Tag Archives: sessions

Congress is Back to Work, with Criminal Justice Reform Still Pending – Update for July 9, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small

CONGRESS RETURNS TO TOWN WITH CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM STILL ON ITS PLATE

The House and Senate were not in session last week, as legislators celebrated the July 4th holiday however they do it. The Senate returns today, and the House tomorrow, with the criminal justice debate still hot, and an announcement about a new Supreme Court justice looming.

grassley180604A recap: The House has passed the FIRST STEP Act, which proposes a number of prison reforms, including a full 54 days a year of good time, better compassionate release and elderly prisoner release policies, and credits for programming that can be used to earn more halfway house and home confinement. The bill is stalled in the Senate, because the senior Republican and Democrat on the Judiciary Committee – Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) – do not want the FIRST STEP’s prison reform without sentencing reform bundled along with it.

The sentencing reform proposals are contained in the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2017. SRCA proposes to make the Fair Sentencing Act retroactive for crack defendants sentenced before the 2010 FSA, to unstack 18 USC 924(c) sentences, and to reduce a substantial number of the mandatory minimums in 21 USC 841(b), which are generally known as “851 enhancements.” As of the end of June, Grassley and Durbin were pressing President Trump to support SRCA as well as FIRST STEP, and we were observing that as of 9 pm this evening (when Trump names his Supreme Court nominee), he is going to need a lot of help from Grassley to get the nominee through the Judiciary Committee.

Trump is needed, because all indications are that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell does not intend to bring FIRST STEP or SRCA to a Senate vote without White House approval. If the bills are not voted on by the end of the year, they will die, and the whole process will have to start over next January.

sessions180215Of course, Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III is dead set against any reduction of mandatory minimums or extension of the FSA, and his conflict with Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and advisor, over reform has not helped McConnell find his backbone. In a thoughtful opinion piece in The Washington Post last Thursday, Michael Gerson noted the success Texas have had with modifying harsh mandatory minimums, and suggested that the evidence means

that the criminal-justice views of the attorney general are far to the right of the Texas state legislature, which puts him in small and disturbing company. It means that Sessions’ opposition to sentencing reform is rooted in vindictiveness and ideology rather than a conservative respect for facts and outcomes. And it means that Sessions has learned nothing from federalism, which he seems to respect only when it fits his preconceptions.

Gerson argued that prison reform should succeed because of “trans-partisanship,” which is defined as “agreement on policy goals driven by divergent, deeply held ideological beliefs.” Liberals see racism and unfairness in the criminal justice system. Fiscal conservatives see wasted resources. Religious activists see damaged lives. Gerson wrote, “All these convictions converge at one point: We should treat offenders as humans, with different stories and different needs, instead of casting them all into the same pit of despair.”

trainwreck180305Also speaking practically, the magazine American Conservative last Friday noted that mandatory minimums and other policies that make America the incarceration capital of the world, a product of the lock-’em-up mentality, have “tarnished the image of Republicans and conservatives in the minds of many. Though Republicans have greatly increased their political power in recent elections, they have nevertheless alienated many of the fastest growing segments of the electorate, casting a pall across the impressive electoral successes of the past decade.”

In a lengthy article, the authors called for the “extension of conservative principles to criminal justice policies.” They observed that “right-leaning organizations, armed with polling data that show significant backing from many conservatives, are mobilizing on criminal justice issues. It’s time to leverage these efforts to rebuild the conservative identity. Perhaps no other policy area holds more potential than criminal justice reform.”

Washington Post, No more pits of despair. Offenders are still humans (July 4, 2018)

The American Conservative, Where the Right Went Wrong on Criminal Justice (July 6, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Sen. Grassley is Relevant Again, and So is SRCA – Update for July 2, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small

SENATORS SEEK TO RECRUIT TRUMP TO BACK SENTENCE REFORM

The Senatorial Odd Couple – conservative Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and liberal Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) – held a joint press conference last Tuesday to try to recruit President Trump as an ally to help move the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2017 through the Senate.

oddcouple180702Grassley and Durbin – No. 1 and 2 on the Senate Judiciary Committee – urged the president to get involved in the reform process — “in a positive way,” Durbin pointedly suggested. “We need for the president, the president of the United States, to say this is a priority for us as well. Let’s do this criminal justice reform, to include prison reform… What a breakthrough that would be.”

Grassley noted that Trump frequently tweets about Senate Democrats needing “to do something.” He said criminal justice reform is tailor-made for Trump’s action agenda. “It kind of is a good combination between what’s good politics and what’s good policy… This is an opportunity for the president to have a win. It’s an opportunity for our justice system to have a win. … It would help a lot if the president would engage on this very important issue,” Grassley said. 

Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III - death to misdemeanants?
Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III – death to misdemeanants?

Grassley has engaged Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III and White House adviser and Trump advisor and son-in-law Jared Kushner on the issue, which has probably left the Senator 1-1: Kushner is a supporter, while Sessions would likely support expanding the death penalty to cover misdemeanors.

Grassley said Sessions told him that SRCA would not undercut the administration’s “tough on crime” stance. “I thought that I determined an opening. Well that opening hasn’t materialized and obviously I didn’t make an impact,” Grassley said.

That may change very soon. Grassley has suddenly become very important to Donald Trump, because it is the Judiciary Committee that will conduct hearings on Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, who will be announced next Monday. The Republicans badly want to confirm the new justice, who will replace the retiring Anthony Kennedy, and Grassley, as chairman of Judiciary, holds a few of the keys to the kingdom.

That’s good news, because criminal justice reform has largely stalled on Capitol Hill. The House passed the FIRST STEP Act, which only addresses prison reform, and Senators John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island) have introduced a similar bill in the Senate. But Grassley and Durbin are pushing broader criminal justice reform legislation that include both the sentencing reform changes in SRCA and the prison reform changes of FIRST STEP.

kushner180622Last Tuesday, Kushner met with Cornyn and Whitehouse, as well as FIRST STEP sponsors Reps. Doug Collins (R-Georgia) and Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York) from the House of Representatives, to strategize on how to move FIRST STEP forward following House passage last month, according to a report on the Axios news website.

SRCA has the backing of more than a fourth of the Senate, and Grassley and Durbin reiterated last Tuesday that they believe they have the 60 votes needed to pass the legislation in the Senate if they are able to get the bill to the floor. Bringing the bill up for a vote requires the approval of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky). McConnell will do what Trump wants him to do. Trump needs Grassley’s cooperation, and Grassley needs Trump’s backing on comprehensive criminal justice reform. Trump does not much need Sessions, whom has been in Trump’s doghouse for well over a year.

fingers180702Trump’s recent pardons and commutations suggests that maybe the Russia probe has sensitized him to what it feels like to have the Dept. of Justice and FBI gunning for you. Amy Povich of the CAN-DO Foundation said of Trump, “I am encouraged that for the first time we are seeing somebody who possibly understands the complexities of the Office of the Pardon Attorney being controlled by the Department of Justice. There are a lot of dirty cases and they don’t want those to see the light of day, so they let their prosecutors have the largest voice as to which cases go over there. Trump now apparently understands this and that is why he’s asking for a list. We are honored to have been asked to provide a list, so fingers crossed.”

Risk-assessment company Skopos Labs sets the odds of FIRST STEP becoming law at 82% as of today, and rates SRCA’s chances at 63%.

The Hill, Bipartisan senator duo urges Trump to back criminal justice bill (June 26, 2018)

Axios, Jared Kushner huddles with Congress on prison reform (June 26, 2018)

Salon, Is there real hope for prison reform? Nonviolent offenders and the “Kim Kardashian moment” (June 29, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Truth is Stranger than Fiction: Reality TV Star’s White House Visit May Jump-Start Sentence Reform – Update for June 4, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues. 

LISAStatHeader2small
WILL THE KARDASHIANS SAVE SENTENCE REFORM?

kardash180604Talk about headlines we never imagined ourselves writing… The twists and turns of federal sentence and prison reform legislation get weirder and weirder. Last week, as Senate Republicans fought one another over whether FIRST STEP Act (H.R. 5682) did enough to benefit prisoners, President Trump had a sit-down in his office with Kim Kardashian over a commutation for Alice Martin, a grandmother doing life at FCI Aliceville, and then pardoned a conservative New York filmmaker who did 8 months in a halfway house over a two-bit campaign finance crime.

So why does this matter to federal prisoners?

To start, The Hill reported last week that the Senate is “under growing pressure” to take up the FIRST STEP Act, which is a priority Trump son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner. But Senate negotiators say they are not close to a deal that would allow the bill to move quickly.

grassley180604Instead, the fight is pitting two influential senators, John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), against each other as they back competing bills. “We’ve got work to do here on building consensus… but right now we don’t have it,” Cornyn said last week. The divisions could scuttle any chance that the Trump-backed FIRST STEP becomes law this year.

Both Cornyn and Grassley are signaling they plan to press forward with trying to build support for their own separate bills once the Senate returns to Washington, D.C., this week. “We’re going to take up my bill,” Grassley said, referring to the Sentence Reform and Corrections Act (S.1917). “Or I should say, my bipartisan bill that’s got 28 co-sponsors — equal number Republicans and Democrats… What the House does through [FIRST STEP] is about the equivalent of a spit in the ocean compared to what the problem is of too much imprisonment.”

SRCA would link prison reform to reductions in mandatory minimums for certain drug offenses, correction of stacked 924(c) convictions, and retroactivity of the 2010 Fair Sentencing Act. Both Grassley and Durbin say they’ve made a deal not to separate the prison and sentencing reform components despite pressure from the White House.

sessions180215The Hill reports that SRCA is unlikely to be taken up in the Senate given opposition from Trump officials, chiefly Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III. Grassley admitted last week he has not yet convinced Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) to bring SRCA to the floor. “You’ve got to remember that McConnell doesn’t like the bill,” Grassley said, “and all I can say is that you ought to let a Republican president who needs a big, bipartisan victory have a bipartisan victory.”

Last week, McConnell told senators, “Look, guys, if you all can get your act together and come up with something that you’re comfortable with, that the president will sign, I’d be willing to take a look at it.”

Enter Kim Kardashian West, reality TV star and wife of Kanye West. Kim, who made early release for federal prisoner Alice Martin. Kardashian visited the White House on Wednesday to urge President Trump to commute the sentence of a 63-year-old grandmother serving life for a first-time drug offense. In pleading her case for a commutation for the inmate, Kardashian seized upon draconian federal sentencing practices that can put low- or midlevel nonviolent offenders away for decades, even life.

kardashian180604Interestingly, Trump – who tends to agree with the last person who spoke to him – tweeted that he and Kardashian had a good visit, and talked about “prison reform and sentencing.” This left some observers hopeful that the President was listening to people other than Sessions, and was about to signal his support for adding some sentencing reform measures to FIRST STEP. At the same time, Trump’s interest in harsh sentencing may help McConnell find some backbone to put FIRST STEP and SRCA to a vote.

Meanwhile, debate continued about the FIRST STEP Act. The liberal opponents of FIRST STEP argue that passing the bill, which lacks any reform of mandatory minimum sentence, would leave Congress and the administration believing they had solved mass incarceration, and thus not willing to address the issues at the heart of the prison problem anytime soon. But the Washington Post suggested this fear is overblown:

If Democrats take control of the House in November, they will be able to revisit the issue anytime they want — but they will have real clout to go along with their passion,” the Post said. “Nothing in the current bill precludes bolder, more comprehensive action when the votes, and the president’s pen, are lined up and ready.

The Hill, Senate grapples with prison reform bill (May 30, 2018)

Washington Post, In prison reform, a little of something is better than a lot of nothing (May 28, 2018)

The Hill, Don’t kick the can down the road on prison reform — now is the time for change (June 1, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Like a Mouse Between Two Cats, BOP Director Just Got Tired of It – Update for May 30, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues. 

LISAStatHeader2small
BOP DIRECTOR QUIT BECAUSE OF SESSIONS AND KUSHNER

As we reported last week, BOP director Mark Inch quietly resigned, ironically packing up his office a week ago last Friday even as President Trump’s senior adviser and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, was praising Inch’s leadership during a White House conference on prison reform. At the time, no one knew why he quit.

CatChasingMouse180530Now we do. The New York Times reported late last Thursday that Inch, a retired Army major general who had been appointed to oversee the Bureau just nine months ago, felt marginalized by Kushner’s prison reform planning, according to three unnamed sources the Times said had with knowledge of the situation. But even more than his ire at Kushner, Inch – a consummate bureaucrat – was frustrated with his boss, Attorney General Sessions, and believed he was in caught in the crossfire of a turf war between Kushner and Sessions, like Ben Franklin’s proverbial “mouse between two cats.”

Sessions had frozen Inch out of budget, staffing, and policy decisions, the Times reported, refusing even to approve his choice for deputy prisons director, the Times reports. For months Inch pleaded with Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein to install Sara M. Revell, North Central Region director, as his top deputy. Rosenstein repeatedly told Inch that Sessions had not yet approved the appointment. Inch reportedly resented Sessions’ habit of communicating with him through junior DOJ lawyers.

Inch also told Rosenstein he was tired of the Trump administration flouting “departmental norms,” and he was frustrated by Sessions trying to thwart Kushner’s reforms. This hardly meant that Inch was a fan of the FIRST STEP Act, however: the Times said Inch objected to the Kushner-backed requirement that inmates be placed in prisons within 500 miles of their homes. He also believed the FIRST STEP earned-credits program for more halfway house was impractical, in part because of a lack of available beds in halfway houses.

inch180530Mostly, it seems Inch was offended that he was largely excluded from discussion of prison reform bill. Even that shutout appears to have been engineered by Sessions. Two senior White House officials said Kushner made a point of inviting Inch to prison reform meetings, but Sessions often sent other officials in his place.

The Times said Inch – whose career was spent in the Army criminal justice and prison system – struggled to publicly explain the BOP’s response to sexual harassment, halfway house and staffing problems. Watching Inch testify before Congress was like getting a tooth pulled without novocaine. The director practiced James H. Boren’s bureaucrat’s creed: “When in doubt, mumble; when in trouble, delegate; when in charge, ponder.”

The New York Times, Turf War Between Kushner and Sessions Drove Federal Prisons Director to Quit (May 24, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Through a Glass Darkly – FIRST STEP Act’s Chances in the Senate – Update for May 29, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues. 

LISAStatHeader2small
FUTURE OF THE FIRST STEP ACT IS FAR FROM CLEAR

breeze180530Supporters of a federal criminal justice system overhaul seemed well on their way to victory after the FIRST STEP Act breezed through the House last week on an impressive bipartisan vote. The Act, H.R. 5682, has strong administration backing, including the fingerprints of Jared Kushner, the presidential adviser and son-in-law. It has some important Senate supporters. But a lot of informed people are still predicting that neither the FIRST STEP Act nor any other criminal justice reform bill will pass the Senate this year.

First, senior Senate authors of the long-stalled Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act, S.1917 – including Senate Judiciary chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), are steadfastly opposed to FIRST STEP. They consider it an insufficient half-measure for its focus on prison programs without changes in federal sentencing laws. Plus, Grassley is still smarting from his inability to pass SRCA last year, and he says he’s not going down without a fight.

Second, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) is highly unlikely to try to move the bill through the Senate as long as Grassley is opposed to it, according to Republican senators and aides. They say McConnell, who is not that keen on criminal justice legislation in general, is definitely uninterested in circumventing his Judiciary Committee chairman and provoking an intra-party fight that would eat up weeks of floor time. A Republican senator said flatly of McConnell’s view of the bill right now: “It’s not on the priority list.” If McConnell decides not to bring the bill to a vote, no one can force him to do so.

sessions180322Third, impressive groups of opponents to FIRST STEP are lining up on both sides of the aisle. Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III Sessions, a former senator himself, opposes SRCA and is lukewarm about FIRST STEP. And even the narrower FIRST STEP bill will probably face opposition on the right from Sessions’ allies, like Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas), who once memorably said America has an “under-incarceration problem” and is reportedly stirring up opposition to FIRST STEP among law enforcement groups.

At the same time, FIRST STEP is opposed by some civil-rights groups, former Attorney General Eric Holder, and a coalition of leading Senate Democrats, including Richard Durbin (D-Illinois), Cory Booker (D-New Jersey), and Kamala Harris (D-California). In a letter last week, the senators said FIRST STEP would be “a step backwards” and that prison reform would fail if Congress did not simultaneously overhaul the nation’s sentencing laws. Also signing the letter were Representatives Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) and John Lewis D-Georgia).

donotwaste180530Last Wednesday, a group of senators asked McConnell for a last-ditch negotiation session to seek an acceptable compromise. SRCA backers fear this may be the only chance for years to come to pass major criminal justice reform. “You don’t get many opportunities around here to do anything meaningful or substantive,” said Durbin, a chief author of the sentencing provisions. “Let’s not waste this one. Let’s get this right.”

Although Trump supports FIRST STEP, it’s unclear how he would react if Congress sent him a bill that included SRCA-style sentencing reforms. A prison reform-only bill gives Trump what he wants: To look tough to his base by not budging on sentences while also showing evangelicals he believes in “second chances.” Adding sentence reform might be too much for him.

New York Times, Why some senators who want a criminal justice overhaul oppose a prisons bill (May 26, 2018)

New York magazine, Can Kushner’s Patchy Prison-Reform Bill Survive the Senate? (May 23, 2018)

The Marshall Report, Is The “First Step Act” Real Reform? (May 22, 2018)

Politico, Trump-backed prisons bill DOA in the Senate (May 21, 2018)

Senate Judiciary Committee release, For criminal justice bill to pass the Senate, it must include sentencing reform (May 22, 2018)

 The Atlantic, Democrats Split Over Trump’s Prison Pitch (May 23, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Prison Reform Gets a Hearing – Update for April 16, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues. 

LISAStatHeader2small
HOUSE PRISON REFORM BILL GOES TO HEARING THIS WEEK

redemption180411The House Judiciary Committee will mark up H.R. 3566, the Prison Reform and Redemption Act, this week, a Republican proposal that aims to reduce recidivism. Rep. Doug Collins (R-Georgia), sponsor of the PRRA, said the bill, which has 10 Democrat and seven Republican co-sponsors, would allow prisoners to serve the final days of their sentences in a halfway house or home confinement if they complete evidence-based programs that have been shown to reduce recidivism rates.

Prison programming could include everything from job and vocational skills training to education and drug treatment.

The White House announced in February it was throwing its support behind prison reform measures such as the PRRA instead of measures like the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act, sponsored by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa). The White House says it sees no path forward for sentencing reform. “And so what we see now is an environment where the prison reform does have enough support to get done,” an official said. “And we think that by maybe doing this in smaller bits and pushing the prison reform now, we think this has a better chance of getting done.” 

blackprisoner171116Not everyone agrees. The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights an umbrella group of 63 organizations, wrote to the House Judiciary Committee last week to complain about the PRRA and “efforts to pass prison reform (or ‘back-end’ reform) legislation without including sentencing reform (or ‘front-end’ reform).” The Conference said that any “legislation that addresses only back end reforms is doomed to fail in achieving these goals. Without changes to sentencing laws that eliminate mandatory minimums, restore judicial discretion, reduce the national prison population, and mitigate disparate impacts on communities of color, H.R. 3356 alone will have little impact.”

The PRRA lets inmates earn credits for completing designated BOP programs that will let them go to halfway house or home confinement early, with the more credits earned, the earlier the prisoner can get released to residential reentry. But the Conference letter noted that “currently there are not enough of these programs available in the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to serve those currently in prisons. Furthermore, BOP more recently has reduced the number of residential reentry centers it contracts with to provide halfway house programming.”

mcconnell180219And the leadership of two organizations on the opposite end of the political spectrum, conservative FreedomWorks and liberal Center for American Progress, wrote in The Hill last week that “[a] recent markup of the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act yielded the same favorable vote as the last committee vote on this legislation, and even those who voted against the legislation voiced support for some level of sentencing reform. Sen. Lee maintains that SRCA would receive 70 votes on the Senate floor, if Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) would simply allow the bill to come to a vote.”

Trump son-in-law and advisor Jared Kushner convinced President Trump to support prison reforms like those some states have implemented more than a decade ago, which since saved billions and has resulted both in the closure of prisons and a drastic reduction the crime rate. Jared presented those ideas to Trump at a White House meeting in January. The following month, the White House asked lawmakers to draw up legislation, highlighting many of the same policies.

Kushner has since worked with Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, a long-time criminal justice reform advocate, who helped craft the plan the House will begin debating this week.

Meanwhile, speculation that Trump may fire Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III – the man who torpedoed the SRCA and has backed off Obama-era easing of DOJ charging policies – has cooled. The Weekly Standard reported his week that such a firing is highly unlikely. Instead, Sessions has a stronger hold on his job than ever.

With Sessions gone, it would be difficult for Grassley to avoid spending the rest of the year on anything but hearings for a new AG. With the risk growing daily that the Democrats may capture the Senate in the midterm elections in November, the chance to confirm more conservative judges would have been frittered away.

sessions180215Still, The Standard reports that anti-Sessions sentiment lives on in the Trump family. Jared Kushner is a supporter of criminal justice reform, which Sessions opposes. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, who openly lobbied to replace Sessions and angered the President in the process, was Kushner’s hope for attorney general and possible backer of SRCA. Pruitt is hanging on to his EPA job by a thread, and has probably permanently spindled any hope of becoming Attorney General.

The Hill, Prison reform bill set for House markup next week (Apr. 11, 2018)

McClatchy Washington Bureau, Washington looks to Texas on federal prison reforms (Apr. 13, 2018)

The Leadership, Letter of Concern regarding H.R. 3356, the Prison Reform and Redemption Act (Apr. 12, 2018)

The Weekly Standard, Jeff Sessions and His Enemies (Apr. 13, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Sentencing Reform Taking It On The Chin – Update for April 11, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues. 

LISAStatHeader2small
SENTENCING REFORM IS DEAD… LONG LIVE PRISON REFORM

kushner180411A couple of hagiographic news articles on Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner’s efforts pushing federal criminal justice reform last week make it clear, if it was not clear before, that hopes of sentencing reform – rewriting mandatory minimums and giving guys with grossly-stacked sentences a chance to get resentenced to something that make sense – are waning.

Notwithstanding Sen. Charles Grassley’s (R-Iowa) optimism, prospects for the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2017, are bleak, with Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III leading Administration opposition to the notion of front-end sentencing reform.

So, if traditional sentencing reform is dead in the water, The Hill asked last week, what’s left? Prison reform legislation that focuses on reentry programs offering prisoners the opportunity to shorten their sentences on the back end is what’s being favored now. Rather than trimming sentences from the start, these programs allow prisoners to earn credits toward early release by participating in programs intended to help reintegrate them into society and reduce their propensity to reoffend. Although they face some of the same political resistance as front-end sentencing reductions, it is significantly easier to overcome.

redemption180411The Hill argued that prison reform bills “avoid many of the usual pitfalls that sentencing reform legislation encounters because they shift the narrative from one of retribution to redemption, from past wrong to future promise. Instead of getting bogged down on issues like whom to punish and for how long, politicians are able to talk about what comes next. Leaving the nominal sentence unchanged insulates these reforms from charges that they don’t adequately reflect the egregiousness of a given crime or that they will negatively impact deterrence.”

The Las Vegas Review-Journal suggested last week that anything criminal justice advocates may get from Congress this year will be due to Kushner, whose father did a bit a decade ago for some white-collar and tax beefs. Sentencing reform failed last year despite Obama’s willingness to sign it, and after law-and-order Trump was elected, it looked like any reform would not happen.

But Kushner convinced Trump to support prison reform (not sentencing reform), changes that would “create a prison system that will rehabilitate citizens who have made mistakes, paid the price and are deserving of a second chance — which will ultimately reduce crime and save taxpayer dollars.”

sessions180322In practical terms, Kushner has helped in two ways. First, his commitment tells Hill Republicans that Trump is not likely to reverse his support for prison reform. Second, Kushner found a way to co-opt Sessions, by convincing advocates to delay their push for sentencing reform in exchange for Sessions not standing in the way of their rehabilitation goals. As a result, DOJ now “is working closely with the White House to develop legislative reforms that further the president’s goals for prison and re-entry improvements,” said spokesman Drew Hudson.

The lead horse in the prison reform race is the Prison Reform and Redemption Act, sponsored by Rep. Doug Collins, R-Georgia, that would require prisons to assess inmates’ recidivism risk, encourage drug treatment and offer incentives for inmates to participate in recidivism reduction programs.

Collins said his bill would create “a federal prison-wide system for evaluating the risk of every individual prisoner for re-offending and then offering evidence-based resources — like mental health care, vocational skills, substance abuse treatment and faith-based programs — that make them less likely to re-offend when they are released.”

Las Vegas Review-Journal, For Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, prison reform is personal (April 7, 2018)

ABC, Inside Jared Kushner’s personal crusade to reform America’s prisons (April 8, 2018)

The Hill, Incentivized early release the right path to sentencing reform under Trump-Sessions (April 6, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Washington Sentencing Reform Soap Opera Grinds On – Update for March 12, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small
THRILLS, CHILLS, AS SENTENCING REFORM GETS KICKED AROUND WASHINGTON

It’s kind of like a made-for-TV thriller, with all sorts of disconnected story lines swirling around the central theme of sentencing reform.

soap180312Starting with the good news/bad news on pardons: President Trump issued the third grant of clemency (and second pardon) of his presidency last Friday to former Navy sailor Kristian Saucier, who learned the news while driving a garbage truck, the only job he could find with a felony conviction. Saucier, who was sentenced to a year in prison in 2016 for taking pictures inside a nuclear submarine, was repeatedly cited by Trump during his presidential campaign as being “ruined” for doing “nothing,” while Hillary Clinton mishandled classified information and used a personal email account while serving as secretary of state, only to receive a “pass” from the FBI.

The bad news is that Trump so far has only granted clemency to people whose stories have contributed to his political narrative (Sheriff Joe Arpaio) or who had powerful political and financial friends (Sholom Rabashkin). There is no indication he cares to do anything about inmates not falling into either category.

Hopes that Trump may support sentencing reform were rekindled slightly this past week as the White House launched the Federal Interagency Council on Crime Prevention and Improving Reentry, intended to reduce crime while looking for ways to “provide those who have engaged in criminal activity with greater opportunities to lead productive lives.”

sessions180215Trump’s executive order calls for “mental health, vocational training, job creation, after-school programming, substance abuse, and mentoring,” for inmates. “Incarceration is necessary to improve public safety,” the Administration said, “but its effectiveness can be enhanced through evidence-based rehabilitation programs.” The council will be co-chaired by Jared Kushner (who strongly supports sentencing reform) and Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III (who is strongly opposed to sentencing reform). Government study groups like this are usually good for burying the problem for an extended period of time, although Trump has called for the council to produce a list of proposals within 90 days.

At the same time, the Washington Post has reported that the Administration is studying a new policy that could allow prosecutors to seek the death penalty for drug dealers. President Trump last week suggested executing drug dealers as a effective way to make a dent in opioid addiction. Sources inside the White House say a final announcement could come within weeks. 

Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), the man with his hand on the Judiciary Committee throttle.
Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), the man with his hand on the Judiciary Committee throttle.

The Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Gazette, last week reported on the feud festering between the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), and Sessions. Grassley’s desire to see his legislative baby, the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2017, passed – and his fury at Sessions’ outspoken opposition to the bill – is spreading now to Grassley head-butting fellow Republicans who say they won’t support the bipartisan proposal to reform sentencing laws. The Gazette reports that Grassley may even side with Senate Democrats to block other legislation until his bill gets a fair shot. The SRCA drew bipartisan support last month, being voted out of the Senate Judiciary Committee by a 16-5 vote without any changes.

Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman suggested in his Sentencing Law and Policy blog last week that Grassley should add the White House death penalty proposals to SRCA “as part of an effort to get the White House and AG Sessions to support that bill. Even if drafted broadly, any federal ‘death penalty for drug dealers’ law would likely only impact a few dozen cases per year, whereas the SRCA will impact tens of thousands of cases every year. And the SRCA could help tens of thousands of least serious drug offenders while any death penalty bill would impact only the most serious drug offenders.”

sessions180312Meanwhile, in the juicy rumor department, Fox Business host Lou Dobbs called on Attorney General Jeff Sessions to resign a week ago after President Trump and a number of Republicans criticized the AG. “Sessions has fallen ill, he’s incapacitated in some fashion, or he’s been coopted or captured: to preserve any dignity, for the good of the country he needs to resign,” Dobbs tweeted. Meanwhile, former Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Alabama), who for years served in the Senate alongside Sessions, says that if he were in the AG’s position, he would stop taking abuse from Trump. “I wouldn’t stay at all unless the president wanted me to stay, if he appointed me,” Shelby said. “I wouldn’t be anybody’s whipping boy. I wouldn’t be belittled because the president’s saying he doesn’t have any confidence in you.”

Washington Examiner, Trump pardons Kristian Saucier, former sailor jailed for submarine pictures (Mar. 9, 2018)

Axios, Trump launches council for prison reform and crime prevention (Mar. 7, 2018)

Washington Post, Trump administration studies seeking the death penalty for drug dealers (Mar. 9, 2018)

Sentencing Law and Policy: Trump Administration reportedly looking (seriously?) at the death penalty for serious drug dealers (Mar. 10, 2018)

The Cedar Rapids Gazette, Grassley the maverick re-emerges in feud with Sessions (Mar. 6, 2018)

The Hill, Fox Business host claims ‘Sessions has fallen ill,’ calls for him to resign (Mar. 3, 2018)

The Hill, Alabama senator: If I were Sessions, I’d quit and stop being Trump’s ‘whipping boy’ (Mar. 1, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

AG Sessions is a Chess-Playing Pigeon – Update for February 15, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small

 

THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE REPORTED S.1917 TO THE FULL SENATE BY VOTE TODAY, FEB. 15TH, AT 12:04 PM. THE VOTES WERE 16 FOR, 5 AGAINST.

SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE PONDERS HOW TO GET SENTENCING REFORM AND CORRECTIONS ACT PAST THE SENATE LEADERSHIP; VOTES TODAY

The Senate Judiciary Committee’s consideration of the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act (S.1917), a bill which injects some sanity into both sentencing and rehabilitation policies, comes to a head with a mark-up and vote today. And unsurprisingly, the Attorney General – who never met an inmate he didn’t think should be serving multiple life sentences – weighed in on the widely-supported measure yesterday.

argueidiot180215In a letter to the Committee, Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III warned that S.1917 “would reduce sentences for a highly dangerous cohorts of criminals, including repeat dangerous drug traffickers and those who use firearms and would apply retroactively to many dangerous felons, regardless of citizenship or immigration status,” Sessions wrote.

Of course, the bill would only entitle persons convicted and sentenced in ways unintended by Congress when it wrote 18 USC 924(c) and some other recidivist statutes to ask their sentencing judges for a reduction under 18 USC 3582(c)(2). The judge is entitled under that statute to grant the request in full, deny it in full or grant it only in part. But the AG hardly trusts federal judges – the people who impose sentences to begin with – to make a reasoned decision about the risk that sentence reduction will create when “a highly dangerous cohorts of criminals” is involved .

sessions180215The Attorney General’s scolding was not well received by Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Committee. The Washington Post reported Sen. Grassley was “incensed” at Sessions “for trying to derail a bipartisan bill that would reduce mandatory prison terms for drug offenders on the eve of its first procedural vote.” Sessions and Grassley have long been at odds over the measure, which reduces the length of mandatory minimum sentences for repeat nonviolent drug offenses, eliminates the “three strike” provision of 18 USC 3559(c)(1) that requires a life sentence, and gives judges greater leeway to impose sentences under the mandatory statutory minimum sentences for some offenses, when certain conditions were met. The reforms embraced by the bill fly in the face of Sessions’ bid to wage a new war on drugs, leading him to label the bill a “grave error.”

Grassley wasted no time publicly blasting Sessions, giving the AG what the Post called “a short reminder about who in the government makes the federal laws — and who is supposed to follow them.”

tweet180215In October 2015, the panel passed an identical measure, sending it on to the full Senate by a 15-5 vote.

Committee members anticipated Sessions’ outcry. Last week, the Committee spent most of its hearing time debating how best to get favorable action in the Senate. John Cornyn (R-Texas), one of the bill’s sponsors, said, “Given the opposition of the Attorney General and given the vocal opposition of some law enforcement groups, I honestly don’t see a path forward for that bill…”

Cornyn, who serves as Senate majority whip, said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) would be more likely to bring a prison reform bill to the floor than a sentencing reform package that might be a wedge within the Republican caucus. Cornyn said the committee’s best opportunity to move a criminal justice bill would be his legislation, proposed along with Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Sheldon Whitehouse D- Rhode Island), which contains only provisions aimed at easing re-entry for prisoners — “and then building on that as we can” with a sentencing amendment process on the floor.

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois), a prominent co-sponsor of the bill, disagreed, saying the Senate should not abandon bipartisan legislation just because the administration does not fully support it. “It’s a sad day if we are saying that we will not consider a measure in the halls here of the Senate Judiciary Committee if the attorney general of the United States opposes it,” Durbin said at the committee meeting. “For goodness sakes, have we reached that point? I hope not.”

“I’m worried that if we just revisit the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act, which failed during the Obama administration, given this change in the new administration and its views on the sentencing reform component of it, we’re going to have nothing to show for our efforts,” said Cornyn, using the bill’s formal title. “I know we all tried to work together on this and it just didn’t work out.”

bipart160307Sen. Grassley said at the time the compromise SRCA bill would be the best way to get the sentencing and prison provisions into law. “It’s a matter of process and around here — nothing gets done unless it’s bipartisan. And I don’t often agree with Sen. Durbin, but we put together a bill that we worked really hard and we think it’s the only way of advancing both bills… There’s some people around here [who] are just a little bit afraid of what you call an Assistant U.S. Attorneys Association and they’re stopping everything from being done that is so successful in the other states. And when some people are willing to stand up to those leaders of the Senate, we’ll get something done in both areas.”

Congress is expected to remain focused on immigration-related debates for the foreseeable future, as the March 5th deadline for the expiration of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program approaches.

One political observer, who writes under the pen name “root” (and has nothing to do with the author of this blog), said he has spoken to Grassley, and that the Senator “plans to use his substantial political clout to press Trump to change his mind.” The commentator said,

Trump bends over backwards to keep Grassley happy. He knows that as Judiciary Chairman, Grassley played a crucial role in delivering two of Trump’s biggest successes so far: the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and a modern record for circuit court judges in a president’s first year. ‘I’ve carried a lot of water for the White House,’ Grassley told me. ‘They ought to give some consideration for the close working relationship we’ve had on issues we agree on… I think people at the White House have not wanted to go against Gen. Sessions,’ he added, before closing with a sentence crafted perfectly to appeal to Trump’s ego. ‘This is an opportunity for a bipartisan victory by the President of the United States’.

Washington Post, Grassley ‘incensed’ by attorney general’s attempt to stymie sentencing reform (Feb. 14, 2018)

10ztalk.com, root, Grassley twists Trump’s arm for criminal justice reform (Feb. 11, 2018)

Reuters, U.S. attorney general opposes plan to reform prison sentencing (Feb. 14, 2018)

District Sentinel, Senate Committee to Advance Criminal Justice Reform Once Opposed by Jeff Sessions (Feb. 8, 2018)

Roll Call, Senators Ponder How to Break Criminal Justice Logjam (Feb. 9, 2018)

Courthouse News Service, Cornyn Sees No Way Forward for Sweeping Criminal-Justice Reform (Feb. 8, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Could Sessions’ War on Pot Light Up Congress? – Update for February 8, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small
SESSIONS UPSETS CONGRESS WITH CHANGE IN POT POLICY

sessions180119Last week, after Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III gave federal prosecutors free rein to begin marijuana busts even state law allows possession and sale, dozens of lawmakers from both parties are seeking legislation that would handcuff Sessions on pot.

“It has awakened a sleeping giant,” Dana Rohrabacher (R-California) said of the Congressional response to Sessions repealing the Cole memorandum, a policy from the Obama administration that tolerated pot companies in states that legalized the drug. “The move by Sessions on the Cole memo has really activated people who were not active before, both inside Congress and across the country,” Rohrabacker was quoted as saying by BuzzFeed News.

Last Tuesday, 54 lawmakers sent President Trump a letter asking him to honor his campaign promise to leave marijuana “up to the states” and override Sessions. A few weeks earlier, 69 lawmakers — including 15 Republicans — sent House leadership a letter urging them to adopt an amendment in the next annual spending bill.

marijuana160818The measure would prevent the Justice Department from using any funds to interfere with a state’s marijuana legalization scheme, similar to prior thereby staving off Sessions. There is precedent for this. Since December 2014’s passage of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act of 2015, Congress has effectively prohibited federal prosecution for medical marijuana sale and use that complies with state law by denying DOJ the right to spend any money to prosecute for conduct that complies with state law. Congress has the power to do the same for recreational marijuana laws, and courts have recognized that the spending ban prevents DOJ prosecution of people in those states.

Anything that drives a wedge between Congress and Sessions lessens the extent of the AG’s influence in keeping Congress from enacting sentencing reform (although it still leaves the President to mollify).

BuzzFeed, Jeff Sessions is making Congress mad with his pot policy, and it may backfire (Jan. 29, 2018)

United States v. McIntosh, 833 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2016)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small