Tag Archives: pardon

Presidential Pardon Gobbled Up, But Not By Inmates – Update for December 5, 2019

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

TURKEY (BUT NO PRISONERS) PARDONED

Predictably, President Trump pardoned a North Carolina turkey named Butter last week, but that was the extent of his Thanksgiving week clemency.

presidential_pardon_thanksgiving_tile_coasterNevertheless, the Washington Examiner reported that many people with long federal sentences told it they hope Trump will make good on pledges to free inmates. Trump publicly asked three former prisoners last month for “a big list” of people to release. He said he was enduring his own injustice with impeachment proceedings.

“Give me the right ones… and as soon as you can, OK?” Trump said. “Because you know some great people that are going to be there for many, many years.”

“In November 2017, I wished I was Drumstick or Wishbone. Then in 2018 I wished I was Peas or Carrots,” said Alecia Weeks, a 42-year-old mother almost halfway through a 30-year sentence for dealing crack cocaine. Weeks said, “So far, the answer is, ‘Maybe, if I were a turkey.’ So, this year, I’m begging [Trump], ‘Gobble Gobble, please have mercy on me and my son! We will be forever grateful and make you proud.’”

Clemency advocates see Trump’s embrace as motivated in part by his own sense of persecution, beginning with special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation. But some note that the issue, pushed by his son-in-law Jared Kushner, has potential electoral significance, winning the enthusiasm of minority voters, some of whom now openly sympathize with Trump.

“President Trump is making ‘AMERICA GREAT AGAIN,’ and his message has reached so many of us inside prisons where I have been the past 31 years as a first offender,” wrote another prisoner, who was sentenced to 40 years for dealing crack. “It would be a great honor to personally thank President Trump if I were one of the chosen few to receive the same mercy as the two lucky turkeys that are guaranteed free range every year for the balance of their lives.”

Prosecutors find out how the other half lives...
Prosecutors find out how the other half lives…

Meanwhile, a number of prosecutors – who send people to prison every day but have never set foot inside an institution – are joining an initiative signed by about 40 of the nation’s most progressive district attorneys. The prosecutors are committing to visit prisons themselves, to send their staffs to do the same, and to incorporate such visits into mandatory training and job expectations.

Miriam Krinsky, executive director of the group Fair and Just Prosecution (FJP), that heads up the effort, said prosecutors have a special obligation to see the correctional system since they control the “front door” to the justice system. She hopes such visits broaden prosecutors’ perspectives and inform decisions on sentencing, bail and alternatives to incarceration. “No prosecutor should be putting people in places they haven’t seen or walked through,” Krinsky said.
Prosecutors signing on to the initiative include several state attorneys general and a number of local prosecutors. Thus far, no federal prosecutors have signed on.

Washington Post, The annual turkey pardon is one of the few norms President Trump has kept alive (Nov. 26)

Washington Examiner, ‘Maybe if I were a turkey’: Prisoners beg Trump to pardon them for Thanksgiving (Nov. 26)

Washington Post, They send people to prison every day. Now, they are pledging to visit (Nov. 25)

– Thomas L. Root

The Prisoners Envy The Turkeys… – Update for November 26, 2019

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

PARDONS, COMMUTATIONS, SENTENCE REDUCTIONS…

At some point in the next 48 hours, President Trump will likely pardon a pair of turkeys. The turkeys will be given silly names (past recipients have included birds named Mac and Cheese), some children and White House staffers will look on, and there will be forced jokes and stiff laughter.

turkey181128“It’s painful to watch,” Minnesota law professor Mark Osler wrote in the Washington Post last week. “Worse, it mocks the raw truth that the federal clemency system is completely broken. While those two turkeys receive their pardons, nearly 14,000 clemency petitions sit in a sludgy backlog. Many of the federal inmates who have followed the rules, assembled documents, poured out their hearts in petitions and worked hours at a prison job just to pay for the stamps on the envelope have waited for years in that queue.”

Osler and the students in his law school clinic have helped people file clemency petitions for almost a decade. “Many of them are well-deserving,” Osler wrote. “It was rewarding to tell their stories of rehabilitation and hope… [But now,] most of my mail is from people who have already filed a petition. They want to know what is happening, and what else they can do. Too many of them have unrealistic plans — often, and very specifically, the plan is that Kim Kardashian West will help them. Or, as one man put it ‘I’ll take any Kardashian.’ It is true that Kardashian West advocated for Alice Marie Johnson, and that Johnson did get clemency from President Trump. But that is a sample size of precisely one, while thousands wait.”

Meanwhile, a government pleading in a compassionate release motion filed under 18 USC 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) last week provided an object lesson for people seeking to get a sentence cut or home confinement because of illness. Federal prosecutors argued that a claim of dementia filed by Bernie Ebbers, former CEO of Worldcom, was bogus.

The government argued that the 78-year-old Ebbers may not be in as bad shape as indicated in his own filings, citing a note from a prison psychologist who listened in on phone calls between the inmate and his daughter in recent weeks. The daughter has claimed in an affidavit that her father has dementia.

fake191126

“In the calls, he was alert, aware and oriented to person, place, time and situation,” a Bureau of Prisons psychologist is quoted as saying, adding that the inmate was asking about his daughter’s efforts to get him out of prison. The psychologist notes that the inmate has presented a much different persona when he knows he is being observed. “The conversations between him and his daughter were very different than how he presented to this writer during our last encounter on 10/11/19 when he presented to this writer as though he didn’t know he was in a prison nor the date and time,” the psychologist writes.

Remember inmates, the BOP knows more about you than you may think. And what the BOP knows, the government knows, which means the U.S. Attorney knows it too. Rather tautological, but very true.

Many inmates eligible for serving the last one-third of their sentences under the Elderly Home Detention Offender program have complained that their case managers will not even submit an application for them to be a part of the program until they qualify by reaching the two-thirds mark of their sentences. Approval may take six months, meaning that an elderly offender may well miss much of the time he or she could be on home confinement, and the BOP continues to spend $100 a day to house someone who could be confined at home on his or her own dime.

Last week, a reliable inmate correspondent reported that his case manager  said BOP Central Office had issued “new guidance” that Elderly Offender Home Detention packages should be prepared and submitted six months prior to the inmate’s eligibility for the program (age 60 and two-thirds of total sentence completed). This way, he reported his case manager reported, everything will be in place so that the prisoner can leave for home detention on his or her earliest eligibility date.

I have not been able to confirm the report through the BOP yet.

Osler, Let’s Pardon Prisoners, Not Turkeys, Washington Post (Nov. 21)

CNBC, NY prosecutors suggest former WorldCom CEO is faking illness to get out of jail (Nov. 19)

– Thomas L. Root

Petition Your Way to Clemency – Update for August 30, 2019

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

ANOTHER ROUTE TO CLEMENCY (BUT NOT AN EASY ONE)

ulbricht190830Ross Ulbricht (known as “Dread Pirate Roberts” to his friends, or sometimes just “DPR” for short) is serving a life term at the sunny U.S. Penitentiary in Tucson for having set up an Internet dark-web marketplace called “Silk Road,” where drugs, guns and criminal acts were bought and sold for bitcoins. As of this week, his change.org petition seeking support for a request for a Presidential pardon has generated an unprecedented 200,000 online signatures.

The petition, which asks President Trump to grant Ross’s application for pardon, is sponsored by the inmate’s mother and sister. His mother told Bitcoinist.com, that her son “is a good person, an idealist, and a libertarian.” She said, “I didn’t think of him as someone who was interested in technology pers se, but he was interested in Bitcoin because he was a freedom guy. He worked on the Ron Paul [Presidential] campaign. He was very interested in Bitcoin as a means to monetary freedom for people.”

Whether 201,403 signatures (the count as of 8 am EDT today), including those of some from politicians and movie celebs, is enough to motivate President Trump to release DPR, a man convicted of drug trafficking on a massive scale, is impossible to predict.

dreadedpirate190830The change.org page, written by Ross’s mother, says, “My son, Ross Ulbricht, is a first-time offender serving a double life sentence without parole, plus 40 years, for a website he made when he was 26 years old and passionate about free markets and privacy. Ross―an Eagle Scout, scientist and peaceful entrepreneur―had all non-violent charges at trial. He was never prosecuted for causing harm or bodily injury and no victim was named at trial.”

Far be it from me to interfere with a mother’s loving narrative, but the facts in the Dread Pirate’s case were a bit uglier than that. The 2nd Circuit said in its decision denying Ross’s appeal:

[T]he facts of this case involve much more than simply facilitating the sale of narcotics. The district court found by a preponderance of the evidence that Ulbricht commissioned at least five murders in the course of protecting Silk Road’s anonymity, a finding that Ulbricht does not challenge in this appeal. Ulbricht discussed those anticipated murders callously and casually in his journal and in his communications with the purported assassin Redandwhite. For example, in connection with the first hit, he wrote to Redandwhite that “FriendlyChemist is a liability and I wouldn’t mind if he was executed.” In the course of negotiating the price for the killing, DPR claimed that “[n]ot long ago, I had a clean hit done for $80k,” but that he had “only ever commissioned the one other hit, so I’m still learning this market.” He then paid $150,000 in Bitcoins for the murder, and he received what purported to be photographic documentation if its completion. Ulbricht then wrote in his journal that he “[g]ot word that the blackmailer was executed,” before returning quickly to other tasks associated with running the site.

In negotiating the other four killings, Ulbricht initially resisted multiple murders. He instructed Redandwhite to “just hit Andrew [usernames Tony76 and nipplesuckcanuck] and leave it at that.” Redandwhite said he could do it for “150 just like last time,” but that he would not be able to recover any of DPR’s money if he killed only one person because he would have to commit the murder outside of the victim’s home or office where he stored his funds. Id. If Ulbricht wanted him to recover money, the self-professed assassin claimed, he would have to kill not only Tony76, but also his three associates. DPR responded that he would “defer to [Redandwhite’s] better judgment and hope[d] [to] recover some assets” from the hit. He then sent $500,000 in Bitcoins, the agreed-upon price for four killings, to Redandwhite. As the district court stated in discussing Ulbricht’s journal entries concerning these projected murders, his words are “the words of a man who is callous as to the consequences or the harm and suffering that [his actions] may cause others.”

The record was more than sufficient to support the district court’s reliance on those attempted murders in sentencing Ulbricht to life in prison.

don190830Under current interpretation, a mere solicitation to commit murder is not a crime of violence under United States v. Davis, but we would be hard-pressed to call Ross a “peaceful entrepreneur.” Our local herbal tea lady is a peaceful entrepreneur, unless she has ordered a hit on the Starbucks across the street.

Still, we’ll see what effect 200,000 online signatures have on President Donald Trump. Unless it’s reported on “Fox and Friends,” we suspect not much.

Bitcoinist.com, Petition for Clemency for Silk Road Founder Nears 200k Signatures (Aug. 19)

change.org, Clemency for Ross Ulbricht, Serving Double Life for a Website

United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 131 (2nd Cir. 2017)

United States v. Davis, — U.S. —, 139 S. Ct. 2319, 204 L.Ed.2d 757 (June 24, 2019)

– Thomas L. Root

Clemency in Dibs and Drabs – Update for August 6, 2019

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

TRUMP GRANTS CLEMENCY TO A FEW MORE… TOO FEW MORE

President Trump last week commuted two sentences and granted pardons to five others who previously pleaded guilty to nonviolent crimes but have completed their sentences.

obtaining-clemencyTrump commuted the sentence of Ronen Nahmani, who was serving a 20-year sentence for conspiracy to distribute the synthetic drug “spice.” The White House said Ronen had no prior criminal history and has five young children at home, the oldest is 13 years old, and a wife battling terminal cancer. Trump noted his case for an early release received bipartisan support from legislators.

Trump also commuted the sentence of Ted Suhl, an Arkansas man convicted in 2016 on four counts of bribery after prosecutors said he took part in a scheme to increase Medicaid payments to his faith-based behavioral health-care center for juveniles company. Suhl lost at the 8th Circuit, and was preparing to file in the Supreme Court. The White House noted his “spotless disciplinary record” over three years in prison and highlighted support for the commutation from former Gov. Mike Huckabee and former U.S. Attorney Bud Cummins.

Trump pardoned five other people who had already served their sentences, for offenses ranging from transferred government property illegally to transporting marijuana, to running an illegal gambling parlor in 1987 and stealing guns from luggage.

With Monday’s announcements, Trump has now pardoned or reduced the sentences of 19 individuals since taking office. Ohio State University law professor Douglas Berman noted in his Sentencing Law and Policy blog last Wednesday that with over 177,000 people in federal prison, “six commutations is, by all sensible measures, a very small number. The granting of only six commutations seems especially disappointing given that last year Prez Trump was talking about considering clemency requests that including “3,000 names, many of those names have been treated unfairly, … [and] in some cases, their sentences are far too long.”

clemency170206Trump’s six clemency grants in his first term beats the first term records of every president since Reagan. The record is still held by Nixon, who granted 48 clemencies in his first term. Berman noted “that so very few federal prisoners have recently received clemency while the federal prison population has swelled makes these numbers even more depressing. The also look terrible if we look back further historically, as almost every other 20th Century US President (except for Dwight Eisenhower) granted a hundred or more commutations while in office (with Woodrow Wilson granting 341 in 1920 alone).”

The Hill, Trump announces seven pardons or commutations (July 29)

Wall Street Journal, Trump Commutes Prison Sentences in Medicaid Bribery, Drug Cases (July 29)

Sentencing Law and Policy, A (depressing) first-term scorecard for recent presidents (July 30)

– Thomas L. Root

Will President Circumvent DOJ With White House Pardon Attorney? – Update for June 13, 2019

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

RUMOR FLOATED THAT TRUMP WILL APPOINT HIS OWN NON-DOJ PARDON ATTORNEY

The Washington Examiner reported last week that “worried clemency advocates are urging President Trump to select his own pardon attorney as the Justice Department reviews a stack of resumes collected on short notice” to fill its own Pardon Attorney slot.

pardonme190123There hasn’t been a politically appointed Pardon Attorney in over 40 years, but advocates say it could enhance the position’s stature and ensuring that Trump’s interest in giving second chances extends beyond isolated cases. “I think it makes a lot of sense to have the pardon attorney job be a political one,” said Margaret Love, U.S. pardon attorney from 1990 to 1997.

The job posting was open for just a month, closing May 10, suggesting that DOJ may already have a candidate in mind, probably another career prosecutor. “I wonder if they are going to make Trump aware of [the search]. Shouldn’t the president have some say over who his pardon attorney is?” said Sam Morison, who worked for 13 years as a staff attorney in the DOJ’s Office of the Pardon Attorney. “If they are just going to the U.S. attorneys’ offices, they are going to get someone who’s a company man, and that’s the idea,” he said.

Rosalind Sargent-Burns, a long-time Office of the Pardon Attorney staffer, was named acting Pardon Attorney on May 28. She has never been a line prosecutor, to her credit, and has held various  positions in the OPA over the past decade, including Designated Agency Ethics Officer, Team Lead, Senior Attorney Advisor over the pardon portfolio, Acting Deputy Pardon Attorney, and Deputy Pardon Attorney.

yesman190613Morison wants Trump to pick his own pardon attorney and move the office into the White House, citing institutional weight against clemency in cases DOJ itself prosecuted. He is hopeful based on President Trump’s public remarks, including that there are “a lot of people” in prison for “no reason.” “Trump gets a lot of criticism, but I think it’s refreshing for him to admit something everyone knows to be truth: The Justice Department is not perfect, and prosecutions are not perfect. Most presidents aren’t actually willing to acknowledge that,” Morison said. “I think Trump does not trust DOJ, and in this particular instance he’s probably correct.”

Heritage Foundation scholar Paul Larkin, who wants Trump to create a White House Office of Executive Clemency, participated in a private group discussion on clemency reform two months ago. CAN-DO founder Amy Povah also wants the pardon attorney separated from DOJ. “We are relying on President Trump to finally be the hero we’ve been waiting for because he is an outsider who doesn’t worry about shaking up the status quo,” she said.

Trump has now fallen behind President Obama on clemency, having granted only 12 people pardons or commutations, nearly all at the urging of politicians or celebrities. At this point in his presidency, Obama had granted clemency to 17 people.

Washington Examiner, Trump urged to pick his own pardon attorney (June 6)

– Thomas L. Root

Time to Restart the Clemency Machine? – Update for January 23, 2019

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

A RENEWED CRY FOR CLEMENCY

pardonme190123Focus on the First Step Act over the past six months has left President Trump’s push to reform clemency in the dark. Last week, however, The Atlantic published a proposal written by three prominent clemency advocates to revamp the process.

The two clemency processes now in use, law professors Mark Osler and Rachel Barkow, and Koch Industries general counsel Mark Holder argued, are the formal Dept. of Justice Pardon Attorney process and Trump’s much more informal celebrity-studded personal recommendation process.

Trump’s is informal: The president evaluates individual cases based on personal recommendations. The problem with the President’s system, the authors complain, is that it does not scale. Instead, it is a one-celebrated-case-at-a-time celebrity-driven approach, in which people with access to Trump lobby him in the Oval Office until he signs off.

But the DOJ process, the article contends, “isn’t any better. It courses through seven levels of review, much of it through a hostile… bureaucracy that tends to defer to local prosecutors who are, in turn, loath to undo the harsh sentences they sought in the first place. Indeed,” the authors observe, “the First Step Act passed in spite of DOJ opposition because those same prosecutors objected to lowering the mandatory minimum sentences that give them so much bargaining power.”

The articles cites some states as having better systems, including Arkansas, Connecticut, Georgia, and South Carolina. In those systems, an expert board – with people from criminal justice, social work, and psychology backgrounds, former judges, defense lawyers, prosecutors, and community activists – identify and evaluate clemency candidates.

obtaining-clemencyThe authors suggest that the President create a similar board of bipartisan clemency advisers who would work with a professional staff to identify cases for White House action. In 1975, President Gerald Ford impaneled an 18-member clemency board to help him with pardon requests from applicants charged with crimes related to avoiding the draft during the Vietnam War. That board was diverse and bipartisan, and ultimately recommended more than 13,000 pardons.

Trump convened a conference on revamp the clemency last summer, but nothing has come of it so far.

The Atlantic, The Clemency Process Is Broken. Trump Can Fix It (Jan. 15)

– Thomas L. Root

Time for the Turkey to Pardon People? – Update for November 28, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

TURKEYS PARDONED, NOW HOW ABOUT PEOPLE?

turkey181128President Trump “pardoned” two turkeys at the annual White House ceremony held last week, but told reporters afterwards that he hadn’t considered  giving any people clemency for Thanksgiving.

Speaking to reporters, Trump side-stepped a question about whether he would issue holiday pardons. “I love the pardons for the turkey,” Trump said. Asked if he would pardon any people, Trump said: “I haven’t thought of it — it’s not a bad thing.”

Behind bars, Trump has generated enormous hope for presidential clemency. Two weeks ago, he endorsed the FIRST STEP Act, after saying in October that “a lot of people” are jailed for “no reason” and that he was “actively looking” for inmates to release.

There are signs that the White House and the Dept. of Justice Office of Pardon Attorney are processing commutation requests from prisoners and pardon requests from already released inmates, making clemency advocates hopeful for near-term reprieves. Trump already has been more generous than recent predecessors early in his first term, issuing nine pardons and prison commutations. He hasn’t given any clemency grants in four months, however, in an apparent pause for the midterm elections.

Last week, New York University law professor and former federal prosecutor Mark Osler wrote that “the process used to choose which turkey might be pardoned is far more rational, efficient and effective than the one used to evaluate clemency for humans.

obtaining-clemencyFirst, he said, the pardons occur regularly, every year, not just in the last days of an administration. Second, decisions are made by objective specialists with the current chairman of the National Turkey Federation responsible for managing a thorough selection process. Third, there are defined criteria. The finalists are selected based on their willingness to be handled, their health and their natural good looks. Fourth, attention is paid to making sure they thrive after their grant of clemency. After the ceremony, they are sent to Virginia Tech’s “Gobbler’s Rest” exhibit, where they are well cared for.

By contrast, Osler said, the clemency process “is irregular, run largely by biased generalists, devoid of consistent, meaningful criteria, and it does little to ensure success of individuals after their release.”

Osler said the DOJ Pardon Attorney is part of the problem. The DOJ, “after all, is the entity that prosecutes these individuals in the first place. Within that office, staff members evaluate cases and provide a report to the pardon attorney, who decides on a recommendation after seeking out the opinion of the very US attorney’s office that prosecuted the case.

But then, instead of going to the President, the Pardon Attorney’s recommendation is routed to an aide to the deputy attorney general, who makes a recommendation to the DAG, the same DAG who is “the direct supervisor of and closely allied with the United States attorneys in the field, whose offices chose to pursue the challenged convictions and sentences in the first place.”

If the recommendation has survived this far, it goes to the White House, where some assistant to the White House counsel evaluates it and makes yet another recommendation to the boss. And, of course, that boss, who has many other duties, also has a conflict: “this time, the tendency to protect the President from risk, something that is inherent in any use of the pardon power.”

presidential_pardon_thanksgiving_tile_coasterWhat’s missing, Osler argued, is “all the things that make the turkey process work. It’s irregular, as inattention by any one of the numerous sequential evaluators stops the whole thing. And instead of objective specialists, we have decisions being made by the deputy attorney general, who is neither objective nor a specialist. The criteria are poorly articulated and currently issued by the stiflingly conflicted DOJ. And finally, there is little to no connection between the process and what comes after, as prison gives way to freedom.”

Osler suggested that the process be taken from DOJ altogether and be given to an independent clemency board, as most states do. “If we did that,” Osler claimed, “the clemency process would finally be at least as functional as the one that informs a silly holiday tradition.”

Washington Examiner, Trump pardons turkeys, says he hasn’t considered human clemency for Thanksgiving (Nov. 20, 2018)

CNN, The process to pardon turkeys is more rational than the one used for humans (Nov. 19, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

After Making the Mess, Trump Tries to Clean It Up – Update for September 19, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small

WHITE HOUSE TRYING TO BRING ORDER TO CHAOTIC CLEMENCY PROCESS

Since President Trump granted executive clemency to former federal inmate Alice Johnson, thousands of federal inmates have been trying to get their clemency petitions in front of President Trump through celebrities, sports figures, elected officials and raw appeals to his better nature.

chaos180920After the Johnson pardon, Trump himself put out a sort of cattle call for clemency applications – even inviting professional football players to send him names rather than protest the criminal justice system by kneeling during the national anthem. But, with the White House meeting two weeks ago, the White House has started an attempt to instill some discipline to the process as part of what Trump reportedly hopes will become a signature piece of his efforts at criminal justice reform.

“We were very critical of the process as it stands,” said attendee Brittany Barnett, a Dallas lawyer who heads pro-clemency Buried Alive Project. “We definitely can’t keep doing these one-offs and it can’t just be celebrity endorsements.”

Law professors Rachel Barkow and Mark Osler told the meeting the president should abolish the Dept. of Justice Office of the Pardon Attorney. Obama relied on that office to process more than 20,000 applications through his clemency initiative, ultimately cutting sentences for 1,715 people but leaving town with a record 11,355 petitions pending.

Clemency experts say bureaucracy and poor planning stifled the program’s ability to free many more. Out of 13,000 people denied between 2014 and 2017, thousands appeared to be worthy candidates—at least on paper, according to a 2017 analysis by the U.S. Sentencing Commission.

The independent analysis found that more than 2,500 of the inmates who were denied appeared to meet all of the guidelines for the types of cases the DOJ claimed to prioritize. The guidelines were supposed to prioritize nonviolent, low-level offenders who served at least ten years in prison, did not have significant criminal history, demonstrated good conduct in prison, and had no history of violence.

slot161208But in fact, the Commission found, only 3% of drug offenders who appeared to meet all of the DOJ’s criteria actually received clemency. Conversely, only 5%of the people who did receive clemency appeared to meet all of the criteria. Without much transparency in the review process, several critics now compare it to a “lottery system.”

DOJ control of the clemency process comes with a built-in conflict of interest: The same officials who prosecute offenders decide whether those same people are worthy of presidential mercy. Justice “shouldn’t be the gatekeeper because that means the gate never opens for far too many deserving people,” Barkow said.

USA Today, Kardashian effect: Trump White House tries to tame a chaotic, celebrity-driven approach to pardons (Sept. 10, 2018)

Cannabis Wire, The Prisoners Left Behind (Sept. 7, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Not “What You Are,” But Rather “Who You Know” – Update for July 16, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small

‘A CELEBRITY GAME SHOW APPROACH’ TO CLEMENCY

President Trump beat feet out of Washington for Europe last Tuesday after nominating a new Supreme Court justice, pausing only long enough to pardon Dwight and Steven Hammond, the father-son Oregon ranchers convicted of arson after brush-clearing fires they set on their land burned a few acres of a federal wildlife preserve.

gameshow180716The ranchers, either notorious right-wing whack-jobs or afflicted small-businessmen (depending on your worldview), had already made enemies of the Federal Bureau of Land Management over cattle grazing issues. They got mandatory 5-year sentences, after prior shorter sentenced meted out by a Federal judge who thought the five-year bits “grossly disproportionate to the severity of the Hammonds’ offenses.” The U.S. Attorney, of course, appealed, and the 9th Circuit demanded the judge impose the mandatory minimums. The Hammonds’ case inspired a 40-day armed occupation of a federal wildlife refuge in 2016 protesting federal land ownership.

The Hammonds’ pardon raise the number of Trump clemency grants to nine, including Sheriff Joe Arpaio, deceased boxer Jack Johnson (supported by Sly Stallone), and Alice Johnson, whose commutation of a life sentence for drugs was championed by Kim Kardashian.

Last Thursday, The New York Times noted that

few constitutional powers lie so wholly at the whims of the president as the power to pardon. No details need to be worked out beforehand and no agency apparatus is needed to carry a pardon out. The president declares a person officially forgiven, and it is so. A layer of government lawyers has long worked behind the scenes, screening the hundreds of petitions each year, giving the process the appearance of objectivity and rigor. But technically — legally — this is unnecessary. A celebrity game show approach to mercy, doling the favor out to those with political allegiance or access to fame, is fully within the law.

Clemency seekers have been watching all of this. Having once put their hopes in the opaque Dept. of Justice pardon/commutation bureaucracy, the Times says, supplicants are now approaching their shot at absolution as if marketing a hot start-up: scanning their network of acquaintances for influence and gauging degrees of separation from celebrity. What’s the best way to get a letter to someone close to Trump?

clemencypitch180716Clemency petitions go through the DOJ Office of Pardon Attorney, a system set up more than a hundred years ago to lessen the risks and hassles of leaving an entire nation’s pleas for compassion to one person. For decades, the process worked smoothly, and hundreds of clemency grants were issued each year. President Dwight D. Eisenhower alone granted over 1,000 pardons.

But starting about 40 years ago, “the prosecutors really got a hold of the process,” said Margaret Colgate Love, Pardon Attorney from 1990 to 1997. “They became increasingly hostile to the pardon power.” And as laws have grown harsher, the number of pardons has dwindled significantly. “It is so secretive and the standards are so subjective,” Ms. Love said. “They operate like a lottery. Except a lottery is fair.”

It is not all bad that Trump’s new system is going around DOJ. But for those without a famous sponsor, it is still as daunting as ever.

The Hill, Trump pardons Oregon ranchers at center of 40-day standoff (July 10, 2018)

The New York Times, Pardon Seekers Have a New Strategy in the Trump Era: ‘It’s Who You Know’ (July 12, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Skepticism About Trump’s Clemency Plans – Update for July 11, 2018

Leave a comment

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small

PARDON US FOR BEING CYNICS ABOUT PARDONS

imageOn Tuesday, in between nominating a new Supreme Court justice and beating feet for Europe to browbeat our NATO allies, President Trump delivered another drive-by pardon, this time absolving notorious right-wing terrorists/innocent rancher-patriots (we’ll let you pick the descriptor that most closely matches your political persuasions) Dwight and Steven Hammond. The Hammonds were doing a mandatory five years for arson on federal land, because vegetation-control fires the set on their own land spread to a wildlife preserve.

We only care about such pardons for what they may tell us about Trump’s clemency policy. Last Wednesday, while everyone was enjoying their July 4th picnics and fireworks, Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman (who writes the authoritative Sentencing Law and Policy blog), reflected on that policy, and expressed the thought that many in criminal justice reform have been quietly fretting over: was President Trump’s love affair with his pardon power a one-night stand?

pardon160321Berman wrote, “It is now been nearly a month since Prez Donald Trump commuted the life sentence of Alice Johnson at the behest of Kim Kardashian West. Immediately thereafter, there were reports of “a growing list of potential pardons or commutations under consideration by President Donald Trump” and Prez Trump himself said: “We have 3,000 names.  We’re looking at them.  Of the 3,000 names, many of those names have been treated unfairly.”  A week later it was reported Prez Trump will be “pardoning a lot of people — pardons that even Obama wouldn’t do” and reported that Mrs. West had “assembled a large legal team and was pursuing clemency for several other nonviolent offenders.” 

Berman admitted that he has been “more than a bit worried that all the buzz about all sorts of clemency action may be a lot of talk that may not be followed by a lot of action.”

It is not for lack of candidates. The Intercept last week reported that “an estimated 3,278 people are serving life without parole for a nonviolent offense… Although the Obama administration freed record numbers of nonviolent drug offenders, experts have pointed out that the pardon process was arbitrary and opaque.”

It is little wonder. The Dept. of Justice, which after all exists to lock people up, has an Office of Pardon Attorney that was too understaffed and inefficient to manage all of the clemency applications submitted during the waning days of the Obama era. “As we saw in previous administrations, the clemency process is entrenched in unnecessary bureaucracy,” Jessica Sloan, national director of the bipartisan criminal justice reform group #cut50, told The Intercept.

clemencyjack161229Critics, including Margaret Colgate Love, who was DOJ Pardon Attorney under Bush I and Clinton, argue the pardon process should be taken away from DOJ. “Rather than seeing presidential pardons as a way to recognize the redemptive power of the justice system, federal prosecutors have often regarded pardons with suspicion — as antithetical and even threatening to what they do,” Love wrote in The Washington Post. “This shortsighted and parochial attitude has ill-served three successive presidents and resulted in an administrative system that is inefficient, arbitrary and unfair.”

Berman, however, is a cautious optimist. He concluded his July 4th post with the observation, “I am not yet going to get cynical about Prez Trump’s clemency chatter because I am eager to hold out hope that he might have a desire to best Prez Obama’s record-setting clemency numbers. But, as regular readers know, I am ever eager to criticize leaders who “talk the talk” but then fail to ‘walk the walk’.”

Sentencing Law and Policy, Hey Prez Trump, how about honoring Independence Day by using your clemency power to give some more Americans more liberty? (July 4, 2018)

The Intercept, Can Trump Succeed Where Obama Failed — Offering Clemency for Nonviolent Offenders? (July 2, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small