Tag Archives: HR 4018

Congress Leaves Stimulus – and Federal Prisoners – Up In The Air – Update for August 10, 2020

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

DON’T START TO FEEL TOO STIMULATED JUST YET

Congress left Washington, D.C. last Friday for its August recess without passing a supplemental stimulus bill. The Democrats are pushing the HEROES Act, passed by the House last May, which proposes $3.5 trillion in spending and includes a lot of beneficial provisions for federal prisoners. The Republican-controlled Senate favors the HEALS Act, which includes about $1 trillion in spending but nothing of the sentencing relief measures favored by the House.

senatestimulus200810The HEROES Act provides that the Bureau of Prisons shall send to home confinement anyone who is 50 or over, is within 12 months of release, or has a list of COVID-19 risk conditions. Those conditions, which were just expanded for a second time by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on July 30, include pregnancy, heart disease, asthma, diabetes, HIV, cancer, sickle-cell anemia, respiratory problems, obesity, hypertension, or immune system weaknesses. The only exception are people who pose a specific and substantial risk of bodily injury to or to use violent force against another person.

What’s more, courts would be required to reduce sentences for people unless the government can show by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant poses a risk of “serious, imminent injury” to an identifiable person. The Act also incorporates a reduction of the elderly offender home detention program sentence requirement (the subject of a separate bill that has already passed the House, H.R. 4018) to two-thirds of the sentence reduced by good time, instead of the current two-thirds of the whole sentence.

The Health, Economic Assistance, Liability Protection and Schools (HEALS) Act being pushed by the Senate is a mashup of eight other bills, none of which favors prisoners. What’s worse, HEALS’ stimulus package of an additional $1,200 per person is now withheld from people who were prisoners for every day of the 2020 calendar year.

Senate Democrats are trying to get the HEALS Act to require that phone calls from federal prisons remain free during the pandemic, which is a fig leaf (but not much of one) for prisoners.

No one knows whether a final bill, if there even is one, will include any of the House provisions.

housestimulus200810Several groups led by ACLU wrote to Senate and House leaders last week, urging that any stimulus package require the BOP to transfer vulnerable federal inmates to home confinement, clarify the authority of courts to order compassionate release based on COVID-19, and reduce the amount of time courts must wait before considering compassionate release motions during the pandemic. The letter also called on Congress to expand the elderly offender home detention program.

Finally, the House last week added an amendment to the 2021 Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations bill which prohibits the BOP from collecting its 25% fee from halfway house or home confinement inmates. “For returning citizens lucky enough to find jobs, especially in the midst of a national pandemic and economic crisis,” Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-District of Columbia) said, “charging up to 25% of their income in unnecessary fees is not only unfair, it is counterproductive. Returning citizens could far better use this money to save for future rent, child support and fines and fees associated with their conviction, such as restitution.”

H.R. 6800, HEROES Act

S.4318 – American Workers, Families, and Employers Assistance Act

The Hill, Senate Democrats push to include free phone calls for incarcerated people in next relief package (August 6, 2020)

ACLU Leadership Conference, Open Letter to Senate and House Leaders (August 4, 2020)

Press Release, Norton Amendment Prohibiting Bureau of Prisons from Collecting Subsistence Fees from Returning Citizens Passes House (August 3, 2020)

– Thomas L. Root

Congress Lurching Toward Easing Compassionate, Elderly Offender Release? – Update for June 29, 2020

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

COVID-19 SPURS LAWMAKERS, CDC

corona200313Last week’s upsurge in COVID-19 cases nationally has begun to translate to an increase in Federal Bureau of Prisons inmates with coronavirus. A number that had dwindled last week to 1,256 by last Thursday shot back up to 1,429 as of last night. The inmate death count is 93, with COVID-19 present on 71 prison compounds throughout the BOP system (57% of all facilities).

As of yesterday, the BOP had tested 21,400 inmates, up about 12% from last week. The Bureau is still showing about 30% of inmates tested as positive for COVID-19, and it has only tested about now out of six inmates.

The noteworthy developments in COVID-19 last week, however, were not viral, but rather legislative and medical.

Legislative: Senators Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) and Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), principal authors of the First Step Act, last week jointly introduced S.4034, bipartisan legislation to reform the Elderly Offender Home Detention (EOHD) Program and compassionate release.

Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa)
                  Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa)

EOHD, authorized by First Step as part of 34 USC § 60541(g), permits the BOP to place prisoners who are 60 years old or older, convicted of non-violent offenses, and with good conduct in home detention for the remainder of their sentences. Compassionate release, expanded by First Step, permits a court to reduce a prisoner’s sentence for extraordinary and compelling reasons, pursuant to 18 USC § 3582(c)(1).

S.4034, dubbed the COVID-19 Safer Detention Act, would reform the EOHD and compassionate release by:

• Clarifying that the percentage of time an inmate needs to qualify for EOHD should calculated based on an inmate’s net sentence, including reductions for good time. Currently, the BOP charily calculates it as two-thirds of the total sentence, not two-thirds of the 85% of the sentence the inmate actually serves. This change has already passed the House by voice vote in HR 4018, which las been languishing in the Senate since last Christmas;

• Cutting the percentage of time an inmate must serve to qualify for  EOHD from two-thirds of the sentence to one-half;

• Making “old law” federal prisoners (those convicted prior to 1988) eligible for compassionate release;

• Making DC offenders housed in BOP facilities eligible for EOHD;

• Making denial of EOHD release subject to court review; and

• Providing that during the pandemic, COVID-19 vulnerability is deemed a basis for compassionate release, a statutory change that would prevent the government from trying to convince courts (and some have been convinced) that the pandemic is hardly extraordinary; and

• Shortening the period prisoners must wait for judicial review for elderly home detention and compassionate release from 30 to 10 days. Currently, there is no judicial review of a BOP denial of EOHD, and inmates must ask the BOP to file for compassionate release on their behalf, and wait 30 days for an answer before filing themselves.

Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Illinois)
Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Illinois)

It is unclear whether the bill will pass, but sponsorship by a Democrat and Republican increases its odds. Hamodia reported that the bill “will likely be attached it to another bill, such as a stimulus bill or the police-reform bill currently being crafted by Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.)”

Medical: The other COVID-19 major development last week was medical. Last Thursday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta released updated COVID-19 guidelines to adjust the ages and expand the health problems that could make people more likely to have severe complications. The move comes amid the rising number of younger patients and new studies that show the effects of certain conditions.

The new CDC guidelines are crucial for prisoners, because courts determine whether movants for compassionate release qualify according to whether the inmates have one or more of the CDC risk factors.

First, the CDC walked back the “65 and over” risk factor, which many judges have interpreted as being a hard number, denying any health-concern consideration for a 64-year old but treating a 66-year old prisoner as knocking on death’s door.

death200330Instead, CDC highlights that all ages could catch the coronavirus but effects of the infection may get worse as people get older. “There’s not an exact cutoff of age at which people should or should not be concerned,” Jay Butler, the CDC’s deputy director of infectious diseases, said in a news briefing.

Of more relevance to prisoners, the CDC has found that risks associated with obesity start at a much lower level. The CDC had held that only the morbidly obese (body mass index of 42+) were at risk. Now, the CDC says anyone with a BMI of 30 or more is at risk.

Under the old standard, a 50-year old 6-foot tall man would have to weigh 310 lbs. to be at risk. Now, the same guy only has to tip the scales at 225 lbs. to exceed a 30 BMI.

Other conditions CDC identified as elevating COVID-19 risk included chronic kidney disease, COPD, weaker immune system due to organ transplant, heart conditions, sickle cell disease, type 1 and 2 diabetes, asthma, dementia, cerebrovascular diseases, cystic fibrosis, high blood pressure, liver disease, pulmonary fibrosis, and an inherited blood disorder known as thalassemia. The CDC also added pregnancy to the list.

A number of inmates have been denied compassionate release because judges decided their risk factors – such as hypertension and dementia – did not match the risk factors on the prior CDC list. There is no statutory limitation to the number of times an inmate may file for compassionate release (other than the judge’s ire, perhaps), meaning that the changing COVID-19 risk landscape offers prisoners a new shot at release.

COVID-19 Tracker: The Marshall Project is running a state-by-state COVID-19 prison tracker website, which includes “Federal” as a category. The site charts total cases, inmates and staff currently sick, deaths, and new cases by date.

S.4034, COVID-19 Safer Detention Act (introduced June 22, 2020)

Hamodia, New Senate Legislation Expands Early Release (June 23)

CDC, People of Any Age with Underlying Medical Conditions (June 25, 2020)

Medical Daily, CDC Updates Guidelines On Coronavirus Risk Factors (June 26)

The Marshall Project, A State-by-State Look at Coronavirus in Prisons (June 25)

– Thomas L. Root

Dept. of Low Expectations – Update for October 8, 2019

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

ONE BILL GETS REPORTED FROM ONE COMMITTEE, AND EVERYONE THINKS HE’S GOING HOME

release191008A few readers complained last week that I had not reported the House Judiciary Committee’s vote that sent H.R. 4018 to the House floor. H.R. 4018 is a bill that would modify the Elderly Offender Home Detention Program (34 USC § 60541(g)(5)) to let those over-60 year old prisoners qualify for home detention after doing two-thirds of their net sentence rather than their gross sentence.

Currently, to qualify for the First Step Act’s expanded EOHD program, you must be 60 years old and have served two-thirds of your whole sentence. In other words, if you were sentenced to 100 months, you have to serve 67 months before you go home on home detention, and then you stay in detention until you reach 85 months, when you are released.

H.R. 4018, a single-sponsor bill, would qualify a 60-year old prisoner after he or she did two thirds of the net sentence. If you were sentenced to 100 months, you get out after 85 months with good time. H.R. 4018 would put you in the EOHD with two thirds of 85 months. Thus, you would go home after 57 months, and stay on home detention until 85 months.

longodds191008The House Judiciary Committee reported the bill favorably on Sept. 10 by a 28-8 vote. Nevertheless, Skopos Labs – which tracks federal legislation – gives the bill a 3% chance of becoming law. The legislation, with only 10 House co-sponsors, had little chance of being brought up for a Senate vote even before the impeachment talk ramped up. Recall how the First Step Act, with the House passing a very pro-prisoner version, barely made it to the Senate floor. That bill, with over 40 Senate co-sponsors and President Trump lobbying for passage, finally passed as a well watered-down measure in the closing hours of the Senate.

I did not mention H.R. 4018 for the same reason I did not mention the proposed Prohibiting Punishment of Acquitted Conduct Act of 2019, introduced Sept. 26 by Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Dick Durbin (D-Illinois). The bill would prohibit federal courts from considering acquitted conduct at sentencing, defining ‘acquitted conduct’ to include “acts for which a person was criminally charged and adjudicated not guilty after trial in a Federal, State, Tribal, or Juvenile court, or acts underlying a criminal charge or juvenile information dismissed upon a motion for acquittal.”

Grassley, who is Senate president pro tempore, said, “If any American is acquitted of charges by a jury of their peers, then some sentencing judge shouldn’t be able to find them guilty anyway and add to their punishment.” Currently, the Guidelines are written to run up the sentence with acquitted conduct, and judges do it all the time.

mcconnell180219This bill, S.2566, already has five co-sponsors, two Democrats and three Republicans. Grassley has a lot of horsepower in the Senate leadership. Yet, like H.R. 4018, it has no more than a ghost of a chance of passage. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), controls what bills reach the Senate floor for a vote. He has been an opponent of any prison reform, and only brought First Step to a vote because of White House pressure. Now, with President Trump soured on criminal justice legislation and preoccupied with re-election and impeachment, there won’t be any White House support for bringing any criminal justice measure to a Senate vote.

Stories like this don’t help: Last Friday, the Providence, Rhode Island, Journal reported that Joel Francisco, released from a life sentence for crack because of the First Step Act, is wanted for stabbing a man to death in a hookah bar. Remember Wendell Callahan? The Sen. Tom Cottons (R-Arkansas) of the world are always gleeful to have a poster child against sentencing reform like this fall into their laps.

H.R.4018 – To provide that the amount of time that an elderly offender must serve before being eligible for placement in home detention is to be reduced by the amount of good time credits earned by the prisoner (reported favorably by House Judiciary Committee, Sept. 10)

S. 2566: A bill to amend section 3661 of title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the consideration of acquitted conduct at sentencing (Introduced Sept. 26)

Providence, Rhode Island, Journal, He was released early from prison in February. Now he’s wanted for a murder on Federal Hill (Oct. 4)

– Thomas L. Root