Tag Archives: pekin

Inmate Vaccine Not In The Near Term? – LISA Newsletter for December 21, 2020

December 21, 2020 lisa-legalinfo Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

INMATES NO PRIORITY FOR VACCINE, ADVISORY PANEL RECOMMENDS

The Federal Bureau of Prisons received its first shipment of COVID-19 vaccines last Wednesday, and began administering the drug to its correctional officers and health care staffers. The agency said inmates will follow “when additional doses are available.”

And that’s not going to be anytime soon. Earlier this month, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices said health care workers and nursing home residents — about 24 million people — should be at the very front of the line for the vaccines. Sunday afternoon, the panel voted 13-1 that next in line should be people 75 and older, who number about 20 million, as well as certain front-line workers, who total about 30 million. Those essential workers include firefighters and police; teachers and school staff; those working in food, agricultural and manufacturing sectors; corrections workers; U.S. Postal Service employees; public transit workers; and grocery store workers.

The committee also voted that behind those groups should be people aged 65 to 74, numbering about 30 million; those aged 16 to 64 with certain medical conditions such as obesity and cancer, that are at higher risk if they get infected with COVID-19, numbering as many as 110 million; and a tier of other essential workers. This group of as many as 57 million includes a wide category of food service and utility workers but also those in legal and financial jobs and the media.

How about vaccine for inmates? The BOP told CBS last week that it is up to Operations Warp Speed to decide when inmates will receive the vaccine. CBS reported, however, that a spokesperson for Operation Warp Speed said the BOP would decide about the timeline.

The National Commission on Covid-19 and Criminal Justice last week recommended that inmates receive priority consideration for Covid-19 vaccines equal to that for police and correctional officers. That recommendation, however, appears to be one of many rejected by the Advisory Committee.

And yet… I received several inmate emails last week (and this is totally unconfirmed) that a handful of BOP inmates at two facilities received vaccine last week. The emails gave no indication of how the inmates were selected for the vaccine. One – from a Texas BOP facility written two days ago – said

well the good news and vibes ran out on the [institution] compound. we ran out of vaccines before we completed even one building. of course the fact that no one was planned to receive it inmate wise. what we did get is hopefully helpful. my building has about 40% done on the first dose.

Another inmate email, received early this morning, independently reported that some inmates at the same institution (“at least a couple hundred,” the report stated) received vaccine.

An inmate in a separate Texas facility reported Friday night:

I thought you’d be interested in reports that 100 inmates received their first dose of the vaccine today. Some of these are known personally to me, so I can confirm that they were sent to the clinic and given a shot. They were told that they would be called back to the clinic in 21 days for their second dose. Reportedly, all staff who wanted the vaccine have received their first dose.

One can reasonably infer from the emails that perhaps the vaccine being administered was left over after staff inoculations had been completed, and – having been thawed – had to be used within five days.

[Later note: An inmate from a North Carolina facility reported by email on Monday, December 21, that he had gotten the vaccine: “Once the staff here at the [institution] received their vaccinations if they chose, there were doses left over. Instead of letting those doses go to waste, the staff chose to offer them to some of the inmates based on their medical conditions. There were probably around 30 or so in my housing unit, including myself, that were offered the vaccine. Most of us chose to take it. I, myself, am thankful to the staff for making that decision and offering them to us and I felt that I needed to let you know that some of us are getting it.” ]

More than two dozen members of House of Representatives last Wednesday demanded details about how inmates will be vaccinated for COVID-19, questioning whether the most vulnerable prisoners will have priority access.

In a letter to BOP director Michael Carvajal and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention chief Dr. Robert Redfield, the 26 lawmakers, led by Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Virginia), wrote,

The BOP has provided informal information regarding the vaccine distribution plan. We are deeply concerned that the current plan places the most vulnerable incarcerated individuals who have a cancer diagnosis, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart conditions, compromised immune systems, sickle cell, diabetes, and individuals 65 years or older in priority level 3 behind incarcerated individuals in minimum security facilities who are in open bay housing and are currently listed in priority group 2. Incarcerated individuals with these types of medical conditions are at a high risk of complications if they contract COVID-19 as it spreads through federal prisons yet are slated to receive the vaccine after prison staffers in phase 1 and other incarcerated individuals listed in phase 2.

Despite reporting that over 1,500 inmates “recovered” from COVID-19 within just a few days of each other, the BOP still reported having 5,881 active inmate cases,1,694 sick staff, COVID in 126 BOP facilities and 180 dead inmates (up 13 in one week). The BOP has tested 62% of all inmates at least once, with the positivity rate continuing to ratchet up. As of last Friday, 36% of all inmate tests are positive for COVID.

Still, the trend apparently suggests that the latest BOP outbreak has peaked.

As of last Friday, Sandstone, Florence, Loretto and Pekin all reported over 200 inmate COVID-19 cases, another 12 facilities had more than 100 cases, and another 20 joints had 50 or more. Loretto had been written down from over 600 cases earlier in the week as inmates are declared to be recovered.

A cautionary note about those “recovered” inmates. Of the 13 inmates who died last week, two – a 64-year old man at FCI Victorville I and a 72-year old man at FCI Lompoc – had contracted COVID-19 months ago, and were considered “recovered” before getting much sicker and dying. In fact, the State of Michigan Dept of Health said last week that it is currently investigating 115 of “recovered” state inmates testing positive for COVID-19 three months after they were believed to be COVID-free.

New York Post, Federal prison workers to start getting vaccinated Wednesday (December 14, 2020)

Chicago Tribune, Federal panel says people over 75, essential workers should be next in line for COVID-19 vaccine as Moderna shots begin shipping out (December 20, 2020)

CBS News, Federal prisons to prioritize staffers for COVID-19 vaccine and give to inmates when more doses are available (December 18, 2020)

National Commission on Covid-19 and Criminal Justice, Experience to Action: Reshaping Criminal Justice After COVID-19 (December 14, 2020)

Letter to BOP from Rep. Robert C. Scott (D-Virginia) (December 15, 2020)

Reuters, U.S. lawmakers press prison authorities on inmate COVID-19 vaccination plans (December 16, 2020)

Detroit Free Press, State reviewing possible COVID-19 reinfections after 115 prisoners test positive twice (December 12, 2020)

– Thomas L. Root

Director Says BOP “Has A Sound Pandemic Plan In Place…” As COVID-19 Spirals Out of Control – Update for December 14, 2020

December 14, 2020 lisa-legalinfo Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

COURT ORDERS BOP TO HONOR SETTLEMENT, WHILE INMATE COVID CASES INCREASE 30% IN ONE WEEK

Ten days ago, the number of Bureau of Prisons inmate COVID-19 cases passed 5,000. That was a first… but it was nothing compared to last week.

As of last Friday, the BOP reported 7,278 ill inmates (a 30% from the week before),1,716 sick staff (up 9% from last week), COVID-19 in 127 BOP facilities and 167 dead inmates. The BOP has tested 58% of all inmates at least once, with the positivity rate continuing to ratchet up. As of last Friday, 34% of all inmate tests are positive for COVID.

Recall that on December 2, BOP Director Michael Carvajal told a House Subcommittee that the BOP’s COVID-19 “procedures have proven effective as this is evidenced by the steep decline in our inmate hospitalizations, inmates on ventilators and deaths.” Some feel differently.

Last Friday, a Connecticut U.S. District Court found that the BOP had violated its settlement agreement in a class action of 450 medically vulnerable prisoners brought last spring over COVID-19 conditions at FCI Danbury. The unhappy judge ordered the BOP to release 17 medically vulnerable inmates by 5 p.m. the next day (a Saturday), prohibited the BOP from relying on administrative roadblocks to delay the release of those granted home confinement, and directed the BOP to report to the plaintiffs’ attorneys whenever the agency expects to fail to release inmates granted CARES Act home confinement within 14 days of grant.

The court order followed a long hearing the day before, where the court heard about a new Danbury COVID-19 outbreak and the BOP’s corresponding failure to mitigate the spread of the disease. In one week, the number of Danbury COVID-19 cases went from zero to nearly 50. The plaintiffs said despite the BOP’s promise to check daily for symptoms for the duration of the pandemic, the BOP failed to follow this pledge for two weeks during a surge of the disease around the country.

A July settlement of the lawsuit required the BOP to promptly identify prisoners who are low security risks and have a greater chance of developing serious complications from the virus and release them to home confinement. The settlement called for prisoners to be released within 14 days of being approved. But the plaintiffs’ lawyers say some of them have been waiting nearly three months to be released after being approved for home confinement.

The BOP cited several reasons for the delays in releasing the inmates, including required 14-day quarantines due to the virus and BOP guidelines in releasing inmates to the community. The Court was not impressed.

Meanwhile, in Minnesota, the ACLU last week filed suit alleging the BOP’s FCI Waseca has “failed to respond in any meaningful way to the pandemic.” The ACLU says the prison did not release medically vulnerable people from the prison, where two out of three inmates contracted COVID-19, making social distancing impossible.

New Jersey congressional leaders last week renewed their call to end inmate transfers to FCI Fort Dix. Led by Senators Robert Menendez and Cory Booker (both D-New Jersey), the state’s congressional delegation sent a second letter to BOP Director Carvajal week calling for the end of inmate transfers and asking the BOP to outline its plan for allocating and administering the COVID vaccine.

The BOP had previously instituted a moratorium on all inmate transfers to Ft Dix through Nov. 23 as active cases hit 300. The lawmakers and BOP staff have pointed to the October transfer of inmates from FCI Elkton to Ft Dix as the cause of the outbreak. BOP officials have denied the accusation. The moratorium was not extended, the BOP said last week, despite a previous letter from the state’s lawmakers demanding the moratorium continue until there are no active cases at the prison.

“By resuming transfers of incarcerated individuals into and out of the facility in the midst of a severe outbreak, BOP is putting at risk the lives of both staff and incarcerated individuals,” the lawmakers wrote in the letter.

The BOP is seeing a resurgence of COVID at institutions where it had previously been controlled. The virus is again at FCC Lompoc, site of one of the worst prison COVID outbreaks in the country, according to the Santa Barbara Independent. An investigation last summer by the Dept. of Justice Inspector General found that the BOP’s initial response to COVID “failed on a number of fronts and likely contributed to the severity of the outbreak, including staffing shortages, inadequate screenings, and a scarcity of protective equipment.”

As of Friday, Englewood and Loretto each have more than 600 sick inmates, Texarkana and Pekin more than 300 each, five more facilities with more than 200, and 12 more BOP institutions with over 100 active COVID cases.

When a local newspaper asked the BOP about Loretto, a spokesman said the prisons are following accepted guidelines. While declining to address the Loretto situation “due to privacy, safety and security reasons,” the spokesman told the paper, “we can tell you all institutions have areas set aside for quarantine and medical isolation.”

Meanwhile, The New York Times last week criticized the BOP for its management of COVID at FDC Brooklyn. Noting that 55 inmates had tested positive for COVID-19, The Times said, “many months into this pandemic, the Federal Defenders of New York, a legal advocacy group, said officials at the jail aren’t following basic public health guidelines to prevent the spread of the virus, to care for sick inmates or to protect those who are most vulnerable. The reports… are disturbing. Corrections officers, they say, aren’t properly wearing masks, including while interacting with inmates. Sick inmates aren’t receiving proper medical attention and are being placed in cells with healthy individuals. One person incarcerated at the facility told an attorney with the Federal Defenders that severely ill inmates who asked for medical attention didn’t get it.”

A BOP spokesman disputed the Defenders’ claims. Nevertheless, the Times said, “if the conditions are anything like what the Federal Defenders describe, they are an affront to human dignity and a threat to the public health of Americans in and out of the Brooklyn facility.”

And here’s an interesting glimpse at the BOP’s record-keeping, a factoid that could suggest to reasonable people that the BOP’s numbers cannot necessarily be trusted. A Youngstown, Ohio, news website, reporting on Columbiana County, Ohio, COVID numbers, was trying to derive a number of people recovered from the virus. It noted that FCI Elkton – located in the county – reported “896 incarcerated people and 54 employees had recovered from COVID-19 as of today… That number has declined in recent weeks, suggesting the bureau removes cases from its total when people are transferred out of the prison.”