All posts by lisa-legalinfo

You’ve Got Questions, We’ve Got Blank Stares – Update for December 27, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

QUESTIONS ANYONE?

questions181227Yesterday, we presented a précis on the First Step Act. It didn’t help much. We have logged over 600 emails asking questions about the effect of the First Step Act on the sentences of existing inmates, and they continue to pour in.

Did we not make everything pellucidly clear?

Apparently not. Here are the most popular questions and our answers:

•   What sentencing changes are retroactive?

Only people with pre-Fair Sentencing Act crack sentences get retroactive relief. There is no retroactive relief for 18 USC 924(c) stacking, for denial of safety valve, or for 851 sentencing enhancements.

That is not to say that these changes will not come, just like the Fair Sentencing Act – which conservatives would not vote for if it was retroactive – finally became retroactive eight years later. But for now, the people with 924(c) stacked sentences, 851 life and 20-year sentences, and non-safety valve sentences are out of luck.

•   How about the seven days extra good time? Is it retroactive?

Yes.

•   When will I get the seven days extra good time?

This question is on everyone’s lips. The change in federal inmates’ sentence computation will be performed by the Bureau of Prisons’ Designation and Sentence Computation Center in Grand Prairie, Texas. It should not be difficult to do, and it is hardly as though BOP did not know this was coming. However, the BOP is a bureaucracy, and no one in a bureaucracy is going to be daring or self-starting enough to throw the switch just because some blow-dried President in Washington, D.C., makes something binding federal law.

As of last Friday afternoon, DSCC said it was waiting for guidance from the Dept. of Justice. Inasmuch as Monday and Tuesday were federal holidays, we doubt anything was forthcoming on those days. Whether DSCC is even staffed, due to the partial government shutdown, is not clear.

Yet, the BOP faces liability for holding people past their release dates, and as of last Friday, nearly everyone’s release date changed. We talked to DSCC today, and we were told that it still awaits direction from DOJ, and does not expect that for two to three weeks. No one appears to be in a hurry there.

That’s the long answer. The short answer is that we don’t know.

creditsign181227•   How about programs I have already completed? Are credits retroactive?

No, the credits are not. However, a change in 18 USC 3621(h) provides that “beginning on the date of enactment of this subsection, the Bureau of Prisons may begin to expand any evidence-based recidivism reduction programs and productive activities that exist at a prison as of such date, and may offer to prisoners who successfully participate in such programs and activities the incentives and rewards described in subchapter D.” We cautiously interpret this to mean that the BOP can start giving credits for programs successfully completed at any time after last Friday. This does not require the BOP to do so, but it is out there.

•   Are all 924(c) offenses ineligible for earned-time credit?

The Act excludes from earned time credits any offense of conviction under “924(c), relating to unlawful possession or use of a firearm during and in relation to any crime of violence or drug trafficking crime.” We read this to exclude all 924(c)s, whether for a crime of violence or for drugs.

•   If you have a 2-level enhancement to your drug conviction for a gun, are you excluded?

No, only a statutory 924(c) conviction excludes you.

miracle181227•   When is First Step effective?

Unless a law says otherwise, it is effective when the president signs it. But do not expect miracles. For the earned time credits, the Attorney General has seven months (until late July 2019) to develop the risk assessment system. The BOP then has 180 days to apply the risk assessment system to everyone and identify the programs that it believes will reduce recidivism (by late January 2020). The BOP then has two years (by January 2022) to fully ramp up the system.

During the initial two years of the program, the First Step Act anticipates, there will be more people wanting programs than there will be program space. The BOP is to put people nearest the end of their sentences in the programs first.

The Elderly Home Detention Program has never had a BOP program statement that implemented it, because it was limited in time and location. The BOP will have to develop procedures to process and judge applications. Nothing prevents someone from applying right away – and we recommend using 34 USC 60541(g)(5)(A) as a guide – but do not expect speedy processing.

Our take about compassionate release, however, is that Congress intends that it be implemented immediately. What is more, the BOP has procedures for dealing with compassionate release applications. While its history of doing so is not especially honorable, there is no need for delay while the BOP spools up a program statement on how to process them.

Nothing else in First Step should require any time for implementation. New or renewed requests for home confinement instead of halfway house, transfers to closer-to-home locations and the extra seven days should be immediate. How quickly the BOP updates sentences to account for the extra seven days is anyone’s guess, but a lot of people with short time will need that done immediately. (See answer above)

•   How do you file for a reduction in a crack sentence because of FSA retroactivity?

You file a motion under 18 USC 3582(c)(2). You should check with the federal public defender in the district in which you were sentenced. Many court ordered the FPD to represent people eligible under 3582(c)(2).

•   Are Guidelines 4B1.1. career offenders excluded from anything under First Step?

No. If you are excluded, it is because of a statute you were convinced of violating.

•   If I was convicted of a crime of violence or a sex offense in my past, does that exclude me from getting earned time credits?

No. Only your current offense will exclude you.

• Who is excluded?

We’ll cover that tomorrow.

now181227•   How soon can people start receiving credits?

Credits could start to accrue as early as the end of July 2019. The Act anticipates that it could take up to two years for the program to completely spool up, and preference will be given to the people who are short time first. This could mean that people with longer dates will not start getting earned time credits right away.

However, there had been discussion that BOP could be expansive in its interpretation of what constituted programs that lessened recidivism, and it could even include UNICOR employment and adult education classes.

•    Did your 21 USC 851 10-year sentence drop to 5 years?

No. Drug sentence enhanced by an 851 notice due to prior drug or state convictions changed, but only natural life (fell to 25 years to life), and 20 years (fell to 15 years to life). Nothing beyond that. And the change is not retroactive.

•   If you are excluded from getting earned time credits, how much halfway house/home confinement will you get?

The Second Chance Act still applies, and theoretically, you are entitled to up to 12 months of halfway house. The BOP has been very stingy with halfway house in the last year and a half, however, and no one knows what the BOP will do.

•   For EOHD, do you serve two-thirds of your sentence or two-thirds of the time between you start and you get good-time release?

If you got 180 months, for example, you serve 120 months. If you get EOHD, you will be on home confinement for 33 months. At 1053 months, you are released on good-time release.

•   If you get 12 months off for RDAP, can you get another 12 months off for earned time credits?

Theoretically, the one does not affect the other. But the BOP has the option to credit you with more halfway house or a shorter sentence, and no one knows how the BOP will decide to apply the earned time credits. No one in Congress discussed this, or, to our knowledge, even thought about it. Some things, like Donald Rumsfeld liked to say, are unknown unknowns.

S.756, First Step Act, passed into law Dec. 21, 2018

– Thomas L. Root

Trump Signs First Step Act… So What Happens Now? – Update for December 26, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

FIRST STEP ACT – BOTH MORE AND LESS THAN MEETS THE EYE

I tried to take a few days to travel to the East Coast for Christmas with the granddaughters. But my inbox did not take any time off, with over 300 emails from inmates wondering what the First Step Act President Trump signed last Friday, would do for them.

I will try to cover what it includes in its 148-odd pages for people who have already been sentenced.

•   SENTENCING LAW CHANGES

firststepB180814First Step made some important sentencing law changes, which unfortunately are not very useful to the already-sentenced. From now on, no one can be convicted of a subsequent 924(c) gun offense carrying a 25-year penalty unless he or she has already been convicted of the first one. The government can still stack up 924(c) offenses in an indictment, but each one would only carry the 5-year, 7-year or 10-year penalty.

First Step also reduces the so-called 851 enhancement because of prior drug convictions penalty from life to 25 years and from 20 years down to 15 years. But where 851 enhancements used to be for drug offenses only, the provision slips in “serious violent felony” as a prior that will count, too.

First Step expands the “safety valve” for drug offenders. It used to be that the defendant could not have more than one Guidelines criminal history point. Now, a defendant can have up to four points, with some limitations.

Finally, the 2010 Fair Sentencing Act changed how crack cocaine was compared to powder cocaine from a 100:1 ratio down to an 18:1 ratio. This eased harsh sentencing for a lot of people whose prison terms were driven by crack cocaine amounts in their cases. But it was not retroactive, leaving a lot of people sentenced before August 2010 with a lot of time under a sentencing structure that had been judged to be unfair. The First Step Act fixed that, extending the Fair Sentencing Act to those people.

•   GOOD TIME CHANGES

When Congress wrote good time into law 30 years ago, it did a sloppy job. It awarded a maximum of 54 days a year, but the provision was so poorly written that it could mean that if you served 319 days, you got 54 days of good time to make up one year, or that you had to serve 365 days, after which you got 54 days. The difference in how you interpreted it amounted to seven more days a year.

Unsurprisingly, the BOP chose to read it the way that shorted everyone the seven days, and the Supreme Court upheld the agency’s right to interpret a messy statute the way it wanted to. The First Step corrects this, so that Congressional intent is clear. Congress always meant “do 319, get 54 more.” Now the BOP has no more wiggle room.

•  EARNED TIME FOR PROGRAMMING

The heart of First Step is recidivism programming. Congress does not want you to come back to prison. The idea is that every prisoner should be assessed to determine how likely he or she is to commit a new crime after release. There will be four categories, minimum, low, medium and high. After the risk assessment is done, the BOP will offer programs that have been shown to reduce recidivism. If prisoners successfully complete the programs, they will be rewarded with credits that the BOP will use to offer more halfway house or even shorten the length of the prisoner’s sentence, 10 days for every 30 days of programming or – when you reach the minimum-risk level – 15 days.

Warning: minimum risk is not the same as minimum security, and high risk is not the same as high security. It is entirely possible that your risk level will have nothing to do with your security/custody level.

Not the right halfway house - but you could get drunk here, which is what it may take to believe that BOP will implement FIRST STEP's transitional housing mandates.
Not the right halfway house – but you could get drunk here, which is what it may take to believe that BOP will implement FIRST STEP’s transitional housing mandates.

Will you get a shorter sentence or more halfway house? It is totally within the BOP’s discretion. You cannot get more than 12 months of time off your sentence, leaving extra earned-time credits for increased halfway house, on which there is no cap. No one knows whether the BOP will prefer halfway house over shorter sentences, but sending you to supervised release is much cheaper for the BOP than sending you to more halfway house. I suspect the BOP will go for cheap.

To satisfy politicians who wanted to look tough on crime to the folks at home, the bill has 63 categories of offenses of conviction that do not qualify for any earned time for programming. The fact that it does not make sense to keep these prisoners from completing programs that would do them and society a lot of good does not matter. What matters is how the senator or congressman looks at re-election time.

•   ELDERLY OFFENDERS

The Second Chance Act of 2007 authorized the BOP to conduct a two-year pilot program to send elderly offenders to home confinement. The program was limited to one prison (we believe the BOP used Elkton), and it only would send home someone who was 65 or over, was non-violent, had served at least 10 years, and had served at least 75% of his sentence (no women at Elkton, so it was all “he”). The limitations are at 34 USC 60541(g)(5)(A) and are worth reading.

With limitations like these, it is little wonder that only a handful of people ever qualified. The First Step Act readopts and expands the elderly offender home detention program. First, EOHD applies to all prisons, not just a single one. Second, the eligible prisoner just has to be 60 years old or older, and originally was intended to have to have served just two-thirds of the sentence.

A very peculiar twist is this: the legislation had always abolished the 10-year minimum service of sentence requirement, but somehow, in the final version passed by the Senate, that sentence was quietly dropped. Usually, when provisions were wrested from the bill, it was because Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Tom Cotton, or some other troglodyte legislator noisily opposed it. I am trying to find out whether the omission was a scrivener’s error or intentional. But if the 10-year limitation remains, all but a handful of nonviolent elderly offenders will ever qualify for the relief.

The original program pretty much left decisions to BOP discretion, including determining “that release to home detention under this section will result in a substantial net reduction of costs to the Federal Government” and that the prisoner is “at no substantial risk of engaging in criminal conduct or of endangering any person or the public if released to home detention.” All of that remains in the law, and applies to EOHD.

Back in 2009, when the pilot program was running, prisoners were told to contact their unit teams to determine whether they were eligible. There was no appeal except through the administrative remedy process. That does not appear to have changed.

•   COMPASSIONATE RELEASE

compassion160124Both the Sentencing Commission and Congress have been up in arms over the BOP’s dismal record in granting compassionate release under 18 USC 3582(c)(1)(A)(ii). Wait times for BOP action took months, the BOP higher-ups seemed to arbitrarily decide that dying prisoners were not terminally ill, and more people died waiting for a decision on compassionate release than received it. And if the BOP refused to file a compassionate release request with the sentencing court, there was nothing anyone could do about it.

The First Step Act rewrites compassionate release, both giving and taking away. Anyone with a crime or violence or sex offense is now excluded, but if the inmate is not dying right away, but requires nursing home-quality care, he or she is now eligible. The BOP is directed to act within deadlines on deciding cases, directed to notify families immediately about terminal diagnoses and about their rights to file a compassionate release. Most important, perhaps, compassionate release applicants can file their own requests with the court if the BOP refuses to do so.

•   HOME CONFINEMENT

Everyone knows that home confinement is dirt cheap for the BOP, but that getting it from the BOP instead of halfway house is like pulling teeth. The First Step Act directs that the BOP “to the extent practicable, place prisoners with lower risk levels and lower needs on home confinement for the maximum amount of time permitted under this paragraph.’’

It is a fine sentiment, but the way the provision is written, it is more a suggestion than a mandate. Still, it may give the BOP some cover from the agency’s fear of bad press that may come from sending someone to home confinement, only to have them run amok.

•   500 MILES…

First Step gives the same guidance, but a little more forcefully, to the placement of inmates. Of special interest to those reading this newsletter, the BOP is directed, “subject to consideration of the factors described in the preceding sentence [bed space, programming needs, security and medical needs] and the prisoner’s preference for staying at his or her current facility or being transferred, transfer prisoners to facilities that are closer to the prisoner’s primary residence even if the prisoner is already in a facility within 500 driving miles of that residence.”

This is a nice provision, helpful to a lot of prisoners who cannot get a transfer because they are 495 air miles from home, but there is a suitable prison 10 miles from the family. The only downside to this provision is that it specifies that you have no judicial remedy if the BOP wrongfully refuses transfer.

•  OTHER STUFF

The Senate print of the bill runs 148 pages, so there is a lot that is not covered here. Pregnant prisoners will no longer be shackled, and women will be provided certain healthcare products without charge, products that the men have no need for. The bill also provides for a lot of evaluation of the programming portions of First Step, meaning that if the attack on recidivism does not work, the legislation could go away someday (although that would require Congress to act, and we have all seen how long that can take).

Tomorrow, I’ll try to take some of the hundreds of questions I’ve been getting on the bill.

S.756, First Step Act, passed into law Dec. 21, 2018

– Thomas L. Root

Find Your Pen, Mr. President – Update for December 21, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OKS FIRST STEP

The House on Thursday approved S.756, with the final name of the First Step Act (no capital letters anymore) and sent it to President Trump’s desk.

firststepB180814The long-awaited and frequently-declaraed-dead legislation overwhelmingly passed the House by a vote of 358-36 after the Senate passed it 87-12 on Tuesday.

Trump has already endorsed the legislation, and he is expected to sign it into law in the next few days.

If you want a copy of the Act as approved, you can find all 149 pages  here.

– Thomas L. Root

First Step Passes Senate Without Cotton’s Killer Amendment – Update for December 19, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

SENATE SHOOTS DOWN COTTON, ADOPTS CRUZ AMENDMENT, PASSES FIRST STEP

The First Step Act, now renamed the Criminal Justice Reform Act, S.756, passed the Senate last night by a vote of 87 – 12, making adoption of federal criminal justice reform virtually a done deal.

firststep1800509A different version passed the House (H.R.5682) earlier this year, so all that remains is to have the House either pass the Senate version, or hold a quick conference committee to work out a compromise before the bill comes to President Trump for a signature. House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) previously promised quick action on anything the Senate sent over on First Step.

Before passing the measure, the Senate shot down the “poison pill” amendment offered by Sens. Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) and John Kennedy (R-Louisiana). That amendment would have disqualified anyone with a crime of violence (applying the very restrictive 18 USC 924(c) definition, which is of dubious constitutionality when applied in this setting) from using program credits for early release, required victim notification whenever anyone got early release, and required DOJ to track rearrests of people who got early release. The Senate broke the amendment into three pieces, all of which were defeated by close to 2-1 votes.

As well, the Senate rejected efforts by Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colorado) to add legalization of marijuana to the measure.

cotton181219At the same time, the Senate adopted two amendments, one from Sen. James Lankford (R-Oklahoma), which permits faith-based groups participate in providing the recidivism-reducing programs envisioned by the bill, and another by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), which added a few specific offenses to the list of offenses excluded from early release  and stripped judges of the right to make people with more than four Guidelines criminal history points eligible for the “safety valve” under 18 USC 3553(f).

The Cotton-Kennedy amendment only needed a majority to pass, but none of the three sections even came close.

Trump last night issued a statement hailing the passage of the bill. “America is the greatest Country in the world and my job is to fight for ALL citizens, even those who have made mistakes,” Trump tweeted moments after the Senate vote. “This will keep our communities safer, and provide hope and a second chance, to those who earn it. In addition to everything else, billions of dollars will be saved. I look forward to signing this into law!”

New York Times, Senate Passes Bipartisan Criminal Justice Bill (Dec. 19)

Fox News, Senate passes criminal justice reform bill, sends to House (Dec. 18)

– Thomas L. Root

 

First Step May Pass Today, But Amendment Battle Looms – Update for December 18, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

SENATE VOTES TO CLOSE DEBATE, SET FIRST STEP UP FOR A FINAL VOTE AS EARLY AS TODAY

firststepB180814The First Step Act of 2018 (S.3747), cleared a major hurdle last night, with the Senate voting 82-12 to end debate on the bill and steer the legislation to a final vote, likely scheduled for today.

Procedurally, the bill has been amended into another pending bill, formerly known as the Save Our Seas Act of 2018, S. 756. The bill is now being called the Senate Criminal Justice Reform Act.

A different version passed the House earlier this year, so the House would have to pass the Senate version, or a conference committee would have to work out a compromise before the bill would come to President Trump for a signature.

Before a final Senate vote, the bill’s 35 sponsors will have to defeat so-called “legislative poison pills” that they say are designed to kill the compromise that has been carefully negotiated among Democrats, Republicans and the Trump administration. “There are a number of members with outstanding concerns that they feel are still unresolved… The Senate will be considering amendments before we vote on final passage later this week,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) said ahead of the vote.

Look out, Sen. Cotton, here comes First Step...
Look out, Sen. Cotton, here comes First Step…

Sens. Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) and John Kennedy (R-Louisiana) will get a vote on their amendment that would bar people convicted of various offenses, including sex crimes and crimes of violence, from being able to qualify for shortened sentences, although they could still earn credits that would get them more halfway house, home confinement and in-prison privileges. The legislation already has a 50 or so exclusions, but Cotton and Kennedy want to add more crimes to the list. Sens. Patrick J. Toomey (R-Pennsylvania), Jon Kyl (R-Arizona) and John Barrasso (R-Wyoming) have endorsed Cotton and Kennedy’s effort, suggesting that they, too, are uncomfortable with the underlying bill.

The Cotton-Kennedy amendment would only need a majority to pass, so some Republicans will have to band with Democratic senators to kill it. And senators who wrote the bill say there are already a number of safeguards meant to prevent violent criminals from being prematurely released.

“From the standpoint that they aren’t specifically mentioned, the answer is, that’s true, they aren’t,” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) said. But “the reasons they aren’t is because we think that other parts of the law cover it and also the process that somebody has to go through to get a review of their sentence, the prosecutors gotta go through that as well.”

poison pillSen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois), who helped craft the deal along with Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Mike Lee (R-Utah), warned that as currently drafted that he believes Cotton’s amendments are “poison pills” meant to undercut the legislation as a whole. “The amendments that he will propose tomorrow, the senator from Arkansas, have been opposed by groups across the board, left and right, conservative, progressive, Republican, Democrat, they all oppose his amendments. …If he goes with the amendments we’ve seen, we’re going to have to do our best to oppose him,” Durbin said. 

Most if not all Democrat senators are expected to support First Step, although they emphasize that the bill alone is not enough. “It is a compromise of a compromise,” Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-California) said in a statement yesterday announcing her support for the bill. “We ultimately need to make far greater reforms if we are to right the wrongs that exist in our criminal justice system.” 

Washington Post, Criminal justice bill clears hurdle in the Senate on strong bipartisan vote (Dec. 17)

The Hill, Senate votes to end debate on criminal justice reform bill (Dec. 17)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

First Step Vote Set, But Drama Will Go To The Wire – Update for December 17, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

FIRST STEP SENATE VOTES SET FOR TODAY AND WEDNESDAY

firststep1800509Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) ended the Senate’s 4-day work last Thursday night by scheduled a procedural vote on the latest revision of the First Step Act of 2018 for 5:30 p.m. today. That vote, promised weeks ago, will be a crucial test of the bill’s backing, where supporters will need to put up 60 votes to advance the bill.

In the latest iteration of First Step, the measure has been renumbered this year for the third time this year as S.3747 and has dropped its unwieldy title of “Formerly Incarcerated Reenter Society Transformed Safely Transitioning Every Person Act” – and thus the need for all capital letters.

If the Monday vote is successful, the Senate leadership says First Step could be wrapped up Wednesday, after allowing opponents the opportunity to have yet amendments considered. “My impression is that people are not going to string this out unnecessarily for procedural reasons, as long as they get an opportunity to make their arguments and have a vote on their amendment,” said Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas), who announced his support for First Step this week.

Supporters say they have at least 70 votes for the measure, although cosponsors of the measure are officially at 35. Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Missouri), a member of Senate leadership, predicted that “slightly more than half” of the GOP conference and as many as 30 of the 51 GOP senators could back it.

As McConnell set the week’s votes last Thursday, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) sought to make last-minute changes in First Step that would reflect a compromise the bill’s supporters had reached with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas). Cruz endorsed the bill because it was supposed to bar many violent criminals from earning early release, but the version that was presented on Wednesday (which is available online) did not include all of the exclusions Cruz had been promised. Lee tried to get McConnell to change them, according to multiple people familiar with the matter, but McConnell wanted to give his divided caucus at least 24 hours to review the new just-released text. The bill‘s chief critic, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas), joined in a private meeting with McConnell, Lee and Cornyn on the Senate floor Thursday afternoon, during which Lee argued that the changes should be made to increase the bill‘s conservative support.

To get any amendments into the bill, the legislation must be amended on the Senate floor. Cruz’s endorsement was critical to moving the bill forward, and he has repeatedly touted that the legislation would no longer allow the early release of violent criminals.

senatevote181217McConnell will allow only a little time and very few amendments to First Step before the Wednesday vote. After the Senate begins debating the bill, it will ultimately take 60 votes to pass it. And an amendment, however, will require just 50 votes in the narrowly divided Senate. Cotton and Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) are expected to offer an amendment to add new exclusions to the list of inmates not allowed to get program credits. Because amendments need only a simple majority, some Republicans will have to vote against them to keep the provisions from being added to the legislation. One senator predicted that many Democrats would probably defect from the legislation if the Cotton amendment passed.

Still, First Step will pass as long as it survives an uncertain amendment process. Most Senate Democrats support it, a significant bloc of Republicans is expected to back it, and President Donald Trump is expected to sign it if it passes the Senate and House ahead of the Dec. 21 partial government shutdown deadline.

The biggest immediate impact of First Step would be felt by nearly 2,600 federal prisoners convicted of crack offenses before 2010. That’s the year the Fair Sentencing Act reduced the disparity in punishment between crack cocaine and the powdered form of the drug. First Step would make the reform retroactive.

goodconduct180509All federal inmates will benefit from an increase in good time from 47 days a year to 54 days a year, retroactive to the beginning of each inmate’s sentence. The change is estimated to result in 4,000 extra prisoners being released in the next year, some immediately.

If it passes the Senate, the House and Senate will have to reconcile their different versions of First Step and then approve the reconciled version, all before Dec. 21. Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Maryland, the House minority whip, told reporters last week, “I presume… we will be able to approve it next week. I’m hopeful that it can move that quickly.” The New York Times said House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) has pledged swift action before the House leaves town for the year-end holidays.

The Hill, McConnell sets Monday test vote on criminal justice bill (Dec. 13)

Politico, GOP infighting continues as criminal justice bill advances (Dec. 13)

The Hill, Senate heads toward floor fight on criminal justice bill (Dec. 14)

The Marshall Project, What’s Really in the First Step Act? (Nov. 16)

First Step Act of 2018, S.3747 (Dec. 12)

The New York Times, Criminal Justice Bill Will Go Up for a Vote, McConnell Says (Dec. 12)

– Thomas L. Root
LISAStatHeader2small

FIRST STEP Sponsors Gave Away a Lot to Get the Bill to a Vote– Update for December 13, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

FIRST STEP GETTING WATERED DOWN AS IT APPROACHES THE FINISH LINE

We now have some idea of what had to be given away to convince House Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) to agree to schedule a vote on the FIRST STEP Act, perhaps as soon as tomorrow. The Senate released the text of the revised FIRST STEP Act (S.3649) this afternoon.

firststepB180814McConnell cited “improvements to the legislation that have been secured by several members” in his surrender speech last Tuesday, in which he agreed to bring the bill to the floor for debate and a vote. Whether these changes actually count as improvements depends on your perspective, but they were crucial to gaining the support of Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and a few other Republican senators who were initially opposed to the bill, which according to The New York Times “seemed to be the clincher” in moving McConnell off the fence.

The votes of Cruz and the others were hardly needed to pass FIRST STEP, which already had the support of Democrats, most Republicans, the president, and several law enforcement groups that are ordinarily leery of sentencing reform. The bill, which may get a Senate vote as soon as today, is expected to pass by a margin of more than 2 to 1. But McConnell “wanted every conceivable guarantee that the criminal justice measure would not blow up on him politically,” The Times said. The cost of reassuring McConnell was further dilution of a bill that was already pretty weak tea, the result of compromises on top of compromises.

Here are some of the additional concessions that were necessary to get McConnell to honor his promise of a vote:

• The bill now excludes all 924(c) firearm offenders from earning time credits.

• The bill now excludes fentanyl and heroin traffickers who are leaders/organizers from earning time credits.

• The bill now limits early release from prison to supervised release by specifying that only low and minimum risk offenders are eligible and specifying that the maximum amount of time off a sentence is 12 months. Also specifies that if a prisoner violates a condition of his or her prerelease custody, and the violation is nontechnical in nature, the Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall revoke the prisoner’s prerelease custody.

• The bill removed first time 18 USC 2252A(a) porn download offenders from earning time credits.

• The bill specifically excludes additional offenses from receiving earned time credits, including smuggling aliens into the U.S. with records of aggravated felonies, importing aliens for prostitution, drug-related robberies involving assault with dangerous weapon, carjacking resulting in serious bodily injury, threatening to murder a congressman, senator or government official, assault of a spouse or intimate partner or dating partner resulting in substantial bodily injury, assault of a law enforcement officer with a deadly weapon, arson, possessing contraband in prison, rioting in prison, gang-related felonies, escape, and failure to register as a sex offender.

good-bad-news-400pxSo is there any good news? Well, the 54 days a year good time is still in the bill, still applies to everyone, and still is retroactive. No one has messed with the Fair Sentencing Act retroactivity, or the changes in the compassionate release or elderly offender home detention program. And Politico is asking in headlines, “Is Tom Cotton’s winning streak about to end?”

Who said schadenfreude was a bad thing?

At Reason magazine, Jacob Sullum said today, “On the whole, the FIRST STEP Act still represents a significant improvement. But the changes are quite modest in the context of a federal system that imprisons more than 180,000 peoplschaden170306e and state systems that hold another 2 million. The difficulty of passing these incremental reforms, which took years notwithstanding broad bipartisan support, does not bode well for further progress anytime soon.”

There remains the possibility that after the Senate passes the bill, some of the good stuff will get put back into the bill by the joint conference committee. The irony is that if FIRST STEP gets back what has been given away to get the bill to the floor, the overwhelming support for the bill in the Senate guarantees that changes – even if McConnell, Cruz and Cotton do not like them – will sail through.

Politico, Is Tom Cotton’s Winning Streak About to End? (Dec. 13)

U.S. Senate, S.3649, Amendment to FIRST STEP Act (Dec. 13, 2018)

Reason.com, Here Are the ‘Improvements’ That Won a Senate Vote on Sentencing Reform (Dec. 13, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

McConnell Blinks! FIRST STEP Will Be Voted on This Month – Update for December 12, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

MCCONNELL TO BRING FIRST STEP TO A VOTE

firststep180814Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) folded yesterday, announcing during a floor speech that the Senate will vote this month on the FIRST STEP Act, S.3649.

McConnell said the Senate will take up the legislation, written by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Illinois) and several other Democratic and GOP senators, despite the controversial nature of the bill within the Senate Republican ranks. The bill could be debated as early as the end of this week.

Proponents of the bill believe the changes could receive as many as 85 votes in the Senate. House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin), who also privately pressured McConnell to take up the bill, has pledged swift action before the House leaves town for the year-end holidays.

The decision to put the bill to a vote comes “at the request of the president and following improvements to the legislation” secured by several senators, McConnell said.

At this time, no one knows what FIRST STEP’s sponsors had to give away, but Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said last Friday that he was supporting the measure now because it would be amended to prevent those convicted of crimes of violence from benefitting from earning earlier release for completing programs that reduce recidivism.

novacation181212McConnell warned that because of the decision to add the criminal justice bill to the Senate agenda, “members should now be prepared to work between Christmas and New Year’s.” He urged senators to “work together or prepare for a very, very long month.” On the Senate’s to-do list is passing a farm bill, averting a partial government shutdown and clearing the deck of judicial and executive branch nominations.

The legislation has the strong support of Trump and his adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner. Responding to McConnell’s announcement, Trump’s daughter Ivanka tweeted, “It’s official . . . the #FIRSTStepAct is headed to the floor for a vote. This historic legislation will reform our prison system and lift millions of Americans!”

Washington Post, McConnell to bring up criminal-justice bill for a Senate vote (Dec. 11)

The New York Times, Criminal Justice Bill Will Go Up for a Vote, McConnell Says (Dec. 11)

– Thomas L. RootLISAStatHeader2small

Supreme Court Says in Burglary, People Make the Difference – Update for December 11, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

SUPREME COURT BROADENS ACCA BURGLARY IN EARLY LUMP-OF-COAL DECISION

coal181211The Supreme Court yesterday issued an unexpectedly-early decision in United States v. Stitt, delivering a lump of coal to the stockings of people still hoping to to convince a court that their state burglary prior conviction should not count as a “prior” under the Armed Career Criminal Act. In a unanimous decision, the Court held in a Justice Breyer opinion that burglary of a structure or vehicle that has been adapted or is customarily used for overnight accommodation counts as a “generic burglary” in the ACCA’s “enumerated offenses” clause.

First, a review: Under the ACCA, a defendant convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm under 18 USC 922(g)(1) receives an enhanced sentence. The basic 922(g)(1) conviction carries a zero to ten-year sentence. But if the ACCA applies, the sentence starts at 15 years and goes to a maximum of life.

A defendant qualifies for an ACCA sentence if he or she has three prior convictions for a serious drug offense or a crime of violence. The Stitt opinion concerned the ACCA’s crime-of-violence definition. A crime of violence is either (1) one of four listed crimes, burglary, arson, extortion or use of explosives, or (2) a crime which requires the use of force or threat of force against another. The first clause is known as the “enumerated offense” clause, which the second is called the “elements clause.”

people181211In deciding whether an offense qualifies as one of the enumerated offenses – burglary, extortion, arson or use of explosives – under the “violent felony” definition in the ACCA, the “categorical approach” first adopted in the 1990 decision Taylor v. United States requires courts to evaluate a prior conviction by reference to the elements of the offense instead of the defendant’s actual conduct. A prior state burglary conviction does not qualify as a generic burglary under the ACCA where the elements of the offense are “broader than those of generic burglary,” as explained in Mathis v. United States.

The Supreme Court has defined the elements of a generic burglary as “an unlawful or unprivileged entry into, or remaining in, a building or other structure, with intent to commit a crime. Under that definition, breaking into a car, a boat, an RV or even a mobile home often was not considered a burglary because it was not a “building or other structure.”

Yesterday’s decision changed all of that. In a consolidated case covering two defendants from two separate states, Arkansas and Tennessee, the Supreme Court expanded that previous definition, saying in effect that burglarizing anywhere that is used for overnight lodging falls within the ACCA’s generic burglary definition. The Court said Congress intended that the burglary definition reflect “the generic sense” in which the term ‘burglary’ was used in the criminal codes of most States when the ACCA was passed.

burglary160502At that time, a majority of state burglary statutes covered vehicles adapted or customarily used for lodging. Also, Congress viewed burglary as an inherently dangerous crime that “creates the possibility of a violent confrontation” between the burglar and an occupant. An offender who breaks into a mobile home, an RV, a tent, or another structure or vehicle “adapted or customarily used for lodging creates a similar or greater risk of violent confrontation.”

The Court said it did not matter if the vehicle or structure was only used for lodging part of the time, meaning that conceivably, breaking into new RVs on the dealer’s lot would still count toward an ACCA sentence.

One of the two defendants, Jason Sims complained that Arkansas’ statute remained too broad, because it also covers burglary of “a vehicle… [w]here any person lives.” He said since homeless people sometimes sleep in cars, this means that breaking into any car would fall under the ACCA definition. The Supreme Court said the question of whether the statute would be applied that way needed to be decided by a lower court, and remanded Jason’s case to a lower court to decide the merits of the claim.

United States v. Stitt, Case No. 17-765 (Supreme Court, Dec. 10, 2018)
United States v. Sims, Case No. 17-765 (Supreme Court, Dec. 10, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Progress on FIRST STEP, or Just Generating Heat Without Light? – Update for December 10, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

FIRST STEP GETS KNOCKED DOWN, BUT IT GETS UP AGAIN, CAN MCCONNELL EVER KEEP IT DOWN?

The lyrics from “Tubthumping,” Chumbawamba’s 1997 hit, describe the FIRST STEP Act’s week. The bill got knocked down early in the week by inaction and demagoguery, to the point that pundits were writing the bill’s obituary last Thursday. But the prison and sentencing reform act stumbled back up again on Friday, with three surprisingly positive developments.

chumba181210FIRST STEP is still far from being passed, but the pressure (for a change) is on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) instead of on the bill’s supporters. Sen. John Thune (R-South Dakota) seemed to signal that McConnell may yield to pressure. On Face the Nation yesterday, Sen. Thune said of FIRST STEP, “There are timing issues associated with it but there – at the moment at least there are still some substantive issues that are being resolved. I think if they get that worked out, if they can attract the support of more Republican Senators, there – there’s still an opportunity I think for that to be finished this year, but if not obviously it – it will be taken up again next year-”

The big news of the week came late on Friday, when President Trump decided to check back in on the bill, and pressured McConnell to bring FIRST STEP to a vote during the crowded lame duck session. After going mostly silent on the bill for several weeks, Trump singled McConnell out on Friday on his Twitter feed:

tweet181210

Trump’s public demands do not guarantee McConnell will bring the bill to a vote. He has told Trump several times that the Senate calendar is too cluttered in December to take up a bill that divides Republicans. As late as Thursday, McConnell had not mentioned the bill at either of two GOP senator meeting, and he has reportedly told senators there’s almost no window to take up the bill this year, according to multiple GOP sources.

One McConnell adviser said the senator does not intend to have a vote on the legislation because he does not have enough time and is more focused on other things — like funding the government and confirming judges. “He doesn’t like the bill,” the Washington Post reported Republican donor Doug Deason, a key White House ally, said of McConnell’s view of FIRST STEP. “He’s a Jeff Sessions-style, lock-them-up-and-throw-away-the-key kind of guy.”

mcconnell180219White House officials say McConnell doesn’t want a vote unless the overwhelming majority of Republicans will vote for it — although both Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said that 28 or 30 GOP senators support the bill. There are 51 Senate Republicans, and nearly all of the 49 Senate Democrats are expected to back it.

McConnell complained at a Wall Street Journal event last week that such a bill requires a week or ten days to consider, while there are only two weeks left before the planned holiday recess and budget bills that must be passed. FIRST STEP advocates argue that it would only take a few days, with a cloture vote capping debate at 30 hours. McConnell acknowledged support on both sides of the aisle but called the legislation “extremely divisive inside the Senate Republican conference,” with more members undecided or opposed than in favor.

“That’s his calling card, protecting his conference,” said Kevin Ring, president of FAMM. The Atlantic suggested yesterday that while past majority leaders like Lyndon Johnson might have strong-armed their members, McConnell waits for near-unanimity among Senate Republicans. “I think he’s not just looking for 60 votes,” said Brett Tolman, a former U.S. Attorney in Utah who also worked as a GOP Senate staffer and now advocates for criminal-justice reform. “He’s looking for a majority of Republicans.”

But it's not a bad thing.
                   But it’s not a bad thing.

Earlier in the week, FIRST STEP opponents Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas), John Kennedy (R-Louisiana) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas) seemed to be on a roll, denouncing FIRST STEP as giving immediate release to sexual predators, drug kingpins and gun-toting gangbangers. But Friday, just before Trump’s renewed support,     Sen. Cruz flipped, issuing a press release pledging support:

“I have long supported criminal justice reform. I believe in reducing mandatory minimum sentences for non-violent drug offenders, and providing greater opportunities for offenders to be rehabilitated. At the same time, I do not believe we should be granting early release to violent offenders.

“That is why I drafted an amendment that would exclude violent offenders from being released early. I’m happy to report that, after working closely with the White House and the sponsors of this bill, they have decided to accept my amendment. This new version of the bill resolves my concerns, and is one that I wholeheartedly support and cosponsor.”

firststep180814Also, last Friday a leading FIRST STEP opponent announced his support of key planks of the legislation. Larry Leiser, president of the National Association of Assistant U.S. Attorneys, told the Washington Examiner he supports in principle three of four major sentencing reforms included in FIRST STEP.

The possible turning of the tide seems to have little effect on McConnell’s reluctance to hold a vote. He has angered some GOP senators and created an unusual rift with Sen. Grassley, a longtime McConnell ally. Grassley has spent years building a coalition around FIRST STEP and is pushing hard for a vote this year. “We’ve done what needs to be done,” Grassley said about the overwhelming support for the bill. “So what’s holding it up?”

On Friday, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) intervened, talking directly to President Trump about attaching the criminal justice legislation to the must-pass year-end spending bill, which is already tangled in a separate fight over funds for the border wall with Mexico. “Just talked with President,” Graham tweeted. “He strongly believes criminal justice reform bill must pass now. He also indicated he supports putting criminal justice reform bill on year-end spending bill which must include MORE wall funding.”

The spending bill will need approval by Dec. 21 to avoid a funding lapse days before Christmas.

On Thursday, Sen. Lee said there were 28 hard “yes” Republican votes plus 49 Democrats for the bill. “It’s rock-solid,” he said. But Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), the Senate Republican whip, said more Republicans needed to be convinced. “Right now we have a majority of the Republican conference either undecided or no,” he told reporters. He also continued to call for some changes to the bill.

reefer181210Despite Sen. Lee’s assurance that he has 49 Democrat votes in favor of FIRST STEP, The Hill reported Wednesday Democrats who are mulling 2020 presidential bids have split over whether to support FIRST STEP. The decision to support or oppose the bill is a significant policy decision for 2020 Democrat candidates.

Among Republican senators, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) told CNN that there’s a generational divide within the party on the issue. “I think there are people who were teenagers in 1937 watching ‘Reefer Madness’ and they’re still concerned that Reefer Madness is going to take over and everybody is going to become zombies, hacking and killing everyone if they smoke pot,” said Sen. Paul, a FIRST STEP supporter. “And then there are a couple of generations after 1937 of people who don’t see it with the same degree of evil.”

The Atlantic, Mitch McConnell Appears to Be Killing Bipartisan Sentencing Reform (Dec. 9)

Politico, Trump leans on McConnell to vote on criminal justice reform (Dec. 7)

The Hill, Criminal justice reform splits 2020 Democrats (Dec. 5)

Washington Examiner, Trump pushes Congress to pass floundering sentencing reform bill (Dec. 7)

Washington Post, McConnell tells White House little chance of Senate vote on criminal justice bill (Dec. 6)

Pittsburgh Tribune, McConnell blocks sentencing bill, upsetting Grassley, GOP (Dec. 7)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small