We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.
SENATE REPUBLICANS SEEK TO CORRAL CARES ACT TERRORISTS
Just when CARES Act prisoners still serving home confinement thought it was safe for them to believe they would remain at home, Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R–TN) has introduced S.J.Res. 47, legislation that would reverse a DOJ rule allowing prisoners on CARES Act home confinement to complete their sentences at home.
On October 30, Blackburn and 26 co-sponsoring Senators introduced the bill under the Congressional Review Act, 5 USC Ch. 8, which would overturn a Justice Department rule allowing some federal offenders to remain under house arrest after the end of the government’s COVID-19 emergency declaration.
“While there are certainly plenty of legitimate issues with the BOP that merit senators focusing oversight on the Bureau, CARES Act home confinement is an example of a program that is working—rehabilitating people while holding them accountable, all while driving down costs and maintaining community safety,” Kevin Ring, vice president of criminal justice advocacy at Arnold Ventures, a private philanthropy group, said.
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) – whose opposition to the First Step Act was responsible for getting those prisoners with 18 USC § 924(c) convictions excluded from obtaining FSA credits for successfully completing recidivism reduction programs written into the law –declared that extending CARES Act home confinement (especially now that every single federal inmate has been vaccinated or offered the vaccine for COVID-19) “betrays victims and law-enforcement agencies that trusted the federal government to keep convicted criminals away from the neighborhoods that the offenders once terrorized.”
There’s nothing quite as easy to demagogue as crime and punishment.
Never mind that the Bureau of Prisons has refused CARES Act home confinement to anyone convicted of sex crimes, terrorism, violent offenses, or even those who had a violent disciplinary report while in prison. CARES Act home confinees had to have low or minimum security status and be at low or minimum risk of recidivism under the Dept. of Justice PATTERN scoring system.
The Congressional Review Act, which was passed 27 years ago, creates a process for Congress to overturn federal agency rules. In 2017, a Republican-controlled Congress used the CRA to invalidate dozens of Obama-era federal rules. Any member of Congress can introduce a CRA joint resolution of disapproval, which is referred to the relevant Senate or House committee. A CRA resolution must be passed by a majority in both the House and Senate and then signed by the president. If the President vetoes the CRA resolution, Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds majority in both houses.
Given that the Biden Administration pushed the new rule and the Senate is controlled by Democrats, passage of S.J.Res. 47 is doubtful. If it would pass both houses, but Biden vetoes it, there is no chance two-thirds of Congress would override it.
Last week, BOP Director Colette Peters told a House subcommittee that “as of August 31, 2023… less than 0.05% of people [on home confinement] have been returned to custody for committing new crimes.” Given that statistic, S.J.Res. 47 seems a lot like shooting a fly with an elephant gun.
S.J.Res. 47, Congressional disapproval of the rule submitted by the Dept of Justice relating to CARES Act (October 30, 2023)
Reason, Senate Resolution Would Send Federal Offenders Back to Prison 3 Years After Being Released to Home Confinement (November 6, 2023)
National Health Law Program, Congressional Review Act (October 2020)
– Thomas L. Root