Tag Archives: sessions

Mr. Sessions, “Depart Immediately Out of This Place…” – Update for July 22, 2020

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

JEFF, WE HARDLY KNEW YE (NOR DID WE WANT TO)…
Not even Alabama wants you anymore, Jefferson...
        Not even Alabama wants you anymore, Jefferson…

Little-noted but good political news last week: former Senator and Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, one of the principal roadblocks to any meaningful sentence reform (think of him as the guy who kept the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 from being retroactive back when it passed), lost his bid to be nominated as Republican candidate for senator from Alabama in a primary battle with former Alabama football coach Tommy Tuberville.

I’m no Alabama fan (and I was never much for Nick Saban), and I suspect Tuberville is a tyro and Presidential sycophant, but I nonetheless cheer his electoral win. For Mr. Sessions, I recall Oliver Cromwell’s dismissal of the Rump Parliament:

It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, which you have dishonored by your contempt of all virtue, and defiled by your practice of every vice.

Ye are a factious crew, and enemies to all good government.

Ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money.

Is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you? Is there one vice you do not possess?

Ye have no more religion than my horse. Gold is your God. Which of you have not bartered your conscience for bribes? Is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth?

Ye sordid prostitutes have you not defiled this sacred place, and turned the Lord’s temple into a den of thieves, by your immoral principles and wicked practices?

Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation. You were deputed here by the people to get grievances redressed, are yourselves become the greatest grievance.

Your country therefore calls upon me to cleanse this Augean stable, by putting a final period to your iniquitous proceedings in this House; and which by God’s help, and the strength he has given me, I am now come to do.

I command ye therefore, upon the peril of your lives, to depart immediately out of this place.

Go, get you out! Make haste! Ye venal slaves be gone! So! Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors.

In the name of God, go!

In Alabama, the Republican candidate is in all likelihood the November winner.

sessionsquote170522

I admit that I have written Sessions’ political epitaph before.  As a Senator, he was a pimple on the ass of criminal justice reform. As an Attorney General, he was a boil. But at last, he is gone.

If current polls hold, the Democrats will sweep the presidency, keep the House and retake the Senate for 2021. Given Democratic President Joe Biden’s public adoption of very ambitious sentence reform in his platform, the elimination of Sessions as an antagonistic senator is a positive development for those looking on legislators to build on the First Step Act with additional changes in the criminal code in 2021.

Sessions get the boot. Will the President and Republican Senate be next?
Sessions get the boot. Will the President and Republican Senate be next?

By the way, if there is any hope for any reform legislation this year – such as sending people 60 years old or older to home confinement after doing two-thirds of their good-time reduced sentences, not their total sentences – it will be included in the stimulus package that the Senate has indicated it will announce later this week. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) has said the Senate will not pass the House HEROES Act, a “sprawling $3 trillion bill,” as Forbes put it, approved by the House in June.

The focus is on cost, with the Senate wanting to limit a second stimulus to a lousy $1 trillion. The sentencing reform measures in the House version don’t really cost anything, so some may be included. Given McConnell’s virulent opposition to anything that smacks of sentencing reform, not much is likely to make the final cut (if anything).

Rolling Stone, So Long, Jeff Sessions (July 15)

Biden-Sanders Unity Task Force Recommendations (July 9)

Forbes, Second Stimulus Bill Update: Everything You Need To Know Before The Senate Meets Next Week (July 16)

– Thomas L. Root

A Lesson in Government – Update for October 17, 2019

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

HOW (AND WHY) OUR LAWS ARE MADE

howlawsmade191018Remember government class in high school? Not so much, huh? Back to school time, boys and girls… Here’s a real-life example of how legislation is written:

In 2010, Congress passed the Fair Sentencing Act, reducing the 100-1 ratio of crack to powder cocaine to 18-1. Under the old regime, a defendant with 1 gram of crack cocaine was deemed to have 100 grams of powder cocaine. Because sentences vary in proportion to the amount of controlled substance possessed, a defendant (almost always black) with a slight amount of crack was punished much more severely than a defendant (usually white) with a slight amount of powder coke.

The FSA as proposed would have eliminated the disparity altogether, so that the mandatory minimum for a kilo of powder was the same for a kilo of crack. The House passed the bill with a 100-1 ration reduced to 1-1. But when the bill finally passed the Senate, 1-1 has mystically become 18-1. No one could figure out where the 18-1 ratio came from. Careful deliberation? Scientific studies?

sessions170811“We could find no objective proof that crack cocaine was in fact more dangerous than powder cocaine,” said Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Illinois), sponsor of the Senate version of the bill, explaining the rationale behind the original draft. But then-Sen. Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III (R-Alabama) was opposed to changing the ratio at all, believing that the crime rate was falling because more people were being locked away for a long time (as well as thoroughly enjoying the prospect of those dangerous black criminals from the hood being warehoused in federal prisons for decades on end).

The day the bill was to come up for a committee vote, Durbin ran into Sessions at the Senate gym. Durbin recounted, “I said to Jeff, “come on, Jeff. We can’t just stop the conversation and see this bill die in committee.” said Durbin. “If you won’t do this 1-1 deal, what deal will you do?”

Sessions offered lowering 100-to-1 to 25-to-1. Durbin countered, 10-to-1. No dice, Sessions said.

What about 15-to-1?

“I’ll take 18-to-1,” Durbin recalls as Sessions’ response.

“We moved from 100-to-1 to 18-to-1 because of a conversation in the Senate gym, that is literally how it happened,” said Durbin.

violent160620A further lesson, this one on what influences legislators. It does not matter how many success stories arise from people who got out early because of the First Step Act’s retroactivity for crack defendants. The public will be reminded endlessly of the one failure.

Stories last week continued to highlight Joel Francisco, released on a sentence reduction last spring, who is a fugitive after allegedly stabbing a man to death in a Providence, Rhode Island, hookah lounge. The Providence Journal again noted that “the life sentence was reduced to time served under a bipartisan criminal justice reform law signed by President Trump in December.”

The conservative American Thinker was more graphic:

Cmdr. Thomas Verdi, the deputy chief of the Providence Police Department, who was familiar with Francisco, warned federal officials that the ‘crown prince of the Almighty Latin Kings’ gang… had a ‘propensity for violence…” At the news of his release, Verdi expressed his doubts about Francisco’s rehabilitation. He was right. Last Wednesday, Francisco, 41, stabbed 46-year old Troy Pine to death.

It only takes one failure, and a compliant news media, to poison the public on sentencing reform.

An opinion piece in The Hill this week, however, tried to put the Francisco matter in context: 

[I]f Francisco is guilty of this crime, he is the exception not the norm. Thousands of individuals are being released from custody under the First Step Act, and many more who have worked hard to prove their rehabilitation stand to benefit in the months to come. While it’s still too early to assess how many of these individuals will commit a new offense, there has hardly been a widespread spike in crime.  

The criminal justice system is not perfect; there will always be cases where someone returns to crime after re-entering society. The only way to guarantee that this doesn’t happen – the fear-filled, totalitarian way – is to imprison everyone who commits a crime for life. The pragmatic, limited-government way is to continue reforming the criminal justice system until we’ve achieved a balanced measure of accountability and rehabilitation.

Peoria, Illinois, Journal Star, Sen. Dick Durbin recalls how he and Jeff Sessions struck deal on Fair Sentencing Act in Senate gym (Oct. 10, 2019)

Providence Journal, Heartbroken father urges son, accused of fatal Providence stabbing, to turn himself in (Oct. 9, 2019)

American Thinker, Trump-supported early prison release law draws blood (Oct. 10, 2019)

The Hill, Don’t give up on the First Step Act (Oct. 17, 2019)

– Thomas L. Root

FIRST STEP First Up After Mid-Terms? – Update for November 5, 2018

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

SENATE POISED TO CONSIDER AMENDED FIRST STEP ACT

Criminal justice reform advocates confirmed to the Washington Examiner last week that sentencing reform provisions will be included in the FIRST STEP Act (S.2795), to be unveiled shortly after tomorrow’s mid-term elections, amendments which are likely to trigger an intense lame-duck struggle over attaching penalty reductions to a White House-backed prison reform bill. 

firststep180814The FIRST STEP Act passed the House in a 360-59 vote earlier this year, but without sentencing reforms. Reform advocates expect rapid legislative action after a pre-election pause, and believe there will be enough votes to pass the expanded legislative package. Two people close to the process told the Washington Examiner that a bipartisan group of senators has agreed to attach a set of sentencing reforms to the House-passed bill. 

The additions include shortening federal three-strike drug penalties from life in prison to 25 years, reducing two-strike drug penalties from 20 years to 15, unstacking 18 USC 924(c) sentencing enhancements to require a conviction on the first 924(c) charge before 25-year minimum mandatory sentences apply, making the 2010 Fair Sentencing Act (that cut crack penalties) retroactive, and expanding the 18 USC 3553(f) “safety valve.”

“We are very excited about it. We think that the four reforms that are in the bill are ones that make sense,” said Mark Holden, the general counsel of Koch Industries and an influential conservative reform advocate. “From what we understand, there are enough votes — plenty — for it to happen.”

Both Holden and another person close to the legislation drafting process, who asked not to be identified, said there is wording to reduce concern about illegal immigrants benefiting from sentencing reform. 

Sentencestack170404Many of the proposed changes to the FIRST STEP Act are included in the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act (S.1917), which passed the Senate Judiciary Committee last February but has not been brought to the floor for a vote. While the physical text of the new sentencing reforms is still being written, the SRCA provides a good example of what might be in the final bill text. “The sentencing reforms that could be included in the First Step Act… do not eliminate any mandatory minimum sentences,” wrote FreedomWorks vice president Jason Pye in The Hill last week. “But these proposed reforms would apply a measure of common sense to federal sentencing law.”

Holden said he expects the White House, particularly presidential adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner, to forcefully back the bill. Last month, President Trump said in a Fox News interview that while Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III opposed sentencing reform, Trump was in favor. “”If he doesn’t support reform, then he gets overruled by me,” the President said. “Because I make the decision, he doesn’t,” Trump said Oct. 11. 

“I think President Trump is doing a really good job on these sentencing reform measures,” Holden said. “He’s right, he’s the president, he makes the call, and we’re glad he said it.”

cotton171204It’s unclear how a group of Republican skeptics, such as Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, will react. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), will be the ultimate decision-maker in whether the bill gets a floor vote. A Louisville Courier-Journal writer said last week that with prison and sentencing reforms polling off the charts in Kentucky, and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) leading the charge, there is little doubt McConnell will find enough votes during the promised whip count (he needs 60) to send the bill to the floor.

The reform efforts have received significant White House support, and in turn, policy advocates have sought to build bridges with Trump-supporting activists. Last month, clemency advocates including Amy Povah of CAN-DO Clemency and Alveda King, the anti-abortion evangelical leader, hosted a panel at a Women for Trump event at Trump International Hotel in Washington. 

pardon171128Povah wants Trump to supplement FIRST STEP passage with generous use of his constitutional pardon powers. Last month, Trump said “a lot of people” are jailed for years for “no reason” and that he was actively looking to release some. Povah said clemency would be particularly appreciated around the holiday, including Thanksgiving, when presidents pardon turkeys, disillusioning people who are looking for one. 

“I think Trump said it best, he said that he’s going to release a lot of people and I think a lot of people in prison took that seriously and literally,” Povah said.

Povah said she’s particularly grateful for Kushner’s role in pushing both legislation and clemency cases, particularly after Sessions’ appointment as attorney general (an appointment Trump openly regrets making and who is likely to resign or be fired after tomorrow’s election). “Jared is a beacon of hope for so many prisoners. They had lost hope for any leniency or reform when Jeff Sessions was sworn in as attorney general. If felt like a nail in the coffin,” she said.

Washington Examiner, Prison reform bill to include sentencing, setting up post-election fight (Nov. 4, 2018)

Americans for Tax Relief, The US Needs Sentencing Reform and the First Step Act (Nov. 2, 2018)

Louisville Courier Journal, Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell play key roles in justice reform (Nov. 1, 2018)

The Hill, Congress must make sentencing reform priority for public safety (Nov. 2)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Not Even Halfway on Halfway – Update for October 31, 2018

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small

A SOBERING REPORT ON HALFWAY HOUSE AND HOME CONFINEMENT
Not the right halfway house - but you could get drunk here, which is what it may take to believe that BOP will implement FIRST STEP's transitional housing mandates.
       Not the right halfway house – but you could get drunk here, which is what it may take to believe that BOP will implement FIRST STEP’s transitional housing mandates.

As Congress is on the verge of passing FIRST STEP Act, a prison reform measure which will let inmates earn substantially more halfway house or home confinement time for successfully completing programs that cut recidivism, the reality is that the BOP’s halfway house and home confinement programs needed to implement the Act may be dead on arrival.

Politico reported last week that even while inmate transfers to transitional housing (halfway house) have been delayed by many weeks and months, scores of halfway house beds lie empty (with some estimates of at least 1,000 vacant spaces) and home confinement has been drastically curtailed.

Just before he unexpectedly resigned last spring, BOP Director Mark Inch told Congress the agency is curbing transitional housing overspending of past years and streamlining operations. Yet, halfway house and home confinement are much cheaper than imprisonment: in 2017, the BOP reported it spent almost $36,300 a year to imprison an inmate, $4,000 more than the cost of halfway house placement. It costs a mere $363 a month to monitor someone on home confinement.

sessions180322Politico argued that “abandoning transitional supervision aligns with Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ disputed opinion that reduced prison populations during the Obama administration are to blame for a small uptick in violent crime.” But Sessions’ policies are running headlong into those of President Trump, who has endorsed the FIRST STEP Act, which not only lets inmates earn significant additional halfway house/home confinement time for successful programming, but also directs that the BOP shall “to the extent practicable, place prisoners with lower risk levels and lower needs on home confinement for the maximum amount of time permitted…”

In 2015, more than 10,600 federal prisoners were in halfway houses. The number of inmates in home confinement — 4,600 — was up more than a third from the year before. In all, 7.1% of BOP inmates were in transitional housing. Since then, halfway house population has dropped by 28% and home confinement is in freefall, down 61% to 1,822. Most of that cut has happened in the last year. Now only 1 in 20 people under federal supervision is in transitional housing.

Judge Ricardo S. Martinez, who chairs the Committee on Criminal Law of the Judicial Conference of the United States, complained that “we are in the dark about those numbers.” He said the committee is working to establish better communication with the BOP, because, as Politico put it, “federal judges, who can sentence defendants to halfway houses, need to know how much space is available.”

Politico, President Trump Says He Wants to Reform Prisons. His Attorney General Has Other Ideas (Oct. 25, 2018)

83 Federal Register 18863, Annual Determination of Average Cost of Incarceration (Apr. 30, 2018)

Administrative Conference of U.S. Courts, Incarceration Costs Significantly More than Supervision (Aug. 17, 2017)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

The Sell Begins For and Against FIRST STEP – Update for October 23, 2018

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small

POLITICKING STARTS FOR COMPROMISE FIRST STEP ACT

Although most political news is focused on the mid-term elections in 15 days, drumbeats of support for the Senate to pass the compromise FIRST STEP Act after election day are increasing.

firststep180814A survey released last week shows widespread support for the provisions in FIRST STEP, in sharp contrast to the National Association of Assistant United States Attorneys’ survey we wrote about last week.

A national survey of 1,234 registered voters conducted online between Oct. 11-12 found 82% of respondents approved of specific FIRST STEP provisions. Additionally, 82% supported allowing non-violent offenders to finish their sentences in home confinement in order to ease their integration back into society, and 76% agreed with expanding the number of good-time days. Most important for political pressure purposes, 53% of respondents said that if the Republican-controlled Senate fails to pass FIRST STEP, they will view the Republicans more negatively.

But despite support from a large number of Republicans, conservative groups, and the White House, FIRST STEP faces stiff opposition from the Justice Department and staunch law-and-order conservatives such as Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas), who especially oppose reductions in mandatory minimums.

sentence181023Fortuitously, HBO aired a documentary last Sunday night (Oct. 21) called The Sentence, which has already been shown at Sundance Film Festival. The Sentence chronicles the aftermath of filmmaker Rudy Valdez sister’s drug conspiracy sentence and the consequences of mandatory-minimum sentencing. Cindy Shank received 15 years for conspiracy charges related to crimes committed by her deceased ex-boyfriend. The film follows the Valdez family’s effort to win Cindy clemency during the last months of the Obama administration.

“Two days after airing the film at Sundance,” Valdez said last week, “a Republican Senator (Mike Lee, R-Utah) reached out to me the say ‘thank you for making this movie’. You know, this is not a party issue, this film is apolitical, both Republicans and Democrats are coming together to fix this broken issue. I’ve been invited to speak many times on Capitol Hill, to share what I know with legislatures, to put a face on the victims, and show the effects of the federal minimum sentencing guidelines. Hopefully, by opening their eyes to the devastating effects of the federal minimum sentencing guidelines, it will help our lawmakers craft even more new legislation that actually gives Federal judges the ability to dole out fair and just punishment, with an emphasis on rehabilitation.”

An op-ed piece in USA Today last week by FAMM president Kevin Ring expanded on The Sentence’s theme of the effect long prison sentences have on inmates’ children. Ring, a former Capitol Hill lobbyist who served a federal sentence, wrote about the effect on his children of his own imprisonment, admitting that “I ended up serving time with people whose unnecessarily long sentences were caused by the laws I helped write.”

sessions180322Meanwhile, different drumbeats continue to sound a death knell for Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III. The New York Times published a long story last Friday reporting how “discontent and infighting have taken hold at the Justice Department, in part because Mr. Sessions was so determined to carry out that transformation that he ignored dissent, at times putting the Trump administration on track to lose in court and prompting high-level departures… President Trump has exacerbated the dynamic, they said, by repeatedly attacking Mr. Sessions and the Justice Department in baldly political and personal terms. And he has castigated rank-and-file employees, which career lawyers said further chilled dissent and debate within the department.” Observers say it is almost a certainty that Sessions, a staunch opponent of sentencing reform, will resign after the mid-terms.

Reason.com, Poll Shows Wide Support for Criminal Justice Reform Bill in Congress (Oct. 18, 2018)

The Poll

USA Today, I once wrote mandatory minimum laws. After ties to Abramoff landed me in prison, I know they must end. (Oct. 16, 2018)

The Knockturnal, The Sentence’ Goes to Capitol Hill (Oct. 18, 2018)

The New York Times, Justice Dept. Rank-and-File Tell of Discontent Over Sessions’ Approach (Oct. 19, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Trump’s Way or the Highway on Sentencing Reform – Update for October 17, 2018

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small

TRUMP SAYS HE’LL OVERRULE SESSIONS ON SUPPORTING FIRST STEP
Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III
Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III

Anyone who remembers recent sentencing reform history will recall that when Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III was a senator from Alabama, he led the charge against the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2015. And last winter, Sessions infuriated Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) when he sent an open letter to the Committee telling it not to vote out the 2017 version of SRCA.

With Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) gun shy about bringing the compromise FIRST STEP Act to a vote if there is insufficient support, Sessions could be a real impediment to passage of sentencing and prison reform.

That’s why President Trump’s statement last Thursday that he would overrule Sessions if he tries to stymie efforts to overhaul the criminal justice system is so significant. In a wide-ranging interview on “Fox & Friends,” the President said he would shut down any Sessions opposition to congressional passage of the compromise FIRST STEP Act. “

When asked whether Sessions is standing in the way of criminal justice reform, Trump said the decision is not up to the attorney general. “He gets overruled by me,” Trump said. “I make the decision, he doesn’t.”

“We do need reform, and that doesn’t mean easy,” the president said during the 40-minute interview. “We’re going to make certain categories tougher when it comes to drug dealing and other things, but there has to be a reform because it is very unfair right now. It’s very unfair to African-Americans. It is very unfair to everybody, and it is also very costly.”

nothappen181016Sessions, a law-and-order candidate now in the doghouse with Trump over the Mueller Russia probe, played a role in successfully urging the president to put off action on criminal justice reform before the midterm elections. But Trump now seems to have made the issue a top priority, thanks in large measure to the advocacy of senior White House adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner.

“Jared Kushner has kept the president in the loop and today’s statements by the president are indicative that he’s interested in this issue and is the one that will make the final decision,” The Hill quoted a person it said was familiar with the discussion. Kushner reportedly briefs Trump regularly on the status of sentencing reform.

Trump’s comments came just before he had lunch with the rapper Kanye West and former Cleveland Browns star Jim Brown, who are expected to urge Trump to move forward with sentencing and prison reforms.

kardashian180604Last June, West’s wife, Kim Kardashian persuaded Trump to commute the sentence of Alice Marie Johnson, a 63-year-old grandmother who was serving a life sentence for a first-time drug offense committed in the early 1990s.

Trump said Kardashian “brought the attention to Mrs. Johnson” and said it was unfair that she received such a long sentence.

The Hill, Trump: I’ll overrule Sessions on criminal justice reform (Oct. 11, 2018)

Politico, Trump: ‘I make the decision’ on prison reform, not Sessions’ (Oct. 11, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root
LISAStatHeader2small

Could It Be ‘Sayonara, Sessions?’ – Update for August 29, 2018

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small

TRUMP BLASTS SESSIONS AGAIN, FUELING SPECULATION THE AG WILL BE FIRED
Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III
Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III

Reports that Trump promised Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III last Thursday that the President would oppose the compromise criminal justice bill are puzzling, because of the simmering rift between Trump and Sessions that exploded again into public view late last week.

Trump complained in a Fox & Friends interview that Sessions “never took control of the Justice Department” and that he was disloyal. Sessions, whom Trump called a moron last year, finally had enough, issuing a statement saying he and the DOJ “will not be improperly influenced by political considerations.”

Trump has been furious at Sessions ever since he recused himself from the Trump Russia investigation. Trump said he considered Sessions’ decision to be a sign of disloyalty, and the two have an unusually cold relationship for a president and the nation’s top law-enforcement official.

White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said last week that Trump has made clear he supports the prison reform legislation “that will ultimately make American communities safer and save taxpayers money. The president recognizes there are some injustices in the system that should be fixed.”

Sen. Tim Scott (R-South Carolina) said it ultimately won’t matter whether they have Sessions’ support or not. “Listen,” Scott said, “[Sessions] doesn’t have a vote on this one.”

The notion that Trump mollified Sessions by agreeing to oppose the compromise package, only several weeks after Trump said he would sign anything Congress sent him on criminal justice reform, is suspect. The fact that he told White House advisor Jared Kushner and Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) the next day that he was willing to take up reform after the November elections and that White House officials continue to state his support for criminal justice reform, makes the alleged Sessions promise even harder to believe.

A Bloomberg article last Thursday provides the starkest evidence that Trump has little to gain by agreeing to kill criminal justice reform to please his AG. Bloomberg reported that Trump “may have received a crucial go-ahead signal from two Republican senators” to fire Sessions “with a key condition attached: wait until after the November elections.”

Confronted with the Manafort conviction and the Cohen guilty plea last week, Bloomberg said, Trump has reaffirmed his open resentment that Sessions recused himself from what’s become a wide-ranging investigation led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

kick-em-out
Beauregard, we hardly knew ye.

The pivotal message to Trump came from Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina). “The president’s entitled to an attorney general he has faith in, somebody that’s qualified for the job, and I think there will come a time, sooner rather than later, where it will be time to have a new face and a fresh voice at the Department of Justice,” Graham said. However, he added, forcing out Sessions before November “would create havoc” with efforts to confirm Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, as well as with the midterm elections on Nov. 6 that will determine whether Republicans keep control of Congress.

Grassley, the Judiciary Committee’s chairman, also changed his position on Thursday, saying in an interview that he’d be able to make time for hearings for a new attorney general after saying in the past that the committee was too busy.

Some senior Republican senators still strongly rejected Graham’s seemingly impromptu fire-him-later idea.

Despite the political hell-storm that Trump’s dismissal of Sessions would create, it is clear that criminal justice reform would only benefit from Sessions being run out of town. 

McClatchy News, Trump, Sessions feud spills over into dispute over policy on criminal justice reform (Aug. 21, 2018)

Politico, Senators Signal Sessions’ Ouster (Aug. 24, 2018)

Bloomberg, Key Republicans Give Trump a Path to Fire Sessions After the Election (Aug. 23, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

After Wild Week, Criminal Justice Reform Postponed Until November, If Then – Update for August 27, 2018

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small

TOPSY-TURVY WEEK IN WASHINGTON FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM

Last week, the editor of this newsletter took a vacation away from the Internet and cellphone coverage for the first time in years. After all, the last weeks of August are always quiet in the courts and halls of Congress.

scotus170627
The Supreme Court may be gone for the summer, but no one else in Washington seems to be…

What a mistake leaving town turned out to be…

The week started out well. Senate Minority Whip Richard Durbin (D-Illinois), the No. 2 Senate Democrat, said he could support the compromise criminal justice reform bill that Republican colleagues presented to President Trump and senior White House officials three weeks ago. That bill, which combined four sentencing changes with FIRST STEP Act, is a compromise pushed by senior White House adviser Jared Kushner in order to win the support of Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa). Grassley, co-sponsor of the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2017 (which was approved by the Committee last February), has opposed FIRST STEP because of the absence of sentencing reform provisions that change some mandatory minimums.

oddcouple180702Durbin’s announcement made him the first Democratic senator to support the legislation, which is key to assuring Senate passage.

Two days later, the news site Axios reported that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) agreed in a meeting with Kushner, Grassley, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) to bring the compromise bill to a vote if an informal review showed that the measure had at least 60 votes in support. Axios admitted that McConnell’s spokesperson said a commitment to a vote had not been made, but asserted that another source said the Majority Leader came just shy of promising a vote.

Axios also reported President Trump had said earlier on Thursday that while he will not endorse the bill before the midterms, he was open to the compromise currently being negotiated, according to a senior administration official and Sen. Lee. The White House said in a statement “the President remains committed to meaningful prison reform and will continue working with the Senate on their proposed additions to the bill.”

While many, including Lee, wish the vote would occur today, McConnell’s willingness to bring it to a vote if the support is there (and earlier reports are that the compromise would collect 80 votes or more) is encouraging. The delay is entirely political: “I think the sentencing reforms are still controversial and divide Republicans,” Cornyn said. “I just don’t see the wisdom of dividing Republicans on a contentious matter like that before the election.

sessions180322Then, on Friday, the Washington Free Beacon reported that Trump told Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III and Kushner the day before that he was opposed the FIRST STEP compromise, in large part due to an exception he believes it carves out that may release convicted drug traffickers early. A statement released by the Dept. of Justice seemed to confirm that. DOJ said: “We’re pleased the president agreed that we shouldn’t support criminal justice reform that would reduce sentences, put drug traffickers back on our streets, and undermine our law enforcement officers who are working night and day to reduce violent crime and drug trafficking in the middle of an opioid crisis.”

The Free Beacon story, however, said that Trump had later walked back his opposition, and told Grassley and Kushner that he was “willing to take up prison/sentencing reform” after the election.

The Free Beacon said “McConnell is famously skittish about dividing his caucus, and so is still unlikely to bring a bill to the floor if it does not have Republican caucus support. Trump’s backing—once held out, and now withdrawn—would almost certainly be vital to getting more Republicans on board.”

dontknow180828So the compromise may be voted on after the mid-term elections the first week of November. Or it may not. Trump may support it. Or he may not. The Democrats may support the compromise. Or they may not.

Of course, last week also brought the conviction of Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman, on fraud charges unrelated to the Trump campaign, and the guilty plea (and probable cooperation agreement with the Feds) of Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen. That is bad news for the defendants and for Trump, but to the extent it makes Trump angrier and more fearful of the Justice Department, it probably increases the chances Trump will support criminal justice reform.

The Hill, Democratic leader gives boost to criminal justice reform compromise (Aug. 21, 2018)

Axios, McConnell commits to moving forward on criminal justice bill after midterms (Aug. 23, 2018)

Washington Free Beacon, Trump Strongly Opposed to FIRST STEP (Aug. 24, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Rough Road Ahead in the Senate for Criminal Justice Reform? – Update for August 20, 2018

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small

CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM: TRUMP WANTED TO LEAD, NOW IT’S TIME TO DO IT

Now that the Senate has resumed sessions after a shorter-than-normal August break, criminal justice reform advocates are escalating pressure on Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky). They want him to schedule a vote on the revised FIRST STEP Act bill, which will include mandatory minimum relief, a bill backed by President Donald Trump.

trumplogjam180806

But there are worrisome signs that a long-running GOP rift on the issue has not healed. Politico reports that interviews with a dozen GOP senators show that the future of FIRST STEP, either amended or in its original form, remains precarious. That’s because the handful of Republicans who have long protested reducing mandatory-minimum sentences leave McConnell without any incentive to call up legislation that would split his conference.

One of the critics of adding sentencing reform to the House-passed FIRST STEP Act, Sen. John Kennedy (R-Louisiana) predicted last week that McConnell would not bring the bill to the floor any time soon. “I’m not sure that we can put together a deal,” Kennedy said in an interview. “I’m not sure we should.” 

White House officials and FIRST STEP supporters have been talking with Republican holdouts to convince them to back the compromise, which adds four sentencing reform provisions to the House bill. Trump senior adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner “will be making the rounds on the Hill,” according to a veteran Kentucky Republican strategist who now leads the nonprofit Justice Action Network. “And once we have the requisite number of Republican votes, I think his father-in-law is going to lean in hard.”

sessions180215A lot of involvement from the President will be required for the GOP to unify over reducing mandatory minimum sentences as part of a prisons package. Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) has 15 Republican cosponsors on the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act, which contains mandatory minimum reductions, but Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III opposes SRCA, and is even against FIRST STEP. Another conservative who is vocal in opposing either bill, let alone a blend of them, is Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas). Cotton wrote an op-ed piece last week that was breathtaking in its falsehoods and shibboleths, calling FIRST STEP a “jailbreak” sentencing bill that would flood the streets with stone-killer ex-cons. Cotton’s opinion piece was roundly condemned, but McConnell is hypersensitive to any dissention in the Republican caucus. There is little doubt that Cotton’s intemperate complaints concern McConnell a lot.cotton171226

Besides Cotton, other reliable allies of the White House, including Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas), are opposing the administration’s approach, which would combine FIRST STEP with changes to some of SRCA’s sentencing and mandatory minimums. The proposal nevertheless has wide, bipartisan support in the Senate.

Supporters say completing the bill would give the administration a needed win heading into November’s midterm elections. Opponents say it would make Trump look soft on crime.

A senior White House official said the Administration has 30 to 32 locked down “yes” votes among Republican senators. He offered hope that the number of Republican supporters could eventually grow as many as 40 to 46.

Trump and McConnell, once implacable foes, have forged something of a partnership these days. That arrangement will be tested in the coming days.

The Hill, Sentencing reform heats up, pitting Trump against reliable allies (Aug. 17, 2018)

CBS News, Trump, McConnell forge partnership as mid-terms approach (Aug. 17, 2018)

Politico, Criminal justice deal faces steep Senate hurdles despite Trump’s push (Aug. 17, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small

Trump Speaks… Will Criminal Justice Reform Become Law? – Update for August 6, 2018

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

LISAStatHeader2small

TRUMP BREAKING CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM LOGJAM?

President Trump told Republican senators last Wednesday that he’s open to a proposal on prison and sentencing reform that combines the FIRST STEP Act with provisions of the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2017, giving new life to criminal justice reform that had seemed hopelessly stalled on Capitol Hill.

trumplogjam180806The compromise presented to President Trump by Republican senators at a White House meeting on Wednesday would combine the FIRST STEP Act with four sentencing reform provisions that have bipartisan Senate backing, according to a source familiar with the meeting.  

A senior White House official described the president as “positively inclined” toward the compromise proposal. The source said Trump told GOP senators to “do some work with your colleagues” and “let’s see where the Senate is and then come back to me with it.”

The White House meeting with Republican senators included Mike Lee (Utah), Lindsey Graham (South Carolina), and Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Charles Grassley (Iowa).

Trump’s support is significant because the core group of Republicans and Democrats behind the Senate bill has insisted on including sentencing reform as part of any criminal justice legislation, but Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) is not about to bring a bill to the floor if there is vocal opposition from either the White House or the Republican caucus. “The question is whether there [are] enough sentencing provisions in there to make those guys happy without turning off too many Republicans and making it too toxic for McConnell to put on the floor,” says Alex Gudich, deputy director of #Cut50, a criminal justice advocacy group.

The Hill reports that some of the bill backers now think there’s a possibility of moving the modified legislation through the Senate as soon as this month, although it’s more likely be delayed until the lame-duck session after the midterm elections, that starts in mid-November.

cotton171226Conservatives such as Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and Attorney General Jeff Sessions have opposed combining prison and sentencing reform. Cotton argued in a speech at the Hudson Institute earlier this year that “if anything, we have an under-incarceration problem.”

Meanwhile. the Washington Free Beacon published a leaked letter from the Dept of Justice to the White House outlining its concerns about the FIRST STEP Act. “In the Department’s view,” the letter says, “this legislation, if passed in its current form, would further and significantly erode our long-established truth-in-sentencing principles, create impossible administrative burdens, effectively reduce the sentences of thousands of violent felons, and endanger the safety of law-abiding citizens and law enforcement officers.”

The DOJ letter also tied the declining federal prison population to rising crime rates. “The number of federal inmates has declined more than 16% since 2013 and is at its lowest level since 2004,” the letter reads. “It is likely no coincidence that, at the same time, we are in the midst of the largest drug crisis in our nation’s history and recently experienced the two largest single-year increases in the national violent crime rate in a quarter of a century.”

sessions180322Conservative groups supporting criminal justice reform pushed back against the DOJ letter. FreedomWorks rebutted the report, saying, “Simply put, correlation doesn’t equal causation.” And when reporters asked Grassley today about his former Senate colleague Sessions’ efforts to derail the criminal justice legislation, Grassley responded sharply, “With all that I have done to help Sessions, to keep the president from firing him, I think Sessions ought to stay out of it.”

Criminal justice reform groups have been bolstered by a poll released last week by Freedom Partners, a nonprofit group that funds conservative and libertarian causes, showing 70% of voters nationwide think the Senate should pass the FIRST STEP Act.

Ohio State University law prof Doug Berman said in his Sentencing Law and Policy blog this past weekend, “I am not counting any sentencing reform chickens before they hatch, but this description of the compromise combo FIRST STEP Act and SRCA would seem to make a lot of sense in light of various positions staked out on both sides of the aisle. And if Prez Trump signals support for such a reform package and is willing to make it a priority, I would now be inclined to predict this will get done this year. But because Prez Trump has never seemed a serious advocate for sentencing reform, and because his Attorney General likely dislikes all of this, and because the run-up and aftermath of an election can disrupt lots in DC, I am inclined to remain pessimistic about all of this until votes are being scheduled and taken.”

The Hill, Trump gives thumbs up to prison sentencing reform bill at pivotal meeting (Aug. 3, 2018)

Reason, The White House Is Moving Forward on Prison Reform Despite Justice Department Resistance (Aug. 2, 2018)

Sentencing Law and Policy, Encouraging news from DC about prospects for prison reform with sentencing reform getting enacted in 2018 (Aug. 4, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root

LISAStatHeader2small