Tag Archives: biden

Pressure on Biden Builds On Fentanyl Analog Ban – Update for April 23, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

BIDEN FACES EARLY TEST ON COMMITMENT TO MANDATORY MINIMUMS

fentanyl210422In 2018, the Drug Enforcement Agency temporarily placed an entire class of compounds with chemical structures similar to fentanyl on the Schedule 1 list of drugs prohibited by federal law. Fentanyl analogs vary in potency, but even a trace of any of these compounds in a batch of drugs can trigger a lengthy mandatory minimum prison sentence.

Last week, the Government Accountability Office raised concerns that the fentanyl ban could result in people getting long sentences for compounds that are not even harmful or contain trace amounts of fentanyl-related substances. The ban has also made it harder for researchers to study thousands of fentanyl-like compounds, including to make treatments and antidotes for people living with opioid addiction, according to public health groups.

President Biden’s Office of National Drug Control Policy said the administration will work to extend the ban for seven months. Biden likely wants to avoid attacks from conservatives claiming he is “legalizing” a drug that has been so heavily demonized in the media, although allowing the Schedule 1 ban to expire is not really legislation.

Over a hundred justice and public health groups last week urged the White House to let the listing – which enhanced criminal penalties for people involved with the analogS –  expire. Instead, the coalition asked Biden to embrace a public health and harm reduction approach to fentanyl and other opioids, rather than repeating past mistakes of the war on drugs.

warondrug210423“The Biden administration and leaders of Congress are faced with their first major test of criminal justice reform… if they choose to extend this Trump-era policy, it will increase mass incarceration and the over-policing and incarceration of people of color,” said Hilary Shelton, a policy director at the NAACP, during a call with reporters on Monday.

Truthout, Biden Poised to Break a Promise on Mandatory Minimum Sentencing (April 13, 2021)

The Intercept, Biden Looks to Extend Trump’s Bolstered Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentencing (April 12, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Patience, People, on Criminal Justice Reform – Update for April 8, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

WHEN WILL BIDEN TACKLE CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM?

The most common question I have gotten from inmates since January is when Congress will pass criminal justice reform. It brings to mind the old variation on the serenity prayer: “Lord, grant me patience… and I want it NOW.”

Reform200819But patience is what everyone needs. There’s the infrastructure, the racial reckoning, and now the gun control push (which will probably prevent a minuscule number of gun crimes, but looks all shiny and robust). I am convinced we will get to criminal justice reform, but it will take a bit.

Still, there are some encouraging signs. First, President Biden’s Dept of Justice followed up on its letter to the Supreme Court a few weeks ago with a brief filed last week in Terry v. United States, arguing that Section 404 of the First Step Act covers low-level crack cocaine offenders sentenced under 21 USC § 841(b)(1)(C), “a dramatic reversal that comes more than three decades after a Biden-crafted bill helped to fuel disproportionately harsh penalties for Black drug offenders,” according to The Hill.

But Biden promised more. During his campaign, he promised to address mandatory minimums. Nkechi Taifa, a Washington-based criminal justice reform advocate, believes that will change soon. Taifa said last week that he has been in touch with the Biden administration. “With respect to drugs,” he said, “it’s only about the weight of drugs and amount of drugs that dictates the time you serve. It doesn’t matter what the judge thinks, doesn’t matter what your characteristics are. Biden has said he’ll do away with it.”

return161227Cynthia Roseberry of the ACLU said on NPR last week that Biden could do a lot with a stroke of a pen, such as reverse the DOJ legal opinion in January that people on CARES Act home confinement had to return to prison when the pandemic ended. Last week, NPR reported, “prisoner rights groups asked Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland to intervene, citing their comments about the need to reduce the prison population.”

And just today, FAMM – which has been active in urging the Dept. of Justice to reverse the legal opinion – is urging people to call the Attorney General to lobby him to take action.

Biden has proclaimed April a second chance month for people involved in the justice system. Roseberry told NPR she wants to see Biden use his sweeping power to grant clemency during the month.

The Hill, Biden urges leniency for harsh crack sentences fueled by his crime bill (March 31, 2021)

WTVR-TV, When will President Biden address criminal justice reform? (April 1, 2021)

NPR, Criminal Justice Reform Advocates Say They’re Anxious To See More Action From Biden (April 2, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Some Reform Advice for Uncle Joe – Update for March 25, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

HOW BIDEN CAN REFORM CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Sometimes, it’s hard to remember the three things my wife wants me to pick up at the local IGA. For that reason, I have empathy for our septuagenarian President trying to wrap his head around the 14 steps that law professors Mark Osler (a clemency expert) and Rachel Barkow (former Sentencing Commission member) proposed last week that he take to reform criminal justice.

henhouse180307Writing in The Appeal, the profs argued (among other things) that “Biden inherits a clemency crisis. There are currently more than 15,000 petitions waiting for an answer, having piled up over the course of the Trump presidency… The current structure bears not one but two fatal flaws: It is overly bureaucratic and is a captive of the deeply conflicted DOJ.” It’s no secret that the fox has been guarding the henhouse – too much of clemency decision-making is embedded in the Department of Justice, the very institution that sought the too-long sentences in the first place and is thus inclined to say no to requests to overturn its initial judgments.

They also called on Biden to reform how the BOP processes sentence reduction motions filed pursuant to 18 USC § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), the so-called compassionate release motions. “DOJ needs to shift course,” Barkow and Osler said, “particularly during the pandemic. It should identify elderly and infirm people in prison for release — not merely home confinement — and, at a minimum, it should support their release when requested.”

In addition, they argued the Administration should make CARES Act home confinement permanent for those who have been sent there during the pandemic, and that the DOJ commit to programming that allows people in prison to earn time off their sentence after participating in programming. “During the Trump Administration,” they said, “BOP proposed a rule that would block reduction eligibility for far too many people, make it too difficult to earn credits, and far too easy to lose them. While public comment on that proposal closed on January 25, it is not too late for DOJ to shift course and propose a different rule that makes this programming—and therefore release eligibility—as widely available as possible.”

social210325Most significantly, they argued that “flawed compassionate release and First Step Act implementation are emblematic of larger problems at the BOP. Nearly everyone outside of government who deals with the BOP finds it to be dysfunctional; it’s inefficient, overly bureaucratic, and prone to cruelty.” They propose legislation to shift the BOP to the Department of Health and Human Services. “In the end, the work of the BOP is to not only securely detain people but to prepare them for life after incarceration. They are much better at the first task than the second. A shift to a department dominated by social work would help change the culture that produces the BOP’s current problems.”

Along with that, they argued, the BOP needs to do a better job of the basic “blocking and tackling in their field, and that starts with ensuring adequate staffing throughout the system. There needs to be additional resources for mental health needs, and even for basic issues like ensuring there is a state ID for every person in prison when they are released.”

The Appeal, 14 Steps Biden’s DOJ Can Take Now to Reform America’s Criminal Legal System (March 15, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Government Cries ‘Uncle’ on Fair Sentencing Act Retroactivity – Update for March 22, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

A MOST SIGNIFICANT CONCESSION

Last week, the Biden Dept of Justice told the Supreme Court that it would no longer argue that the § 404 of the First Step Act – the provision that made the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (FSA) retroactive, thus letting people given draconian sentences prior to that date a chance to bring their prison terms more in line with powder cocaine sentences – did not apply to people who did not fall under a mandatory minimum at their pre-2010 sentencing.

crackpowder191216

At first blush, it sounds rather arcane. Section 404 permitted anyone with a “covered offense” to apply to his or her sentencing judge for a sentence reduction. A “covered offense” is defined in § 404(a) as “a violation of a Federal criminal statute, the statutory penalties for which were modified by section 2 or 3 of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010.” The Act lowered the ratio of crack-to-powder from 100:1 – which punished 5 grams of crack as though it were 500 grams (over a pound) of powder – to 18:1. This had the effect of requiring a defendant to have 28 grams of crack (instead of 5 grams) before the five-year mandatory minimum sentence of 21 USC 841(b)(1)(B) would apply, and 28 grams of crack before the 10-year mandatory minimum in 21 USC 841(b)(1)(A) would apply.

Essentially, the drug distribution penalties are hierarchical. The people with the most drug are sentenced under 21 USC 841(b)(1)(A), with penalties starting at 10 years and going up. The people with a lesser amount are punished under 21 USC 841(b)(1)(B), with penalties starting at five years. People convicted of having amounts less than the minimum needed for (b)(1)(B) – which is 28 grams for crack under the FSA – are punished under 21 USC 841(b)(1)(C), where the penalties start at zero.

A number of judicial circuits have ruled on whether a person with a pre-2010 (b)(1)(C) sentence had a “covered offense” under § 404. After all, the reasoning went, the FSA did not change the pre-2010 mandatory minimum, which was zero before the FSA and zero after. Unsurprisingly, the DOJ has fought hammer-and-tong against any (b)(1)(C) defendant getting resentenced under the FSA, and it so far has won in four circuits but lost in three.

crackpowder160606Now for Terry: In Terry v. United States, the Supremes are to weigh in on the issue, whether defendants sentenced for low-level crack-cocaine offenses under (b)(1)(C) before the FSA are eligible for resentencing under First Step. This is important for those defendants, because on resentencing, the courts are not bound to merely adjusting the sentence to reflect the FSA. Instead, they can consider post-sentence conduct and rehabilitation, and vary downward rather freely. Even if this were not so, most of those (b)(1)(C) people are nearing the end of their sentences.

The Trump DOJ consistently took positions to limit § 404 crack retroactivity as much as possible, and argued in Terry that unless a defendant had a mandatory minimum, § 404 did not apply. But in a letter to the Supreme Court last week, the DOJ said that following the change in Administration, it “began a process of reviewing the government’s interpretation of Section 404 of the First Step Act. As a result of that review, the Department of Justice has concluded that petitioner’s conviction is a “covered offense” under Section 404, that petitioner is entitled to request a reduced sentence, and that the court of appeals erred in concluding otherwise.”

The letter was filed on the day the Government’s brief was due. The petitioner filed an immediate response, criticizing DOJ for waiting to the last minute and urging the Court to decide the case without any further delay. DOJ, exhibiting the heart of a bureaucrat, noted,

According to the Federal Bureau of Prisons, petitioner is scheduled to complete the remainder of his term of imprisonment, which he will serve almost entirely on home confinement, on September 22, 2021… Were the case not to be decided before September 22, a question of mootness would arise that would need to be addressed before any decision on the merits.

wrong210322Of course, not a word about Tarahrick Terry, whose paltry 3.9 grams of crack netted him a sentence that – had the district court been told by the government that the FSA applied – would have gotten a reduction which nationally was averaging 26%. In other words, Tarahrick and the kids would have been coloring Easter eggs at home two years ago.

The Supreme Court is unwilling to delay a decision on relief for Tarahrick until it no longer matters. Last Friday, it appointed a lawyer to argue the position abandoned by the government (which is common practice when the government refuses to defend a case). Argument had been set for April. The Court postponed that but still promised a decision by the end of June.

The Terry case has drawn a lot of interest. Senators Richard Durbin, Charles Grassley, Cory Booker, and Mike Lee also filed a joint brief, as have several major think tanks and advocacy organizations spanning the spectrum from the American Civil Liberties Union to the American Conservative Union. Groups of retired federal judges, former federal prosecutors, and defense lawyers, have filed as well. None of the amici favors the government.

hope160620The DOJ confession of error is interesting for another reason more based in policy. It is still too early for any comprehensive Biden criminal justice reform legislation to have been introduced in Congress, but the DOJ letter strongly indicates interest at high levels of the Administration to favor maximizing current statutes to reduce federal sentences. Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman said last week the DOJ letter “is big news that the new Administration is open to a broader application of the First Step Act here, and I am hopeful that this kind of Justice Department new thinking may end up being applied in a whole host of other sentencing settings.”

Such as maybe a legislative push for criminal justice reform, perhaps?

Reuters, Biden reverses course in U.S. Supreme Court drug sentencing case (March 15, 2021)

DOJ, Letter to Supreme Court in Case No 20-5904 (March 15, 2021)

Federal Public Defender, Letter to Supreme Court in Case No 20-5904 (March 15, 2021)

Washington Standard, Coalition Calls For Reform Of Drug Laws That Delivered Harsher Prison Sentences By 100–1 Ratio To Minorities For Low-Level Offenses (March 13, 2021)

Sentencing Law and Policy, Acting SG tells SCOTUS that new administration now supports broad application of crack retroactivity provision of FIRST STEP Act in Terry (March 15, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Great Clemency Idea Or Stupid Political Stunt? – Update for March 18, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

WASHINGTON WEEK: SEEKING CLEMENCY FOR SOME LADIES
"I won!"
“I won!”

Congresswomen Cori Bush (D-Missouri) and Ayanna Pressley (D-Massachusetts) last Friday joined with the National Council for Incarcerated & Formerly Incarcerated Women and Girls’ initiative calling on President Joseph Biden to grant 100 women clemency in his first 100 days in office. Speaking at an event held outside the White House, Pressley told the President “to exercise his clemency authority,” adding he can grant clemency to the 100 women “by the stroke of a pen.”

Vox said several weeks ago that “advocates want Biden to act quickly” on clemency. “They point to epidemics of Covid-19 in jails and prisons, which could be eased if there were fewer people in those settings to spread the coronavirus. And they argue that acting too slowly would repeat the mistakes of Biden’s predecessors, who, if they moved on clemency at all, did so too late during their terms to do the long, hard work of broader reforms.”

clemencyjack161229Acting quickly on clemency is a great idea, but “100 women in 100 days” is nothing but a political stunt. The greatest danger in a proposal like this one is that if Biden knuckles under, 100 inmates get clemency, and then the Administration will check clemency off its “to-do” list, moving on to the next domestic issue. The problem with the clemency system – beyond the obvious, that 14,000 petitions are pending, many for years – is that the arbitrariness and bias of a system that relies on mercy from the very people who make their careers locking up defendants has a systemic infirmity that must be addressed. A political stunt that relies on an alliterative label – ‘100 in 100…’, like there’s something significant about the base-10 number system – simply detracts from the serious work to be done while delivering commonsense mercy in a scattershot and ineffective way.

The well-meaning people behind this have little idea of the effect of their Lafayette Park theatre on the inmates. I have had several emails this week from women inmates informing me that a list of 100 inmates was handed to the President in the Oval Office, and that he was ready to act. They wondered if they were on the list. Oh, if life only imitated rumor…

Why not simply distribute 151,703 scratch-off cards to the BOP population, with only 100 winners among them? That approach would make as much sense, while adding a bit of drama and excitement to the event.

crackpowder160606Last Tuesday, Representatives Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York), Bobby Scott (D-Virginia), Kelly Armstrong (R-North Dakota), and Don Bacon (R-Nebraska) introduced the Eliminating a Quantifiably Unjust Application of the Law (EQUAL) Act in the House. The bipartisan legislation would eliminate the federal crack and powder cocaine sentencing disparity and retroactively apply it to those already convicted or sentenced.

The measure is identical to the measure introduced in the Senate by Cory Booker (D-New Jersey) and Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) five weeks ago.

USA Today, ‘No justice in destroying lives’: Pressley, Bush call on Biden to grant clemency to 100 women in 100 days (March 12, 2021)

Vox, Biden’s secret weapon for criminal justice reform (March 1, 2021)

Atlanta Daily World, Congress Introduces Bill to Eliminate Sentencing Disparity Between Crack and Powder Cocaine (March 10, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Pardon Joe While He Works on Clemency – Update for February 16, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

WHITE HOUSE BEGINS TO UNTANGLE CLEMENCY MESS

broken210216President Biden has inherited 14,000 unresolved clemency requests – petitions seeking a pardon (forgiveness of the offense) or commutation of sentence (reduction of sentence, usually to time served). Many of the clemency petitions date from the Obama era but a good number piled up in the last four years, during which time who you knew was more important that what you wrote in your petition.

Politico reported last week that the White House is seeking suggestions on how to reform the clemency system and deal with the backlog. But the White House so far has revealed little about its plans, leaving advocates concerned that Biden’s team lacks a comprehensive plan for dealing with the backlog.

Over 100 criminal justice reform groups are urging Biden to overhaul the process and start resolving cases right away. The ACLU launched an ad campaign last month to push him to grant clemency to 25,000 people and make good on his pledge to tackle criminal justice issues amid a national reckoning on racial injustice. “The danger,” law professor Mark Osler said, “is that they’ll replicate the mistake the past several administrations of never focusing on it until it’s too late and it’s a mess.”

While Biden didn’t campaign aggressively on the issue of clemency, the joint task force Biden and Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-Vermont) assembled last summer proposed a 60-person agency independent of the DOJ, composed of people with diverse backgrounds to review cases.

clemencypitch180716Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tennessee), who chairs the House Judiciary subcommittee with jurisdiction over pardons, lobbied Obama and Trump to issue more pardons. He said he plans to do the same for Biden.

“There are… more and more people in jail, and a lot of those people have been there forever and they have been there for long draconian sentences,” Cohen said.

Ohio State University law prof Doug Berman counseled patience as the White House figures out a plan. But, he said, “taking a careful and deliberative process toward grander reform of the entire clemency process should not be an excuse for Prez Biden to hold back entirely on the use of his clemency pen…I am pretty confident that only a relatively little amount of time would be needed for members of the Biden team to identify at least a handful of compelling cases that could and should allow clemency grants” to be part of Biden’s first 100-day agenda.

Politico, Trump left behind a clemency mess. The clock’s ticking for Biden to solve it. (February 11, 2021)

Sentencing Law and Policy, How about some clemency grants from Prez Biden while his team works on grander clemency plans? (February 11, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Let’s Get Moving, People! – Update for February 12, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LORD, GRANT ME PATIENCE… AND I WANT IT NOW

time210212With Biden in office, prisoners have been jamming my email inbox asking when President Biden will be tackling criminal justice reform. Everyone, including me, wants it now.

For that matter, people are asking whether the $1.9 trillion stimulus will include changes in compassionate release, CARES Act release and elderly offender home confinement. The answer: no one knows.

The stimulus bill’s details have not yet been released. For all we know, the details have not yet been written. We don’t know whether prisoners will qualify for the $1,400 stimulus. We don’t know about sentencing breaks, or extending home confinement past the end of the pandemic. The best estimates are that the text will be available some time in March.

advice210212The lack of action right now hasn’t stopped people from proposing what Biden should do. Reason magazine called for creation of a new pardon office, independent of the Justice Department, to handle clemency petitions at volume, with an eye toward cutting the sort of excessive drug sentences that both Obama and Trump criticized but did not address. Reason noted this wouldn’t require an act of Congress—just the will of a president able to admit the size and scope of the problem. Some Latino groups are proposing that Biden issue a mass presidential pardon for at least some of the estimated 11 million people in the country illegally.

Writing in The Hill, Marc Levin argued that among the most important items deserving action by the White House and Congress are abolition of drug mandatory minimums and allowing courts to take a second look at certain sentences after individuals have spent many years behind bars. Others include laws prohibiting prosecutors from contaminating the sentencing phase of a trial with references to acquitted conduct waiving federal laws that interfere with state legalization of medicinal or recreational marijuana.

There is no shortage of suggestions. It’s just no one knows when it’s going to happen.

Reason, A Practical Wish List for Joe Biden (February 1, 2021)

USA Today, A pardon for ‘Dreamers’? Some activists tout amnesty for undocumented immigrants if Congress doesn’t act (February 2, 2021)

The Hill, Build a bridge, not a wall, between administrations on justice reform (February 1, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Reading the Tea Leaves on Biden’s Criminal Justice Reform – Update for February 1, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

CHANGE IS GONNA COME… SLOWLY BUT SURELY

bidensuperman210201Biden ain’t Superman. For that reason, people who have been lighting up my inbox with emails asking whether Biden has done away with mandatory minimums should take a deep breath. A President cannot abolish mandatory minimums. Only Congress can do that.

But there’s a lot of early indication that Biden is going to be active in criminal justice reform. Last week, the acting attorney general pulled the Trump administration’s May 10, 2017, charging and sentencing memo, which required US Attorneys to pursue the harshest charges and stiffest penalties. The new policy, a rollback to the Obama era, “ensures that decisions about charging, plea agreements, and advocacy at sentencing are based on the merits of each case and reflect an individualized assessment of relevant facts.”

Last week, I reported that Trump’s DOJ issued a legal opinion that CARES Act inmates on home confinement would have to return to prison after the pandemic ends. Writing in USA Today, three criminal justice advocates argued that Biden “should immediately rescind the Trump administration’s legal opinion, and should identify more people who could be safely released early back to society, with priority “ given to those who are most vulnerable to COVID-19.

The ACLU announced the launching of an ad campaign calling on Biden to carry out his campaign promise to cut the number of incarcerated persons in the country. The campaign calls for clemency using set criteria, such as focusing on people who, if they were sentenced today, would not receive the same sentence, and releasing the elderly, the medically vulnerable and people locked up for technical probation or supervised release violations.

crackpowder191216

Not to be outdone, FAMM and the Prison Fellowship last week announced the “End the Disparity” campaign, to urge Congress to eliminate the 18:1 ratio between crack and powder cocaine-related offenses, making them one-to-one. Senators Cory Booker (D-New Jersey) and Richard Durbin (D-Illinois), both members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, announced legislation that will do so, eliminating the federal crack and powder cocaine sentencing disparity and apply it retroactively to those already convicted or sentenced.

Before the 2010 Fair Sentencing Act, the penalties for one gram of crack was the same as for 100 grams of powder cocaine, resulting in horrific sentences for people with small quantities of crack.  Those people were mostly black, crack being a drug of choice for poorer urban communities (which also were mostly black). In 2010, the Fair Sentencing Act introduced a bit of sanity, but the ratio didn’t drop to 1:1 (a concession to some Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III-type senators to get them to vote for the measure).

So, now, a gram of crack is equal to 18 grams of powder, fairer than before but still a differentiation that is untethered to common sense. The Booker-Durbin bill would drop the ratio to 1:1, if it passes. The fact that both sponsors are on the Judiciary Committee (and Durbin will probably be running the Committee) greatly increases those odds.

HEROES210201Two questions loom large for federal inmates. First, will Biden’s proposed stimulus bill, many elements of which are expected to be drawn from House Democrats’ $3.4 trillion HEROES Act (passed in May but blocked by the GOP-controlled Senate), include breaks for compassionate release, CARES Act releases and elderly offenders? Second, when will Congress see a sweeping criminal justice reform bill?

The details of the stimulus bill have not yet been released. Just like with the HEROES Act, which we didn’t get to read until almost the day it was passed, we will have to wait. As for criminal justice reform, no one knows when legislation will be filed or how long it will take to past.

HuffPost, DOJ Pulls Trump Administration’s Harsh Charging And Sentencing Policy (January 29, 2021)

Courthouse News Service, Biden Moves to End Federal Private Prisons as Part of Racial Equity Plan (January 26, 2021)

Bloomberg, Biden’s Go-Big Stimulus Plans Set Up Fresh Fight in Senate (January 11, 2021)

USA Today, Biden’s executive orders on criminal justice should extend to inmates sent home by COVID (January 28, 2021)

The Hill, ACLU pressing Biden to stick to promise of decarceration with new ad buy (January 28, 2021)

EIN Presswire, FAMM and Prison Fellowship Launch #EndTheDisparity Campaign (January 28, 2021)

Office of Sen. Cory Booker, Booker and Durbin Announce Legislation To Eliminate Federal Crack and Powder Cocaine Sentencing Disparity (January 28, 2021)

Bloomberg Law, Criminal Justice Changes Need Harris to Lead, Advocates Say (January 26, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

CARES Act Home Confinees Must Return to Prison, Trump’s DOJ Says in Parting Shot – Update for January 22, 2021

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

A FINAL STEAMING PILE OF LEGAL EXCREMENT AS THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION LEAVES THE BUILDING

DOJOLC210122Under the March 2020 CARES Act, Congress gave the Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons the authority to send inmates to home confinement at any time, despite the 6-month/10% limitation on home confinement set by 18 USC § 3624(c). The conditions set by the legislation were only two: (1) the national emergency declared because of COVID-19 had to be in effect, and (2) the Attorney General had to determine that COVID-19 was materially affecting BOP operations.

Attorney General William Barr concluded in short order that BOP operations were being affected, and that nonviolent inmates with good prison records (and US citizenship and a few other requirements) should be sent to home confinement. The BOP added its own gloss, that the inmate must have completed 50% of his or her sentence (or, for short-timers, 25% of the sentence with 18 months or less to go). By mid-April 2020, the prison-to-parlor pipeline was flowing.

snakeoil170911Since then, the BOP has trumpeted that it has sent over 18,000 inmates to home confinement. It turns out, however, that – like most BOP claims – this one is misleading, if not downright dishonest. The BOP has sent 18,112 people to home confinement in the last 10 months, but 60% of those were eligible for home confinement under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(2) anyway, because they were within their last six months of their sentences (or 10%, if they were sentenced to under five years).

But this leaves about 7,245 people who were sent home who could not have been sent if not for the CARES Act. I know at least two sent home with more than 10 years of sentence left to serve. While that’s a long time to spend in a Barcalounger, nevertheless, there is no doubt that an inmate’s worst day on home confinement is better that his or her best day in prison.

There was a kerfuffle last fall, when a DOJ Attorney said in open court, almost as an aside, that once the pandemic ended, all of the federal inmates sent to home confinement would have to come back to prison.

At the time, FAMM president Kevin Ring said that he had communicated his concern that CARES Act inmates might be recalled to the White House. He said the Trump Administration assured him it would never happen.

Back then I said

but White House assertions (remember President Trump’s promised 3,000 clemencies?) have a way of being wrong. The risk of reincarceration seemed real enough that the House of Representatives included a provision in last May’s HEROES Act that no one “granted placement in community supervision, termination of supervision, placement on administrative supervision, or pre-trial release shall be re-incarcerated, placed on supervision or active supervision, or ordered detained pre-trial only as a result of the expiration of the national emergency relating to a communicable disease.

I generally like being right, but not this time…

Although the end of the pandemic appears to be months away (former basketball point guard and rockstar doctor Anthony Fauci said yesterday that “if the country can get over the hurdle of vaccine hesitancy and reach a 70% to 85% uptake, Americans can expect normalcy in the fall”), the Trump Administration was seemingly unable to resist breaking one final promise.

Last week, the DOJ Office of Legal Counsel issued an opinion entitled “Home Confinement of Federal Prisoners After the COVID-19 Emergency,” concluding that

the CARES Act authorizes the Director of BOP to place prisoners in home confinement only during the statute’s covered emergency period and when the Attorney General finds that the emergency conditions are materially affecting BOP’s functioning. Should that period end, or should the Attorney General revoke the finding, the Bureau would be required to recall the prisoners to correctional facilities unless they are otherwise eligible for home confinement under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(2). We also conclude that the general imprisonment authorities of 18 U.S.C. § 3621(a) and (b) do not supplement the CARES Act authority to authorize home confinement under the Act beyond the limits of section 3624(c)(2).

kick210122Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman said yesterday in his Sentencing Law and Policy blog that “this opinion is certain contestable, the new Biden Justice Department could reconsider it and a court might reject it, and we are surely a long ways from reaching a post-pandemic world.” Kevin Ring denounced the opinion as “one last kick in the groin from the Trump Justice Department,” calling it “is a poorly reasoned piece of cruelty that could make families worry unnecessarily.”

I consider it very unlikely that Biden’s new Attorney General, Merrick Garland, is going to rescind Barr’s finding “that the emergency conditions are materially affecting BOP’s functioning” any time soon. Although the pandemic emergency declaration expires in March, I suspect Joe is more likely to invite Donald Trump over to the White House for a drink than he is to end the emergency. There’s plenty of precedent. At the time the COVID emergency was declared, 60 national emergencies had been declared since the National Emergencies Act was enacted 45 years ago, and 31 of them (including the emergency are still in effect, having been renewed repeatedly. I figure the pandemic emergency to last for another nine months at least.

As I noted above, the House HEROES Act last May sought to plug the CARES Act hole that left home confinees in a non-permanent status. HEROES died a lonely death on January 2nd, but the new 117th Congress can fix the home confinement problem simply enough. Even if Congress does not, the President could grant conditional clemency or district courts could grant compassionate release to keep these folks on home confinement.

Even if it doesn’t, the Biden DOJ can walk back the OLC opinion (and the reasoning is shaky enough that there is plenty of room for reinterpretation) without much difficulty.

timecover2310122There is scant policy justification for returning people on home confinement to prison, unless sheer meanness is now an Administration goal. (Sheer meanness is a criterion more at home in the last Administration, the one that issued the OLC opinion, than with the new people in charge). The BOP has first determined that inmates it proposes sending to home confinement pose little risk to public safety but high risk of COVID, meaning that the CARES Act cohort includes a lot of older and sicker folk. They’re the ones, unsurprisingly who cost the BOP the most to care for. And the lower BOP prisoner population (a drop of 12.5% in a year) has eased the burden the BOP faces from staff shortages. Because the BOP has always had the discretion to return these persons to prison for misconduct, there’s no compelling public safety or cost justification for sending everyone back to prison after the pandemic is over.

In fact, there was probably no compelling need for the outgoing Administration to drop this opinion on the way out the door, unless of course the Trump appointees wanted to create as much legal vandalism for the Biden DOJ to clean up as possible.

Dept. of Justice, Memorandum Opinion for the General Counsel of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (January 15, 2021)

Sentencing Law and Policy, Notable OLC opinion on “Home Confinement of Federal Prisoners After the COVID-19 Emergency” (January 21, 2021)

Forbes, Department Of Justice Lays Plans For Federal Inmates On Home Confinement To Return To Prison (January 21, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

Whither Sentence Reform After Biden Win? – Update for November 9, 2020

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

SENTENCE REFORM DIDN’T WIN LAST TUESDAY, BUT IT DIDN’T LOSE, EITHER

Reform200819Anyone who read the House of Representatives’ version of The First Step Act (which was watered down substantially to satisfy the Republican-led Senate) or, for that matter, exulted at the House’s HEROES Act last May has some idea what an unbridled Democratic-controlled Congress and White House might do to advance sentence reform. Retroactivity, relaxed compassionate release and elderly offender programs, maybe even some relief for people convicted of violent crimes…

We probably did not get that last week. The Democrats still control the House (but with a smaller majority), and the weekend brought us a Democrat for president-elect. The Senate has 50 Republicans and 48 Democrats, however, with the final two Senate races in Georgia not to be decided until January. If even one of the two eventual winners is Republican (which is likely), the Republicans and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) will still rule the Senate.

But that does not mean we won’t see some criminal justice reform in the next two-year Congress. President-elect Joe Biden spent decades in the Senate, and one of his great strengths is the ability to make deals. “And perhaps most importantly,” Politico reported last week, “Biden and McConnell have a real relationship — forged over the years as Senate colleagues and combatants. McConnell was the only Senate Republican to attend the funeral for Biden’s son Beau in 2015, and he’s largely stayed away from GOP attacks on Biden’s other son, Hunter.”

“They have negotiated big things before. They’ve come through some very hard and even bitter fights over judicial confirmations,” Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), a close Biden ally, told Politico in an interview. “But I think they’ve managed to stay friends or have a working, professional relationship even in the hardest of times.”

potscooby180713Voters may be ready for change. The Appeal called last Tuesday “a banner election against the war on drugs,” noting that Oregon voters approved a “groundbreaking initiative to decriminalize drugs” – not just marijuana – making low-level drug possession a civil offense, punishable by a fine, rather than jail time. Four other states made recreational pot legal, raising the number of states permitting it to 15.

President Trump, who was himself a reluctant supporter of the First Step Act, reminded everyone during the campaign that Biden was the sponsor of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1993,  (which morphed into the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) – legislation that  critics claim is responsible for the large numbers of federal prisons locked up today. Some suggest that that fact gives the president-elect something to live down. For that matter, the vice-president elect, Kamala Harris, was hardly progressive during her days as a prosecutor. Some are already predicting she will lead the sentencing-law reform efforts of the Biden administration.

In his Sentencing Law and Policy blog, Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman said priorities that ought to be able to garner the bipartisan support of a Republican Senate and Democratic White House include repeal of mandatory minimums, further reduction of the crack/powder sentencing disparity, making all sentencing reforms retroactive, reinvigoration of compassionate release “so that the sick and elderly are transitioned out of incarceration so long as they do not pose a public safety risk,” and removing barriers to reentry.

bipartisanship201109Berman suggests that Politico’s observation that “’McConnell has already succeeded in his longtime goal of reshaping the judiciary’ has me wondering whether Senator McConnell might be less adverse to giving federal judges significantly more sentencing discretion now that he views so many as the product of his own king-making.”

Politico, America’s new power couple: Mitch and Joe (Nov 5)

The Appeal, How Criminal Justice Reform Fared at the Ballot Box on Tuesday (Nov 5)

Sentencing Law and Policy, Can we be hopeful federal leaders will make deals to advance federal criminal justice reforms in the next Congress? (Nov 6)

– Thomas L. Root