion is mainly focused on ways to improve that process to ensure deserving cases receive a fair review,” according to Hogan Gidley, White House deputy press secretary.

Others at the meeting included CNN commentator Van Jones, Georgetown law professor (and former federal inmate) Shon Hopwood, former U.S. District Court Judge Kevin Sharp, Mark Holden, the general counsel of Koch Industries, Jessica Jackson Sloan, a human rights attorney and prison reform advocate, law professors Rachel Barkow and Mark Osler, both of whom are sentencing and clemency specialists, and Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society.

trump170515
How many people have gotten clemency from President Trump?

Following the round-table discussion Wednesday, Sharp visited the Oval Office with Kushner, Ivanka Trump, Kardashian and a few others to brief the President. “We talked about criminal justice reform in general and the need for it, (and) for a change in the clemency and pardon process,” Sharp said, who noted the President seemed receptive during the roughly 20-minute meeting. “My sense was, he cares and he was listening to us. Sitting in that room, you would not have known it’s been a busy week – it was very relaxed. You wouldn’t know there was anything else going on.”

Wall Street Journal, Kim Kardashian Visits White House to Discuss Prison Reform (Sept. 5, 2018)

Chicago Tribune, Kim Kardashian meeting with President Trump on prison reform (Sept. 5, 2018)

Nashville Tennessean, Former Nashville judge speaks with Donald Trump about clemency, criminal justice reform (Sept. 7, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small