We post news and comment on federal criminal justice issues, focused primarily on trial and post-conviction matters, legislative initiatives, and sentencing issues.
54 DAYS GOOD TIME DELAY IS A “MISTAKE”
The BOP let inmates know last week that it does not have to recalculate good time to give inmates the extra seven days approved by the First Step Act until the Attorney General adopts a new risk assessment system, relying on Sec. 102(b)(2) of the Act.
First Step gives the AG 210 days from the date the bill was signed to complete the risk assessment. That deadline, and the latest date for BOP crediting the good time, is July 19, 2019.
A Chicago halfway house resident lost his bid for immediate release in District Court last week. The Northern District of Illinois court said the defendant, whose current out date is next month but who would already have been out with the additional time, “cannot obtain relief. Section 102(b) of the First Step Act states that the amendment to section 3624(b) does not take effect until after the Attorney General completes and releases the needs assessment system established under section 101(a) of the Act. The Attorney General is given up to 210 days to implement the risk and needs assessment system.”
“This court is not unsympathetic to the apparent inequity of petitioner’s situation,” wrote U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. “This court, however, is obligated to apply the law as it is written.”
Reuters reported last week that the delay in increased good time resulted from as drafting mistake. First Step activists said the law, as drafted, confused good-time credits, which reduce a sentence for compliance with BOP rules, with earned-time credits, which was to be awarded for completing approved programming. Sec. 102(b)(2) mistakenly said that new rules on good-time credits could not kick in until the AG finishes a risk-assessment process which relates to the earned-time credits, but has nothing to do with good-time credits.
Several First Step supporter told Reuters their groups are working with the White House to find a work-around, although a legislative fix may be needed. The groups are considering trying to tuck a fix into a broader spending bill for action by Congress.
Meanwhile, Annette Bongiorno, a former Bernie Madoff associate, did not fare much better. We reported on December 31 that her lawyers had petitioned her sentencing court to send her to home confinement under the Elderly Offender Home Detention program as soon as she hit her two-thirds date. Last week, her sentencing judge denied the motion, noting that which Bongiorno appears to be eligible for home confinement in February, “the statute does not provide for direct application to the Court for the relief she seeks. Instead, the initial determination as to Mrs. Bongiorno’s eligibility for release to home confinement, which is discretionary, rests with the… BOP.”
Order, Shah v. Hartman, Case No. 18 C 7990 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 3, 2019)
Reuters, Error in U.S. prisons law means well-behaved inmates wait longer for release (Jan. 9)
– Thomas L. Root