Wicker | Legal Information Services Associates LLC

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

SUDDENLY, CRIMINAL JUSTICE LEGISLATION IS IN TROUBLE

Just last Friday, I mused that the EQUAL Act (S.79) – the much-heralded legislation that would finally make penalties for cocaine distribution identical regardless of the form the cocaine took (cocaine base or cocaine powder) – might have a little competition.

Now, that seems to be like predicting the Russians might run into a little delay on their way to Kyiv.

On Friday, it looked like a few Republican senators might want to leverage their SMART Cocaine Sentencing Act to win a few amendment concessions before EQUAL passes. Now, the problem seems much more extreme than that.

At the end of last week, The New York Times reported, “with control of Congress at stake and Republicans weaponizing a law-and-order message against Democrats in their midterm election campaigns, the fate of [the EQUAL Act] is in doubt. Democrats worry that bringing it up would allow Republicans to demand a series of votes that could make them look soft on crime and lax on immigration — risks they are reluctant to take months before they face voters… Even the measure’s Republican backers concede that bringing it to the floor could lead to an array of difficult votes.”

You may recall that on Thursday, Senators Roger Wicker (R-Mississippi), Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) announced SMART, a bill that would reduce the current 18:1 crack-to-powder ratio to 2.5:1 instead of EQUAL’s 1:1.

(If Lindsay Graham’s name seems familiar, maybe that’s because he is also a co-sponsor of the EQUAL Act).

But diddling with the ratio is not all that SMART does. For people already convicted under 18:1, there would be no retroactivity unless the Attorney General “certified” to the court that the sentence should be reduced. Mind you this is the same Dept. of Justice that rejects thousands of clemency petitions before they ever reach the White House and fights hammer and tong against any inmate seeking First Step Act Section 404 reductions.

Imagine nominating Scrooge to plan Santa Claus. Same thing.

Grassley argued last week that the EQUAL Act does not account for the differences in recidivism rates between the two types of cocaine offenses. He said crack offenders reoffend at a 60.8% rate while powder cocaine offenders are at only 43.8%, and crack defendants are the most likely drug offenders to carry weapons.

The obvious rejoinder is that if the crack offenders are carrying weapons, there are Guidelines enhancements (such as § 2D1.1(b(1)) and even separate statutory offenses that do a much better job of targeting the people with the guns than punishing one class of drug offenders for the probability that the person has a weapon. As for recidivism, the Guidelines already increase sentencing ranges based on the defendant’s criminal history. Arguing that a crack offender must be punished more severely than a cocaine powder offender because he or she is statistically more likely to commit a crime in the future has a certain “Minority Report” aura to it.

FAMM President Kevin Ring blasted SMART on Twitter for

INCREASING the # of people who will be subject to man mins for powder while reducing the # subject to man mins for crack. Remember, no member had suggested powder sentences were too low until the EQUAL Act gained steam.” Plus, SMART “requires the Attorney General to certify every request for retroactive application of the new penalties. This is unprecedented and absurd. No retroactive changes in recent history – by the Commission or Congress – ever required AG certification.

But beyond the weird provisions of SMART is the fear that it may spell the death of EQUAL. Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman said in his Sentencing Law and Policy blog, worried that “the fact that the EQUAL Act has not become law already makes me concerned about the fate and future or long-overdue efforts to end the crack/cocaine sentencing disparity.”

“The time for negotiation has passed, and it passed a long time ago,” said Jason Pye from the Due Process Institute. “The EQUAL Act is an exercise in bipartisanship, which is more than I can say for Senator Grassley’s bill.”

Meanwhile, expectations are wavering over the marijuana legalization bill that Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-NY) promised would be introduced in April. Now lawmakers have pushed the timeline back to later in the summer as continued debate threatens the bill’s success.

Schumer said he wanted to give senators time to debate certain provisions. The Senate majority leader said he is reaching across party lines to gain support for the bill, but experts predict he won’t have enough Republican votes for passage. The bill faces opposition from some Democrats, including Sen Joe Manchin (D-WV), who last month told The Hill that is he unsure about legalizing adult-use marijuana.

Last month, the Marijuana Opportunity, Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act passed the House with a near-party line vote that included only three Republicans. MORE is not expected to pass the Senate.

As the November midterms approach, it is likely that criminal justice will become even more of a political game, with federal prisoners as the football.

The New York Times, Drug Sentencing Bill Is in Limbo as Midterm Politics Paralyze Congress (April 29, 2022)

S.__ (no number yet), SMART Cocaine Sentencing Act

Sen Charles Grassley, Senators Introduce Bill To Reduce Crack-Powder Sentencing Disparity, Protect Communities From Criminals Most Likely To Reoffend (April 28, 2022)

Politico, Huddle: Freedom Caucus at a crossroads (April 29, 2022)

Twitter, Kevin Ring, Current Crack-Powder Disparity Is Unjustifiable (April 28, 2022)

Sentencing Law and Policy, GOP Senators introduce competing crack/powder sentencing reform bill tougher than EQUAL Act (April 29, 2022)

The Paper, Cannabis News (April 28, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root

We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.

BACK TO WORK FOR CONGRESS

Congress is back in session after Easter/Passover/Ramadan break, and the drumbeat continues for the EQUAL Act, even as insurrection against the favored bill brews.

As noted earlier this week, the DOJ threw a plug in for EQUAL as part of its PATTERN report to Congress. It wasn’t alone. Last week, The Hill editorialized that “April is Second Chance Month and an opportunity to think deeply about the real purpose of incarceration — and of penal systems more broadly. Is the purpose to dehumanize those who transgress? Or is it to protect communities and preserve or restore justice within them?… The EQUAL Act… addresses the sentencing disparity in our federal justice system involving penalties for crack and powder cocaine offenses, which has resulted in unintentional racial disparities and significantly higher federal prison populations. The law was intended to reduce the harm of crack cocaine possession, distribution and consumption. The validity of its original intention may be debated, but it has been proven to have unacceptable consequences.”

Writing in the Washington Examiner, former congressman Doug Collins said, “it’s no surprise that law enforcement is spearheading” the EQUAL Act… Roughly 90% of those serving time for crack offenses at the federal level are black, which means they serve vastly longer prison sentences than those convicted of powder cocaine offenses, even though the substances are chemically similar and equally dangerous. According to the country’s most respected law enforcement leaders, eliminating this disparity would help police officers build trust with communities of color, especially in urban areas where law enforcement finds it difficult to cultivate sources to investigate murders, shootings, and other violent crimes.”

However, proving that nothing in this world is such a slam-dunk that Congress cannot screw it up, the Start Making Adjustments and Require Transparency in Cocaine Sentencing Act (shorthand, “SMART Cocaine Sentencing Act” – an obvious competitor to the EQUAL Act – was introduced in the Senate yesterday. SMART, sponsored by Senators Roger Wicker (Mississippi), Charles Grassley (Iowa), Mike Lee (Utah) and Lindsey Graham (South Carolina), all Republicans – reduces the current 18:1 crack-to-powder ratio to 2.5:1 instead of EQUAL’s 1:1.

The nasty part of SMART is that for people already convicted under 18:1, there would be no retroactivity unless the Attorney General “certified” to the court that the sentence should be reduced. Given the Dept. of Justice’s traditional antipathy to the many prisoners seeking First Step Act Section 404 reductions, this is yet another example of turning the keys to the henhouse over to the fox.

Sen. Grassley explained the thinking behind SMART:

Separate legislation has been introduced in the Senate to completely flatten the differences between sentences for crack cocaine and powder cocaine offenses. This approach does not account for the differences in recidivism rates associated with the two types of cocaine offenses. According to a January 2022 analysis from the U.S. Sentencing Commission (USSC), crack cocaine offenders recidivate at the highest rate of any drug type at 60.8 percent, while powder cocaine offenders recidivate at the lowest rate of any drug type at 43.8 percent. Raising additional public safety concerns, USSC data reveals that crack cocaine offenders were the most likely among all drug offenders to carry deadly weapons during offenses. These statistics show the need for a close look at all available government data before we consider an approach to flatten sentencing for crack and powder cocaine offenses.

The MORE Act, which would decriminalize marijuana, has passed the House of Representatives. Whether it will pass in the US Senate, where all 50 Democrats and at least 10 Republicans would need to support it, is unclear. Maritza Perez, Director of National Affairs at Drug Policy Alliance, told The Grio last week it will be a “hard sell.” As reported, the Senate will be considering its own bill that Perez said focuses on less on decriminalization and more on a regulatory and tax framework for the sale and use of cannabis.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said a week ago Wednesday that President Biden “remains committed” to honoring his campaign pledge to release “everyone” in federal prison for marijuana, claiming that he believes “no one should be in jail because of drug use.”

Psaki did not provide a timeline. “I don’t have an update here. We are continuing to work with Congress. But what I can say on marijuana is we’ve made some progress on our promises. For instance, the DEA just issued its first licenses to companies to cultivate marijuana for research purposes after years of delay during the prior administration… Additionally, the president’s continuing to review his clemency powers, which is something he also talked about on the campaign trail and he certainly remains committed to taking action on.”

Of course, shortly after this, the President did grant some clemencies, although relatively few to marijuana offenders. More clemencies have been promised, albeit vaguely.

The Hill, Justice for some is no justice at all — we must change our criminal justice system (April 22, 2022)

The Grio, Advocates say legalizing cannabis would restore justice for Blacks, but can Washington get it done? (April 20, 2022)

Washington Examiner, Take the next step on the First Step Act (April 20, 2022)

NY Post, Biden ‘committed’ to freeing inmates with marijuana convictions, Psaki says (April 20, 2022)

S.__ (no number yet), SMART Cocaine Sentencing Act

Sen. Charles Grassley, Senators Introduce Bill To Reduce Crack-Powder Sentencing Disparity, Protect Communities From Criminals Most Likely To Reoffend (April 28, 2022)

– Thomas L. Root