Tag Archives: DOJ inspector general

The Phone Just Keeps On Ringing For the BOP – Update for March 26, 2024

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

PHONE CALL MAY BE A SCAM… OR NOT

The Bureau of Prisons reissued a press release last week warning prisoners and their families of a phone scam in which callers identify themselves as BOP employees and demand money for halfway house or home confinement placement. The BOP stated that it “will not contact individuals to request personal information or money.”

money170419This scam, of course, would not fool federal inmates. They already know that getting the BOP to place people in halfway house or home confinement for the amount of time they’re entitled to for their FSA credits can’t be solved with mere bribes (which are illegal anyway and would just get prisoners more time).

More concerning is a scam in which callers claim to be US Probation Officers and demand personal information or money for halfway house or home confinement placement or relocation approval. Real USPO officers actually do call families from time to time, but usually just to make a home inspection appointment.

Phonescam240326Lesser-known phone frauds that may affect the BOP: Roll Call reported last week on the 38% haircut BOP took on its facilities budget in new appropriations bill. Last year, the BOP got $290 million repair and maintenance, but only $108 million came through regular appropriations. The other $182 million came through emergency funding.

Due to last summer’s Fiscal Responsibility Act, any call Director Peters gets from Congress promising emergency money this year is probably a scam. The paltry $179 million the BOP got “reflect[s] a thoughtful, serious approach to what can be achieved in a single given year… and then also given the overall environment of the Fiscal Responsibility Act,” Assistant Attorney General Jolene Lauria told Roll Call, trying to put a good spin on a repair budget that falls 96% short of the $3 billion needed to fix decaying infrastructure.

A phone call that would not be a scam: If a BOP warden gets a call from the front gate that a herd of inspectors from the Dept of Justice Office of Inspector General is demanding to be let in for an unannounced inspection, it’s probably the real thing.

IG230518Speaking at a National Press Foundation function recently, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz said, “My 500 personnel [are] comprised mostly of auditors and law enforcement agents. We also have evaluators and inspectors. One of the things we’re doing now, by the way, is unannounced inspections of federal prisons, and those are much smaller groups compared to the auditors and the agents.”

Horowitz contrasted innocent mistakes found in some DOJ offices to recent BOP revelations: The problems the IG uncovered in other offices were “usually… one of the lawyers who didn’t quite understand rules, didn’t abide by the rules, played fast and loose with the rules and got in trouble… Wasn’t, you know, generally people stealing, people being bureaucratic. It was, you know, people trying to get things done right. And then on the other hand, go to the Federal Bureau of Prisons, which the current director is the 8th director in my 12 years there, right?”

Horowitz also said, “Whistleblowers are critical to who we are, what we do. We take their complaints seriously, we take retaliation against them particularly seriously. But whistleblowers are very important part of what we do.”

BOP, Phone Scams Impacting Adults in Custody (August 23, 2023, reissued last week)

Fiscal Responsibility Act, HR 3746 (June 3, 2023)

Roll Call, Congress cuts federal prison infrastructure funding (March 20, 2024)

Nationall Press Foundation, ‘The Truth Still Matters’: Justice Department Inspector General Highlights Non-Partisan Work (March 15, 2024)

– Thomas L. Root

An “AIC” Would Get More Prison Time For Doing What the BOP and ACA Did – Update for December 21, 2023

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

INSPECTOR GENERAL UNMASKS BOP-ACA INSPECTION SCAM

Adults in Custody (that’s “prisoners” in normal-speak and so far, the new label is about all the progress BOP Director Colette Peters has made in 17 months at the helm) are fortunate that the institutions in which they’re housed are regularly audited by the American Correctional Association to ensure that they continue to meet that organization’s uncompromising high standards.

badcheck231221Of course. And the check’s in the mail, too…

A report issued by the Dept of Justice Inspector General last month found that instead of providing an independent evaluation of Federal Bureau of Prisons facilities, the ACA “instead relied on the prisons’ own internal reports during reaccreditation reviews.” In other words, as the DOJ put it, “it appears the BOP is, in effect, paying ACA to affirm the BOP’s own findings.”

The BOP awarded a $2.75 million contract to the ACA in 2018 to obtain accreditation and reaccreditation for BOP facilities. Five years into the agreement, the DOJ audit was intended to evaluate “the value the BOP receives through ACA accreditation for its prisons” and “how the BOP uses ACA’s accreditation to improve BOP standards for health, safety, and security of inmates and staff; and (3) the BOP’s contract administration and ACA’s performance and compliance with terms, conditions, laws, and regulations applicable to the contract.

nothingtosee230313The IG’s report found that “[a]lthough the contract requires ACA to perform its accreditation and reaccreditation in accordance with ACA’s policies, manuals, and procedures, current BOP and ACA officials… agreed that ACA would only perform independent reviews of BOP facilities as provided for in ACA policy during initial accreditation. For reaccreditation reviews, which was most of ACA’s work under the contract, the BOP and ACA agreed that ACA would rely on the BOP’s internal program review reports. As a result, it appears the BOP is, in effect, paying ACA to affirm the BOP’s own findings.”

The auditors also wrote they “did not identify instances where the BOP used ACA’s accreditation process to improve BOP standards for health, safety, and security of inmates and staff.” Of course not. If the BOP did a self-audit that the ACA signed off on, why bother to improve? Remember that only three months ago, NPR reported that the BOP claimed on its website that its medical centers were accredited by the Joint Commission, which accredits the vast majority of US hospitals, when in fact the certification had lapsed two years before.

NPR’s investigation – showing that federal prisoners die from treatable conditions that the BOP does not diagnose or treat in a timely way – was behind a call last week from Sens Richard Durbin (D-IL) and Charles Grassley (R-IA) for better BOP healthcare.

drquack191111“It is deeply upsetting that families are mourning the loss of their loved ones because they were not afforded the proper medical care they deserved while incarcerated,” Durbin, who is chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, told NPR. “BOP must immediately prioritize correcting the ineffective, harmful standards and procedures used to determine when an incarcerated person will be seen by medical professionals.”

Grassley, also a member of the Judiciary Committee, agreed. “BOP needs to be held responsible for this failure and take action to raise its standards.”

In response, a BOP spokesperson told NPR the Bureau “‘appreciates the Senators’ focus on this important issue’ and is committed to continue working with them on oversight.”

DOJ Office of Inspector General, Audit of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Contract Awarded to the American Correctional Association (November 16, 2023)

Lincoln, Nebraska, Journal-Star, Federal audit blasts nonprofit responsible for accrediting Nebraska’s prisons (December 10, 2023)

NPR, Lawmakers push for federal prison oversight after reports of inadequate medical care (December 12, 2023)

– Thomas L. Root

BOP Director Plays Chico Marx To House Subcommittee – Update for November 14, 2023

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

WHO YOU GONNA BELIEVE, ME OR YOUR OWN EYES?


In testimony last week before a House Judiciary subcommittee, Bureau of Prisons director Colette Peters boasted that the agency has “modernized our mission, vision, core values, and strategic framework to formalize our commitment to transformative change… Our diverse and adept workforce champions a modern approach to corrections, where safety, humane environments, and effective reintegration are paramount.”

“[M]odernize[] our… strategic framework to formalize our commitment to transformative change?” Does the BOP use AI to generate bureaucratic mumbo-jumbo, or is this the combined output of a special Central Office committee on obfuscation? A more basic question: does that line even mean anything?

chico231114It apparently doesn’t mean much. A day after Director Peters delivered her bureaucratic buzz-word-laden report to the subcommittee, the Dept of Justice Office of Inspector General dropped a stunning rebuttal to that “safety, humane environments…” part of the Director’s word salad. The OIG’s findings on conditions of the women’s prison ar FCI Tallahassee, juxtaposed with Director Peters’ happytalk, reminded me of the classic Chico Marx line: “Who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?”

Peters says “safe[]” and “humane.” The OIG report described its surprise inspection last May as “alarming.” 

The inspection report identified “serious operational deficiencies,” with “the most concerning” being “the alarming conditions of its food service and storage operations.” The New York Times reported that the OIG inspectors only “expected to find serious problems endemic to other crumbling, understaffed facilities run by the Bureau of Prisons. What they encountered shocked them: Moldy bread on lunch trays, rotting vegetables, breakfast cereal and other foods crawling with insects or rodents, cracked or missing bathroom and ceiling tiles, mold and rot almost everywhere, roof leaks plugged with plastic bags, windows blocked with feminine hygiene products to keep out the rain, loose ventilation covers that created perfect hiding places for contraband and weapons.”

Tallahasseelunch231114AThe inspection report identified “serious operational deficiencies,” with “the most concerning” being “the alarming conditions of its food service and storage operations.” DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz said, “When we go to Tallahassee and we see windows leaking and ceilings leaking onto inmate living space, and we see female inmates having to use feminine hygiene products to keep the water from coming into their space, that’s something you should never have to deal with.”

In as much defense as she deserves after 15 months on the job, Peters did tell the Subcommittee the day before the OIG report was issued that the BOP’s unmet infrastructure needs are dire. She estimated that $2 billion was needed to clear the backlog of repairs and renovations identified as urgent. The Tallahassee Food Service Administrator position, responsible for food safety, had been vacant for two years. As it happened, FCI Tallahassee’s current Food Service Administrator’s first day on the job coincided with the first day of OIG’s inspection.

badexample231114In another embarrassment for the BOP, a federal judge last week ruled that the Alabama prison system, which has been sued by the DOJ for 8th Amendment violations, may inspect four federal prisons as part of its discovery in building its defense in the case. The State apparently intends to show that its prison conditions are no worse than those in the BOP. Alabama requested to inspect the FCC Coleman in Florida, FCI Yazoo City in Mississippi, and USP Atlanta.

House Subcommittee on Crime and Federal Government Surveillance, Oversight of the Bureau of Prisons (November 7, 2023)

New York Times, Justice Dept. Watchdog Describes Unsanitary Conditions at Florida Prison (November 8, 2023)

Dept of Justice Office of Inspector General, Inspection of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Federal Correctional Institution Tallahassee (November 8, 2023)

AL.com, Judge rules Alabama can inspect federal prisons to build defense in DOJ lawsuit (November 9, 2023)

– Thomas L. Root

Sort of like ‘Warden, a “60 Minutes” Crew Is At The Sallyport’ – Update for May 19, 2023

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

DOJ INSPECTOR GENERAL PUBLISHES FIRST REPORT ON SURPRISE INSPECTION OF BOP FACILITY

Another continuing story: Last week, I reported that the Department of Justice Inspector General said the BOP is falling down and the BOP was in institutional stasis.

IG230518The IG said that because of operational deficiencies at USP Atlanta and MCC New York (which has since been closed), its investigators set out to “assess how critical issues at BOP institutions are identified, communicated to BOP Executive Staff, and remediated.”

When the BOP Executive Staff told the IG that management “had been largely aware of the long-standing operational issues at USP Atlanta and MCC New York and expressed confidence in the BOP’s existing mechanisms to communicate information about operational issues.”

Almost as if to say, You want a for instance’?, the IG last week also released a report on its unannounced inspection of the low-security women’s prison at FCI Waseca. The report, resulting from a surprise inspection, uncovered “many significant issues,” according to KSTP-TV, and is “the first unannounced inspection under the DOJ Office of the Inspector General’s new inspections program, which is expected to include inspections at other federal prisons across the country in the coming months.”

The inspection, which occurred in late winter, was performed by a team of nine making physical observations, interviewing staff and inmates, reviewing security camera footage and collecting records. It found that Waseca was operating with only two-thirds of its normal staff complement, and that augmentation was taking a toll on services and operations. “We… identified staff shortages in both FCI Waseca’s health services and psychology services departments which have caused delays in physical and mental health care treatment. Such delays can potentially result in more serious health issues for inmates, create further demands on health care staff and increase the costs of future treatments,” Inspector General Michael Horowitz said.

The IG found

• Significant staffing shortages have cascading effects on institution operations.
• Substantial concerns with numerous blind spots, poor night vision, poor zoom quality, and an insufficient number of cameras.
• Significant challenge limiting the amount of contraband in the institution, specifically drugs.
• Institution management and staff frustration with the amount of time it takes to close a staff misconduct investigation.
• Long inmate program participation wait lists.

waseca230519
The report also documents ‘serious facility issues’ affecting the conditions for inmates, such as pipes leaking next to prisoners’ beds and roof damage leading to unsanitary food services situations.

The IG’s “unannounced inspection” program should give the BOP Central Office – which has long accepted (if not tacitly approved) BOP facility “inspections” which were nothing more than ‘dog and pony’ shows – some sleepless nights.

DOJ, Inspection of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Federal Correctional Institution Waseca (May 10, 2023)

Bringmethenews.com, DOJ: Surprise inspection of Waseca women’s prison finds ‘significant issues’ (May 12, 2023)

KSTP, Surprise inspection of Waseca prison uncovers ‘many significant issues,’ DOJ says (May 10, 2023)

– Thomas L. Root

BOP Fiddles While Prisons Crumble – Update for May 12, 2023

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

DOJ INSPECTOR GENERAL SAYS BOP FACILITIES ARE FALLING APART… AND NO ONE KNOWS WHAT TO DO

In a couple of reports issued last week that will surprise few, the Department of Justice Inspector General said the BOP is falling down, and management knows it but pretends otherwise.

nero230512In the first report, the IG said, “The BOP’s institutions are aging and deteriorating: all 123 of the BOP’s institutions require maintenance, with a large and growing list of unfunded modernization and repair needs, and three of these institutions are in such critical stages of disrepair that they are fully or partially closed.

The report found that the BOP chronically requests much less maintenance money from Congress than it needs. At the same time, Congress has set aside over $1 billion to build two new institutions, “but these funds remain largely unspent, the projects have been in the planning stages for over a decade, and the BOP’s requests each year that Congress cancel one of these projects and rescind the funds—made at the direction of the Department of Justice and the Office of Management and Budget—have not been acted on.”

The second report is more damning. Because of operational deficiencies at USP Atlanta and MCC New York (since closed), the IG set out to “assess how critical issues at BOP institutions are identified, communicated to BOP Executive Staff, and remediated.”

But the BOP Executive Staff told the IG “they had been largely aware of the long-standing operational issues at USP Atlanta and MCC New York and expressed confidence in the BOP’s existing mechanisms to communicate information about operational issues.” In light of the fact the staff knew all about the messes in New York and Atlanta but had done nothing about them, the IG “modified the scope of this review… to focus on [the] causes and the scope of the challenges, their effects on institutional operations, and the Executive Staff’s efforts to remedy them.”

dogandpony230512The IG found that BOP internal audits of facilities were not reliable because everyone knew when the audits were to happen and, predictably enough, put on a ‘dog-and-pony’ show for the inspectors. “Executive Staff members questioned whether the BOP’s overwhelmingly positive enterprise-wide audit ratings reflected actual institution conditions,” the report said. “Validating this concern, we found that the USP Atlanta internal audit conducted in January 2020 rated USP Atlanta’s inmate management efforts as Acceptable despite identifying numerous significant issues.”

Also, the report said, the BOP’s internal investigative staff has insufficient, resulting in a “substantial backlog of unresolved employee misconduct cases.” Not only does the BOP lack adequate staff the IG found, it doesn’t even know “whether the number of staff it represents as necessary to manage its institutions safely and effectively is accurate.”

Finally, the BOP’s “inability to address its aging infrastructure as a foundational, enterprise-wide challenge [limits] its ability to remedy institution operational issues.” In other words, the agency does not have a coherent maintenance plan, but rather just tries to fix problems when they get too serious, resulting in “increasing maintenance costs and, in the most extreme circumstances, having to shutter institutions and relocate inmates because needed maintenance and repairs have resulted in unsafe conditions.”

"Do you miss me yet?" No...
“Do you miss me yet?” No…

In a written response to a draft of this report, the unlamented former BOP Director Michael Carvajal said the challenges discussed in this report were “long-established” prior to his February 2020 appointment. He added that the executive staff “acknowledged and made attempts to address these issues in some fashion, although they may not have been corrected or completed for various reasons.” Conveniently omitting the fact that in his 30-year tenure with the BOP, he had been everything from a correctional officer to a lieutenant, a captain, a correctional services administrator, an associate warden, a warden, a regional director and Assistant Director in Washington, D.C., Carvajal whined that his appointment and two-year tenure coincided with the onset of COVID-19 and that “responding to the pandemic ‘required prioritization of resources behind life safety’.”

DOJ, The Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Efforts to Maintain and Construct Institutions, Rpt No 23-064 (May 3, 2023)

DOJ, Limited-Scope Review of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Strategies to Identify, Communicate, and Remedy Operational Issues, Rpt No 23-065 (May 4, 2023)

BOP, BOP Director Announces Plans to Retire (January 5, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

DOJ Kicks Post-CARES Act Can Down the Road (A Little) – Update for April 7, 2023

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

BOP FOX SHOULD GUARD HOME CONFINEMENT HENHOUSE, DOJ SAYS

fox230131Remember when the Trump Administration made that minute-to-midnight announcement that the end of CARES Act home confinement would mean that all those prisoners placed at home would have to return to prison?

Thankfully, the flawed Dept of Justice Office of Legal Counsel opinion was later withdrawn by the Biden Administration. But when a new OLC opinion supplanted the old, the reversal wasn’t total. Rather, DOJ said that some might return, but that would be governed by rules yet to be promulgated.

(Explainer: Under the March 2020 CARES Act, Congress gave the Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons the authority to send inmates to home confinement at any time, despite the 6-month/10% limitation on home confinement set by 18 USC § 3624(c). The conditions set by the legislation were only two: (1) the national emergency declared because of COVID-19 had to be in effect, and (2) the Attorney General had to determine that COVID-19 was materially affecting BOP operations.)

As an old Administrative Procedure Act hand, I was relieved. “Rules” suggested regulations written after a classic 5 USC § 553 notice-and-comment formal rulemaking. Everyone could argue the merits and demerits of whatever standards were proposed, and the Bureau of Prisons would subsequently be compelled under the Accardi doctrine to follow the rules (something the BOP too often ignores where its own informal rules, policies and program statements are involved).

Last Tuesday, the rulemaking announced last June ended with a detailed report and a new subpart to the BOP’s delegation rule, 28 CFR §0.96.  The new rule, which will affect slightly more than 3,400 people (because the agency is still sending people to CARES Act home confinement for another month), adds a subpart (u), which, alas, contains no substantive limitation on the BOP’s discretion. That, we are promised, is to come.

can230407The can just got kicked down the road.

DOJ says the final rule, reduced to its essence, provides that “the [DOJ] and the [BOP] will work together to develop guidance to explain objective criteria the Bureau will use to make individualized determinations as to whether any inmate placed in home confinement under the CARES Act should be returned to secure custody. Providing the Bureau with discretion to determine whether any inmate placed in home confinement under the CARES Act should return to secure custody will bolster the Bureau’s ability to efficiently manage its resources and nimbly address changing circumstances in the community, in relation to the needs and profiles of individual inmates.”

The BOP? Nimble? If that’s the case, Joe Biden can compete against Simone Biles.

nimble230407Still, DOJ’s report acknowledges that “under typical circumstances, inmates who have made the transition to home confinement would not be returned to a secure facility absent a disciplinary reason. This is because the typical purpose of home confinement is to allow inmates to readjust to life in the community. Removal from the community of those already making progress in home confinement would frustrate this goal, and the widespread return of prisoners to secure custody without a disciplinary reason would be unprecedented and out of step with the reentry-specific goals of home confinement, as mentioned throughout this final rule.”

(My emphasis, not the report’s).

Reuters interpreted the report as directing that “[t]he BOP will still be able to impose ‘proportional and escalating sanctions,’ including a return to prison, on inmates who commit infractions.”  But the report does not exactly say that, and the contents of the report itself do not limit the BOP’s management of CARES Act home confinees at all.  Any such limitations are coming – if at all – in subsequent policy memos and program statements.

Two sets of fun facts are contained in the DOJ report adopting the rule. First, as Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman noted in his Sentencing Law and Policy blog, between March 26, 2020, and January 23, 2023, the BOP placed 52,561 inmates in home confinement. As of January 23, there were 5,597 inmates in home confinement, and 3,434 of those were CARES Act people.

The second has to do with money. Contrary to the oft-repeated inmate trope that the BOP makes money by keeping inmates locked up (something that only be believed if you simultaneously pay your Flat Earth Society dues), keeping people in prison is expensive. The DOJ noted:

Moneyspigot200220Supervision of inmates in home confinement is also significantly less costly for the Bureau than housing inmates in secure custody. In Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2019, the cost of incarceration fee (“COIF”) for a Federal inmate in a Federal facility was $107.85 per day; in FY 2020, it was $120.59 per day. In contrast, according to the Bureau, an inmate in home confinement costs an average of $55.26 per day—less than half the cost of an inmate in secure custody in FY 2020.

Only the government could manage to spend $55.00 a day to keep someone in their own house eating their own food and paying their own bills. Anyone wonder how we have a national debt of over $31 trillion?

Office of the Attorney General, Department of Justice,
Home Confinement Under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act (88 FR 19830, April 4, 2023)

Sentencing Law and Policy, Justice Department formally gives BOP discretion to decide who moved to home confinement during pandemic will be returned to federal prison (April 4, 2023)

Reuters, US rule to allow some inmates to stay home after COVID emergency lifts (April 4, 2023)

– Thomas L. Root

“What We Have Here…” – Update for October 27, 2022

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

… IS A FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE


failuretocommunicate221027We Should Have Told You It Would Be On the Test: If email is any indication, not only did Federal prisoners receive First Step Act earned-time credits applied well after the credits were promised, but what was delivered was well short of what was reasonably anticipated.

Writing in Forbes last week, Walter Pavlo reported that although BOP Director Colette Peters told the Senate Judiciary Committee during her September 28 testimony that the agency’s new “auto-calc” program was already up and running, “it was not until the week of October 3rd that FSA credits started to be applied. As one prisoner told me, ‘I was expecting a year of credits and I got 4 months. I have no idea what happened’.”

Pavlo said that “what happened is that the calculator still has errors in it. Prisoners who were transferred to a halfway house after receiving an interim calculation of their sentence, were called in and told they would be returning to prison after the new calculation took away their year.”

Pavlo wrote, “One of the main factors that seems to be causing issues is that federal prisoners were told to complete a needs assessment survey when they first entered prison. The survey was part of the FSA in that it was meant to provide an assessment of the types of programs, needs, that the prisoner would address while in prison. The assessment was to be done on-line through an internal computer terminal that prisoners use for email communications with their families… What prisoners were not told was that the survey’s completion was a requirement to initiating the FSA credits. All of the prisoners I spoke to stated that they were never told of the survey’s importance nor could I find information about this in the FSA nor in any directive given to prisoners.”

Pavlo’s report is consistent with email complaints I have gotten from prisoners that no one ever suggested that the needs surveys served any necessary purpose.

Pavlo quoted Emery Nelson of the BOP is quoted as saying, “Completion of the self-assessment survey is only one factor which determines when an inmate begins earning FSA time credits.”

We’re Not Listening to You: The DOJ Office of Inspector General told BOP Director Colette Peters two weeks ago about an aspect of its recent investigation into sexual abuse of inmates by BOP employees that it found troubling.

dontbelieve221027“These concerns arose when the OIG recently inquired of the BOP’s Office of Internal Affairs (OIA)… about a disciplinary action taken by the BOP following an OIG investigation of alleged sexual abuse by a BOP employee. In response to our inquiry, we were told by OIA that, in cases that have not been accepted for criminal prosecution, the BOP will not rely on inmate testimony to make administrative misconduct findings and take disciplinary action against BOP employees, unless there is evidence aside from inmate testimony that independently establishes the misconduct…”

OIG told Director Peters that BOP’s refusal to rely on inmate testimony to make misconduct findings in administrative matters “is inconsistent with the fact that such testimony is fully admissible in criminal and civil cases, and creates significant risks for the BOP in its handling of administrative misconduct matters. Inmate testimony alone has been found sufficient, and with corroborating evidence is often found sufficient, to support criminal convictions of BOP employees, where the evidentiary standard is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. In short, inmates are not disqualified from providing testimony with evidentiary value in federal courts, and there is no valid reason for the BOP to decline to rely on such testimony… where the evidentiary standard is the preponderance of the evidence. In addition, the OIG found that in the context of sexual misconduct cases, BOP policy and federal regulations, specifically those DOJ regulations implementing the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA), require the credibility of an alleged victim to be assessed on an individual basis and not be determined by the person’s status as an inmate.”

After the OIG provided the Bureau of Prisons with a draft of its report, BOP quickly denied that it had ever said it didn’t believe inmates as a matter of policy.  The Inspector General was unimpressed:

However, contrary to this assertion, the statements made by the OIA to the OIG as reflected in this memorandum were made by OIA on multiple occasions. Moreover, as described later in this memorandum, we found that in cases where the OIG substantiated BOP employee misconduct relying on inmate testimony the OIA has, on more than one occasion, sent less serious findings to the BOP’s Employment Law Branch (ELB) and the BOP institution where the subject employee works.

So now who doesn’t believe whom?

Forbes, Bureau Of Prisons’ Failure To Communicate First Step Act (October 15, 2022)

DOJ Office of Inspector General, Notification of Concerns Regarding the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ (BOP) Treatment of Inmate Statements in Investigations of Alleged Misconduct by BOP Employees (October 12, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root