All posts by lisa-legalinfo

The Sheriff Was Making It Up – Update for January 28, 2022

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

YOU PUT THE WORDS RIGHT IN MY MOUTH

In October 2018, two Butts County Sheriff’s deputies placed signs in the front yards of all 57 registered sex offenders in the County, warning kids to “STOP” and “NO TRICK-OR-TREAT AT THIS ADDRESS.” When one of the people whose house had the posted sign called the Sheriff, he was told it was a crime to remove it.

trickortreatsign220128

The next year, three of the registered sex offenders sued, seeking a court order prohibiting the Sheriff from placing the signs again. The district court denied the injunction.

Last week, the 11th Circuit reversed, concluding that “the Sheriff’s warning signs are compelled government speech, and their placement violates a homeowner’s First Amendment rights.” The Court noted that First Amendment protection “includes both the right to speak freely and the right to refrain from speaking at all… The right to speak and the right to refrain from speaking are complementary components of the broader concept of individual freedom of mind.”

Where First Amendment rights are implicated, the state has to show it has a “compelling interest” in doing so and that the violation is “narrowly tailored” to achieve that end. Everyone agreed that protecting kids from sex abuse is compelling. But the Sheriff tried to swat a fly with a sledgehammer.

Before placing the signs, the Sheriff didn’t consider whether any of the registrants were classified as likely to recidivate. What’s more, he admitted that in the past six years he’d been Sheriff, he had never had an issue with a registrant having unauthorized contact or reoffending with a minor. The Sheriff could not show the Butts County sex offenders “actually pose a danger to trick-or-treating children or that these signs would serve to prevent such danger.”

trick220128Influencing the decision might have been the Sheriff’s explanation that he had placed the signs because Georgia law forbids registered sex offenders from participating in Halloween. After the warning signs were placed, the Sheriff posted a message on the Department’s Facebook page, along with a picture of the sign, in which he said as much. That was more trick than treat: Georgia law says nothing of the such.

“Assuming that yard signs alerting people to the residences of registered sex offenders on Halloween would prevent the sexual abuse of children (which, we repeat, is not supported by any record evidence),” the Circuit held, “the signs are not tailored narrowly enough.”

The decision against the Sheriff does not seem to have affected his popularity…

sheriffFB220128

McClendon v. Long, Case No. 21-10092, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 1635 (11th Cir., Jan. 19, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

Chewing on a Procedural Pretzel – Update for January 27, 2022

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

NO PERMISSION NEEDED FOR AN APPEAL FOR WHICH PERMISSION NEEDED

“Huh?” you ask. No wonder.

This problem has happened to inmates before, especially during pandemic lockdowns. In 2015, Serwan Mizori filed a 28 USC § 2255 motion arguing that his lawyer had rendered ineffective representation. The motion languished for four years before his court got around to denying it.

pretzel2230127Once the court acted, Serwan had 60 days under the rules to file his notice of appeal (NOA). But as luck would have it, he was confined in the Special Housing Unit (“SHU”) for some prison rules violation right about then, and had no access to stamps or a law library. He got out of the SHU about two weeks after the NOA was due.

Serwan filed an NOA and a motion for leave to file it late under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5)(A)(ii). The district court turned him down, so Serwan appealed its denial of his right to file the NOA. To turn this into even more of a procedural pretzel, the 6th Circuit first took up the question of whether he needed a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal denial of his motion to late file the NOA.

Section 2253(c)(1)(A) of Title 28 provides that unless a circuit justice or judge issues a COA, an appeal may not be taken from “the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process” issued by a court. A COA is a ruling that the issue to be appealed is one that is subject to reasonable dispute, one that “jurists of reason” would find debatable.

Last week the Circuit ruled Serwan could argue his procedural motion without a COA. The Court said that for COA purposes, a “final order… disposes of the merits of a habeas corpus proceeding.”

rules201202Here, the district court’s two-page order denying Serwan’s motion under Rule 4(a)(5) “plainly did not dispose of the merits of his 2255 motion,” the Circuit said. “The district court’s July 2019 order denying the 2255 motion had already done that; and the order that Mizori seeks to appeal now said nothing about the merits of his underlying § 2255 motion.”

Thus, Serwan could proceed with appealing the denial of his late-filed notice of appeal without a COA. If he wins that, then he will require a COA.

No wonder lawyers make big bucks.

Mizori v. United States, Case No, 19-2433, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 1639 (6th Cir., Jan. 20, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

… And Venter Vents – Update for January 25, 2022

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE WITNESSES SAVAGE BOP’S COVID RESPONSE

venters220125Witnesses blasted BOP healthcare, CARES Act and compassionate release response, and the PATTERN score at a House of Representatives Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security hearing on what Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) called “BOP’s troubling response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its inability to protect inmates and staff adequately.”

Nadler, who is chairman of the full House Committee on the Judiciary, said the BOP has a “duty to ensure basic protections for those in our custody” and “to make sufficient use of the authority granted to it under the CARES Act to place certain prisoners at home confinement earlier than previously permitted by statute…”

Epidemiologist Homer Venters, who has inspected some 40 prisons since the pandemic began, testified that “my greatest area of concern is that pre-existing deficiencies in the health services provided to people in BOP custody which contributed to the spread and lethality of COVID-19 remain unaddressed… My investigations have real revealed a disturbing lack of access to care when a new medical problem is encountered.”

Additionally, he argued that “there’s a compelling and unrealized rationale for release of high-risk patients who pose minimal public safety risks. This approach is even more important now to consider during the omicron outbreaks because of the tremendous lack of staffing inside facilities.”

death200330Venters faulted the lack of any independent review and assessment of reported COVID-19 deaths “including those that occurred in private facilities,” a number the BOP has been careful to erase from its count since contracts with those facilities lapsed. He argued that “the lack of independent assessment in how [inmate COVID] deaths are reviewed and more broadly the lack of meaningful oversight by a health organization” is a fundamental problem.

“Every other sector of health care in the United States has independent and professional health organizations reviewing the quality of care,” Venters told the Subcommittee, “but in the BOP and other carceral spaces we leave those crucial assessments to law enforcement to review its own provision of health care… The BOP is left to make its own assessments about the quality and scope of his health care and only sporadic investigations by the Inspector General of the Dept of Justice provide alternative viewpoints. This is wholly insufficient and leaves incarcerated people at a systemic disadvantage because the organizations and structures that measure and promote health for the rest of the nation for the rest of us are excluded from the care people receive in the BOP.”

University of Iowa law professor Allison Guernsey echoed the problems with the BOP’s self-reporting of inmate COVID numbers. “There are serious questions about the veracity of the BOP’s infection and death data. Not only do these questions cast doubt on the handling of the pandemic but they have real-world impact on the adjudication of compassionate release motions.”

She noted that the BOP has delayed reporting some COVID deaths for as much as a year, and that even now, Freedom of Information Act data she obtained from the BOP show five inmate deaths that the BOP has never publicly acknowledged. What’s more, she said, BOP numbers “don’t include anyone who died in a privately managed facility with a federal contract [which she reported totaled 17] and… it excludes people who were granted compassionate release just in time to die free.” Furthermore, she testified, “the Bureau of Prisons has admitted that its cumulative infection rate doesn’t include anyone who caught COVID and was then released from prison.”

With Guernsey’s additional numbers, the BOP’s inmate COVID death total is at least 301 inmates.

funwithnumbers170511Guernsey observed that “the accuracy of the data matters” because “courts rely on it routinely in granting compassionate release, and if a judge misjudges the COVID risk based on inaccurate data, people that we know are medically vulnerable will be left in prison to die.” She asked the Subcommittee to take steps to “require the BOP to report accurate and verifiable data. We should require them to do this for deaths and for infections, and we should require the BOP to comply with the mandates already articulated in the First Step Act by requiring them to report to this Committee and Congress what they are doing with respect to compassionate release procedures.”

[Editor’s aside: If the BOP accountants who diddle daily with the agency’s COVID numbers were in private industry, they’d have done the perp walk by now.]

Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security, Hearings: The First Step Act, The Pandemic, and Compassionate Release: What Are the Next Steps for the Federal Bureau of Prisons? (Jan 21)

– Thomas L. Root

COVID Rages… – Update for January 24, 2022

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

BREAKING RECORDS


numberone210326The Federal Bureau of Prisons maintained its streak, ending last week with a record-breaking 9,020 active inmate COVID cases. This is 17% higher than the previous worst week ever for COVID, when the BOP reported 7,690 sick inmates 56 weeks ago, on December 28, 2020 .

Last week’s total was 48% higher than the week before. At the same time, 1,432 BOP staff are down with COVID, a 52% increase over a week ago. Two more inmate deaths have been reported officially, two women, ages 30 and 59, at FPC Alderson.

The worst COVID conditions as of Friday were Yazoo City Medium (664 cases); Carswell (316 cases); and Herlong, Lompoc, Berlin, Yazoo City USP, Loretto, Los Angeles MDC and Marianna, all with more than 200 cases. Another 21 facilities reported between 100 and 200 cases.

The timing couldn’t be worse for the BOP’s pending motion in the class-action suit over its handling of COVID at Lompoc. Last Tuesday, the federal judge hearing the BOP’s motion to dissolve a July 14, 2020, preliminary injunction – that ordered the release of vulnerable inmates to home confinement – ruled that two facility reports by Dr. Homer Venters, a court-appointed infectious disease expert were admissible in the case.

The reports based on inspections in September 2020 and April 2021, were strenuosly objected to by the BOP. The judge held that the reports “have sufficient guarantees of trustworthiness, are more probative regarding the conditions at Lompoc than other evidence.”

The court asked Dr. Venters for an update on conditions at Lompoc, just as a local newspaper reported that 294 Lompoc inmates had COVID.

plaguevictim220124

“Having found Dr. Venters’ reports are admissible, the court finds a more recent report from [him] regarding the current conditions at Lompoc is needed prior to ruling on respondents’ motion for summary judgment and motion to dissolve [the preliminary injunction],” the Court said.

Despite complaints to the Attorney General by Sens Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy, and Rep Jahana Hayes (all D-CT) over what they described as “highly disturbing” reports that FCI Danbury was not following COVID-19 isolation guidelines, conditions “appear to have improved little” at the facility, according to allegations by BOP staff and a lawyer involved in an inmate COVID lawsuit there. The News-Times reported that about 80 inmates — some allegedly at higher risk — had been relocated in Danbury’s auditorium, and staff is “still not being provided appropriate personal protective equipment, according to Sarah Russell, director of the Legal Clinic at Quinnipiac University School of Law and a Quinnipiac law professor.”

The News-Times said the BOP responded that the agency follows CDC guidance, “the same as community doctors and hospitals, with regard to quarantine and medical isolation procedures, along with providing appropriate treatment.”

Vaccinesticker211005The CDC reported last Friday that Pfizer and Moderna vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization from Covid-19 omicron was 81% from two weeks until about 6 months after dose two, 59% after six months after dose two and 90% at least two weeks after a booster dose. The report issued the same day an federal court in Houston halted President Biden’s federal employee vaccine mandate.

This means that the 30% of BOP employees who have so far ignored the mandate when it was in place are unlikely to get a vaccine now that it’s gone away.

Not that vaccinations matter in the real world that much. As of last Friday, the BOP reports it has fully inoculated 1,511 Carswell inmates (despite Carswell only having a population of 1,296). Yet 312 inmates have COVID.

Santa Maria Times, 294 Lompoc federal prison inmates, staff test positive for COVID-19 (January 21, 2022)

Order, Torres v. Milusnic, Case No. CV 20-4450 (C.D. Cal. January 18, 2022)

Wall Street Journal, Third Dose of Pfizer, Moderna Covid-19 Vaccines Offers Strong Protection Against Omicron (January 21, 2022)

Feds for Medical Freedom v. Biden, Case No. 3:21-cv-356, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11145 (S.D. Tex, January 21, 2022)

BOP COVID webpage (January 23, 2022)

News-Times, Reports from FCI Danbury show little change since legislators call for change (January 16, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

Will Congress Have To Approve New BOP Chief? – Update for January 21, 2022

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

NEW DIRECTOR BLUES

As the search for a new BOP director commences, Rep. Fred Keller (R-PA), head of the new House Bureau of Prisons Reform Caucus, introduced a bill to strengthen congressional oversight over what Associated Press called “the crisis-plagued bureau” by adding checks and balances to how its director is chosen.

boss220122Currently, the attorney general appoints a director without Congressional say. H.R. 6403, if passed, would shift the responsibility of picking a director to the White House, authorizing the president to nominate someone to the post, with that person then facing approval of the Senate. It would also limit the director to one 10-year term.

If the bill passes after a new director is appointed, that person could still end up being subject to Senate confirmation. The bill would let a sitting stay in office for only three months after it becomes law without Senate confirmation.

H.R. 6403, Federal Prison Accountability Act

Associated Press, Bill would require Senate confirmation for US prison chief (January 14, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

BOP COVID Cases Smash Record – Update for January 19, 2022

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

MEANWHILE, BACK IN THE COVID WARD…

Last week was the worst for BOP COVID since the pandemic started, so bad in fact that the agency didn’t even bother to issue numbers on Friday. When the numbers were finally posted yesterday, they were impressive (and not in a good way).

COVIDrocket220119

Case numbers grew 110% in a week, up from 4,377 on January 11 to a whopping 9,194 yesterday. This number eclipsed the previous record of 7,690 on December 28, 2020.  Yesterday’s number was 239% of the 21-day rolling average. 

Staff numbers hit 1,150, a 24% increase from the week before. One more inmate died, and COVID gripped all 128 institutions.

Forbes reported that “On December 10, 2021, there were 265 active COVID-19 infections among federal prisoners across the country… now, just a month later, that figure is at 3,761 cases and climbing. If the past is any indication of how the BOP is reporting these numbers, it is grossly underestimated.”

A BOP employee union representative at FCI Englewood told a Denver TV station complained that inmates don’t always follow COVID rules. “When you have people in our community in there for not following the rules, many of them don’t wear it, and that creates a burden in itself. You may catch inmates not wearing their masks all the time.”

Fault200728Some suggest it’s not necessarily the inmates’ fault. Writing at Medscape.com, an infectious disease expert complained about the low vaccination rate among BOP personnel: “Prison guards across the country have also been more reluctant than many others to receive the COVID vaccine, although they were prioritized to be vaccinated… The risk of acquiring COVID is sixfold higher in prison than in communities… While there were supply shortages early in the pandemic, there is no reason now that prisoners should not be cared for by fully vaccinated and masked staff and with provided better masks and ventilation. Imprisonment shouldn’t be a death sentence.”

Currently, only 69.5% of BOP employees have been vaccinated, compared to 74.6% of inmates (despite the fact that BOP employees are under a federal mandate to get vaxxed). So who are the scofflaws here?

Forbes complained that BOP facilities have been slow-walking CARES Act releases, saying, “Wherever there is a BOP facility, there is a person who is not being transferred to home confinement who is eligible per the BOP’s own policy. This is likely to continue without some intervention by the Executive or Legislative branch of government. The BOP is an organization that needs new leadership, is poorly managing the pandemic in its institutions, is behind in implementation of the First Step Act, has a terrible relationship with the union, experiencing staffing shortages, is short on qualified medical staff, has poor morale, has many staff calling in sick and multiple cases of staff corruption.”

Forbes, As COVID Cases Spike, Federal Bureau Of Prisons Is Not Releasing Eligible Inmates (January 11, 2022)

KCNC-TV, Denver, Federal Correctional Institution Englewood Employees Concerned About COVID Risk (January 13, 2022)

Medscape.com, Some Prisoners Face Risk for COVID From the Community (January 16, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

Did the BOP’s New ETC Rules Get Hijacked By Biden? – Update for January 18, 2022

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

THE UNSEEN HAND WRITES NEW BOP EARNED TIME RULES?

The Federal Bureau of Prisons last week announced final rules for granting federal time credits (“FTCs”) to inmates who successfully complete specified programs designed to reduce recidivism or engage in what the statute calls “productive activities.”

In November 2020, the BOP finally got around to proposing rules for granting FTCs under the incentives program authorized two years before in the First Step Act. The agency proposed a rule that would require 240 classroom hours of successful programming in order for an inmate to receive a mere 15 days credit on his or her sentence. At the time, I said, “In the BOP, a 500-hour program takes 12-18 months to complete. That may seem like a fairly substantial commitment for a month more of home confinement. But it is consistent with what we’ve come to expect from the BOP: given a chance to interpret the extent of its authority to be lenient, it invariably interprets that authority in the most chary way possible.”

[Editor’s note: Yes, I said “most chary.” My wife the grammarian, has since pointed out that the superlative of “chary” is “chariest.” I’d fire her, but she’s been right too many times before.]

icecreamsundae210118In my experience practicing administrative law back in the day, when an agency rolled out proposed rules in a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for public comment, the final product looked a lot like what had been proposed, perhaps with a tweak here and there. Once in a blue moon, an agency might back off after an especially loud and sustained hue and cry from the industry and public, but rulemaking was a lot like ordering an ice cream sundae – you could specify which sprinkle, nuts, sauce, and cherry you wanted on it, but the 95% of it that was ice cream was fixed and was not going to change.

The history of agency rulemaking since the passage of the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 makes what happened to the FTC rules so puzzling. It’s like the BOP specified an ice cream sundae, but delivered a cup of mashed potatoes and gravy instead.

The new rules, already being applied to hundreds if not thousands of inmates, represent a total repudiation of the BOP’s proposed rules announced a year ago.

I reported on the changes in the rules – the “what” – last Friday. What I didn’t talk about was the “why.” Even now, I am unsure of what caused the sea change at the BOP, but there are some hints. Traditionally, the BOP director has scrambled to imprint any favorable program with his or her initials. Yet, last week, BOP Director Michael Carvajal was strangely silent, while Attorney General Merrick Garland took a victory lap in a press release. The fact that the Attorney General issued a statement supporting the new rules, but Carvajal did not, suggests that the Biden DOJ grabbed hold of the FTC process after the BOP sought to impose Draconian limitations on the program.

sycophant220118Several members of Congress – such as Richard Durbin (D-IL), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), John Cornyn, (R-TX) and Cory Booker (D-NJ), on the Senate side, and Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), on the House side – criticized the proposed rules in public comments. That may have played a factor as well. The BOP’s report adopting the final rule mentioned their comments, such as this excerpt from Sens. Whitehouse’s and Cornyn’s filing:

The proposed rule’s definition of a “day” of program participation does not adequately reward engagement with [EBBR programs] and PAs consistent with the First Step Act. . . Because BOP programs do not run for eight hours per day, the proposed rule would require individuals to attend an EBRR or PA for several calendar days before they earned a full “day” of time credit. . . It was not our intent as drafters of the legislation that BOP define a “day” in this way. Nor did Congress ever consider it. . . The proposed rule’s narrow definition of a “day” does not adequately incentivize program participation and reduce recidivism as intended by the First Step Act.

The fact that the legislators’ comments were singled out approvingly – maybe even fawningly – in the report would permit a reasonable person to infer that the BOP was sending the two Judiciary Committees a message that their concerns were being addressed.

The Hill noted that the new rules were announced “just one week after the DOJ revealed that BOP Director Michael Carvajal would be resigning from his post. He had faced criticism during his time as chief of the bureau.” Fox News said “the Biden administration has faced increased pressure from both Democratic and Republican lawmakers to do more to put in place additional aspects of the First Step Act, and the bureau has been accused of dragging its feet.” Associated Press observed that the final rules came “about two months after the department’s inspector general sounded an alarm that the Bureau of Prisons had not applied the earned time credits to about 60,000 federal inmates who had completed the programs.”

It seemed strange that several media outlets connected the Director’s departure with the release of the rules. It is fair to note that there is no logical reason for his announcing the retirement on January 6th, especially when the actual date was left open (he said he would stay on until a new director is appointed). The timing, as The Hill implied, may be linked to the dramatic turn in the BOP’s approach to FTCs.

bidensuperman210201

Likewise, Fox News may have settled on another reason. President Biden has taken a lot of heat recently for doing nothing on criminal justice reform. Probably because he has done nothing. Hijacking the rules and rewriting them the way Congressional Democrats would love and Congressional Republicans would accept may have been seen by the White House as a cheap fix: liberal FTC rules did not require Congressional approval and conservatives could hardly complain, because all Biden was doing was carrying forward a program President Trump proudly owned, the First Step Act.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m not complaining that the BOP did the right thing. I’m puzzled, that’s all.

Associated Press, Thousands of federal inmates to be released under 2018 law (January 13, 2022)

Dept of Justice, Justice Department Announces New Rule Implementing Federal Time Credits Program Established by the First Step Act (January 13, 2022)

BOP, Final Rules for Federal Time Credits Program (January 13, 2022)

BOP, FSA Time Credits (January 13, 2022)

The Hill, Thousands of federal inmates being released this week under law signed by Trump (January 13, 2022)

Fox News, Federal inmates to be released under ‘time credits’ program (January 13, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

Merry (Belated) Christmas! – Update for January 14, 2022

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

BOP WOWS WITH FINAL EARNED TIME CREDIT RULES

christmas220114My grandfather always would say, “Christmas comes but once a year, and when it comes, it brings good cheer…”

Grandpa was never a federal inmate.

In what can only be classified as a stunning turnaround, the Federal Bureau of Prisons yesterday announced its final rules for granting federal time credits (“FTCs”) to inmates who successfully complete specified programs designed to reduce recidivism or engage in what the statute calls “productive activities.”

The First Step Act enacted the FTC program. The notion was that a scoring system – should classify inmates as to the risk that they would be recidivists – we now know it as the PATTERN score – and their programming needs to reduce that risk should be assessed. The BOP would then tell the inmate which programs he or she should complete to address those needs (for example, a course in anger management, apprenticeship training, or substance abuse treatment). Ideally, inmates who complete such EBRR programs will be less likely to commit new crimes after release.

To encourage inmate participation, the prisoners collect ten days of FTC credit for every month in which they participate in such “evidence-based recidivism reduction” – or “EBRR” – programs. If they are considered “low” or “minimum” recidivism risks, they may get an extra five FTC days a month.

The FTC credits may be used to shorten an inmate’s sentence by up to 12 months. If an inmate earns more than 12 months of FTC credits, the extras can be used to earn more halfway house or home confinement.

devil200113But as with everything, the devil’s in the details. First Step provides that “a prisoner shall earn ten days of time credits for every 30 days of successful participation in evidence-based recidivism reduction programming or productive activities.” But precisely what is a “day?”

In its proposed rule, the BOP proposed that a “day” was eight hours long, meaning that an inmate would have to log eight hours of EBRR instruction to earn one day of programming credit. That means that 30 days of successful EBRR participation would require 240 hours. The proposal was Draconian.

The BOP’s position was even worse than that. It proposed that inmates could only start to earn FTC credits after January 15, 2020, or – horror of horrors – January 15, 2022 (yes, that’s tomorrow, for you calendar-challenged people). The number of programs considered to be EBRR-worthy was limited, and the long list of convictions that excluded inmates from participation unfairly limited the number of people who could participate.

The BOP’s deadline for full implementation of the FTC is upon us. Yesterday, I complained that the whole furball was ripe for endless litigation and that the BOP had not adopted the final rules, oppressive as they might be.

hamburger160826I am impressed at the extent of my influence. Within an hour of posting my blog, the Dept of Justice announced that the final rules had been adopted. And what a set of rules they are! I should write a blog demanding that each inmate get TWO cheeseburgers at lunch on Hamburger Day (which is Wednesday, for those of you who haven’t been locked up).

• The terrible 8-hour day standard has been jettisoned. Now, any day an inmate spends enrolled in an EBRR or productive activity is an FTC day. This means that if an inmate works at an orderly job for a couple of hours, works out for a few hours, watches some TV, goes to the chow hall, and spends an hour in an EBRR anger management class, he or she will be credited with one day of FTC credit.

• Inmates will receive credit for any EBRR program completed after December 21, 2018, the day the FSA was signed by President Trump. This is a windfall. The BOP had not even applied the PATTERN score to inmates and assessed needs until January 2020. After that date, FTC credit is only assigned if an inmate completes an EBRR course to which he or she has been assigned. But for any courses completed before the 2020 needs assessment, the BOP will assume a need. So an inmate who had been a banker with an MBA from Harvard took the “Money Smart” program in 2019 for something to do? She gets FTC credit.

• The BOP has taken to heart complaints that the EBRR programs and (especially) the productive activities were too limited. It has promised that “new funding allotments will enhance the Bureau’s course offerings, largely by permitting it to increase capacity through hiring additional staff, and will also serve to bolster the Bureau’s resources, thereby improving its ability to carry out the FSA Time Credits program.” Participation in RDAP, working at UNICOR, and taking correspondence college courses will earn FTC credit for inmates. However, the BOP has not suggested that it will remove the cap on how many FTC credits can be earned. Right now, 15 weeks in UNICOR earns an inmate 500 hours of FTC credit. So does 15 years.

For that matter, because the prior caps – all of which were expressed in terms of “hours,” a metric without any value now that the 8-hours-is-a-day standard has been abandoned – will probably have to be redone.

• The BOP will award FTC credits for successful months of participation, not only for successful completion of the EBRR courses.

• FTC credits will be available to inmates in halfway houses and home confinement (although the BOP acknowledges some difficulty in delivering such programs in halfway house or home confinement environments).

education180205Right now, only about 41% of BOP inmates (65,000) are eligible to earn FTC credits. There is little the BOP can do about that because the limitations were written into the First Step Act by Congress. However, the BOP does have some latitude in defining prior convictions as “violent,” and it has promised to “ensure that its facilities receive updated information as to which federal and state offenses qualify or are the subject of litigation and that inmate records are updated to ensure maximum participation in credit-earning EBRRs.”

The BOP has promised to immediately apply FTCs to people closest to release. I’ve heard that before. But last night, I called an inmate in a halfway house whose release date was in May to tell him about the new rules. Not more than an hour later, he called me back to tell me he had just been called into the office to sign immediate-release papers. He goes home today.

pony2230114

There will be many nuances to discuss in the coming weeks, but for now, the DOJ’s prediction that releases “are expected to begin this week… and that ‘thousands’ of inmates are being affected,” as the Associated Press put it, is not far off.

A late Christmas gift, but I expected new socks. Instead, we got that pony we’d always wanted.

Associated Press, Thousands of federal inmates to be released under 2018 law (January 13, 2022)

Dept of Justice, Justice Department Announces New Rule Implementing Federal Time Credits Program Established by the First Step Act (January 13, 2022)

BOP, Final Rules for Federal Time Credits Program (January 13, 2022)

BOP, First Step Act Approved Programs Guide (July 2021)

Thomas L. Root

Forget I said What I said… – Update for January 13, 2022

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

GLAD TO EAT MY WORDS

Victory220113Not more than an hour after I posted the blog below, the Dept of Justice issued a press release announcing that the Bureau of Prison had adopted a final rule for application of its earned-time credit program.

I practiced administrative agency law in Washington, D.C., for a long time, but I never have seen such an agency execute such an astounding about-face on a proposed rule between the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and final order before.

It’s Christmas Day for inmates. I will take a dive into the new rule for a blog tomorrow.  For now, suffice it to say… wow.

Ignore the following:

BOP EARNED TIME CREDIT MEMO PORTENDS LITIGATION

delay190925The Federal Bureau of Prisons has been stalling full implementation of First Step Act earned time credits for three years now, but the clock runs out in a few days. By then, the BOP is supposed to have the earned-time credit program (which the BOP is calling “Federal Time Credits”) fully implemented.

Under the FTC program, prisoners who successfully complete recidivism reduction programming and productive activities are eligible to earn up to 10 days of FTCs for every 30 days of program participation. Minimum and low-risk inmates will get 15 days. But the list of programs and productive activities is limited, the list of eligible prisoners is even more limited, and the BOP has thus far fought inmates’ efforts to win any credit.

That has resulted in decisions such as an Oregon holding from November that the BOP’s belief that “may delay awarding time credits to inmates that complete qualifying programming until January 15, 2022, is contrary to the statute.”

Forbes magazine last week published portions of an “internal memorandum posted at some prison camps.” The memo said that beginning in January 2022, the Bureau will begin applying FTC under this update. However, while inmates with high and medium PATTERN risk levels may earn FTC, only those with low and minimum levels may actually use them.

The BOP plans to apply the first 365 days of FTC time to early release, with “[a]ny FTC earned beyond that may be applied toward community placement.” The BOP plans to update sentence computations in the next few months, with the Bureau’s Designation and Sentence Computation Center to “prioritize based on those inmates we project to be immediate releases, beginning with inmates in community placement.”

confusion200424Forbes predicts that “far from clarifying things… implementation of [FTC]… will be almost impossible over the near term. This affects multiple levels of the criminal justice system; prisons, halfway houses, home confinement, and supervised release. It is an intricate web of agencies that manage the incarceration and supervision of hundreds of thousands of people in the federal criminal justice system. Thousands will file lawsuits whether they are in prison, halfway houses, home confinement, or supervised release, fighting for their right to a broadly defined, and subject to BOP discretion, FSA credit… This is going to be more complicated than anyone ever imagined.”

The great unsettled question is exactly what constitutes program participation. Inmates were jubilant when First Step passed, because everyone wrongly assumed that if one had an hour-long evening class four days a week for four weeks, he or she would have earned 16 days of programming credit on successful completion. But then the BOP proposed rule – which has not yet been adopted – holding that a day of program participation was equal to eight hours of programming. Under that metric, an hour a day four days a week for four weeks would be worth 16 hours, or two days of programming, not 16 days.

What was as bad, the credits for “productive activities” are capped. Working in UNICOR – the Federal prison industries – has a well-earned reputation for reducing recidivism. But credit for UNICOR work is limited to 500 hours. In other words, if one works in UNICOR for four months at 35 hours a week, he or she has amassed 500 FTC hours, which translates to 62 days, which translates to two months. Two months of FTC credit is worth 30 days off the sentence.

If the inmate works in UNICOR for 10 years (which would be about 17,500 hours), he or she would still get 30 days off his or her sentence. Is the favorable effect of 10 years of productive factory work on recidivism no different than four months? The BOP rule would seem to suggest so.

oddcouple210219As of today, the rulemaking proceeding has not been completed, yet another failure of the BOP to get anything done on time. What’s more, Senator Richard Durbin (D-Illinois), chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Committee Ranking Member Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) jointly blasted the proposed rule last May, asking the Attorney General to “reevaluate and amend the rule consistent with the statute’s goals of incentivizing and increasing program participation to reduce recidivism. Establishing robust programming and a fair system to earn time credits is critical to meeting the FSA’s goal of reducing recidivism.”

Durbin and Grassley are the fathers of the First Step Actsuggesting that perhaps they know what they meant when they wrote it.

Whether anyone listened has yet to be answered. It’s a cinch that if the BOP’s 8-hour-day rule gets adopted, there will be litigation.

Forbes, Implementation of The Criminal Justice Reform Law, First Step Act, Will Likely End Up In Court (January 5, 2022)

Cazares v. Hendrix, Case No 3:20-cv-02019, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 240776 (D. Ore., November 9, 2021)

Press release, Durbin, Grassley Press DOJ to Strengthen First Step Act Rule on Earned Time Credits to Incentivize Rehabilitation (May 5, 2021)

– Thomas L. Root

January 2022 Really Is January 2021 Redux – Update for January 11, 2022

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

COVID ROILS THE BOP

control200511BOP inmate COVID cases shot up last week at a rate not before seen since the pandemic started. On the last reporting day in 2021 (Thursday, Dec 30), 1,194 inmate COVID cases were reported. Yesterday, the number shot up to 3,761, a number not seen since January 21 of last year.

Yesterday’s number was 200% of the 21-day rolling average, the highest number recorded since the pandemic began.

Staff cases aren’t faring much better, up 141% in a week to 992 cases. COVID is now present in 127 facilities. Last week, the BOP reported two more inmate deaths, one at Beaumont and another at Lewisburg. The Lewisburg death occurred 11 months ago but only now has been recharacterized as COVID-related (a belated admission that either impresses you at the BOP’s candor or frightens you at the Bureau’s failure to properly identify the death at the time). However, the Beaumont death just occurred and – as with more than 55% of all deaths since March 1, 2021 – was the passing of someone whom the BOP had previously declared to be “recovered” from an earlier bout of COVID.

BOP vaccinations have slowed. Last week, 74,2% of inmates and 69.4% of staff had been vaccinated. Over the past month, those numbers rose 3.2% for inmates and 2.1% for staff, a slower rate than in November, when the monthly vax increase was 3.8% for inmates and 9.8% for staff.

A New York emergency room physician said last week that the current COVID omicron surge is different, both in who’s coming to the ER and how they’re being affected by the variant. “Like before, some [COVID patients] were really short of breath and needing oxygen. But for most, COVID seemed to topple a delicate balance of an underlying illness. It’s making people really sick in a different way.”

deadcovid210914Meanwhile, Bloomberg reported Saturday that a new COVID variant being called “deltacron” has been identified in Cyprus. According to Leondios Kostrikis, a University of Cyprus professor and director of the Laboratory of Biotechnology and Molecular Virology, said, “There are currently omicron and delta co-infections and we found this strain to be a combination of the two,” Kostrikis said in an interview with Sigma TV on Friday. “We will see in the future if this strain is more pathological or contagious or if it will prevail” over delta and omicron, he said.

As of yesterday, however, an Imperial College (UK) scientist cast doubt on the Cypriot report, saying “the so-called ‘Deltacron’ variant that was discovered on the island of Cyprus ‘looks to be quite clearly contamination’,” according to French news and current affairs public radio station RFI.

The BOP filed a motion last week to dissolve the preliminary injunction issued against FCC Lompoc in the class-action lawsuit over its management of the COVID pandemic. That injunction issued July 14, 2020, identifying inmates vulnerable to COVID and beginning the process of release to CARES Act home confinement. Citing the Prison Litigation Reform Act and a December 10th 9th Circuit decision in another case, Ahlman v. Barnes, the government is arguing that the PLRA automatically dissolves injunctions issued against prisons after 90 days.

The District Court has ordered briefing on the issue.

Questions about the BOP’s management of the virus at FCI Danbury may be heating up again. Danbury was the focus of the first successful class-action suit, Martinez v. Brooks, over BOP COVID management 18 months ago.

Senators Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy (both D-CT) and Rep Jahana Hayes (D-CT) last week sent a letter to the Attorney General, BOP Director and acting FCI Danbury warden over “highly disturbing” reports on COVID at the facility. The letter alleges that over half of the women at FCI Danbury camp tested positive on Dec 27, but weren’t isolated or initially told whether they had the virus. “These actions, if true, are shockingly reckless and contrary to BOP and CDC guidelines,” the letter said, and “endanger not only the women at the Camp, but also staff and the surrounding communities.”

As of January 10th, 61 of the 86 women at the Camp had COVID.

Inmate families were protesting last week outside of FPC Alderson, alleging high COVID transmission and inmate mistreatment at the West Virginia women’s facility. Organizers said they hope to spark a movement for prison reform nationwide for access to healthcare and basic needs.

Allegations included that the prison suffered from a lack of food, feminine products, commissary items, and hot water. Paul Petruzzi, an attorney representing ten Alderson inmates suggested the facility was not using CARES Act home confinement authority, a complaint inmates have been making for the last year.

crazynumbers200519Finally, a media report about a COVID outbreak at FCI Ray Brook in upstate New York included a note of interest to people who have ever doubted the accuracy of BOP COVID numbers. The Adirondack Daily Enterprise reported last week that last year, Ray Brook “had a COVID-19 outbreak which peaked at 130 inmates and 25 staff testing positive at one time. These numbers were only discovered weeks after the fact, when the corrections officer union for FCI Ray Brook – AFGE CPL33, Local 3882 – raised concerns that the BOP was not publicly reporting all of its COVID-19 data at the facility.”

Beaumont Enterprise, Third COVID-recovered senior inmate dies at Beaumont federal prison (January 5, 2022)

WNBC-TV, Omicron Variant Symptoms: Latest COVID ‘Making People Really Sick in a Different Way’ (January 4, 2022)

Bloomberg, Cyprus identifies ‘deltacron’, a variant that combines delta and omicron (January 8, 2022)

Santa Maria Times, Motion to dissolve federal prison COVID-19 injunction continued (January 4, 2022)

Adirondack Daily Enterprise, 40 inmates at FCI Ray Brook test positive for COVID-19 (January 8, 2022)

Martinez-Brooks v. Easter, 459 F. Supp.3d 411 (D. Conn. 2020)

WVNS-TV, Relatives of Alderson Federal Prison inmates allege mistreatment at peaceful protest (January 5, 2022)

News Times, Investigation into Danbury prison COVID conditions called for by delegation: ‘Shockingly reckless’ (January 4, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root