Tag Archives: garland

EQUAL Act Rises, Phoenix-Like, In New Congress – Update for January 30, 2023

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

EQUAL ACT COMING AROUND AGAIN

People are still asking about the status of various criminal justice bills that have been pending in Congress for the past few years. So let’s review some high school government class notes…

Every Congress lasts two years, beginning in the January of an odd year and ending at the end of the next year (and even year). The last Congress was the 117th Congress since the adoption of the U.S. Constitution. The one that started on January 3, 2023, is the 118th Congress.

phoenix230130Any bill that was pending but not passed when the last Congress ended died on January 2. This included the EQUAL Act, a bill that would have equalized the penalties for crack and powder cocaine. EQUAL passed the House last session, but while declaring its support for the measure, Senate leadership (and I’m talking about Sen. Charles Schumer [D-NY], Senate majority leader) inexplicably failed to bring EQUAL to a vote.

So the EQUAL Act – like marijuana reform, 18 USC 924(c) retroactivity, expungement, and every other criminal justice issue before Congress – now must start over. No new EQUAL Act has yet been introduced in either the House or Senate, but last week, talk of crack-powder equality rose like a phoenix from the ashes of the 117th Congress. FAMM and 20 other criminal justice reform groups wrote to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Richard Durbin (D-IL) and the new Ranking Member of the Committee, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), urging them to have the Committee schedule a markup for the measure as soon as it is introduced (whenever that is).

The letter said

Last Congress, the EQUAL Act was one of only a few pieces of legislation to enjoy clear bipartisan support. The House of Representatives passed the bill in September 2021 with an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 361-66. The Senate version of the bill enjoyed the support of more than 60 senators, but never received a vote in committee or on the floor. To ensure this strong bipartisan bill reaches President Biden’s desk, we urge you and your committee to begin work on this urgent piece of legislation immediately.

Signers of the letter included criminal justice rights groups from the left and right, as well as a gallimaufry of organizations including Americans for Tax Reform, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, the Major Cities Chiefs Association, and the NBA’s National Basketball Social Justice Coalition.

canoe230130

In his Sentencing Law and Policy blog, Ohio State University law professor Douglas Berman wrote last week that “notably, but not surprisingly, this letter to Congress makes no mention of the fact that… US Attorney General Garland released last month new federal charging guidelines that includ[ed] instructions to federal prosecutors to treat crack like powder cocaine at sentencing. Though these new charging guidelines do not have the legal force of statutory reform, they might readily lead members of Congress to see less urgency in advancing reform or even to be more resistan[t] to reform as we saw late last year. Fingers crossed that EQUAL can gather momentum again and actually finally eliminate the pernicious and unjustified crack/powder disparity once and for all.”

FAMM, Coalition of law enforcement, justice reform, and civil rights organizations urge Congress to pass the EQUAL Act (January 26, 2023)

FAMM, Letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman (January 26, 2023)

Sentencing Law and Policy, New year and new Congress brings a new effort to advance new EQUAL Act (January 26, 2023)

– Thomas L. Root

Blue Christmas for Criminal Justice Reform – Update for December 27, 2022

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2smallSanta
SENTENCE REFORM DIES WITH 117TH CONGRESS

Sentencing reform is dead for another two years.

bluechristmas221227Of all the criminal justice reform bills in Congress – the First Step Implementation Act (S.1014), the Smarter Sentencing Act (S.1013), the COVID-19 Safer Detention Act (S.312), the Prohibiting Punishment of Acquitted Conduct Act (S.601), the EQUAL Act (S.79) and the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act (H.R. 3617) – exactly none made it past the Senate during the two-year Congress that ends in a week. Zero. Zip. Bupkis.
With both the House nor Senate closed for a Christmas-Passover-Kwanzaa-New Year’s vacation until next Tuesday, the 117th Congress is done. It’s the legislative equivalent to taking a knee in the final minute of a football game. The clock’s running out.

runoutclock221227It was clear last summer that the First Step Implementation Act, the Smarter Sentencing Act, the COVID-19 Safer Detention Act (and the Prohibiting Punishment of Acquitted Conduct Act were going nowhere. But some marijuana and cocaine reform – even though it was not quite what was in the MORE Act and EQUAL Act that passed the House – looked likely as late as last week. However, despite bipartisan support for both bills, Senate Republicans shot them down, but with plenty of help from Senate Democrats and the Biden Administration.

As for marijuana, the Senate’s failure to act comes as a repudiation of Biden’s efforts for pot reform. In October, the president pardoned thousands of people convicted of simple marijuana possession (although no one pardoned was in federal prison) and said his administration would review how the drug is categorized.

The MORE Act would have allowed cannabis companies to open bank accounts and would have retroactively permitted changes in pot-based sentences. But efforts were severely hobbled last fall when Senate Majority Charles Schumer (D-NY), Sen Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Sen Ron Wyden (D-OR) introduced their own version of weed reform, the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act (S.4591).

Either MORE or CAOA would have been good for prisoners, but Democratic leadership’s push of an alternative bill diluted the groundswell of support needed to get MORE passed. By last week, the only hope was for banking reform – nothing for federal prisoners – but even that was exempted from last week’s giant end-of-year spending bill, the last chance it had for passage.

congressgradecard221227If anything, the EQUAL Act’s failure was a bigger disappointment. Aimed at reducing the disparity in sentencing for crack versus powder cocaine offenses by making crack and powder sentences the same, it would have benefitted thousands of prisoners with retroactive relief. EQUAL passed the House with bipartisan support and had what seemed to be a veto-proof majority of 50 Democrat supporters and 11 Republican Senate co-sponsors.

Then, Sen Charles Grassley (R-IA), the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee and introduced his SMART Cocaine Sentencing Act (S. 4116), which watered down EQUAL and put retroactivity in the hands of the Dept of Justice.

Still, EQUAL had a chance until Sen Tom Cotton (R–AR) single-handedly stopped the Senate from considering the bill last Wednesday. EQUAL, like the marijuana-friendly SAFE Banking Act was proposed as an addition to the catch-all spending package, an effort that Cotton frustrated.

Sen. Booker then sought unanimous consent to release the stand-alone version of the EQUAL Act from the Senate Judiciary Committee. Sen. Cotton, a hardline prohibitionist described by Beforeitsnews.com as someone “who has never met a drug penalty he thought was too severe,” objected. Sen. Booker’s “hail Mary” fell short.

Still, it appeared up until a week ago that some crack cocaine relief would be jammed into the giant end-of-year spending bill. Reuters reported a week ago that Senate negotiators had reached a potential compromise.

timing221227But then, Attorney General Merrick Garland picked the middle of the negotiations to issue a memo directing federal prosecutors to “promote the equivalent treatment of crack and powder cocaine offenses” in two ways. If they decide that a mandatory minimum should be charged, they should “charge the pertinent statutory quantities that apply to powder cocaine offenses.” And at sentencing, “prosecutors should advocate for a sentence consistent with the guidelines for powder cocaine rather than crack cocaine.”

Grassley was enraged, blasting the Garland memo as demanding that “prosecutors ignore the text and spirit of federal statutes [and] undermining legislative efforts to address this sentencing disparity.” And just like that, when the text of the 4,000-page, $1.7 trillion spending bill was released, the watered-down EQUAL Act was nowhere to be found.

“It is a searing indictment of a broken Beltway when a bill that passed the House with an overwhelming bipartisan vote, endorsed by law enforcement and civil rights leaders alike, with 11 Republican co-sponsors and filibuster-proof majority support in the Senate, and an agreement between the relevant committee Chairman and Ranking Member for inclusion in the end-of-year package, fails to make it to the President’s desk,” Holly Harris, president and executive director of the Justice Action Network, said. “The American people deserve better.”

FAMM vice president Molly Gill wants to see the EQUAL Act reintroduced next session. The politics are hard to predict: Democrats have one more seat in the Senate, while Republicans will take narrow control of the House.

The fact that a large number of House Republicans joined Democrats in passing the EQUAL Act last year is not reassuring: the trick will be getting a Republican speaker – who controls what comes up for a vote – put the bill in front of the chamber.

Any bill now pending in the House or Senate that has not passed will disappear on Jan 3, when the new 2-year Congress – the 118th – convenes. And we will start all over again, but with a much unfriendlier House of Representatives.

New Republic: Three Incredibly Popular Things That Congress Chose to Leave Out of the Spending Bill (December 20, 2022)

Reason, Congress Yet Again Fails To Pass Crack Cocaine Sentencing Reforms (December 20, 2022)

Marijuana Moment, Schumer’s “last ditch” cannabis banking push (December 19, 2022)

Reason, Merrick Garland’s New Charging Policy Aims To Ameliorate the Damage His Boss Did As a Drug Warrior (December 19, 2022)

Beforeitsnews.com, The Failure To Enact Marijuana Banking and Crack Sentencing Reforms Is a Window on Congressional Dysfunction (December 22, 2022)

Filter, The Limits of AG’s Guidelines Against Crack-Powder Sentencing Disparity (December 21, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2smallSanta

Criminal Justice Reform Efforts Die In 117th Congress With a Whimper – Update for December 20, 2022

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2smallSanta

SENATE CRACK COMPROMISE AND POT REFORM ARE DEAD

As of last Thursday, negotiators in the Senate had reportedly reached a tentative deal to narrow sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine from 18:1 to 2.5:1. Then, enter Merrick Garland…

congressbroken220330First, the compromise: Reuters reported that its sources said senators planned to tuck the measure into a bill funding the government. Under the deal reached, the crack/powder weight disparity would be narrowed to 2.5 to 1, but the change would not be retroactive. The Senate would attach the change to a year-end spending bill, which has been delayed for another week.

The compromise is the death knell for the EQUAL Act (S.79), which would have made crack and powder equal in sentence severity and would have been retroactive. EQUAL, which passed the House last year, has been in trouble in the Senate since Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA), the highest-ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, introduced the SMART Cocaine Sentencing Act (S.4116), which embodied the 2.5-to-1 ratio. proportion instead.

Then, the Dept of Justice: The compromise was shaky even before the DOJ announced relaxed crack charging policies last Friday. Those changes angered Sen. Grassley, who warned that “it undermines legislative efforts to address this sentencing disparity.” Yesterday, the compromise seems to have gone to hell.

Two sources told Reuters yesterday that even the 2.5:1 negotiations have stalled. After Friday’s DOJ announcement, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) joined Sen. Grassley in opposing the compromise. One source told Reuters that last-minute negotiations to tuck the measure into the year-end spending bill continued yesterday morning, but “inclusion was no longer seen as likely.”

nochance221220At this point, neither the EQUAL Act nor retroactivity nor even the watered-down SMART Cocaine Sentencing Act has any chance to pass in this Congress. Why the Attorney General had to choose Friday to stick his thumb in Chuck Grassley’s eye is anyone’s guess.

Marijuana reform this year is equally dead. Last Thursday, Sen Sherrod Brown (D-OH), who chairs the Senate Banking Committee, signaled that marijuana reform might be on hold until the next Congress in 2023. The modest changes being considered now do not address any criminal justice reform. Brown told Marijuana Moment he is interested in the “expanded SAFE Plus bill that Senate leadership has been finalizing because it’s expected to go beyond simple banking reform and also contain other provisions dealing with expungements and more.”

Today, Marijuana Moment reported:

Congressional staffers confirmed to Marijuana Moment that cannabis banking language is not being included in the omnibus appropriations bill despite a final push by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and other supporters from both parties. Advocates will now look ahead to 2023 and the possibility of advancing the cannabis reform in a divided Congress.

marijuana220412Sen Cory Booker, (D-NJ) said last week that Sen. McConnell is standing in the way of the lame-duck Congress passing any marijuana-related bills before the end of the year. NJ Advance Media reports that McConnell’s opposition to any marijuana bill “is giving Senate Republicans who support the measure cold feet, said Booker, who is helping to lead the effort to enact legislation before Republicans take control of the House in January and most likely prevent any bill from passing in the next two years.”

Congress is not completely impotent when it comes to prison and criminal justice reform. Last Wednesday, the House passed The Prison Camera Reform Act (S.2899) – approved by the Senate last year – and sent it to President Biden for signature. The bill requires the Bureau of Prisons to fix broken surveillance cameras and install new ones, “providing upgraded tools to fight and investigate staff misconduct, inmate violence and other problems,” according to industry publication Corrections1.

Reuters, U.S. Senate set to address cocaine sentencing disparity in funding bill (December 15, 2022)

Reuters, U.S. Senate Talks on Cocaine Sentencing Reform Hit Roadblock (December 19, 2022)

SMART Cocaine Sentencing Act (S.4116)

Marijuana Moment, Key Senate Chairman Signals Marijuana Banking Will Wait Until 2023, Says There’s ‘Interest In The Republican House’ (December 15, 2022)

Marijuana Moment, Cannabis banking left out of omnibus (Newsletter: December 20, 2022)

NJ.com, Mitch McConnell is blocking all marijuana legislation in Congress, N.J.’s Booker says (December 15, 2022)

Prison Camera Reform Act of 2021 (S.2899)

Corrections1, Congress passes Prison Camera Reform Act (December 16, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2smallSanta

DOJ Uses Guidance Memos to Try to Effect Crack Cocaine Reform – Update for December 19, 2022

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2smallSanta

CRACK REFORM COMETH… BUT IT’S TEMPORARY AND DOESN’T HELP ANYONE ALREADY LOCKED UP

Attorney General Merrick Garland has instructed federal prosecutors to end disparities in the way they charge offenses involving crack cocaine and powder cocaine.

crackpowder160606The change, outlined in two internal memos released by the Dept of Justice on Friday, is a “win for criminal justice reform advocates, who point out that the current sentencing regime has led to the disproportionate incarceration of Black Americans since the policy was adopted nearly 40 years ago,” Reuters said.

The new policy will take effect within 30 days. It does not apply retroactively. This means anyone sentenced under the harsher 18;1 ratio has no way to have his or her sentence adjusted to reflect what Congress now believes is fair.

The memos argue that “the crack/powder disparity in sentencing has no basis in science, furthers no law enforcement purposes, and drives unwarranted racial disparities in our criminal justice system.” Garland instructed prosecutors to treat “crack cocaine defendants no differently than for defendants in powder cocaine cases” when charging defendants and making sentencing recommendations.

They also instruct prosecutors to reserve charges involving mandatory minimums to situations with certain aggravating factors, such as leadership, possession of a gun, gang membership, or a history of violence.

“Today’s announcement recognizes this injustice and takes steps to finally strike parity between powder and crack cocaine sentences,” Sen Cory Booker (D-NJ), a sponsor of the EQUAL Act (S.79), said in a statement.

grassley180604But Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA), whose SMART Cocaine Sentencing Act (S.4116) – introduced last summer – is responsible for derailing the EQUAL Act, was displeased. “A bipartisan group of lawmakers, including myself, just recently came to an agreement on statutory changes that could possibly be included in the year-end funding bill,” Grassley said in a statement. “That hard-won compromise has been jeopardized because the attorney general inappropriately took lawmaking into his own hands. The administration could have engaged in the real and lasting legislative process, but opted for flimsy guidance that will disintegrate when this administration leaves office.”

Although Garland’s new charging policy has no retroactive effect, Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman noted in his Sentencing Law and Policy blog that “federal law does provide at least one possible means for Garland’s memo to retroactively apply to some previous crack convictions: AG Garland could have prosecutors bring, and vocally and consistently support, motions for sentence reductions under 3582(c)(1)(A) for crack offenders who are still serving unduly long and unfair crack sentences based in the unjust disparity.”

Reuters, U.S. Justice Department moves to eliminate cocaine sentencing disparity (December 16, 2022)

Washington Post, Garland moves to end disparities in crack cocaine sentencing (December 17, 2022)

Dept of Justice, General Department Policies Regarding Charging, Pleas, and Sentencing (December 16, 2022)

Dept of Justice, Additional Department Policies Regarding Charging, Pleas, and Sentencing in Drug Cases (December 16, 2022)

BBC, US to end crack and powder cocaine sentencing disparity (December 16, 2022)

Press Release, Grassley Statement On Justice Department’s Usurpation Of Legislative Authority, Disregard For Statutes As Written On Cocaine Prosecutions (December 16, 2022)

Sentencing Law and Policy, US Attorney General Garland releases new federal charging guidelines that include instructions to treat crack like powder cocaine (December 16, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2smallSanta

Peters Sworn In As Director of ‘Beleaguered’ BOP – Update for August 9, 2022

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

PETERS TAKES BOP HELM

Colette S. Peters was sworn in as the Bureau of Prisons 12th director last week, as the Biden administration looks to reform what the Associated Press called a “beleaguered agency.”
petersgarland220810Peters, the former director of the Oregon state prison system, replaced Michael Carvajal, who submitted his resignation in January but stayed in his post until a new director was named. Carvajal announced his retirement amid mounting pressure from Congress, after AP investigations by exposed widespread corruption, misconduct, and sexual abuse of female inmates.

Citing the Benedictine principles of love of neighbor, service, stewardship, justice and peace, Peters said at her investiture that “our mission is twofold: to ensure safe prisons and humane and sound correctional practices so that people reenter society as productive citizens. Our job is not to make good inmates; it is to make good neighbors… I believe in good government, I believe in transparency, and I know we cannot do this work alone. We must come to this work with our arms wide open.”

Peters replaces Carvajal as BOP director only a week after a Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations hearing on BOP mismanagement of USP Atlanta. After being forced by subpoena to appear, Carvajal “refused to accept responsibility for a culture of corruption and misconduct that has plagued his agency for years, angering both Democratic and Republican senators,” AP reported.

Dumpster220718Writing in Forbes, Walter Pavlo said, “Often frustrated by Carvajal, the subcommittee insisted that Carvajal stop talking about the organization chart in the BOP that prevented important information from reaching his desk.” Subcommittee chairman Sen Jon Ossoff (D-GA), told Carvajal that issues plaguing the BOP “are deeper than your leadership personally. This is clearly a diseased bureaucracy, and it speaks ill to our national values and our national spirit that we let this persist year after year and decade after decade. And if this country is going to be real about the principles at the core of our founding, and our highest ideals, then it can change at the Bureau of Prisons… And it has to happen right now. And with your departure and the arrival of a new director. I hope that moment has arrived.”

During her 10 years at Oregon DOC director, Peters built a reputation as a reformer, vowing to reduce the use of solitary confinement and even banning the use of the term “inmate” in favor of “adult in custody.” Like her counterparts in California and North Dakota, Peters visited Norway five years ago, hoping tobringing a gentler model of incarceration back to the United States.

But as The Marshall Project observed last week, “American prisons are still a long way from Europe’s, and even the most innovative corrections leaders here have overseen horrific living conditions in their prisons and abuse from their staff. In picking Peters to run the Bureau of Prisons, the Biden administration has brought local and state debates to a national stage: Can this new generation of prison leaders, who use words like “dignity” and “humanity,” actually make lives better for the men and women under their control?”

Kevin Ring, president of FAMM, said last week that worrying about who runs the BOP r may be focusing on the wrong problem. “I’m less concerned about who the BOP director is than whether we have an independent oversight mechanism in place,” Ring told The Marshall Project. Although the BOP has an inspector general to perform audits, FAMM has been pushing for legislation to create an oversight body with the authorization and funding to do regular site visits and unannounced inspections.

transparancy220810“During Carvajal’s tenure, the BOP has been a black box,” Ring said in a news release last month. “When COVID began spreading in federal prisons and families’ fears were at their greatest, Carvajal and the BOP somehow became less transparent. The BOP’s opaqueness felt like cruelty. We hope the incoming secretary is prepared to make significant changes to a system badly in need of them.”

Sen Richard Durbin (D-IL), chairman of the Judiciary Committee and Carvajal’s harshest Senate critic, said after meeting with Peters last week, “I’m more hopeful than ever that with Director Peters, Attorney General Garland and Deputy Attorney General Monaco have chosen the right leader to clear out the rot and reform BOP.”

Fox News, AG Garland swears in new director of the federal Bureau of Prisons, pushes for reform (August 2, 2022)

Forbes, Bureau Of Prisons Director Carvajal Leaves Behind A Tainted Legacy Void Of Accountability (July 31, 2022)

The Marshall Project, She Tried to ‘Humanize’ Prisons in Oregon. Can She Fix the Federal System? (August 4, 2022)

Reason, Biden’s New Bureau of Prisons Director Won’t be Able To Run Away From the Agency’s Corruption (August 1, 2022)

Shaw Local News, Durbin meets with newly sworn-in director of federal prisons (August 3, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

Outgoing Director Carvajal Beaten Up by Gang of Senators – Update for August 1, 2022

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

FORMER BOP DIRECTOR GETS SENATORIAL KICK IN THE PANTS ON HIS WAY OUT THE DOOR

Widespread drug abuse, substandard health care, violence and horrific sanitary conditions are rampant at USP Atlanta, according to a Senate Permanent Investigations Subcommittee investigation revealed last week.

riot170727The dysfunction at USP Atlanta is so notorious within the BOP that “its culture of indifference and mismanagement is derisively known among bureau employees as ‘the Atlanta way’,” the New York Times reported last week. Witnesses at the Subcommittee hearing last week “describe[ed] dozens of violent episodes — and the systematic effort to downplay and cover up the crisis — over the past few years,” The Times reported.

The prison’s conditions reflect wider problems in the BOP’s network of 122 facilities housing about 158,000 inmates, The Times said. The system has suffered from chronic overcrowding, staffing shortages, corruption, sexual violence and a culture that often encourages senior officials to minimize the extent of the problems.

The Associated Press reported that outgoing BOP Director Michael Carvajal, who testified under a Subcommittee subpoena, “faced a bipartisan onslaught Tuesday as he refused to accept responsibility for a culture of corruption and misconduct that has plagued his agency for years.”

schultz220801Carvajal argued that “he had been shielded from problems by his underlings — even though he’d been copied on emails, and some of the troubles were detailed in reports generated by the agency’s headquarters.” He blamed the size and structure of the BOP for his ignorance on issues such as inmate suicides, sexual abuse, and the free flow of drugs, weapons and other contraband that has roiled some of the BOP’s 122 facilities. His attempts to deflect responsibility for his leadership failings sat well with neither Subcommittee chairman Sen Jon Ossoff (D-GA) nor its ranking member, Sen Ron Johnson (R-WI).

Colette S. Peters, the longtime head of Oregon prisons, assumes the BOP director’s post on Tuesday. Carvajal finally will get the retirement he announced seven months ago, but not before the Subcommittee made it clear that it was fed up with his blandishments.

“Inmates hanging themselves in federal prisons, addicted to and high on drugs that flow into the facilities virtually openly,” Ossoff told Carvajal, “and as they hang and suffocate in the custody of the US government, there’s no urgent response from members of the staff, year after year after year… It’s a disgrace. And for the answer to be ‘other people deal with that. I got the report. I don’t remember’. It’s completely unacceptable.”

“It’s almost willful ignorance, and that’s what I find disturbing,” Johnson said. “‘Don’t want to know what’s happening below me. Don’t want to hear about rapes. Don’t want to hear about suicides’.”

rapeclub220801In one of the hearing’s most heated moments, Ossoff pressed Carvajal on rampant sexual abuse at FCI Dublin, a federal women’s prison in California’s Bay Area known to staff and inmates as the “rape club.” Among the Dublin employees charged criminally so far is the prison’s former warden.

“Is the Bureau of Prisons able to keep female detainees safe from sexual abuse by staff?” Ossoff asked. “Yes or no?”

“Yes, we are,” Carvajal replied. “In those cases when things happen, we hold people appropriately accountable.”

“You are the director at a time when one of your prisons is known to staff and inmates as a ’rape club,” Ossoff shot back. Carvajal had no response.

Rebecca Shepard, a staff attorney for the Federal Defender Program Inc., said USP Atlanta subjects inmates to inhumane and substandard conditions:

I have seen clients routinely locked down and allowed out of their cells for extremely limited periods of time, such as only 15 to 30 minutes, three to four times a week, or only an hour each day. And these lockdowns persist for months. Clients are treated as though they are in solitary confinement, not because of their behavior, but because of their misfortune and being placed at USP Atlanta.

The problems were “stunning failures of federal prison administration,” Ossoff said. But despite “unequivocal internal reports of abuse and misconduct, the situation continued to deteriorate.”

sexualassault211014Attorney General Merrick Garland appears to be moving more decisively, especially on the issue of sexual violence against female inmates and staff members. On July 14, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco announced a task force to establish a policy aimed at “rooting out and preventing sexual misconduct” by prison employees over the next 90 days. Ms. Monaco said she was also instructing frontline prosecutors to make all misconduct cases at facilities a top priority, The New York Times said.

Last week, Forbes reported that Peters will take over an agency in disarray:

Relations between management and labor is at an all-time low, the agency is failing at implementing the First Step Act and COVID-19 continues to ravage its institutions. A recent survey by Partnership for Public Service, which ranks best places to work within the US government, ranked the BOP near last among 432 federal agencies. It ranked dead last in Effective Leadership category. This comes at a time when the BOP is trying to recruit new workers to make up for many veteran BOP employees who are leaving the agency.

Dumpster220718Hyperbole?  Well, just last week:

•      An independent arbitrator found the management at the Bureau of Prisons Federal Correctional Center Yazoo City in Mississippi guilty of violating the civil rights of the American Federation of Government Employees’ (AFGE) local President Cyndee Price at the facility, as well as retaliating against her in violation of the union contract.

     In 2020, Price was the first Black woman elected to serve as the local union president at any Federal Correctional Complex in the nation. But after that, the arbitrator ruled, prison wardens prohibited Price from using 100% official time to perform her union work, although previous Local President Vincent Kirksey had been granted 100% official time for the past seven years, and male local presidents at other BOP facilities also are on 100% official time.

     Bankston ordered the agency to pay Price overtime pay for the 1,080 hours of union work she performed on her own time that should have been performed during duty hours under the approved contract and past practice. Price was also awarded $300,000 in compensatory damages, as well as attorney’s fees and expenses.

•    A former BOP employee from FMC Lexington was sentenced last Friday to 80 months in federal prison after pleading guilty to committing five counts of sexual abuse of a ward. The employee, Hosea Lee, was a correctional officer serving as a drug treatment specialist. Between August and December 2019, Lee engaged in sexual acts with four separate female inmates who were in his drug classes.

•    A Mississippi woman, Tarshuana Thomas, was arrested Monday after being indicted by a federal grand jury for alleged fraud involving federal COVID-19 Paycheck Protection Program loans. The US Attorney said Thomas, who worked as a CO at FCC Yazoo City at the time of the alleged fraud, devised a scheme to obtain PPP funds by filing fraudulent loan applications.

The Atlanta Voice, Senator Ossoff grills Federal prison officials over deplorable conditions at Atlanta Penitentiary (July 28, 2022)

The New York Times, Prison Personnel Describe Horrific Conditions, and Cover-Up, at Atlanta Prison (July 26, 2022)

Forbes, Outgoing Federal Bureau Of Prisons Director Carvajal Subpoenaed By Senate Subcommittee (Jul 19)

WRDW-TV, Ossoff leads hearing on troubled Georgia federal prison (July 26, 2022)

WJTV, Arbitrator finds Yazoo County federal prison guilty of violating civil rights (July 26, 2022)

Dept of Justice, Former BOP Employee Sentenced to 80 Months in Prison for Sexual Abuse of a Ward (July 29, 2022)

Mageenews.com, Former BOP Correctional Officer Charged with COVID-Relief Fraud (July 29, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

DOJ’s Post-CARES Act Rule Proposal Leaves Out The Important Stuff – Update for June 27, 2022

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

DOJ PROPOSES RULE TO GIVE BOP DISCRETION ON ORDERING CARES ACT HOME CONFINEES TO RETURN TO PRISON

nogoingback210208Almost everyone was relieved last December when the Dept of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel rescinded its Trump-era opinion that people on CARES Act home confinement would not have to return to prison when the COVID-19 emergency ends.

Unfortunately, there was an “easter egg” in that opinion. In a statement that accompanied release of the opinion, Attorney General Merrick Garland said DOJ would issue rules to ensure that those “who in the interests of justice should be given an opportunity to continue transitioning back to society, are not unnecessarily returned to prison.”

At the time, Ohio State Univ law professor Doug Berman said in his Sentencing Law and Policy blog, “I am not sure how that rulemaking process will work, but I am sure the AG statement is hinting (or flat-out saying) that there will still be some in the ‘home confinement cohort’ who may need to worry about eventually heading back to federal prison.”

Last week, the chickens started coming home, but not precisely as the AG suggested. In a Notice Of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), the DOJ proposed that after the COVID-19 national emergency ends, the BOP Director would have delegated authority to let “any prisoner placed in home confinement under the CARES Act who is not yet otherwise eligible for home confinement under separate statutory authority to remain in home confinement under the CARES Act for the remainder of her sentence, as the Director determines appropriate.”

arbitrary220627So far, so good. The problem, however, is that the NPRM does not propose the criteria the BOP should use to decide who stays home and who returns. Instead, the NPRM promises that “following the issuance of a final rule, the Bureau will develop, in consultation with the Department, guidance to explain criteria that it will use to make individualized determinations as to whether any inmate placed in home confinement under the CARES Act should be returned to secure custody.”

The devil’s in the details; here, DOJ has apparently decided that the criteria for keeping folks at home will remain opaque to public comment and judicial review. For anyone who lived through the moving targets that were the original CARES Act home confinement criteria in the early days of COVID, this suggests a continuation of an arbitrary and confusing system for returning home confinement people to prison.

The good news is that DOJ – noting that over 4,900 inmates had been placed in home confinement under the CARES Act, with 2,826 of them having release dates over 12 months away – said it intended that CARES Act placement will “for the duration of the covered emergency period.”

covidneverend220627When will the COVID-19 emergency end? Walter Pavlo said last week that while no one knows for sure, “one can bet that it will not be before the mid-term elections in November and could likely extend through another COVID-19/flu season of 2023.” Given that 55% of all national emergencies declared in the last century are still in effect (including six over 25 years old), the end of the COVID-19 emergency probably will not come soon.

Meanwhile, a bit of irony: We reported on May 11th about a lawsuit in Connecticut challenging the removal of an inmate from CARES Act home confinement without a hearing. The government has moved to dismiss the habeas corpus action. A hearing on the dismissal motion set for June 15 was postponed because the government’s attorney was too ill with COVID to attend.

DOJ, Discretion to Continue the Home-Confinement Placements of Federal Prisoners After the COVID-19 Emergency (December 21, 2021)

Sentencing Law and Policy, New OLC opinion memo concluding CARES Act “grants BOP discretion to permit prisoners in extended home confinement to remain there” (December 21, 2021)

DOJ, Statement by Attorney General Merrick B. Garland (December 21, 2021)

DOJ, Home Confinement Under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, 87 FR 36787 (June 21, 2022)

Forbes, Department of Justice Proposes Final Rule to End CARES Act for Home Confinement for Federal Prisoners (June 25, 2022)

Order (ECF 27), Tompkins v. Pullen, Case No 3:22cv339 (D.Conn)

– Thomas L. Root

Emergency Continues, And So Does CARES Act Home Confinement – Update for February 22, 2022

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

BOP CARES ACT AUTHORITY EXTENDED

caresbear210104The BOP’s CARES Act authority to place inmates in home confinement expires, according to the law, 30 days after the end of the national pandemic emergency. That emergency was originally declared by President Trump and extended by President Biden. Biden’s last extension was set to expire March 1, 2022, by operation of 50 USC § 1622(d).

Last Friday, Biden extended the national emergency for another year. He said, “The COVID-19 pandemic continues to cause significant risk to the public health and safety of the Nation. For this reason, the national emergency declared on March 13, 2020, and beginning March 1, 2020, must continue in effect beyond March 1, 2022.”

Section 12003(b)(2) of the CARES Act provides that

During the covered emergency period, if the Attorney General finds that emergency conditions will materially affect the functioning of the Bureau, the Director of the Bureau may lengthen the maximum amount of time for which the Director is authorized to place a prisoner in home confinement under the first sentence of section 3624(c)(2) of title 18, United States Code, as the Director determines appropriate.

So the BOP authority continues as long as there’s a national emergency and the Attorney General “finds that emergency conditions will materially affect the functioning of the Bureau.” Attorney General William Barr made that finding on March 26, 2020, and again a week later.

home210218What this means is the BOP’s authority to place people in home confinement under the CARES Act will continue for another year unless Attorney General Merrick Garland would decide the BOP no longer needs to decrease population. Given that the BOP must still absorb another 6,085 federal prisoners from private prisons, that inmate totals are trending upward again, and that the BOP is still understaffed, it is unlikely that the AG will abandon the CARES Act any time soon.

The White House, Notice on the Continuation of the National Emergency Concerning the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-⁠19) Pandemic (February 18, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

Biden DOJ Flips, Says CARES Act People Can Stay Home – Update for December 22, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

HOME FOR THE HOLIDAYS

holidays211222Eleven months of uncertainty came to an abrupt and welcome end yesterday as Attorney General Merrick Garland announced that the Dept. of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel had reversed its January 2021 opinion, concluding that inmates sent to home confinement under the CARES Act will not have to return to prison when the COVID-19 national pandemic emergency ends. 

The decision reversed the OLC’s swan song from the last days of the Trump Administration that

the CARES Act authorizes the Director of BOP to place prisoners in home confinement only during the statute’s covered emergency period and when the Attorney General finds that the emergency conditions are materially affecting BOP’s functioning. Should that period end, or should the Attorney General revoke the finding, the Bureau would be required to recall the prisoners to correctional facilities unless they are otherwise eligible for home confinement under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(2). We also conclude that the general imprisonment authorities of 18 U.S.C. § 3621(a) and (b) do not supplement the CARES Act authority to authorize home confinement under the Act beyond the limits of section 3624(c)(2).

Last July, things looked dire when the New York Times reported that the Biden DOJ had reviewed the OLC opinion and concluded that it was right. That was perhaps a trial balloon, because DOJ made no official announcement about any review. Nevertheless, the Times story unleashed a storm of criticism.

But yesterday, the Biden DOJ left a shiny gift under the tree for about 4,000 federal prisoners on home confinement. The new OLC memorandum begins

This Office concluded in January 2021 that, when the COVID-19 emergency ends, the Bureau of Prisons will be required to recall all prisoners placed in extended home confinement under section 12003(b)(2) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act who are not otherwise eligible for home confinement under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(2). Having been asked to reconsider, we now conclude that section12003(b)(2) and the Bureau’s preexisting authorities are better read to give the Bureau discretion to permit prisoners in extended home confinement to remain there.

gift211222The New York Times said this morning that the OLC’s reversal “was a rare instance when the department under Attorney General Merrick B. Garland reversed a high-profile Trump-era decision. It was also a victory for criminal justice advocates.”

But not completely unexpected. During a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing last October, Garland said, “It would be a terrible policy to return these people to prison after they have shown that they are able to live in home confinement without violations, and as a consequence, we are reviewing the OLC memorandum… [and] all about other authorities that Congress may have given us to permit us to keep people on home confinement.”

He promised Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) that “we’re not in a circumstance where anybody will be returned before we have completed that review and implemented any changes we need to make.” At that session, Committee Chairman Richard Durbin (D-IL) complained that he was “frustrated by DOJ’s handling of COVID and prison issues.”

Yesterday, Garland said in a statement, “Thousands of people on home confinement have reconnected with their families, have found gainful employment and have followed the rules. In light of today’s Office of Legal Counsel opinion, I have directed that the Department engage in a rulemaking process to ensure that the Department lives up to the letter and the spirit of the CARES Act. We will exercise our authority so that those who have made rehabilitative progress and complied with the conditions of home confinement, and who in the interests of justice should be given an opportunity to continue transitioning back to society, are not unnecessarily returned to prison.”

A White House spokesman said in a statement that President Biden welcomed the change, noting “the relief it will mean for thousands of individuals on home confinement who have worked hard toward rehabilitation and are contributing to their communities.”

christmasunderpants211222Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman had an interesting observation about Garland’s statement in his Sentencing Law and Policy blog: “This statement by AG Garland suggests that DOJ is now going to engage in ‘rulemaking’ that will create a set of requirements or criteria about who may get to stay on home confinement and who might be returned to prison after the pandemic ends. I am not sure how that rulemaking process will work, but I am sure the AG statement is hinting (or flat-out saying) that there will still be some in the “home confinement cohort” who may need to worry about eventually heading back to federal prison.”

For now, the impetus for prisoners to qualify for CARES Act placement, which can continue as long as the emergency lasts (and if omicron has anything to say about it, it will be awhile) will increase. CARES Act placement will rightly be seen as not just a furlough but as a bus ticket home. And we’ll just have to see whether a DOJ rulemaking wants to turn that shiny gift Biden left under the tree into a pair of underpants.

The New York Times, Biden Legal Team Decides Inmates Must Return to Prison After Covid Emergency (July 19, 2021)

The New York Times, Some Inmates Can Stay Confined at Home After Covid Emergency, Justice Dept. Says (December 22, 2021)

Sentencing Law and Policy, New OLC opinion memo concluding CARES Act “grants BOP discretion to permit prisoners in extended home confinement to remain there” (December 21, 2021)

DOJ, Statement by Attorney General Merrick B. Garland (December 21, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Biden Administration Promises a Fix for CARES Act Home Confinees – Update for November 1, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

ATTORNEY GENERAL PLEDGES TO SEEK CARES ACT PATCH

return161227By now, everyone knows that a Dept. of Justice Office of Legal Counsel opinion issued in the last days of the Trump Administration ruled that the CARES Act requires that anyone the Bureau of Prisons sent to home confinement under the Act must return to prison when the COVID-19 emergency ends. A few months ago, the Biden DOJ agreed that the opinion was correct.

Since then, there has been a hue and cry from elected officials, advocates, and celebrities that no inmates on home confinement should be forced back to prison if they have complied with home confinement terms. Last Wednesday, Attorney General Merrick Garland made the most solid commitment yet from the Biden Administration that a way out of the legal thicket will be found.

During a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing on DOJ, Garland said “it would be a terrible policy to return these people to prison after they have shown that they are able to live in home confinement without violations, and as a consequence, we are reviewing the OLC memorandum… [and] all about other authorities that Congress may have given us to permit us to keep people on home confinement.” Garland told Sen Cory Booker (D-NJ) that while he doesn’t know how long the DOJ review might take,

but we can be sure that it will be accomplished before the end of the CARES Act provision which extends until the end of the pandemic, and so, we’re not in a circumstance where anybody will be returned before we have completed that review and implemented any changes we need to make.

At the opening of the session, Committee Chairman Richard Durbin (D-IL) complained that he was “frustrated by DOJ’s handling of COVID and prison issues.” He complained to Garland that he’d written to DOJ multiple times about home confinement with no reply, and that the Department had supported only 36 of over 31,000 compassionate release requests filed with it.

hear211101We’re only a little more than nine months into the Biden Administration, but I already have this disconcerting feeling that Joe has overpromised but underperformed. We’ll see whether Garland – by all accounts a careful and thoughtful lawyer – was hinting at a significant DOJ effort to solve the CARES Act home confinement problem, or was just saying what he thought the Judiciary Committee wanted to hear.

Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Oversight Hearing on Dept of Justice (October 27, 2021)

Josh Mittman, FAMM, on Twitter (October 27, 2021)

Interrogating Justice, AG Garland Gives Hope to Those on COVID-19 Home Confinement (October 28, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root