Tag Archives: CARES Act home confinement

Home Confinement Removal Without Hearing Challenged – Update for May 11, 2022

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

CONNECTICUT SUIT ARGUES HOME CONFINEMENT REVOCATION VIOLATED DUE PROCESS


homeconfinement220511Under the CARES Act, the Federal Bureau of Prisons was authorized to place inmates in extended home confinement as a means of getting medically vulnerable people out of the path of the coronavirus. Under this authority, the BOP has sent about 9,000 inmates to home confinement, where they remain in their residences except for work and a very few tightly-controlled exceptions (weekly groceries, medical appointments, church services and the such).

BOP Director Michael Carvajal has touted the success of the program. He told the Senate Judiciary Committee that only 289 inmates had been returned to prison after being on CARES Act home confinement, and only three of those were returned because of new criminal conduct.

The flip side of that coin is that the BOP sees home confinement as just another prison designation, meaning that the BOP can pull someone at home back to prison for the flimsiest of reasons, or for no reason at all. The government has argued that because inmates have no due process right to placement in any particular prison facility, they have no grounds to challenge a decision to revoke home confinement.

Now, three FCI Danbury inmates have filed a habeas corpus action in U.S. District Court in Connecticut claiming their release to home confinement under the CARES Act was revoked without due process.

“There’s no due process for resolving these cases or real consideration whether the person should be pulled back to prison,” said their attorney Sarah Russell, director of the Legal Clinic at Quinnipiac University School of Law. “There is no opportunity for a hearing or an argument even when children are being impacted.”

On home confinement for over a year, the lead petitioner, Nordia Tompkins, had been able to regain custody of her daughter, enroll in vocational classes and hold down a job. She was sent back to prison after the halfway house supervising her could not reach her by phone because she was in class at an approved time.

The government has argued that because the inmates remained in BOP custody, they had no “protected liberty interest” in remaining on home confinement. Such an interest is necessary in order to trigger a right to procedural due process.

home190109However, the inmates – represented by Yale and Quinnipiac University law school professors – argue that other factors, “such as whether one can form close family and community ties, seek and obtain employment”, are “markers of a liberty interest. It does not matter that someone is serving sentence or is technically in the ‘custody’ of prison authorities. Because Ms. Tompkins has been able to reside with her children and take care of them, attend a community school to further her education, and seek employment, she has a liberty interest in remaining on home confinement under the Due Process Clause [and] was entitled to basic due process protections…”

Danbury News-Times, Danbury prison inmates file lawsuit over home confinement getting revoked (May 5, 2022)

Tompkins v. Pullen, Case No. 3:22cv339 (D.Conn, filed Mar 2, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

Just When You Thought It Was Safe To Stay At Home… – Update for February 17, 2022

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

BUREAU OF PRISONS MUDDIES THE WATER ON CARES ACT PRISONERS REMAINING AT HOME

A BOP letter responding to a request from Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) last week has renewed concern that CARES Act home confinees aren’t out of the woods yet.

muddywaters220217You may recall that the CARES Act, gave BOP the authority to send medically vulnerable prisoners to home confinement because of COVID. Since CARES passed in March 2020, the BOP has sent about 9,000 prisoners home, and of those – according to the BOP – only three have been returned to prison for committing new crimes.

However, despite the success of the program, the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel issued an opinion in the dying throes of the Trump Administration that when the pandemic ended, all of those folks – who had reconnected with families, gotten jobs, and generally reacclimated to society – would have to go back to prison. There was near-universal condemnation of the opinion, but last July, the newly-installed Biden people at DOJ offered as the Trumpian opinion was probably right.

flipflop170920Then, in December (with the President looking for some kind of criminal justice “win” to placate his progressives), CARES Act people rejoiced when the OLC reversed the January 2021 opinion. In fact, the jubilation was so great that none of the celebrants seemed to notice that the BOP had sent a memorandum to OLC a few days before saying that if return to prison was not mandatory, the agency planned to develop a plan to evaluate “which offenders should be returned to secure custody.

“Which offenders should be returned” is one of those compound statements, necessarily assuming that some of the CARES Act people should be returned. Some people are now taking note of just how ominous the statement is, and are asking what the BOP means by it.

“Sentence length is likely to be a significant factor,” the memo from BOP’s Office of General Counsel said, “as the more time that remains will provide the agency a more meaningful opportunity to provide programming and services to the offender in a secure facility. The nature of the sentence imposed, the interests of the prosecuting U.S. Attorneys’ Office, the potential impact on any victims or witnesses, and deterrence are other potential factors for the criteria BOP would develop. It is likely that inmates that have longer terms remaining would be returned to secure custody, while those with shorter terms left who are doing well in their current placement would be allowed to remain there, subject to the supervisory conditions described above.”

mumbo161103
Asked by two dozen other members of Congress to clarify, the BOP last week said it was preparing regulations that would be adopted “at the appropriate time.” Until then, the letter said, “we cannot speak to specifics.”

When he appeared before the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security two weeks ago, BOP Director Michael Carvajal said the BOP is “committed to returning people to society” and his agency “follows the laws that have been implemented and continue to do so.”

Right, Mike.

KXAN-TV, What will happen to inmates released under CARES Act? Prison officials vague (February 8, 2022)

BOP, Memo on CARES Act Return Authority (December 10, 2022)

BOP,  Letter to Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (February 7, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

COVID Deja Vu… All Over Again – Update for January 4, 2022

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

JANUARY 2022’S KIND OF LIKE JANUARY 2021

deadcovid210914A year ago, the Bureau of Prisons was in the grip of a major COVID outbreak. How major? Back on New Year’s Day 2020, there were 6,831 sick inmates and 1,750 sick staff.

Things aren’t quite that bad right now, but as of last night, the number of sick inmates had increased 425% over the past two weeks, from 289 on December 20 to 1,516 currently. Sick staff increased 110% from 243 to 511. COVID is present at 94% of BOP facilities.

The percentage of vaccinated inmates inched up last week a half a point to 73.8%. Staff vaxxes still lag, up only 3/10th of a point to 69.1%.

Meanwhile, the nation is a hot mess. Last year, the country had 231,000 cases on New Year’s Day. Yesterday, there were 444,000.

A Fort Worth Star-Telegram story last Thursday reported on a December 16th FMC Fort Worth COVID death. The story noted that the inmate “is the 16th man to die from COVID-19 at FMC Fort Worth, according to BOP data. At the prison, ten incarcerated men and seven BOP staffers had confirmed COVID-19 cases as of Thursday… People incarcerated in prisons are at least 4.77 times more likely to be infected with COVID-19 than the general population, according to the Federal Public Community Defenders. At the federal women’s prison in Fort Worth, FMC Carswell, 70 women tested positive for COVID-19 as of Thursday and 22 BOP staff members had the virus. According to BOP data, FMC Carswell, — which is also a federal medical facility — had the 6th highest number of cases of all BOP facilities as of Thursday.”

Vaccinesticker211005In Connecticut, a female inmate at FCI Danbury has sued the BOP alleging that she was wrongly passed over for CARES Act home confinement because she cannot safely be vaccinated against COVID-19. 

Monique Brady, 46, contends in her December 16, 2021, complaint filed that she was wrongly passed over for home confinement even though she has underlying medical conditions that make her vulnerable to the disease. According to filings in Whitted v. Easter, the class-action litigation against FCI Danbury over COVID at the institution, which was settled largely in the inmates’ favor, Brady received one dose of vaccine but not the second. The institution’s medical staff advised her not to receive a second shot due to her reaction to the first one.

The BOP has previously told the Whitted v. Easter court that it would not consider home confinement for inmates who did not get fully vaccinated.

Brady claims she is at risk for COVID due to her taking prescribed steroids for a medical condition, obesity, a history of smoking, and high blood pressure. She asks the district court to issue an order that she be placed on CARES Act home confinement.
 

miracle181227The BOP continues to declare inmates recovered under its very liberal reading of CDC guidelines. Reality is not as forgiving. A research paper released last week reported that “Covid-19 can spread within days from the airways to the heart, brain and almost every organ system in the body, where it may persist for months.” In what Bloomberg described as the most comprehensive analysis to date of the SARS-CoV-2 virus’s distribution and persistence in the body and brain, scientists at the National Institutes of Health said they found the pathogen is capable of replicating in human cells well beyond the respiratory tract.”

The report pointed to delayed viral clearance as a potential contributor to the persistent symptoms wracking so-called long-haul COVID sufferers.

Ft Worth Star-Telegram, Man is 16th to die from COVID-19 at Fort Worth prison; cases spike at women’s facility (December 30, 2021)

Connecticut Insider, Lawsuit: Unvaccinated woman convicted in $10M Ponzi scheme a ‘sitting duck’ for COVID at CT prison (January 3, 2022)

Bloomberg, Coronavirus Can Persist for Months After Traversing Body (December 26, 2021)

Daniel Chertow, et al., SARS-CoV-2 infection and persistence throughout the human body and brain (Nat’l Institutes of Health, December 20, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Biden DOJ Flips, Says CARES Act People Can Stay Home – Update for December 22, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

HOME FOR THE HOLIDAYS

holidays211222Eleven months of uncertainty came to an abrupt and welcome end yesterday as Attorney General Merrick Garland announced that the Dept. of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel had reversed its January 2021 opinion, concluding that inmates sent to home confinement under the CARES Act will not have to return to prison when the COVID-19 national pandemic emergency ends. 

The decision reversed the OLC’s swan song from the last days of the Trump Administration that

the CARES Act authorizes the Director of BOP to place prisoners in home confinement only during the statute’s covered emergency period and when the Attorney General finds that the emergency conditions are materially affecting BOP’s functioning. Should that period end, or should the Attorney General revoke the finding, the Bureau would be required to recall the prisoners to correctional facilities unless they are otherwise eligible for home confinement under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(2). We also conclude that the general imprisonment authorities of 18 U.S.C. § 3621(a) and (b) do not supplement the CARES Act authority to authorize home confinement under the Act beyond the limits of section 3624(c)(2).

Last July, things looked dire when the New York Times reported that the Biden DOJ had reviewed the OLC opinion and concluded that it was right. That was perhaps a trial balloon, because DOJ made no official announcement about any review. Nevertheless, the Times story unleashed a storm of criticism.

But yesterday, the Biden DOJ left a shiny gift under the tree for about 4,000 federal prisoners on home confinement. The new OLC memorandum begins

This Office concluded in January 2021 that, when the COVID-19 emergency ends, the Bureau of Prisons will be required to recall all prisoners placed in extended home confinement under section 12003(b)(2) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act who are not otherwise eligible for home confinement under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(2). Having been asked to reconsider, we now conclude that section12003(b)(2) and the Bureau’s preexisting authorities are better read to give the Bureau discretion to permit prisoners in extended home confinement to remain there.

gift211222The New York Times said this morning that the OLC’s reversal “was a rare instance when the department under Attorney General Merrick B. Garland reversed a high-profile Trump-era decision. It was also a victory for criminal justice advocates.”

But not completely unexpected. During a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing last October, Garland said, “It would be a terrible policy to return these people to prison after they have shown that they are able to live in home confinement without violations, and as a consequence, we are reviewing the OLC memorandum… [and] all about other authorities that Congress may have given us to permit us to keep people on home confinement.”

He promised Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) that “we’re not in a circumstance where anybody will be returned before we have completed that review and implemented any changes we need to make.” At that session, Committee Chairman Richard Durbin (D-IL) complained that he was “frustrated by DOJ’s handling of COVID and prison issues.”

Yesterday, Garland said in a statement, “Thousands of people on home confinement have reconnected with their families, have found gainful employment and have followed the rules. In light of today’s Office of Legal Counsel opinion, I have directed that the Department engage in a rulemaking process to ensure that the Department lives up to the letter and the spirit of the CARES Act. We will exercise our authority so that those who have made rehabilitative progress and complied with the conditions of home confinement, and who in the interests of justice should be given an opportunity to continue transitioning back to society, are not unnecessarily returned to prison.”

A White House spokesman said in a statement that President Biden welcomed the change, noting “the relief it will mean for thousands of individuals on home confinement who have worked hard toward rehabilitation and are contributing to their communities.”

christmasunderpants211222Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman had an interesting observation about Garland’s statement in his Sentencing Law and Policy blog: “This statement by AG Garland suggests that DOJ is now going to engage in ‘rulemaking’ that will create a set of requirements or criteria about who may get to stay on home confinement and who might be returned to prison after the pandemic ends. I am not sure how that rulemaking process will work, but I am sure the AG statement is hinting (or flat-out saying) that there will still be some in the “home confinement cohort” who may need to worry about eventually heading back to federal prison.”

For now, the impetus for prisoners to qualify for CARES Act placement, which can continue as long as the emergency lasts (and if omicron has anything to say about it, it will be awhile) will increase. CARES Act placement will rightly be seen as not just a furlough but as a bus ticket home. And we’ll just have to see whether a DOJ rulemaking wants to turn that shiny gift Biden left under the tree into a pair of underpants.

The New York Times, Biden Legal Team Decides Inmates Must Return to Prison After Covid Emergency (July 19, 2021)

The New York Times, Some Inmates Can Stay Confined at Home After Covid Emergency, Justice Dept. Says (December 22, 2021)

Sentencing Law and Policy, New OLC opinion memo concluding CARES Act “grants BOP discretion to permit prisoners in extended home confinement to remain there” (December 21, 2021)

DOJ, Statement by Attorney General Merrick B. Garland (December 21, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Biden Administration Promises a Fix for CARES Act Home Confinees – Update for November 1, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

ATTORNEY GENERAL PLEDGES TO SEEK CARES ACT PATCH

return161227By now, everyone knows that a Dept. of Justice Office of Legal Counsel opinion issued in the last days of the Trump Administration ruled that the CARES Act requires that anyone the Bureau of Prisons sent to home confinement under the Act must return to prison when the COVID-19 emergency ends. A few months ago, the Biden DOJ agreed that the opinion was correct.

Since then, there has been a hue and cry from elected officials, advocates, and celebrities that no inmates on home confinement should be forced back to prison if they have complied with home confinement terms. Last Wednesday, Attorney General Merrick Garland made the most solid commitment yet from the Biden Administration that a way out of the legal thicket will be found.

During a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing on DOJ, Garland said “it would be a terrible policy to return these people to prison after they have shown that they are able to live in home confinement without violations, and as a consequence, we are reviewing the OLC memorandum… [and] all about other authorities that Congress may have given us to permit us to keep people on home confinement.” Garland told Sen Cory Booker (D-NJ) that while he doesn’t know how long the DOJ review might take,

but we can be sure that it will be accomplished before the end of the CARES Act provision which extends until the end of the pandemic, and so, we’re not in a circumstance where anybody will be returned before we have completed that review and implemented any changes we need to make.

At the opening of the session, Committee Chairman Richard Durbin (D-IL) complained that he was “frustrated by DOJ’s handling of COVID and prison issues.” He complained to Garland that he’d written to DOJ multiple times about home confinement with no reply, and that the Department had supported only 36 of over 31,000 compassionate release requests filed with it.

hear211101We’re only a little more than nine months into the Biden Administration, but I already have this disconcerting feeling that Joe has overpromised but underperformed. We’ll see whether Garland – by all accounts a careful and thoughtful lawyer – was hinting at a significant DOJ effort to solve the CARES Act home confinement problem, or was just saying what he thought the Judiciary Committee wanted to hear.

Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Oversight Hearing on Dept of Justice (October 27, 2021)

Josh Mittman, FAMM, on Twitter (October 27, 2021)

Interrogating Justice, AG Garland Gives Hope to Those on COVID-19 Home Confinement (October 28, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

You Know, Joe, You Could Be Doing A Lot More… – Update for October 28, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

WHO YOU GONNA BELIEVE, JOE BIDEN OR YOUR OWN EYES?

whoyabelieve201214President Joe Biden’s Administration has said all the right things about criminal justice reform, making its inaction or, worse, contrary actions on significant initiatives in Congress (or even in the President’s own Dept. of Justice) frustrating and baffling. So do we believe what we hear or what we see?

But then, the guy so far can’t get his signature infrastructure bill through his own party’s caucus. Maybe I am expecting too much from the septuagenarian chief executive.

Still, what Biden himself could be doing without Congress is addressing the 4,000 inmates on CARES Act home confinement. Those people, according to both Trump’s and Biden’s Dept of Justice, will have to return to prison when the national pandemic emergency ends, which could be as soon as early next year. Recently, 28 House Democrats became the latest to urge Biden to “immediately commute the sentences” of the CARES Act home confinees. The lawmakers also urged the creation of an independent board to review a massive backlog of more than 15,000 petitions seeking clemency.

“Nearly all of those released have thrived since returning home by reconnecting with their families and communities, and by engaging actively in civic life,” David Trone (D-MD) and his colleagues wrote to the president. “Mr. President, with a stroke of your pen you could remove the threat of reincarceration that looms over thousands of people who have already demonstrated their commitment to being productive members of their communities.”

Last week, Kara Gotsch, deputy director at the Sentencing Project, a Washington-based nonprofit focused on injustices in the criminal justice system, said the DOJ’s opinion is “devastating” for those who are staying at home and now face the possibility of being sent back to federal prison. “It is really a shame that the White House and DOJ appear to be standing by that memo issued by the Trump administration,” she said.

The Capital News Service reported Gotsch has been in communication with the Biden administration, asking for grants of clemency for everybody who’s been serving sentences in home confinement, but the White House is considering granting it to only some.

“I think that’s a step in the right direction, but there’s no reason why anyone who has proven themselves to be successful on the home confinement program should be sent back,” she added.

warondrugs211028If the Administration is so concerned about racial disparity, it might urge the Senate to take up the EQUAL Act (S.79). According to the Sentencing Commission, no class of drug is as racially skewed as crack: 79% of sentenced crack offenders in 2009 were black, versus 10% white and 10% Hispanic. Combined with a 115-month average imprisonment for crack offenses versus 87 months for powder offenses, this makes for more African-Americans spending more time in the prison system.

Instead, Biden is pushing a proposal that would enhance sentences for certain synthetic opioids related to fentanyl. A coalition of nearly 100 civil rights and criminal justice reform groups last week warned that the plan will exacerbate racial disparities.

“Since the inception of the war on drugs, African Americans and Latino people have borne the brunt of enforcement-first approaches,” Sakira Cook of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, said. She argued that about 70% of defendants charged with fentanyl-related crimes have been minorities.

The Biden Administration defends the initiative as needed to stop the overdose epidemic.

Last week Kristen Clarke, the DOJ’s civil rights chief, highlighted the racial disparities in state juvenile detention systems. “Nationally, black children are over four times more likely to be incarcerated than white children,” Clarke said. “And the disparity is even greater in Texas, where Black children are over five times more likely to be incarcerated.”

Apparently, racial disparities are only important when the states cause them.

NPR, A proposed Biden drug policy could widen racial disparities, civil rights groups warn (October 20, 2021)

Drug Policy Alliance, Letter to Congress (October 22, 2021)

CNN, ‘Big, big shifts’: How Biden’s civil rights pros have reoriented the Justice Department (October 20, 2021)

Southern Maryland Chronicle, Democrats in Congress press Biden to extend COVID-related prisoner releases (October 19, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Biden Plans to Commute Some Drug Defendants, Vax BOP Staff – Update for September 14, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

SO WHAT HAPPENS NOW?

The morning after President Biden announced an executive order that all federal employees would get the COVID vaccine, the Bureau of Prisons numbers were stubbornly high. The number of sick inmates was up 5% from a week ago, standing at 553 (the highest count since March 15). More ominously, the number of sick staff jumped 12% to 563, nearly equal to the number of sick inmates, and the highest since April 20. COVID is present at 112 of 122 institutions, and the death toll notched up to at least 267 inmates.

deadcovid210914What remains puzzling is the BOP’s testing. The agency said it tested 127 people last week, a very low number of tests for the number of inmate cases the BOP is reporting.

Meanwhile, the number of vaccinated inmates hit the 60% mark, while the staff percentage barely moved, from 53.39% to 53.62%.

The staff number should change. On Thursday, Biden signed an Executive Order that, among other things, “require[s] COVID-19 vaccination for all Federal employees, subject to such exceptions as required by law.” The exceptions are for medical and religious reasons only, and (I already received one email asking this) the Order does not exempt BOP employees. Biden ordered each Federal agency to implement a program to require COVID-19 vaccination for all Federal employees and directed the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force to issue guidance within 7 days of the date of this order on agency implementation of this requirement for all agencies covered by this order.

The BOP announced two more COVID-19 deaths, one on September 4th at FCI Bennettsville and another from last November at FCI Talladega. The Talladega death was of a 29-year old who had contracted COVID on August 5, 2020, but who was declared “recovered” 12 days later.

At the 43-minute mark of last Friday morning’s White House press briefing, Press Secretary Jen Psaki had an exchange with an unidentified reporter:

Q: Jen, I’m hearing that the Bureau of Prisons issued a memo today telling approximately about 1,000 drug offenders how to apply for clemency. Have you — do you have anything on that?

MS. PSAKI: I would certainly point you to the Department of Justice. I would say that the President has been clear about his openness to using clemency powers, but I don’t — I wouldn’t say that’s an assessment of decisions made — and certainly targeting those toward nonviolent drug offenders. But I’d point you to the Department of Justice for any further details.

The riddle was solved yesterday when POLITICO reported that the Biden administration has begun asking people on CARES Act home confinement inmates to “formally submit commutation applications, criminal justice reform advocates and one inmate herself tell POLITICO.”

clemencyjack161229“Those who have been asked for the applications fall into a specific category,’ POLITICO reported, “drug offenders released to home under the pandemic relief bill known as the CARES Act with four years or less on their sentences. Neither the White House nor the Department of Justice clarified how many individuals have been asked for commutation applications or whether it would be expanding the universe of those it reached out to beyond that subset. But it did confirm that the president was beginning to take action.”

Business Insider published a piece on Saturday noting that “the Biden administration is considering granting commutations to those under home confinement who have federal drug charges and have less than four years left in their sentences. If enacted, that decision would only affect about 2,000 out of the 4,000 people currently under home confinement. To those that don’t fit the criteria, the administration will force them back to federal prison. For these individuals, the decision could be devastating to the progress they’ve made since emerging from behind bars. Sending [inmates] back to prison and hampering [their] progress would have the opposite effect of what our justice system purports to achieve.”

White House, Executive Order on Requiring Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination for Federal Employees (September 9, 2021)

BOP, Inmate Death at FCI Talladega (September 10, 2021)

White House, Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jen Psaki (September 10, 2021)

Politico, Biden starts clemency process for inmates released due to Covid conditions (September 13, 2021)

Business Insider, Thousands of people who were released from prison due to the pandemic are now thriving with their families. But if Biden doesn’t act now, they will be cruelly sent back. (September 11, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Who Knows What Joe’s Thinking? – Update for August 17, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

ADMINISTRATION HINTS AT DRUG CLEMENCY (MAYBE)

Biden Press Secretary Jen Psaki started hearts and tongues fluttering last week when she said the Administration was looking at clemency for federal drug offenders.

clemencypitch180716“The president is deeply committed to reducing incarceration and helping people successfully reenter society,” Psaki said in a press briefing. “And he said too many people are incarcerated — too many are black and brown — and he’s therefore exploring multiple avenues to provide relief to certain nonviolent drug offenders, including through the use of his clemency power.”

As a candidate, Biden said in 2019 that he wanted to release “everyone” in prison for marijuana, but Psaki has referred questions on whether he will do so to the Justice Department, saying last April it was “a legal question.”

The New York Post reported that “Psaki’s remark thrilled clemency advocates who have been pushing for Biden to commute prison sentences and issue pardons early in his term, which is uncommon for presidents. Clemency advocate Amy Povah said, “We are elated that President Biden has expressed an interest in using his executive clemency power with an emphasis upon drug cases.”

caresbear210104Meanwhile, other advocates feel frustrated that Biden has done nothing on a matter as small as addressing the status of people on CARES Act home confinement. Last Wednesday, Senators Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) and Cory Booker (D-New Jersey) wrote to President Biden, urging him to act on keeping CARES Act home confinees at home. They suggested, in part, that the Bureau of Prisons could “provide relief for certain individuals through prerelease home confinement, under 18 USC § 3624(c)(2), and the Elderly Home Detention Pilot Program, pursuant to 34 USC 6054l(g). For those who do not qualify for those provisions, BOP can recommend, and DOJ should support, compassionate release pursuant to 18 USC § 3582(c)(l)(A). Compassionate release is authorized whenever extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant a sentence reduction, and the once-in-a-century global pandemic that led to these home confinement placements certainly constitutes such an extraordinary and compelling circumstance.”

Reuters last week reported that the Justice Department had asked an Oregon federal judge on Tuesday to deny a bid by federal inmates to qualify for early release through First Step earned time credits. Prosecutors argued that no programs or activities completed by the inmates qualified for earned time credits.

Reuters said, “The rift could increase pressure on the Justice Department, which is under fire from civil rights advocates for its inaction to prevent BOP from sending thousands of federal inmates back to prison once the pandemic emergency is lifted.”

At issue is a provision from the 2018 First Step Act, which aims to ease harsh sentencing for non-violent offenders and reduce recidivism. The BOP may award 10 or 15 days’ credit for every 30 days of participation in recidivism-reduction or activities such as academic classes or certain prison jobs.

In a November 2020 proposed rule, the BOP defined a day of participation as eight hours and limited the menu of qualifying programs.

recid160321One issue is the BOP’s definition of a day of participation as 8 hours. “The math speaks for itself,” federal defenders wrote in a January 2021 letter to BOP. “It would take 219 weeks, or over 4 years to earn a full year of credit under the BOP’s proposed rule.”

In Tuesday’s case, the lead plaintiff has held prison jobs such as a painter and an HVAC worker and completed courses such as anger management, entrepreneurship, and a residential drug abuse program. But the government argued that none of those programs is on the BOP’s EBRR program list.

“If HVAC work doesn’t qualify, what kinds of jobs do?” asked Magistrate Judge John Acosta, noting the program’s goal of reducing recidivism and facilitating reintegration into society.

“The ones that are identified by the Bureau of Prisons,” AUSA Jared Hager replied, noting the inmates have “not shown entitlement to any credit.” The list of qualifying programs and activities will be updated by Attorney General Merrick Garland, he added.

Similar suits are on file in federal courts throughout the country.

Finally, JDSupra.com reported last week that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) has partnered with Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) and Sen Booker to draft comprehensive federal cannabis reform legislation, which the sponsors plan to introduce this fall.

marijuanahell190918The measure, called the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act (the CAOA), would – among other matters – would require the federal government to expunge any arrest or conviction for a non-violent federal cannabis offense, and allow any person serving a criminal justice sentence for a non-violent federal cannabis offense to move for sentence reduction. After the hearing, the court would be required to expunge each arrest, conviction, or adjudication for a non-violent federal cannabis offense.

The drafting of the bill is in its early stages. The sponsors are actively soliciting comments prior to CAOA’s introduction. Comments may be submitted through September 1, 2021, at Cannabis_Reform@finance.senate.gov.

New York Post, Biden ‘exploring’ clemency for federal drug crimes, Psaki says (August 11, 2021)

Letter from Senators Durbin and Booker to President Biden (August 12, 2021)

Reuters, U.S. Justice Dept clashes with inmates over credits to shave prison time (August 10, 2021)

JDSupra.com, US Senators Seeking Input on Comprehensive Federal Cannabis Reform Legislation (August 11, 2021)

 

– Thomas L. Root

SIZZLE BUT NO STEAK YET IN WASHINGTON – UPDATE FOR AUGUST 13, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LAST WEEK IN WASHINGTON

oddcouple210219The news website Axios reported last week that Sens. Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) and Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) – the Senate’s criminal-justice reform “odd couple” – “are working to win Senate passage of a big criminal justice reform package this Congress.”

Axios cited approval of three bills by the Senate Judiciary Committee, the COVID-19 Safer Detention Act, the First Step Implementation Act, and the Prohibiting Use of Acquitted Conduct Act as being “three measures, Grassley told Axios, they ‘hope to package along with potentially other proposals to pass the Senate sometime this Congress’.” Durbin separately told Axios in his own statement that he’s “committed to bringing these bills to the Senate floor this Congress.”

Axios predicts the final package also may include a measure for CARES Act confinees who otherwise may be forced to return to prison, a Republican Senate staffer told Axios, as well as the EQUAL Act. One challenge will be the crime spike, Axios said, which has the potential of sapping support from senators afraid of being branded soft on crime.

I like Axios, which is a pretty even-handed service, albeit more of a news aggregator than a news reporter. (Nothing wrong with news aggregators – LISA is largely one itself). But because it’s an aggregator, I am not sure whether Axios’s report represents something new, or is just a survey of what we already know.

caresbear210104In other developments, a coalition of five civil rights groups last week urged the Dept of Justice to reconsider its position on sending back to prison thousands of federal inmates transferred to home confinement during the pandemic, offering a legal analysis they believe would justify keeping them out from behind bars.

They argued that the Trump-era legal memo that concluded BOP is required by law to revoke home confinement for those transferred during the pandemic as soon as the emergency period is over, contending the Office of Legal Counsel memo is based on a flawed interpretation of the CARES Act.

Update: Yesterday, Senators Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) and Cory Booker (D-New Jersey) wrote to President Biden, urging him to act on keeping CARES Act home confinees at home. They suggested, in part, that the Bureau of Prisons could “provide relief for certain individuals through prerelease home confinement, under 18 USC § 3624(c)(2), and the Elderly Home Detention Pilot Program, pursuant to 34 USC § 6054l(g). For those who do not qualify for those provisions, BOP can recommend, and DOJ should support, compassionate release pursuant to 18 USC 3582(c)(l)(A). Compassionate release is authorized whenever extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant a sentence reduction, and the once-in-a-century global pandemic that led to these home confinement placements certainly constitutes such an extraordinary and compelling circumstance.”

So far, the President has resisted by inaction such calls to address the looming home confinement crisis.

Axios, Senate plans barrage on crime (August 1, 2021)

The Hill, Civil rights groups offer DOJ legal strategy on keeping inmates home after pandemic (August 4, 2021)

Letter to Dawn E. Johnsen, Acting Asst Attorney General (August 4, 2021)

The Hill, Top Senate Democrats urge Biden to take immediate action on home confinement program (August 12, 2021)

Letter to President Biden from Sens. Durbin and Booker (August 12, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

A Couple of ‘Shorts’ – Update for July 9, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

GRANDMA GOES HOME AS ADVOCATES BEAT UP BIDEN ON HOME CONFINEMENT

short210709FAMM, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Justice Action Network last week called on President Biden to use his clemency authority to prevent about 4,000 people now on CARES Act home confinement from being sent back to prison when the pandemic ends.  Nothing new there. But then, into the middle of this brouhaha stepped the Bureau of Prisons.

A month ago, Gwen Levi, a Baltimore grandmother who had been sent to home confinement under the CARES Act, was returned to prison by the BOP.  Her offense was “escape.” In the BOP, that means that she was taking a computer class, and during class, she turned off her phone. The halfway house called to check on her whereabouts, but she did not call back until after class. For that, she went back to prison for another eight years.

The BOP didn’t reckon on the media outcry. After all, who doesn’t like grandmas? The Washington Post trumpeted, “A grandmother didn’t answer her phone during a class. She was sent back to prison.” USA Today blared, “‘Scared and confused’: Elderly inmate sent home during COVID is back in prison after going to computer class.” A grandmother didn’t answer her phone during a class in Baltimore. The Mayor of Baltimore issued a statement complaining that

Following Gwen’s early release from prison last year, the 76-year-old chose to rewrite her story by volunteering for advocacy organizations around Baltimore. But while grace is a rare occurrence, judgment in America flows abundantly. Gwen recently made national headlines after being sent back to prison for failing to answer her phone during a computer class. This lack of patience and empathy was wrong…

Last Tuesday, Gwen’s district court judge granted her compassionate release.
levi210709

However, the media hue-and-cry may be having an effect. Every movement needs an icon, and Gwen may be it. For months advocacy groups have been asking Biden to address the issue, resulting from a Trump DOJ Office of Legal Counsel memo holding that CARES Act home confinees should be sent back to prison once the COVID-19 emergency ended. Biden has not withdrawn the memo, despite bipartisan calls for the Administration to do so.

Maybe now, the issue will get traction.

Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.), who led a letter of 28 House Democrats in April calling for the policy to be rescinded, “is disappointed he hasn’t officially extended the home confinement program,” a spokesperson said. Other advocates are considering it a misstep for Biden to not discuss the program as part of the administration’s crime portfolio.

A BOP spokeswoman said, “This will be an issue only after the pandemic is over. The president recently extended the national emergency and the Department of Health and Human Services has said the public health crisis is likely to last for the rest of the year.” The White House revisits the emergency declaration every three months, leaving the former prisoners in a constant state of limbo. The next deadline is later this month.

“This is not a heavy lift for the Biden administration. All these people were moved out of prison because Trump officials felt it was safe enough for them to go home, said Holly Harris, president and executive director of Justice Action Network. “What more political cover does President Biden possibly need? Lawmakers and advocates from both sides of the aisle agree: it’s time for President Biden to grant clemency to these men and women so they can fully connect with their families, secure jobs, and move on with their lives. Anything less is unconscionable.”

ABA Journal, Judge rules for grandma on home confinement after arrest for not answering calls during computer class (July 7, 2021)

ACLU, Bipartisan Organizations Call on President Biden to Immediately Prevent Thousands on Home Confinement From Being Sent Back to Federal Prison (June 28, 2021)

The Hill, Biden faces criticism for not extending home confinement for prisoners (June 26, 2021)

New York Times, Thousands of Prisoners Were Sent Home Because of Covid. They Don’t Want to Go Back (June 27, 2021)

BORDEN NOTCHES ITS FIRST COLLATERAL WIN

Kristen Brenner was convicted of being a felon in possession of a gun in violation of 18 USC § 922(g)(1). Because of her prior convictions, the government sought to get Krissy a minimum 15-year Armed Career Criminal Act sentence. Her district court refused the government, however, agreeing with Krissy that her Tennessee reckless aggravated assault conviction (related to impaired driving) was not a crime of violence.

Reckless, maybe... but not c a crime of violence,
Reckless, maybe… but not a crime of violence,

The government appealed, but the case was held in abeyance pending the Supreme Court decision in Borden v. United States. After that June 10 decision held that crimes that could be committed with a “reckless” intent did not fit the “crime-of-violence elements” definition, the government moved to dismiss its appeal in Krissy’s case.

Last week, the 6th Circuit dismissed the government appeal. “Because we apply the law as it currently stands, Borden controls Brenner’s case. Borden analyzed the very statute under which she was convicted, which refers to a person ‘recklessly committing an assault’… Under Borden, that mens rea is insufficient.”

United States v. Brenner, Case No 19-5647, 2021 US App LEXIS 19657 (6th Cir. July 1, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root