We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

THE NEW YORK TIMES OBTAINS DRAFT AMENDED FIRST STEP ACT

The New York Times has released what it reports is a draft of the amended FIRST STEP Act obtained by its reporters.

The amended version shows the effects of a lot of behind-the- scenes deal-making. It contains good news, so-so news and bad news for current inmates.

The bad news first:

• While the amended bill draft retains the changes in 18 USC 924(c) stacking rules (for people who get charged with more than one 924(c) count), it drops the retroactivity proposed in the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act.

• While the amended bill draft retain the reduction in mandatory drug life sentences to 25 years and 20-year sentences to 15 years, where the enhancements came because of prior drug convictions, the retroactivity proposed in the SRCA has been dropped.

The so-so news:

• The amended bill draft retains the changes in the 18 USC 3553(f) “safety valve” for drug defendants – which lets some lesser offenders escape mandatory minimum sentences – to include people with more criminal history than the near-virgins who once were the only ones to benefit from the provision. The change is not retroactive, but the SRCA never proposed that it would be, so nothing was lost.

•  The amended bill draft retains the reduction in the mandatory 10-year drug sentence to five years under certain circumstances, as originally proposed in the SRCA. The change is not retroactive, but again, the SRCA never proposed that it would be, so nothing was lost to people already serving sentences.

• The amended bill draft retains expanded “good conduct credit” to 54 days for each year of sentence (this has the effect of awarding an extra seven days a year). Currently, a federal prisoner with good conduct serves 87.1% of the sentence. Under the change, it will be 85.2%. It is not clear from the legislation whether the “good time” change will apply to current prisoners retroactive to their first day of the sentence, or only to time remaining after the law becomes effective.

The good news:

• The Fair Sentencing Act retroactivity, which applies the crack reduction to people who received crack cocaine mandatory minimum sentences before July 2010, remains.

• There is no change in the prior FIRST STEP‘s proposed expansion of the elderly offender or elderly terminally ill offender release to home confinement proposals .

• There is no change in the in the prior FIRST STEP‘s proposed expansion of the compassionate release, to let defendants apply directly to the courts if the BOP refuses to do so.

The really good news:

• Every prior version of FIRST STEP let prisoners earn time for programs the BOP holds reduce recidivism, on the order of 10 days a month (or 15 for minimum-risk people). But the time credit was not “good time” that would reduce a sentence. Instead, the “program credit” only got the prisoner more halfway house or home confinement time. We were skeptical that the BOP could find the halfway house capacity to honor the change in the law.

The amended bill draft adds this kicker:

“Time credits earned under this paragraph by prisoners who successfully participate in recidivism reduction programs or productive activities shall be applied toward time in prerelease custody or supervised release. The Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall transfer eligible prisoners, as determined under section 3624(g), into prerelease custody or supervised release.”

In other words, the time earned from qualified programming would be like additional good conduct time, and would shorten the prisoner’s sentence. Theoretically, a prisoner could reduce his or her sentence from 85% (normal good time) down to 56% (if he or she completed back-to-back qualified programs, and earned 10 days a month). (If the prisoner were minimum-risk – which is NOT the same thing as minimum-security – he or she could get up to 15 days per month of successful programs, and drive the total sentence to between 40 and 50%.)

• The draft directs the BOP to have enough halfway house and home confinement capacity, but because the Act says the BOP shall honor the extra days earned under the programs, it seems that a shortfall in halfway house or home confinement capability would simply require that the program credit reduce sentence length. In fact, the BOP may use the shortened sentence award as the default, because the agency will save the most money that way.

The draft gives the Attorney General six months to develop a risk assessment system with which to classify inmates, at which time the expanded “good conduct time” and the program credits become effective.

There is, of course, no assurance the bill will pass, and if it does, that it will not undergo further amendments.  However, CNN reported last night that two sources close to the FIRST STEP Act legislative process said President Trump is scheduled to announce today that he is supporting the amended FIRST STEP Act. The President will be joined by supporters of the legislation during the White House event, the sources said.

Draft Amended FIRST STEP Act (S.2795)

The New York Times, Bipartisan Sentencing Overhaul Moves Forward, but Rests on Trump (Nov. 12, 2018)

CNN, President Trump to announce support for criminal justice overhaul proposal (Nov. 12, 2018)

– Thomas L. Root