Tag Archives: cares act

There Ain’t No Easter Bunny… – Update for September 16, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

HOW’S THAT 65% BILL DOING?

After answering yet another email about the mythical 65% bill – legislation that purportedly would reduce everyone’s sentence to 65% of what the court imposed – I thought I would lead with this sad news:

There is no Santa Claus. There is no Easter Bunny. And there is no 65% Bill.

easterbunny210916While Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) has introduced such a bill in a number of previous sessions of Congress since 2001, there is no such bill in the hopper now. When she did introduce it, the bill never even got a committee hearing. If it did exist, it wouldn’t get one now. A 65% bill would stand a chance of passage approaching zero.

In sum, the so-called 65% bill is like a pink unicorn: fun to imagine, but not real. And neither is the rumor that everyone will get a sentence cut because of COVID.

So what is real? First, a letter sent last week by 25 state attorneys general to House and Senate leadership, urging an expansion of Section 404 of the First Step Act to include people sentenced under 21 USC § 841(b)(1)(C). You recall that in Terry v. United States last June, the Supreme Court held that Section 404 did not qualify pre-2010 crack sentences for sentence reduction. The state attorneys general want legislation to change that.

Second, a lot of criticism of the President over the CARES Act. Writing in the Washington Examiner last week, Matt Schlapp – chairman of the American Conservative Union – argued that Congress should act to ensure that CARES Act home confinees stay at home after the pandemic ends. He wrote, “As a former influential senator and Judiciary Committee chairman, President Joe Biden is at least partially responsible for the explosive growth of our federal prison population. His legislative record is riddled with bills he supported, and sometimes wrote, that filled BOP cells and encouraged states to do the same. Indeed, there are thousands of Americans still serving draconian sentences authorized by some of then-Sen. Biden’s bills.”

chart210624Meanwhile, a piece in the Deseret News made the conservative argument for the EQUAL Act, which would retroactively make crack cocaine sentencing levels equal to those of powder cocaine: The EQUAL Act already passed through the U.S. House Judiciary Committee with a vote of 36-5, garnering support from both sides of the aisle. It faces another battle to pass through the rest of Congress, and Utah’s delegation should be there to vote in support. The debate over crack versus powder cocaine has no basis in science, in rationality, or in ethics. Because of this, many individuals have been needlessly imprisoned for far too long in comparison to the crime committed. Congress should pass the EQUAL Act to ensure these penalties are equalized and fairness is restored to criminal sentencing.”C

So when will Congress get to any criminal justice reform measures? No one knows. Only a few bills have been voted out of committee in the Senate – the COVID-19 Safer Detention Act, the First Step Implementation Act of 2021, and the Prohibiting Punishment of Acquitted Conduct Act. In the House, the EQUAL Act is the only criminal justice bill voted out of committee. No floor votes have been scheduled for any bills. With infrastructure and the $3.5 trillion spending bills taking center stage in Congress, it is unlikely that criminal justice reform will get any attention until next year.

Letter to Sens Charles Schumer and Mitch McConnell (September 2, 2021)

Washington Examiner, Biden promised to address over-incarceration. He’s blowing his opportunity (September 8, 2021)

Deseret News, Conservatives should support sentencing reform for crack cocaine (September 8, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

BOP COVID Report – Update for August 10, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

SO WHAT ABOUT THAT COVID VARIANT?

The Bureau of Prison’s own sometimes-controversial numbers suggest the agency is holding the COVID-19 Delta line for inmates, with 310 reported ill as of last night, up only 5.4% since a week before. The BOP has complete control over that number. But it has less control over the number of ill BOP employees – up 48% from a week before, from 157 to 233 – and the number of facilities with COVID-19 present. That number jumped from 80 to 96 joints, the highest level in four months.

Raisedead210208According to data published Sunday by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 50.1% of the total U.S. population is now fully vaccinated – more than 166 million people. The US now is averaging more than 100,000 new COVID-19 cases every day, the highest in almost six months. The BOP reports 55.7% of inmates and 52.5% of staff have been vaccinated.

Two more inmate deaths were reported last week, one July 17th at Texarkana and a second, on July 28th at FMC Ft Worth. Roy Berry, who died at Ft Worth, had COVID in March but had been declared recovered by the BOP. At least 257 federal inmates have died of COVID. Due to squirrely reporting from private prisons (where reports of deceased prisoners magically disappeared from time to time), the number is certainly higher than that.

USP McCreary reported 56 sick inmates, Miami FDC 25, FCI Texarkana 25, FCI Phoenix 24, USP Yazoo City 14, FMC Butner 13; and FCI Terminal Island with 11.

NPR reported last Friday on the COVID-19 Safer Detention Act, noting that the bill – sponsored by Sens Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) and Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) – would extend compassionate release to the ever-decreasing numbers of “old law” inmates (those sentenced before 1988) still in the system.

The bill, which has passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee and is also pending in the House, would ease COVID-19 compassionate release procedures, make permanent CARES Act home confinement, and benefit Elderly Offender Home Detention  inmates.

home190109Meanwhile, Reason magazine argued last week that the CARES Act home confinees have proven that home detention is a viable imprisonment alternative. “The overwhelming majority of those released on home detention have not reoffended. Of the 28,881 prisoners allowed on home detention last year, only 151 individuals, less than 1%, violated the terms of their confinement. Only one person has committed a new crime… In short, home detention seems to be largely successful. Most prisoners under the program have stayed out of trouble and are working to become law-abiding citizens. In doing so, they are saving taxpayers the exorbitant price of incarceration—which, on average, costs over $37,500 per year versus $13,000 per year for home confinement and monitoring.”

BOP, COVID-19 resource page (August 9, 2021)

CDC, COVID Tracker (August 8, 2021)

BOP, Inmate Death at FCI Texarkana (August 2, 2021)

BOP, Inmate Death at FMC Ft Worth (August 3, 2021)

NPR, Some Older Prisoners Aren’t Eligible For Compassionate Release. Lawmakers Want Change (August 6, 2021)

Reason, The Pandemic Showed Home Detention Works (August 6, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Biden Says Trump Got It Right on CARES Act Home Confinees Going Back to Prison – Update for July 29, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

BIDEN DOJ AGREES CARES ACT REQUIRES HOME CONFINEES TO RETURN TO PRISON, BUT ALL IS NOT LOST

comeback201019In a dying gasp last January, Donald Trump’s Dept of Justice Office of Legal Counsel interpreted § 12003 of the CARES Act to mean that anyone sent to home confinement during COVID-19 had to return to prison a month after the official state of emergency for the pandemic ends, according to officials.

Since taking office, President Biden’s administration has come under pressure from FAMM, other activists, and lawmakers – including Senate Judiciary Committee Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) and Sen Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) – to revoke the memo. But last week, The New York Times reported the Biden DOJ has concluded that the January memo correctly interpreted the law.

The COVID state of emergency is not expected to end this year, in part because of the rise of the Delta variant. “But the determination means that whenever it does end,” The Times said, “the department’s hands will be tied.”

The Times said several Administration officials “characterized the decision as an assessment of the best interpretation of the law, not a matter of policy preference.” But that didn’t slow the barrage of criticism.

backstab160404“We took President Biden at his word that he wanted to reduce mass incarceration, but this choice, to send thousands back to prison, would be doubling down on the worst parts of his legacy,” Holly Harris, president of Justice Action Network, said. “It’s time for President Biden to keep his promise, and keep these people home.” The Hill complained that “Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland could have rescinded that policy.” Lauren-Brooke Eisen, director in the Brennan Center’s Justice Program, said, “No public interest is served in having this group of individuals reincarcerated.”

The Justice Action Network and the Brennan Center both noted that Biden campaigned heavily on criminal justice reform last year.

“On the campaign trail, President Biden vowed to take bold action to reduce our prison population, create a more just society, and make our communities safe. He said he believed in offering second chances,” Eisen said.

Forbes said, “The position of both administrations seems odd when the program has been such a success… Of the 20,000 on home detention (CARES Act plus those on home confinement because they were near the end of their prison term) there had only been 20 individuals returned to prison institutions as a result of violations. That’s a 99.9% success rate.”

interpretation210729I think the critics are missing the point. The fact that the Biden DOJ thinks the prior OLC legal analysis of the CARES Act is solid has no effect on what policy the Administration will follow. If anything, the criticism Biden is taking over last week’s Times story makes it more likely than not that Biden or Congress will find some means of keeping CARES Act people on home confinement.

The New York Times, Biden Legal Team Decides Inmates Must Return to Prison After Covid Emergency (July 19, 2021)

The Hill, Biden administration criticized over report that it is not extending home confinement for prisoners (July 20, 2021)

Forbes, Biden Administration Signals That Federal Inmates On Home Detention Will Return To Prison (July 20, 2021)

The Crime Report, Prisoners Freed During COVID are ‘Twisting in the Wind,’ say Reformers (July 23, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

BOP’s Secret Home Confinement Memo Sows Confusion – Update for April 26, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

DUELING HOME CONFINEMENT MEMOS DRAW CRITICISM

A week ago, I wrote about a new Bureau of Prisons memo (which some said was really a Dept of Justice memo) expanding eligibility for CARES Act home confinement. I admitted that despite my efforts, I could not obtain a copy of it.

secret210426I’m not alone. FAMM was scrambling, inmates were scrambling, and even Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman, the dean of federal sentencing law if there ever was one, complained in his Sentencing Law and Policy blog last Tuesday that the memo has still not been released. That same day, Keri Blakinger of The Marshall Project released what purported to be the text of the memo, a well-meant but ultimately unhelpful post.

Meanwhile, my email was smoking. Inmates heard that the BOP had been told to send minimum-security inmates home even if they had not served half of their sentence, the standard that people with prior offenses of violence were excluded had been dropped… the institutions were rife with rumors. People complained that their case managers were stubbornly ignoring the new standards, that wardens were releasing internal memos that underpromised.

You remember the game “post office.” The message was whispered around the circle of kids until it returned to the source mangled beyond recognition. That’s what we had. And the blame can be laid at the bureaucratic feet of the Bureau of Prisons, which would classify road signs as “sensitive” and “FOIA exempt” if the agency could get away with it.

Thankfully, Washington, D.C., leaks like a screen door on a submarine. By Then, on Thursday, both FAMM and the Defenders Services Office of the Administrative Office of U.S. Court (the support agency for Federal Public Defenders nationwide) had obtained bootlegged copies of the memo – an April 13 release from Andre Mateviousian, Assistant Director of the Correctional Services Division, BOP – and posted them on the Internet. These posts, which are identical, appear to be the real deal.

So what changed? A couple of things. First, inmates with -300 and -400 series disciplinary reports shots in the last 12 months are not automatically disqualified. Second, inmates with “low” PATTERN scores are now eligible for CARES Act home confinement.

violence151213What didn’t change? At least a couple of things. First, if you have a prior conviction for a crime of violence (let’s say a bar fight back in 1985, when you were 21 years old and possessed a testosterone-addled brain), you are still disqualified from CARES Act home confinement (no matter that you’re doing 24 months for tearing the label off your mattress). Second, the BOP is adhering to its self-imposed standard that you have to have completed 50% of your sentence (or 25% of your sentence with less than 18 months to go).

So the Marshall Project text was wrong: prior violence still counts. The versions of the memo posted by FAMM and fd.org continue to say that “the inmate’s current or a prior offense” cannot be “violent, a sex offense, or terrorism-related.”

At the end of last week. FAMM President Kevin Ring wrote to the BOP complaining about its failure to officially release the memo. “I am writing to ask that you publish on the Bureau of Prisons’ (BOP) website any and all memos sent to wardens about the eligibility criteria for CARES Act home confinement,” Ring wrote. “The BOP’s failure to do so has created unnecessary confusion and frustration for incarcerated people and their families…”

There is not a bureaucratic reason on God’s green earth why the BOP could not have released the memorandum on April 13, 2021. Instead, the agency’s obsession with secrecy (or at least playing its cards close to the vest) generated a week’s worth of heat without light. In fact, if the memo had not been leaked to outside organizations, inmates would still be in a tizzy and families still confused.

winnie210426While I am on a rant, I should note the moment in BOP Director Michael Carvajal’s testimony two weeks ago before the Senate Judiciary Committee that made me shout “liar!” at my computer screen. That in turn caused my faithful and efficient office dog Winnie to cower under a table until I calmed down.

As I note, the new memorandum retains the 50%-of-sentence requirement. This is a standard that Attorney General William Barr never imposed. Instead, as you may remember, it was the BOP’s own fiat, added in the agency’s all-too-typical ham-handed way (with inmates who were literally walking out the door to return home being called back because of the new requirement).

When I heard Carvajal assure the Senators that all the BOP had done was to apply the AG’s home confinement criteria, I was disgusted at his prevarication and furious that the Senators were so ill-prepared by their staffs that no one called Carvajal out on the fib.

In Forbes last week, Walter Pavlo noted it as well. He too observed that the time-served requirement was not dictated by the Attorney General, but rather was

based on an internal BOP memorandum that stated it was screening inmates based on whether they had served 25% of their sentence with less than 18 months remaining or have served more than 50% of their sentence. The directive had little logic behind it because COVID-19 did not discriminate between those who had been in prison years or those who had just arrived. The result of the memorandum was devastating, leading to deaths and infections at everyone of the BOP facilities nationwide.

liar151213Testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee two weeks ago, BOP Director Michael Carvajal said that “…any inmate that is eligible under the criteria presented to me by the Attorney General is on home confinement as we speak.” Pavlo called that misleading, noting that “what Carvajal failed to add were details of the internal memos that mandated that priority for a person’s transfer to home confinement be measured against the amount of time they had served…”

Carvajal’s statement was false then, and it is false now.

Sentencing Law and Policy, Why is DOJ apparently keeping hidden a new memo expanding the criteria for home confinement? (April 20, 2021)

The Marshall Project, Document Cloud, Home Confinement Memo (April 20, 2021)

FAMM, BOP Home Confinement Memorandum of April 13, 2021 (posted April 21, 2021)

Federal Public Defender, BOP Home Confinement Memorandum of April 13, 2021 (posted April 21, 2021)

Sentencing Law and Policy, FAMM urges federal BOP to publish memos with home confinement criteria (April 23, 2021)

Forbes, Bureau of Prisons Director Testimony To Senate Judiciary Leaves Unanswered Questions (April 20, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

DOJ Eases CARES Act Home Confinement Eligibility – Update for April 19, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

DOJ RELAXES PATTERN SCORE LIMITATION FOR CARES ACT HOME CONFINEMENT

Bureau of Prisons Director Michael Carvajal last Thursday told the Senate Judiciary Committee that the Dept of Justice has modified the CARES Act home confinement criteria to qualify people whose PATTERN recidivism scores are “low” for home confinement.

release160523A memorandum apparently has been issued, because in a FAMM press release issued on Friday, FAMM president Kevin Ring said “We’re grateful that the new administration heeded the widespread calls to make more people eligible for home confinement. The original criteria were too narrow.”

Although I tried Friday and over the weekend to obtain a copy of the memo, I was not able to. The Ring statement suggests that more than one standard may have changed, but nothing else has been confirmed. I have heard a rumor as to what that change might have been, but I try not to deal in rumors, so I am awaiting confirmation.

The DOJ decision to expand CARES Act home confinement at this time suggests that the Administration does not intend to stop COVID home confinement placement anytime soon, despite the fact that all inmates will have access to vaccine within the next month. Carvajal told the Committee, “We are working to get as many people as are appropriate out within the criteria we are given.”

Sen Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) complained to Carvajal that the BOP’s use of “home confinement fails to comply with the First Step Act.”

mismanagement210419Committee Chair Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) was even blunter, asking Carvajal whether he had been directed to make eligibility for CARES Act home confinement as restrictive as possible. He said of the 230 BOP inmate COVID deaths, “These were preventable deaths. It is clear that the Bureau has been far too rigid in approving transfers to home confinement and to approve compassionate release. This is part of a broader issue of mismanagement.”

Carvajal told the Committee that the BOP, which has about 4,500 prisoners on home confinement under the CARES Act, has always followed DOJ guidance. No one asked him about the BOP’s own gloss on those criteria, which was the April 22, 2020, BOP memo requiring 50% of the sentence to be served (a standard from which the BOP said it could deviate “in its discretion,” if, for example, your name is Paul Manafort or Chaka Fattah).

Carvajal said the home confinement program has been a success. Right now, over 4,500 inmates are at home under the CARES Act, while only 151 have been returned to prison, 26 of which for escape from monitoring, and only three for new crimes (only one of which was violent).

return161227Many Committee members expressed dismay at the January 15 DOJ Office of Legal Counsel opinion that CARES Act confinees have to return to prison when the pandemic ends. Carvajal said about 2,400 of the CARES Act confinees have more than a year left on their sentences, and about 310 of those have more than five years to do. He said the BOP just wants guidance: “I ask that the statute be changed, or that we work with the DOJ… I don’t want somebody to believe that the Bureau of Prisons somehow doesn’t want to let someone out.”

But if the confinees are sent back, Carvajal said the BOP is prepared to handle the influx. Not everyone agrees. “We don’t have the staff,” Council of Prison Locals Southeast Regional Vice President Joe Rojas told Reuters. “We are already in chaos as it is, as an agency.”

Durbin and Grassley said they would ask the new Attorney General to withdraw the January OLJ memorandum, or – if that failed – they would seek to change the statute.

Courthouse News Service, Federal Prisons Flunked the Pandemic, Senators Say (April 15, 2021)

Reuters, U.S. has no plans to order inmates released in pandemic back to prison-official (April 15, 2021)

Reason, Pressure Grows on Biden To Rescind Memo That Would Send Thousands Released on Home Confinement Back to Federal Prison (April 16, 2021)

FAMM, FAMM releases statement on Department of Justice expanding home confinement (April 16, 2021)

Senate Judiciary Committee, Oversight of the Bureau of Prisons (April 15, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Patience, People, on Criminal Justice Reform – Update for April 8, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

WHEN WILL BIDEN TACKLE CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM?

The most common question I have gotten from inmates since January is when Congress will pass criminal justice reform. It brings to mind the old variation on the serenity prayer: “Lord, grant me patience… and I want it NOW.”

Reform200819But patience is what everyone needs. There’s the infrastructure, the racial reckoning, and now the gun control push (which will probably prevent a minuscule number of gun crimes, but looks all shiny and robust). I am convinced we will get to criminal justice reform, but it will take a bit.

Still, there are some encouraging signs. First, President Biden’s Dept of Justice followed up on its letter to the Supreme Court a few weeks ago with a brief filed last week in Terry v. United States, arguing that Section 404 of the First Step Act covers low-level crack cocaine offenders sentenced under 21 USC § 841(b)(1)(C), “a dramatic reversal that comes more than three decades after a Biden-crafted bill helped to fuel disproportionately harsh penalties for Black drug offenders,” according to The Hill.

But Biden promised more. During his campaign, he promised to address mandatory minimums. Nkechi Taifa, a Washington-based criminal justice reform advocate, believes that will change soon. Taifa said last week that he has been in touch with the Biden administration. “With respect to drugs,” he said, “it’s only about the weight of drugs and amount of drugs that dictates the time you serve. It doesn’t matter what the judge thinks, doesn’t matter what your characteristics are. Biden has said he’ll do away with it.”

return161227Cynthia Roseberry of the ACLU said on NPR last week that Biden could do a lot with a stroke of a pen, such as reverse the DOJ legal opinion in January that people on CARES Act home confinement had to return to prison when the pandemic ended. Last week, NPR reported, “prisoner rights groups asked Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland to intervene, citing their comments about the need to reduce the prison population.”

And just today, FAMM – which has been active in urging the Dept. of Justice to reverse the legal opinion – is urging people to call the Attorney General to lobby him to take action.

Biden has proclaimed April a second chance month for people involved in the justice system. Roseberry told NPR she wants to see Biden use his sweeping power to grant clemency during the month.

The Hill, Biden urges leniency for harsh crack sentences fueled by his crime bill (March 31, 2021)

WTVR-TV, When will President Biden address criminal justice reform? (April 1, 2021)

NPR, Criminal Justice Reform Advocates Say They’re Anxious To See More Action From Biden (April 2, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

CARES Act Extended, But Does the BOP ‘Cares’? – Update for March 1, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

COVID AND CARES ACT HOME CONFINEMENT TO GO ON… FOR NOW

caresbear210104CARES Act Re-upped, As If the BOP Cares: The CARES Act, passed in March 2020, dumped truckloads of money on the coronavirus pandemic. More important that piles of dough (for our purposes, at least), Section 12003 authorized the Federal Bureau of Prisons to place inmates in home confinement as long as the nation is under a COVID emergency and the Attorney General has determined that the “emergency conditions will materially affect the functioning of the Bureau.” President Trump declared a COVID emergency under the National Emergencies Act a few weeks before CARES passed, and Attorney General William Barr made the materiality finding on April 4th.

Under the National Emergencies Act, an emergency only lasts a year unless the President extends it. That means the emergency would have ceased today, and with it, the CARES Act authority would expire.

Last week, President Biden extended the COVID emergency without specifying an end date (which is common). In essence, the COVID emergency will be over with Biden says it is. Biden wrote, “The COVID-19 pandemic continues to cause significant risk to the public health and safety of the Nation. More than 500,000 people in this Nation have perished from the disease, and it is essential to continue to combat and respond to COVID-19 with the full capacity and capability of the Federal Government.”

One could reasonably infer from the President’s statement that the “full capacity and capability” of the government would include continued BOP use of its CARES Act home confinement authority. Yet, as the New York Times observed last week in a scathing article about the BOP’s failure to use home confinement at FCI Danbury, “just 7,850 of the 151,735 people serving federal sentences right now have been granted home confinement — about 5%. State prison populations have fallen by 15% since the pandemic began, according to the Prison Policy Initiative, but not because inmates are being released to home confinement. Instead, many state prisons simply have stopped accepting transfers from county jails.”

The BOP website prefers to trumpet that “the total number of inmates placed in home confinement from March 26, 2020 to the present (including inmates who have completed service of their sentence) is 22,158.” But it turns out that most of those people were placed there in normal course by halfway houses or under elderly offender home detention. The CARES Act home confinees have not constituted much more than a dribble.

home210218The Times reported that “Danbury was singled out for prompt action” by Barr last April, “because it had seen an outbreak, [but] only about 100 inmates have been granted home confinement so far, many as recently as December. At least 550 are still under consideration, most of them convicted of nonviolent offenses like fraud or drug possession.”

It’s not like the problem is limited to Danbury, either. A California federal court found last summer that “[d]espite… the existence of emergency conditions facing the BOP as the result of the pandemic… there is no evidence Respondents are prioritizing their use of statutory authority under the CARES Act to grant home confinement to Lompoc inmates… or giving due consideration to inmates’ age or medical conditions in evaluating eligibility of home confinement.” And a New York federal court found that “rather than attempt to use home confinement, furloughs, and compassionate release as tools to reduce the density among the most vulnerable inmates, the prison chose to not pursue that path at all until well after the initial outbreak had subsided.”

In fact, at Danbury, the BOP settled a class action lawsuit by promising to expedite release of inmates to home confinement. But five months after the BOP and Danbury warden made the deal, a Connecticut federal court found they had “breached the provision of the Settlement Agreement requiring that they ‘endeavor to release individuals approved for home confinement to home confinement within 14 days of the approval decision.”

About 48,000 of the 105,000 inmates the BOP has tested (still, a year later, only 69% of its inmates have had the nose swab) have contracted COVID. This is despite the BOP’s self-lauded “multiphase action plan” to protect inmates and staff from COVID-19. A Pennsylvania federal court dryly observed that “[t]he government’s assurances that the BOP’s ‘extraordinary actions’ can protect inmates ring hollow given that these measures have already failed to prevent transmission of the disease.” The agency’s slow-walk implementation of CARES Act placement cases seems to be cut from the same cloth.

The COVID Curve: The BOP continued last week to report fewer COVID cases. Last Friday’s total of 1,414 was down 29% from the week before. Staff cases remain stubbornly high, 1,622 (down only 3% from the week before). COVID remains present at 128 facilities, up two from last week, but there have been no reported deaths in the last 7 days.

As of Friday, the BOP reported vaccination data for 78 facilities. It reports that about 34% of its 36,000 staff have been vaccinated, and 6.9% of inmates have gotten the shot (up from 5.3% last week). The number of vaccine doses the BOP says it has distributed suddenly froze last week at 58,300, after climbing steadily since January. This suggests the BOP is out of additional doses until it gets its next distribution.

comparison210228

Plotting the rise and fall in inmate COVID numbers against the national ebb and flow shows the graphs are nearly a perfect fit. This is troubling, because late last week, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warned that with relaxing restrictions and a spread of variant viruses, the declines since January “may be stalling, potentially leveling off at still a very high number. We at CDC consider this a very concerning shift in the trajectory.” The nation had an average of about 66,350 new daily coronavirus cases a day over the last week, higher than the week before which was 64,000 new cases a day.

If national numbers rise again, history suggests the BOP numbers will, too.

Equally troubling is the fact that BOP staff COVID cases have not shown the kinds of decline that inmate and national numbers have. Beyond that, it has taken the BOP over two months to get a mere one-third of its staff vaccinated. The likelihood that staff is the primary vector for spreading COVID inside facilities thus remains high.

Federal Register, Continuation of the National Emergency Concerning the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic (86 FR 11599, Feb 26, 2021)

CARES Act (Mar 26, 2020)

New York Times, Vulnerable Inmates Left in Prison as Covid Rages (Feb 27, 2021)

Torres v. Milusnic, 472 F.Supp.3d 713 (C.D. Cal. July 14, 2020)

Fernandez-Rodriguez v. Licon-Vitale, 470 F.Supp.3d 323 (S.D.N.Y. July 2, 2020)

Whitted v. Easter, Case No. 3:20-cv-569 (D.Conn. December 11, 2020), 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 232843

Wilson v. Williams, 961 F.3d 829 (6th Cir. 2020) (Cole, C.J., dissenting).

United States v. Rodriguez, 451 F.Supp.3d 392 (E.D. Pa. 2020).

Los Angeles Times, New fears of next coronavirus wave as case declines slow and variants grow (February 27, 2020)

– Thomas L. Root

$timulus Bill Is Cash-Rich But Justice-Poor – Update for February 22, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BENJAMINS

benjamins210222The House of Representatives finally released the text of the new stimulus package last Thursday, the 591-page American Rescue Plan, which includes billions of dollars for vaccine, unemployment benefits, state coffers, small businesses and stimulus checks, not to mention a grab-bag of special interest goodies like $15.00 an hour for the kid assembling sandwiches at the neighborhood McDonalds.

The American Rescue Plan contains something for almost everyone. Almost. For federal prisoners, the bad news is this: unlike the CARES Act (adopted 11 months ago) and the HEROES Act (a House measure last May that never passed the Senate), the American Rescue Plan contains nothing easing compassionate release, fixing the elderly offender home detention plan, or addressing any other criminal justice program.

The good news: inmates will be eligible for the $1,400 stimulus payment, just as they were eligible for the prior $1,200 and $600 payments.

[How to get stimulus payments, old and new]

The reasons that the ARP left out in a criminal justice measures are complex. Primarily, it is because Congress wanted to move rapidly, and the Democrats are pushing hard for Republican support in the evenly divided Senate. The New York Times reports that the House may pass the ARP this week, and the goal is to have President Biden sign the bill by March 14 (when existing federal unemployment money runs out). ARP is all about money, and sponsors want to keep it that way, because as a money bill, ARP has broad public support.

The Biden administration clearly plans some sort of comprehensive criminal justice reform this year. At a townhall meeting in Milwaukee last week, Biden said, “No one should go to jail for the use of a drug. They should go to drug rehabilitation.” The sentencing system should be changed to one that focuses on making sure that there are rehabilitation plans for inmates more generally, Biden said, adding that prison systems should have access to vocational programs that help those behind bars learn the career skills they need to succeed outside of prison.”

booker210222Meanwhile, Sen. Cory Booker (D-New Jersey) has been picked to chair the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Criminal Justice and Counterterrorism. The subcommittee’s jurisdiction includes the Dept of Justice Criminal Division; the Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Prisons, Sentencing Commission, and other law enforcement agencies.

This is significant, because a subcommittee chairman controls the subcommittee’s agenda, and can bring substantial pressure – even without writing legislation – on the agencies it oversees. “Our nation’s broken criminal justice system is a stain on the soul of our country, the result of decades of failed policies that have broken apart families and communities and have not made us safer,” Booker said. “I look forward to continuing and strengthening my partnership with Chairman Durbin [Sen Richard Durbin (D-Illinois), chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee] to further advance reforms to our policing and criminal justice system.”

letter161227Finally, interest groups finally have sympathetic ears in Congress and at DOJ. In an open letter to the not-yet-confirmed Attorney General, Merrick Garland, the ACLU urged him “to make clear, on-the-record commitments on five critical issues: mass incarceration; policing; COVID-19 in federal detention; the death penalty; and solitary confinement.” The ACLU asked that the “Trump DOJ’s efforts to thwart Congressional intent behind the FIRST STEP Act of 2018 should also be reversed: DOJ should support application of the Act’s reduced penalties at all sentencings, including resentencings in cases where an illegal sentence was vacated.”

HR -____, American Rescue Plan (reported to the House), Feb 18, 2021

New York Times, Republicans Struggle to Derail Increasingly Popular Stimulus Package (February 19, 2021)

Washington Examiner, Biden: ‘No one should go to jail for the use of a drug’ (February 16, 2021)

NJInsider, Booker to Chair Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Criminal Justice and Counterterrorism (February 14, 2021)

ACLU, Open Letter to Merrick Garland (February 18, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Reading the Tea Leaves on Biden’s Criminal Justice Reform – Update for February 1, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

CHANGE IS GONNA COME… SLOWLY BUT SURELY

bidensuperman210201Biden ain’t Superman. For that reason, people who have been lighting up my inbox with emails asking whether Biden has done away with mandatory minimums should take a deep breath. A President cannot abolish mandatory minimums. Only Congress can do that.

But there’s a lot of early indication that Biden is going to be active in criminal justice reform. Last week, the acting attorney general pulled the Trump administration’s May 10, 2017, charging and sentencing memo, which required US Attorneys to pursue the harshest charges and stiffest penalties. The new policy, a rollback to the Obama era, “ensures that decisions about charging, plea agreements, and advocacy at sentencing are based on the merits of each case and reflect an individualized assessment of relevant facts.”

Last week, I reported that Trump’s DOJ issued a legal opinion that CARES Act inmates on home confinement would have to return to prison after the pandemic ends. Writing in USA Today, three criminal justice advocates argued that Biden “should immediately rescind the Trump administration’s legal opinion, and should identify more people who could be safely released early back to society, with priority “ given to those who are most vulnerable to COVID-19.

The ACLU announced the launching of an ad campaign calling on Biden to carry out his campaign promise to cut the number of incarcerated persons in the country. The campaign calls for clemency using set criteria, such as focusing on people who, if they were sentenced today, would not receive the same sentence, and releasing the elderly, the medically vulnerable and people locked up for technical probation or supervised release violations.

crackpowder191216

Not to be outdone, FAMM and the Prison Fellowship last week announced the “End the Disparity” campaign, to urge Congress to eliminate the 18:1 ratio between crack and powder cocaine-related offenses, making them one-to-one. Senators Cory Booker (D-New Jersey) and Richard Durbin (D-Illinois), both members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, announced legislation that will do so, eliminating the federal crack and powder cocaine sentencing disparity and apply it retroactively to those already convicted or sentenced.

Before the 2010 Fair Sentencing Act, the penalties for one gram of crack was the same as for 100 grams of powder cocaine, resulting in horrific sentences for people with small quantities of crack.  Those people were mostly black, crack being a drug of choice for poorer urban communities (which also were mostly black). In 2010, the Fair Sentencing Act introduced a bit of sanity, but the ratio didn’t drop to 1:1 (a concession to some Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III-type senators to get them to vote for the measure).

So, now, a gram of crack is equal to 18 grams of powder, fairer than before but still a differentiation that is untethered to common sense. The Booker-Durbin bill would drop the ratio to 1:1, if it passes. The fact that both sponsors are on the Judiciary Committee (and Durbin will probably be running the Committee) greatly increases those odds.

HEROES210201Two questions loom large for federal inmates. First, will Biden’s proposed stimulus bill, many elements of which are expected to be drawn from House Democrats’ $3.4 trillion HEROES Act (passed in May but blocked by the GOP-controlled Senate), include breaks for compassionate release, CARES Act releases and elderly offenders? Second, when will Congress see a sweeping criminal justice reform bill?

The details of the stimulus bill have not yet been released. Just like with the HEROES Act, which we didn’t get to read until almost the day it was passed, we will have to wait. As for criminal justice reform, no one knows when legislation will be filed or how long it will take to past.

HuffPost, DOJ Pulls Trump Administration’s Harsh Charging And Sentencing Policy (January 29, 2021)

Courthouse News Service, Biden Moves to End Federal Private Prisons as Part of Racial Equity Plan (January 26, 2021)

Bloomberg, Biden’s Go-Big Stimulus Plans Set Up Fresh Fight in Senate (January 11, 2021)

USA Today, Biden’s executive orders on criminal justice should extend to inmates sent home by COVID (January 28, 2021)

The Hill, ACLU pressing Biden to stick to promise of decarceration with new ad buy (January 28, 2021)

EIN Presswire, FAMM and Prison Fellowship Launch #EndTheDisparity Campaign (January 28, 2021)

Office of Sen. Cory Booker, Booker and Durbin Announce Legislation To Eliminate Federal Crack and Powder Cocaine Sentencing Disparity (January 28, 2021)

Bloomberg Law, Criminal Justice Changes Need Harris to Lead, Advocates Say (January 26, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Where Did The HEROES Go? (And Other Stories That Puzzle Inmates) – Update for January 4, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

DEAD HEROES

deadheroes210104Last May, the House of Representatives passed the HEROES Act, intended to be the second coronavirus stimulus. The bill, which included in its $3 trillion giveaway a number of criminal justice changes (like letting eligible elderly offenders get home confinement after two-thirds of their good-time adjusted sentences, instead of gross sentences), was promptly denounced by Republicans appalled at its price tag and then ignored by the Senate.

Eight months later, I am still getting questions about it, mostly from people who may have been sleeping in the back of the classroom during high school government class.

A bill passed by the House must then be passed by the Senate and then signed by the President in order to become law. In the case of HEROES, the Senate refused to consider the bill. Rather, the Senate passed the HEALS Act in response to HEROES, a bill that was then immediately not considered by the House.

sleep210104What finally happened last month was that the Senate and House worked out a compromise bill that was neither HEROES nor HEALS. The compromise bill included no sentencing provisions at all, a fact that seems not to detain prisoners at all. One inmate wrote me last weekend, asking me to confirm the rumor that § 205 of the stimulus bill gave elderly offenders the home confinement adjustment they sought. Alas, § 205 is entitled “Pipeline Safety Management Systems,” a provision of interest to elderly offenders only if they’re in the natural gas transmission business.

Another inmate asked me whether HEROES might still pass in January or February. Remember this from high school civics, boys and girls: every Congress lasts two years, and ends on January 3. The 116th Congress ended yesterday, and the 117th Congress starts its two-year run today. When a two-year Congress ends, any bill not passed by both the House and Senate is dead.

That means the sentencing changes contained in HEROES will have to be introduced all over in a new bill.

caresbear210104Someone else wondered how long the BOP’s home confinement authority will last under the CARES Act. There are three answers to that. First, the BOP’s authority lasts until 30 days after the COVID-19 national emergency declared by Trump ends. The National Emergencies Act requires any emergency to end one year after it is declared, unless extended by the President. Since some national emergencies (such as with respect to Iranian assets) have continued for four decades. The current COVID emergency ends in March, but there is little doubt Biden will extend it.

Second, the BOP’s authority only lasts as long as the Attorney General’s determination that the emergency conditions are “materially affect[ing] the functioning of the BOP.” Attorney General Barr made that determination last April, but he or the new AG could withdraw the finding at any time.

Finally, the CARES Act lets the BOP Director put prisoners in home confinement “as the Director determines appropriate.” This provision delegates virtually unreviewable power to the BOP. If the Director decided tomorrow that he had sent all the people he needed to send, he could pull the plug.

A year ago, the BOP population stood at 175,858 inmates. As of last week, the number had fallen 13.5% to 152,184. That’s a 31% drop from six years ago.

No one knows when the BOP will no longer place prisoners in home confinement. But we’re much closer to the end than we are to the beginning.

HEROES Act, H.R. 6800 (May 15, 2020)

HEALS Act, S.4318 et al. (July 27, 2020)

Section 205, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (December 27, 2020)

Section 12003(b)(2), CARES Act, H.R. 748 (March 28, 2020)

Sentencing Law and Policy, Federal prison population closes out 2020 at new modern low of 152,184 according to BOP (December 31, 2020)

– Thomas L. Root