Tag Archives: BOP

BOP Slouches Toward First Step Programming – Update for January 13, 2020

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

EARNED TIME CREDITS – THE DEVIL’S IN THE DETAILS

devil200113Probably the biggest selling point used by First Step Act supporters when Congress passed the measure in December 2018 was that the bill would deliver evidence-based programming to reduce recidivism. The inmates would be assessed under a new program that accurately gauged their likelihood to be recidivists and their needs that should be met to reduce that likelihood. The inmates would benefit, the public would benefit, the overcrowded and understaffed prisons would benefit, the U.S. Treasury would benefit. Everyone’s a winner!

The programming to reduce recidivism, after more than a year of preparation, is supposed to begin in a week. But the devil’s in the details, and hope for a broad rollout that meets the expectations of First Step backers, let alone those of inmates, is dwindling rapidly.

recividists160314By now, virtually all inmates have undergone an initial assessment under PATTERN, the new risk and needs assessment program developed in response to the First Step Act. According to the Act (a provision now codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3621(h)(1)(B)), the Bureau of Prisons is to begin to expand the most effective evidence-based recidivism reduction programs and productive activities it currently offers and to add any new evidence-based recidivism reduction programs and productive activities necessary to effectively implement First Step by Jan. 20. Subsection (h)(2)(A) gives the BOP until Jan. 20, 2022, to provide such programming for all inmates. During the “phase in” period, priority placement in the programs is to go to people closest to their release date.

As an incentive for participating in the programs, the First Step Act provides eligible inmates with earned-time credits which can be used toward increasing pre-release custody (halfway house and/or home confinement) or swapping time inside the BOP for more supervised release. A Bloomberg Law article described it last week like this: “Earned time credits… do not reduce a prisoner’s sentence, per se, but rather allow eligible prisoners to serve their sentence outside prison walls.”

winner200113But for a lot of reasons the question of whether the BOP is anywhere close to meeting the First Step Act’s timetable remains open. First, as the BOP admitted two weeks ago, PATTERN has not yet been adopted in its final form. Although the BOP has promised to identify its existing programs that will award inmates earned-time credits, it has not yet done so. What’s more, a surprising large number of federal inmates will not be eligible to receive earned time credits because the BOP has determined they are excluded by one or more of the 65 categories of crime or immigration statute exempted from the program by Congress.

The current limits on time in a halfway house (up to 12 months) and home confinement (the lesser of six months or 10% of the sentence) specified in 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c) will not apply to earned time credits. Thus, an inmate can be released to more than a year of halfway house or home confinement after accumulating earned time credits.

Bloomberg Law reported last week that any earned-time credits inmates receive for completing programs prior to the final implementation of the PATTERN tool – whenever that will be – will not be eligible for redemption until the tool is implemented. What’s more, the article reported, “the ability to start earning credits may not actually come for most prisoners until even later than that, depending on how long it takes the BOP to apply PATTERN and create programming and productive activities and assign prisoners to them.”

prisonrace200113PATTERN was the subject of a House Judiciary Committee Oversight hearing last October, where some experts expressed concern about its “racial bias and lack of transparency, fairness, and scientific validity.” The Dept. of Justice has not said how close PATTERN is to being finalized, stating only that it “is currently undergoing fine-tuning.” Indications are that inmates that have been scored so far have been analyzed under a preliminary version of the tool. Last July, DOJ estimates were that the final PATTERN program would be in place by Thanksgiving 2019.

A further impediment to full implementation of earned-time credit program will be the availability of halfway house beds. In most of the country, there is a shortage of available halfway house beds for federal inmates. The Act provides no additional funding or resources for the BOP to increase the loss of halfway house beds, which was at crisis levels several years ago.

“The BOP has a long history of acting in ways that result in lengthier and less productive terms of incarceration despite the obvious will of Congress,” David E. Patton, executive director of the nonprofit Federal Defenders of New York, was quoted as saying by the Washington Post. “For decades the BOP took an unreasonably restrictive view of good time, resulting in thousands of years of additional overall prison time. For decades it refused to exercise the authority given to it by Congress to release incarcerated people who were terminally ill, infirm, or otherwise suffered from extraordinary circumstances… and for decades it has not provided enough vocational, educational, mental health, and substance abuse programming despite abundant need and lengthy waitlists.” Pointing to DOJ data, Patton said wait lists include 25,000 prisoners for prison work assignments, 15,000 for vocational and educational training and 5,000 for drug treatment.

The Washington Post said last week that almost half of BOP prisoners complete no programs, more than half don’t get needed drug treatment, more than 80% haven’t taken technical or vocational courses, and more than 90% have no prison industry employment, according to data.

Help-Wanted180221“The BOP is struggling to fulfill the requirements of the Act as the Bureau is still more than 4,000 positions short,” Shane Fausey, president of the American Federation of Government Employees Council of Prison Locals, told the Post. He complained of “abusive overtime and mandatory double shifts,” adding that requirements of the First Step Act have worsened the crisis.

BOP Director Kathleen Hawk Sawyer told the House oversight committee last October that the understaffing was over 3,700 vacancies and said resolving that “is among my highest priorities… but doing so will take time.”

Bloomberg Law, Insight: The First Step Act—Earned Time Credits on the Horizon (Jan. 9)

Washington Post, Federal prison reform has bipartisan support. But it’s moving slowly. (Jan. 9)

– Thomas L. Root

How Shall I Release Thee? Let Me Count the Ways – Update for January 7, 2020

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

THE GOLDILOCKS OPTION

All of the New Year’s Eve revelers had not yet left Times Square when the first rumor of the new year landed in my email inbox. An inmate reader wrote: “The Bureau of Prisons is saying that even though the law now says that good time is to be applied based on length of sentence, the ‘rules’ say that they are to evaluate an inmate at the end of the year for good conduct, therefore it can only apply to time served.”

corso170112Not so fast, my friend. As the Old Man of 2019 disappeared through the door – and ‘good riddance!’ many of us thought  – the BOP issued a proposed change to 28 CFR § 523.20 it intends to follow in applying the changes in the good time statute (18 USC § 3624(b)(1)) brought about by the First Step Act. The notice, of course, was published in the Federal Register, where everyone was sure to see it.

Time out for some remedial government class, for those who sat in the back texting their friends. Congress passes bills, which the President signs. Those bills change federal law. Federal law is conveniently restated in the United States Code, which organizes the laws so that they are easy to find.

textinclass200107.jpgLaws quite often sweep broadly and are light on detail. Federal agencies, which are charged by Congress with seeing that the laws are carried out, are entitled to use procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act to adopt rules that give definition to the laws. Imagine Congress passes a law that broadcast licenses should be granted and renewed when the public interest, convenience and necessity requires it. (Actually it did, in § 307 of the Communications Act of 1934.) What the dickens does that mean? Congress delegated authority to the Federal Communications Commission to define what it means by rules adopted pursuant to the APA‘s procedures. Those rules are conveniently set out in the Code of Federal Regulations.

So, contrary to our reader’s perception, the ‘rules’ the BOP seeks to adopt should not contradict 18 U.S.C. § 3624(b)(1), but instead provide the detail needed to implement it. Rules are not laws, and – when a statute and a rule are inconsistent – a law always trumps a rule.

classisover200107Enough high school government class for now… In its Dec. 31 Notice, the BOP proposes to calculate an inmate’s “out date” at the time the sentence commences by assuming all good time will be earned (as it has always done). The actual award of the time for each year of sentence will come on the anniversary date of when the sentence started, after the BOP determines, in the words of § 3624(b)(1), that the inmate has shown “exemplary compliance” with BOP rules and policies. Practically speaking, this means the inmate received no disciplinary reports that took away good conduct time as a sanction.

The “exemplary compliance” standard is nothing new. In fact, the only changes in § 3624(b)(1) resulting from the First Step Act are that (1) prisoners earn up to 54 days of good conduct time each year of their sentences, not for each year they are actually in prison. This results in an extra seven days each year; and (2) credit for the last year of a term of imprisonment shall be given on the first day of the last year of the term of imprisonment.

threebears200107In last week’s Notice, the BOP proposed three alternatives for administering good conduct time under the changed law. The first alterative would be, because the changed statute no longer referred to a “portion of a year,” for the BOP to give no credit for the final part of a year an inmate served. The Bureau rejects this as “an erroneous and unfair interpretation” of the new law. In other words, this porridge was too hot.

The second alternative, the Bureau said, would be to interpret the new law to mean inmates get 54 days for the final part of a year, no matter how short. If a sentence were 38 months, for example, an inmate would get 54 days a year for each of the 3 years, and another 54 days for the last two months. The BOP rejected this interpretation as being too fair, because it “would result in some inmates receiving benefits incongruous with those received by others.” This porridge was too cold.

goldilocks200107The third alternative is the BOP’s Goldilocks choice, one the Bureau believes is neither too unfair nor too fair. The BOP proposes that 54 days’ good conduct time vest on each anniversary of the sentence. For the last year, however, the prorated good time would not be awarded until the last day of the sentence, so an inmate could still lose a part year’s good conduct time up to the time he or she walks out the door.

The BOP thinks this porridge is just right. However, the public may file comments agreeing or disagreeing  until March 2.

A couple of interesting factoids appear in the Notice: In the introduction to the rulemaking proposal, the BOP mentioned that the PATTERN risk and needs assessment program has not yet being adopted in final form. As well, the Bureau referred to the glacial pace of recalculating existing inmates’ sentences to add the 7 additional days of good conduct time per year each inmate was awarded by First Step:

Under section 102(b)(2) of the FSA, the recalculation of GCT credit was not effective until the Attorney General completed and released the risk and needs assessment system on July 19, 2019. Although this proposed regulation is not yet in effect, the Bureau re-calculated release dates beginning on July 19, 2019 under the statutory authority of the FSA. Based on these recalculations, 3163 inmates were released from Bureau custody on July 19, 2019; the Bureau is in the process of completing recalculations for the remainder of the inmate population based on the FSA authority, prioritizing recalculations by proximity of projected release date, and releasing inmates as appropriate according to the recalculated GCT release dates.

PB286-200107Of course, many people (your writer included) are at a loss to understand why recalculation of sentences has been such a laborious task. Certainly, even the BOP’s Packard Bell 286s ought to be able to recalculate sentences by running an algorithm that any boot-camp coder should be able to write between video games. But the bureaucracy plods on…

Good Conduct Time Under the First Step Act, 84 Federal Register 72274 (Dec. 31, 2019)

– Thomas L. Root

Government Promises To Behave – That Settles That! — Update for December 17, 2019

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

WE’RE THE GOVERNMENT, YOU CAN TRUST US

trust191217In what probably did not shock any inmate reader of this newsletter, the Dept. of Justice inspector general issued a report last week that the FBI’s four applications for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act search warrants for Trump foreign policy advisor Carter Page contained 17 significant errors, including one where an FBI lawyer altered a document relied on to extend the search warrant, thus inverting its meaning. The IG found that had the document not been altered, Page’s contacts with the Russians would have been seen in a “much different light,” one that suggested the contacts were proper.

“We concluded that the failures… represent serious performance failures by the supervisory and non-supervisory agents with responsibility over the FISA applications,” the report says. “These failures prevented (the Justice Department) from fully performing its gatekeeper function and deprived the decision makers the opportunity to make fully informed decisions. Although some of the factual misstatements and omissions we found in this review were arguably more significant than others, we believe that all of them taken together resulted in FISA applications that made it appear that the information supporting probable cause was stronger than was actually the case.”

FBI defenders have argued that “the FBI and Justice Department are extraordinarily careful and meticulous in how they present evidence to the FISA court, which is no rubber stamp,” according to NBC News. If that is so, imagine how sloppy and conniving the FBI must be on run-of-the-mill search warrants, which seldom get much scrutiny from the judges who sign them.

laugh191217The FBI says it will institute reforms, an announcement that will make everyone feel better. Meanwhile, you can continue to trust the agency as a thoroughly professional organization of highly-trained professionals dedicated to protecting you and your family, while scrupulously observing the civil rights of the accused.

That’s a lot like the BOP.

Back in 2010, the warden at ADX Florence began banning Prison Legal News as “detrimental to the [facility’s] security, good order or discipline” under 28 CFR 540.71(b). PLN sued under the 1st Amendment, the 5th Amendment and 5 USC § 706(2) of the Administrative Procedure Act. After PLN sued, the warden folded like a cheap suit, distributing the 11 banned publications, revising ADX’s institutional policies, and issuing a declaration from its current warden that the old policy would not be reinstated. PLN didn’t believe it, and asked for a court ruling on its claims.

Based on these actions, the BOP moved for summary judgment, arguing that PLN’s claims were moot or not ripe. PLN filed a cross-motion for partial summary judgment on its constitutional and 706(2) claims. The district court agreed with the BOP that PLN’s claims were moot, and dismissed the case.

Last Friday, the 10th Circuit agreed, holding that the BOP had made “clear the [BOP’s] allegedly wrongful behavior could not reasonably be expected to recur.”

Ipromise191217Of course not. Never happen again.

By the way, in early November, the warden at FCI Herlong banned email newsletters on legal matters, “because the Bureau has determined that such communication is detrimental to the security, good order, or discipline of the facility, or might facilitate criminal activity.”

NBC News, The FBI’s warrant system for spying on Americans is a mess, the IG report shows (Dec.10)

Prison Legal News v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2019 U.S.App. LEXIS 36955 (10th Cir. Dec. 13, 2019)

– Thomas L. Root

So You Had a Bad Day… Dr. Hawk Sawyer – Update for November 27, 2019

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

THE BOP’S TERRIBLE, HORRIBLE, NO GOOD, VERY BAD DAY

Tuesday, November 19, was no kind of day for the BOP.

lazyguard191127First, two BOP correctional officers on duty the morning financier Jeffrey Epstein, in pretrial detention for sex charges, killed himself last summer were indicted under 18 USC 1001 for having faked records that they performed Special Housing Unit inmate counts overnight and one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States for good measure. The New York Times reported one CO was catching up on sports news and looking at motorcycle sales on a government computer, while the other spent time shopping online for furniture. For a couple hours, they slept.

Attorney General William Barr said the suicide was the result of “a perfect storm of screw-ups,” numerous irregularities at MDC New York that gave Epstein the chance to take his own life.

At the same time the indictments were being announced, BOP director Kathleen Hawk Sawyer got grilled by the Senate Judiciary Committee about the Epstein debacle, a mess she was brought out of retirement to fix. She admitted that issues such as officers sleeping on the job have been an ongoing problem. “We’ve been monitoring the cameras… at every one of our institutions to determine how well and how effective our staff members are doing their rounds,” Sawyer said. “We have found a couple of other instances [of guards napping on the job] and we’ve immediately referred those to the inspector general’s office.”

Sawyer also told the Committee that FBI investigators are looking into whether a “criminal enterprise” may have played a role in Epstein’s death.

risk160627The Committee also criticized the proposed PATTERN risk assessment tool which is to be adopted in its final form by the end of November. Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) complained that PATTERN is “so fundamentally unfair, that it cannot stand without challenge.”

In a PATTERN test run, Durbin said, 29% of white inmates were deemed to be high-risk for returning to prison compared with 59% of black inmates. “Part of the problem is the tool doesn’t distinguish between a traffic stop and a murder conviction,” Durbin said. “It simply measures the risk that someone will be arrested or return to the federal system, and an arrest is not a new crime. A conviction is a new crime.”

The New York Times, Guards Accused of Napping and Shopping Online the Night Epstein Died (Nov. 19)

The Crime Report, Federal Prison Guard Napping Called Ongoing Problem (Nov. 20)

Associated Press, AG Barr: Epstein’s death was a ‘perfect storm of screw-ups’ (Nov. 22)

– Thomas L. Root

First Step Touted While Good-Time Adjustments Languish – Update for October 29, 2019

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

FIRST STEP: TRUMP FIDDLES WHILE BOP BURNS

angrytrump191003President Donald Trump touted the First Step Act in a speech last Friday at the 2019 Second Step Presidential Justice Forum in South Carolina, talking about how the Act helped African Americans by releasing thousands of non-violent offenders to gain early release from federal prison.

“In America, you’re innocent until proven guilty and we don’t have investigations in search of that crime,” he said while accepting an award at historically black Benedict College for his role in passage of First Step.  “Justice, fairness and due process are core tenets of our democracy. These are timeless principles I will faithfully uphold as president.”

Much of what was said at the conference was overshadowed by Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Kamala Harris (D-California), who refused to attend the conference because Trump was included on the list of speakers. Harris, whose record as a take-no-prisoners prosecutor has caused some to be skeptical of her 11th-hour conversion to the cause of criminal justice, flip-flopped on the boycott threat and agreed to show after all, after winning a window-dressing removal of one of the sponsors for its sin of giving an award to Trump.

During the hour-long address, Trump called on several people who had been released from prison under the First Step Act to the stage to offer testimonials.

Many of Trump’s Democratic presidential rivals spoke over the weekend, and took turns slamming Trump. Sen. Cory Booker, D-New Jersey, argued, “The fact of the matter is Donald Trump was given an award for the 10 seconds it took him to sign a bill into law that contradicts every one of his instincts and history of promoting racist criminal justice policies.”

I’m no Trump fan, but Sen. Booker needs to be fact-checked on this assertion.

All was not bliss for implementation of First Step last week. Filter magazine, launched in September 2018 to advocate for rational and compassionate approaches to drug use, drug policy and human rights, blasted the Bureau of Prisons for its “incompetent” application of the star-crossed additional 7 days-a-year good time.

Citing long-time prisoners who would be camp-eligible if they were granted the additional good time to which they are entitled, Filter said that due to “a potential failure, attributable to administrative inadequacy, to apply a much-anticipated reform to… federal prisoners until over a year after it was supposed to be implemented in July 2019.

screwup191028

Filter reported that as of September 16th, the Designation and Sentence Computation Center “had made First Step Act updates only for incarcerated people with previously projected release dates that fell before October 2020.” The magazine quoted a response to an August 22 administrative remedy request for recalculation filed by an anonymous inmate, in which the BOP gave no clear date for when the inmate could expect an updated GCT calculation, only explaining their prioritization of projected release dates and stating that “there may be some variance in the speed with each DSCC team completes the recalculations for the inmates assigned to them.” The BOP said “this process may take up to a year.”

A BOP official told Filter that implementing the change in good time is “complex” due to the “various federal statutes and BOP policy” with which recalculations must be “carried out in accordance.”

The BOP’s information technology systems are “dinosaurs,” Kara Gotsch, the director of strategic initiatives for The Sentencing Project, told Filter, citing explanations she’s heard from BOP staffers. Gotsch said that even this description “is generous,” adding that “it’s like they don’t have the right kind of computer” to perform the recalculations in time.

The BOP denied this claim, calling Gotsch’s explanation “speculation based on hearsay,” and added that “the computers and technology utilized by our staff are not outdated and incompetent. They use commercially-available and fully-supported technology.

Speculation it may be, but the BOP has known since last Christmas it would have to recalculate inmate good time. It’s failure to get the process in place, which would require  the use of a simple formula that any high school math geek could write with a Texas Instruments nine-buck calculator, is equally explainable as institutional arrogance or institutional incompetence.

The Columbia, South Carolina, State, Trump’s Columbia visit wraps with praise of HBCUs and reform, peaceful demonstrations (Oct. 26)

Filter, The Consequences of an Incompetent First Step Act Rollout (Oct. 15)

– Thomas L. Root

Dog Bites Man: Vendor Sells Bad Food to BOP – Update for October 2, 2019

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

WEDNESDAY IN THE CHOW HALL WILL NEVER BE THE SAME

For those of you unfortunate enough not to have experienced it firsthand, we offer an explanation: Wednesdays are always hamburger days in the Bureau of Prisons chow halls nationwide. While it’s true that the Burger King would be dethroned for selling a burger like the one that’s standard fare in the BOP, still, the Wednesday midday meal is a brighter spot than the meals for the other six days of the week.

Until now.

badburger191002Two meatpacking plant executives pled guilty last Tuesday to their role in a scheme to sell 800,000 lbs. of bad meat to the BOP, according to the US Attorney for the Northern District of Texas.

According to the plea agreement, the two men admitted to selling uninspected, misbranded, or adulterated meat – including whole cow hearts labeled as “ground beef” – to 32 prisons in 18 states.

West Texas Provisions, Inc. president Jeffery N. Smith and operations manager Derrick Martinez pled guilty to conspiracy to defraud the United States. The BOP paid about $1 million for the bad meat between October 2016 and August 2017.

West Texas Provisions marketed uninspected meat as “USDA inspected.” The company processed whole cow hearts (not permitted in ground beef products) at nights, when inspectors were not present, and labeled it “ground beef.” The defendants often kept the lights off while processing uninspected meat, hid uninspected meat in the freezer while inspectors were in the building, and distracted inspectors from looking at questionable product.

Bon appetit.

US Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Texas, Meat Packing Plant Execs Plead Guilty to Selling $1 Million in Adulterated Ground Beef to Federal Bureau of Prisons (Sept. 25)

The Crime Report, Meat Executives Plead Guilty to Selling Bad Beef to 32 Prisons (Sept. 26)

– Thomas L. Root

Sisyphus Had Nothing on Us – Update for September 24, 2019

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

NOTHING HAPPENS FAST – PART 1

sisyphus190924Remember that Greek guy who kept rolling the rock up the hill, only to have it roll back down, and then he’d have to do it again? Yeah, that Sisyphus character… Legal combat with the Bureau of Prisons over the agency’s glacial pace in updating sentences to add the additional 7 days-a-year good time credit is something like that.

Last December, the First Step Act amended the wording of 18 USC 3624(b)(1) to correct a Congressional oversight. Congress had always intended that federal inmates get 54 days per year good-conduct credit, but it had written the statute so badly that the BOP was able to interpret 54 days to really mean 47 days. No fooling. The First Step Act was to fix that.

onecar190924But trust Congress to screw up a one-car parade… even the “fix” was messed up. Congress meant that inmates would immediately retroactively receive seven extra days for every year they had served in their sentences, the be only 47. But the statute was unclear, and the BOP took the position that the extra seven days would only be effective on July 19th (180 days after the statute passed).

Even that hasn’t worked. Since July 19th, I have been bombarded with emails from inmates that the BOP has yet to correct their sentences to add the extra seven days per year. The BOP complains that the process is labor-intensive, and it’s moving as fast as it can.

Attempts to address the problem judicially has thus far come to naught. Case in point: Tim Greene, doing a long sentence for bank robbery, was due to be released August 9th. But with the additional 7 days a year, his release date would be moved back to March 29. He filed a habeas corpus petition in the Northern District of Texas last February, arguing that he was due the extra good time right away, and should be released at the end of March.

The District Court dismissed the petition as premature, because July 19th had not yet come around, and Tim appealed. By now, it was early June. He filed his brief, a motion for expedited consideration, and a request for conditional release. But nothing happened fast. The government filed its brief a month later, and Tim replied on July 18. The next day, the BOP kicked him out the door, which is exactly what would have happened had Tim done nothing.

nothing190924Last week, the 5th Circuit finally ruled. It held the BOP was right that the extra goodtime only became effective on July 19, making Tim’s petition premature. Because Tim got out July 19, the requests for expedited consideration and conditional release were dismissed as moot.

There are undoubtedly habeas cases in the pipeline over the BOP’s failure to update release dates by applying the extra goodtime, a failure that messes with release plans and halfway house/home confinement placement. But as Tim’s case – which took seven months start to finish – shows, nothing happens fast.

Greene v. Underwood, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 28512 (5th Cir. Sept. 20, 2019)

– Thomas L. Root

Ecclesiastes Was Right Where the BOP is Concerned – Update for August 27, 2019

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

THE OLD IS NEW AGAIN AS FORMER BOP DIRECTOR RE-ASSUMES HELM

nothingnew190827The supremely pessimistic and apochryphal author of Ecclesiastes in the Christian bible (Kohelet in the Talmud), King Solomon, complained in Chapter 1, Verse 9, that “The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.”

Welcome to the all-new BOP. 

As everyone knows by now, last Monday Attorney General William Barr unceremoniously fired interim BOP Director Hugh J. Hurwitz, replacing him with former BOP Director Dr. Kathleen Hawk Sawyer as interim director and former interim BOP Director Dr. Thomas R. Kane as interim assistant director.

Even before Epstein’s death, Justice Dept. officials reportedly expressed off-the-record frustration with senior BOP officials, but the management flaws found since high profile defendant Jeffrey Epstein killed himself at MCC New York Aug. 10 have angered DOJ leaders, including the attorney general, according to anonymous law enforcement officials quoted by the Washington Post.

hurwitz190827Robert Hood, a retired former warden at ADX Florence and a critic of BOP leadership, called Hawk Sawyer an “outstanding” choice. “After a lot of recent instability, Kathleen Hawk Sawyer brings stability and direction,” Hood said. “She’s been a warden, she’s been a trainer, and she means business. It’s breathtaking to hear that she’s back. It’s exciting for the staff, many of whom have only heard about her. They know she’s a nuts-and-bolts person and a very direct person to work with.”

Hood predicted that Hawk Sawyer, a psychologist, will move quickly to fix a major problem at the bureau — the number of senior positions that have gone unfilled or had their responsibilities delegated temporarily.

sawyer190827Hawk Sawyer is no newbie. She ran the BOP from 1992 to 2003, capping a career that began back in 1976 as a psychologist at FCI Morgantown. But it’s been 16 years since she last led the agency, and some say a lot has changed in the interim. Jonathan Smith, a prison rights attorney, says the BOP is “much more complicated than when she was last director, partially because the growth in population, partially because you see a much harsher and more punitive system.”

Smith told NPR that today’s BOP uses solitary confinement more frequently than it did in the past. He says the use of private prisons has skyrocketed, as has the privatization of services across the system. And perhaps most importantly, the federal prison population has jumped from 65,000 in 1992 to more than 177,000 in 2019.

NPR reported that during her tenure as BOP Director, Hawk Sawyer was thought of as a champion of rehabilitation, someone who pushed for education opportunities inside federal prisons.

Additionally, Hawk Sawyer has “a long track record advocating for ‘good-time credits’ as a way to motivate inmates to participate in programs for personal development,” according to the Washington Examiner. “She correctly realized that increasing good-time allowances could go a long way toward reducing the federal prison population and help maintain order in prisons too.”

With last year’s passage of the First Step Act, some of the changes to sentencing laws and good-time credits that Hawk Sawyer supported are now law. The reforms included in the First Step Act are based largely on state-level successes, including former tough-on-crime states, that have now instead become smart on crime — and soft on taxpayers.

inch190827Not everyone is excited by Hawk Sawyer’s appointment. A former AUSA turned defense attorney and former BOP official observed that in 2017 then-Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III appointed Mark Inch, a retired Army major general, to run the system. After less than a year, General Inch – who tried to make changes within the BOP and to navigate a middle course, abruptly quit. Hawk Sawyer, a permanent replacement, was not named until this week, the authors complained,

 

when Barr appointed someone who previously served in the position for over a decade, and who contributed to the current problems plaguing the Bureau. This is not going to create systemic change. This reactive switch in leadership is pure optics. We need to ask this question: Why was General Inch, someone who tried to change the culture, ultimately replaced with a BOP veteran?

clusterfuck190827Regardless of one’s position on Hawk Sawyer’s appointment, there is general agreement that she faces an agency in disarray. “”Clusterfuck doesn’t begin to describe the current state of the BOP, and it dates far beyond the Trump administration,” David Safavian, deputy director of the American Conservative Union Foundation’s criminal justice reform center, told The Marshall Project this week. “Anyone who thinks BOP is a high performing organization has never been inside a federal prison.”

Part of the problem, according to Reason.com, is “that the BOP is its own secretive fiefdom. It’s incredibly hard for reporters, family members, and civil liberties groups to find out what goes on behind prison walls, much less hold officials accountable.”

Washington Post, After Epstein’s death, attorney general replaces leader at Bureau of Prisons (Aug 19)

The Huffington Post, Jeffrey Epstein Death Shines Light On Understaffed, Unaccountable Federal Prison System (Aug 15)

National Review, The Epstein Fiasco and the Flaws with Our Criminal-Justice System (Aug 22)

The Marshall Project, Epstein’s Death Highlights A Staffing Crisis in Federal Prisons (Aug 14)

Reason.com, Jeffrey Epstein Is Dead Because His Jailers Neglected Him. He’s Not the Only One. (Aug 15)

Washington Examiner, New Bureau of Prisons leadership should focus on rehabilitation (Aug 21)

Washington Examiner, AG William Barr must do more to fix dismal prison conditions (Aug 22)

The Hill, A better way to run the Federal Bureau of Prisons (Aug 22)

NPR, What’s Changed Since Kathleen Hawk Sawyer Last Headed Prison Bureau? (Aug 22)

– Thomas L. Root

Unwelcome Spotlight Shines on the BOP – Update for August 19, 2019

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

MEDIA CRANKS UP HEAT ON BOP IN WAKE OF EPSTEIN SUICIDE

abandonprison170501The Justice Dept. last Tuesday reassigned the warden at MCC New York, where Jeffrey Epstein hanged himself nine days ago, and placed on leave two Bureau of Prison staff who had been monitoring Epstein’s unit at the time. The shakeup came as the MCC fell under intense scrutiny, with critics calling the suicide “emblematic of a neglected, understaffed and dysfunctional federal prison system.”

A day earlier, Attorney General William P. Barr decried “serious irregularities” at the MCC and criticized the BOP’s “failure” to keep Epstein secure.

USA Today said that the suicide “has cast a jarring spotlight on the nation’s largest prison system plagued for years by dangerous staffing shortages, violence and widespread sexual harassment of female officers.”

Noting the BOP’s efforts to fill up to 5,000 vacancies and its lack of a director since Mark Inch resigned a year ago, Eric Young, national president of the federal prison workers union, said, “We’ve got a serious problem.”

The Houston Chronicle reported that Epstein’s suicide is “the latest black eye for the U.S. Bureau of Prisons, the jail’s parent agency that already was under fire for the October death of Boston gangster James “Whitey” Bulger… Taken together, the deaths underscore ‘serious issues surrounding a lack of leadership’ within the BOP, said Cameron Lindsay, a former warden who ran three federal lockups, including the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.”

shu160201Other outlets reported that “major irregularities” in the MCC Special Housing Unit contributed to Epstein not being monitored properly. Those stories were followed by reports that the irregularities were primarily due to COs “working extreme overtime shifts to make up for staffing shortages the morning of his apparent suicide,” according to Politico. A BOP source was quoted as saying that the SHU was staffed with one guard working a fifth straight day of overtime and another who was working mandatory overtime.

The New York Times reported that one of the SHU guards that day was not a full-fledged correctional officer, and neither guard had checked on Epstein for several hours before he was discovered.

By the middle of last week, the focus was on BOP staffing levels. The Marshall Project reported that the Epstein suicide “followed steep and persistent staffing shortages that exceeded the rate of decline in the federal prison population… The federal prison system lost 12% of its workforce from the start of the Trump administration through the end of 2018. Administration officials have argued that the staff drop, which resulted partly from a hiring freeze, was mitigated by a reduction in the number of federal prisoners. But… over a two-year period between Sept. 2016 and Sept. 2018, the bureau lost 10% of its employees. In that same period, the total number of federal prisoners dropped by just over 5%.”

CNN reported that the BOP continues to rely on “augmentation,” using non-correctional officers in CO positions to cover staff shortages, noting that Congress has repeatedly asked the BOP to give up augmentation, even while denying it enough budget to hire more COs. The Hill complained that “it is the failure of leadership inside the permanent Justice Department bureaucracy — one that has served multiple presidents, Republican and Democrat — to fully address the resources and cultural deficiencies” that has resulted in the staffing crisis at BOP.

Schadenfreude aside, it is rare that media attention and Congressional hand-wringing results in changes in the BOP that positively affects staff or inmates.

Washington Post, Justice Dept. reassigns warden of jail where Epstein died, puts two staffers on leave (Aug. 13)

USA Today, Jeffrey Epstein suicide casts spotlight on federal prison system riven by staff shortages, violence, sexual harassment (Aug. 12)

Houston Chronicle, Federal New York lockup draws new scrutiny in Epstein death (Aug. 12)

Politico, Jeffrey Epstein’s guards were working extreme OT shifts (Aug. 12)

The Marshall Project, Epstein’s Death Highlights A Staffing Crisis in Federal Prisons (Aug. 14)

The New York Times, In Short-Staffed Jail, Epstein Was Left Alone for Hours; Guard Was Substitute (Aug. 12)

The Hill, Deadly déjà vu: Epstein’s prison death was decades in the making (Aug. 13)

– Thomas L. Root

Not a Great Week for the BOP – Update for August 13, 2019

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

NOT THE BEST WEEK FOR THE BOP

baddayA181130Earlier this past week, a gang fight at a Florida BOP facility killed an inmate and sent several to the hospital. Then this past weekend, high-profile defendant Jeffrey Epstein, being detained at MCC New York, apparently killed himself shortly after being taken off suicide watch.

It all adds up to a bad week for BOP Acting Director Hugh Hurwitz. And it’s not like to get better soon.

Investigations were immediately launched by the FBI and Dept. of Justice Inspector General. The Washington Post said Saturday afternoon that “the death is sure to draw intense scrutiny of the Bureau of Prisons and the Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York. The high-rise federal detention center in downtown Manhattan has a fearsome reputation; one inmate who spent time there and at Guantanamo Bay said that the U.S. facility in Cuba was “more pleasant” and “more relaxed.”

At minimum, expect the BOP’s suicide program statement, last updated 12 years ago, to get a rewrite over the Epstein incident. More likely, a lot of hard questions are going to be asked by law enforcement and congress alike of BOP Central Office staff and the affected wardens.

But the investigation is likely to go far beyond that. Yesterday, the Houston Chronicle reported that “the apparent suicide of Jeffrey Epstein has brought new scrutiny to a federal jail in New York that, despite chronic understaffing, houses some of the highest-security inmates in the country.” It characterized the suicide as “the latest black eye for the U.S. Bureau of Prisons, the jail’s parent agency that already was under fire for the October death of Boston gangster James “Whitey” Bulger, who was fatally beaten at a federal prison in West Virginia shortly after his arrival.”

Taken together, the deaths underscore “serious issues surrounding a lack of leadership” within the BOP, the Chronicle reported, quoting Cameron Lindsay, a former warden who ran three federal lockups, including the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.

badday190813Yesterday, the New York Times reported that “one of the two people guarding Jeffrey Epstein when he apparently hanged himself in a federal jail cell was not a full-fledged correctional officer, and neither guard had checked on Mr. Epstein for several hours before he was discovered, prison and law-enforcement officials said.” The description sounds suspiciously like the BOP was using augmentation, its practice of pressing non-correctional officers into CO roles.

Attorney General William P. Barr criticized BOP’s management of MCC New York yesterday, saying, “We are now learning of serious irregularities at this facility that are deeply concerning and demand a thorough investigation… We will get to the bottom of what happened. There will be accountability.”

Uh-oh. Sounds like some Warden’s bonus is in jeopardy. Or not.

USA Today, One inmate killed and five others hospitalized after clash between white and black federal prisoners (Aug. 5, 2019)

Houston Chronicle, Federal New York lockup draws new scrutiny in Epstein death (Aug. 12, 2019)

Washington Post, Jeffrey Epstein dead after ‘apparent suicide’ in New York (Aug. 10, 2019)

The New York Times, In Short-Staffed Jail, Epstein Was Left Alone for Hours; Guard Was Substitute (Aug. 12, 2019)

– Thomas L. Root